Seattle, Washington
June 14, 2015
June 14, 2015
June 17, 2015
978-0-692-50180-1
2153-5965
Something New??? within Engineering Design Graphics Education
Engineering Design Graphics
Diversity
18
26.656.1 - 26.656.18
10.18260/p.23994
https://peer.asee.org/23994
738
Dr. Yip-Hoi received his Ph.D. from the Department of Mechanical Engineering at the University of Michigan in 1997. His dissertation research focused on developing Computer-Aided Process Planning methods and software tools to support automation of machining on Mill/Turn machining centers. In 2003 he joined the faculty of the Mechanical Engineering Department at the University of British Columbia. His appointment included a position as junior chair of the NSERC sponsored research program in Virtual Machining. After 3 ½ years at UBC, he moved to the Department of Engineering Technology at Western Washington University to focus on teaching. His teaching and scholarship interests lie in the areas of design, CAD/CAM and CNC machining. Since his arrival at WWU he has acted as coordinator of the CAD/CAM option in the Manufacturing Engineering Technology program and is currently director of the new Manufacturing Engineering Program.
Jerimiah took his first CAD class at University of Washington in 2003. After that, he promptly joined the workforce. After working as an industrial designer at various firms, notably General Electric, he attended Western Washington University, receiving his design degree in 2008. Upon graduation, he started a company that developed Telepharmacy Systems, enabling hospitals to share pharmacist expertise over the internet. In 2012, after four years of bringing Telepharmacy to the United States and Canada, he retired and started teaching at Western Washington University. His interests in design, lean manufacturing, and programming influence his teaching style today.
Lean Manufacturing principles have been applied to many service industries that do not manufacture physical goods. Blended Learning techniques have increasingly been utilized in university courses. This paper explores the parallels between the two in the context of an introductory CAD course, discovering a “Lean Education” framework that uses Blended Learning techniques to serve Lean Manufacturing goals and philosophies.
Enhancing a Blended Learning Approach to CAD Instruction Using Lean Manufacturing Principles The Department of Engineering and Design at Western Washington University has implemented a blended learning methodology in its introductory Computer‐Aided Design course. This methodology improves learning using a combination of techniques which improve the efficiency of delivery of course content while maximizing value‐added student activities where interactions with the instructor and TAs are prized. These techniques include a “flipped classroom” model, on‐line video instructional materials, efficient content modularization and customizability, automated feedback, integrated assessment mechanisms and team‐based in‐class activities. A high proportion of class time is structured to support creative project work where students appropriate CAD skills by applying them to creative problem solving. It is the opinion of the authors that this blended learning methodology has the potential to provide a just‐in‐time delivery of instruction which can be customized to meet an individual student’s need. While traditional assessment techniques are designed to measure student course outcomes, and under the ABET accreditation model show fulfillment of overall program outcomes, they do little to measure the efficiency of instruction. Since there is an undeniable connection between the delivery mechanism and how well a student learns, it can be postulated that the ability to measure the performance of this mechanism and to adjust this in a systematic way, needs to be an integral part of any strategy for improving student learning. In this paper we present an approach that looks to the body of work in Lean Manufacturing to provide the framework and principles for studying the performance of the blended learning mechanism we have adopted. The Toyota Production System identifies Muda (unnecessary work), Muri (overburden) and Mura (unevenness) as the three contributors to waste in manufacturing. The goal of Lean Manufacturing is to control and ultimately eliminate these three sources of waste. This view of manufacturing can be applied to the delivery mechanism used in instruction. For example, Muda can manifest itself in repetitive instruction needed to keep students with different learning abilities in step. Muri can result from increasing class sizes where the instructor and TA are spread thin in their coverage of student needs. And, Mura can be created by the traditional approach to instruction where it is available only at scheduled times and in a specific location. Mitigating these inefficiencies can be viewed as developing a Lean Education philosophy in the same way that lean principles have been applied to other disciplines outside of manufacturing such as in the health care, construction, distribution and service industries. This paper will review the blended learning approach developed for this introductory CAD course. Each activity performed and technique used by the instructor, TAs and students will be described and evaluated in terms of the lean principles discussed in the previous paragraph. A comparison with the previous approach to delivering this content and information from student surveys will be provided. This will show that this new approach has improved the efficiency of instruction and learning in keeping with moving towards a Lean Education philosophy. Further, it will be shown that the evidence suggests an improved ability on the part of students to meet course outcomes, as a consequence.
Yip-Hoi, D. M., & Welch, J. G. (2015, June), Enhancing a Blended Learning Approach to CAD Instruction Using Lean Manufacturing Principles Paper presented at 2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Seattle, Washington. 10.18260/p.23994
ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2015 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015