June 24, 2017
June 24, 2017
June 28, 2017
Pre-College Engineering Education Division
In this qualitative study, I describe elementary students’ reflections on engineering design failure, their exposure to “fail words” (i.e., fail, failure, failed, etc.) in and out of school, and what they think it means to fail. This work draws from the idea that while design failure is a normal part of engineering practice, the concept of failure and the fail words themselves have very particular meanings in the context of engineering that are likely to be different than meanings these words and ideas take on in other contexts. Data collected for this study included 14 video-recorded, semi-structured focus group interviews with a total of 29 students, and the design journals of those students for the two Engineering is Elementary engineering units that they learned. Analysis involved an iterative approach to generating and refining codes to describe the range experiences, word use, and meaning making in the data. Students identified their first and second designs within design challenges as having failed overall, somewhat, or not at all. Their evidence for these assessments varied, and included criteria-based assessments (e.g., a design failed if it did not perform well against multiple criteria) that are in alignment with good engineering practice. Teams used other strategies, as well, including identifying a “most important criterion” amongst multiple design criteria, and determining their design success based upon how well other teams in the class performed. Students were exposed to fail words in and out of school. They heard fail words in various settings, including within the context of organized sports, from their parents, and in the media. Students had different conceptions of failure, including that it was associated with poor performance, quitting, failure analysis and improvement. Implications of this study include suggestions for preservice and inservice teachers, teacher educators, and professional development providers. Those suggestions include the need for teachers to: have conversations with students about fail words and their meanings; present an engineering definition for design failure to students; avoid the use of clichés about failure; and ensure that students follow testing procedures and assess design performance accurately and consistently.
Lottero-Perdue, P. S. (2017, June), Elementary Student Reflections on Failure Within and Outside of the Engineering Design Process (Fundamental) Paper presented at 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Columbus, Ohio. 10.18260/1-2--28213
ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2017 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015