Asee peer logo

Evaluating Student Project Ranking in an Industry-Sponsored Multidisciplinary Capstone Program to Improve Student Placement and Project Proposals

Download Paper |

Conference

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Location

Baltimore , Maryland

Publication Date

June 25, 2023

Start Date

June 25, 2023

End Date

June 28, 2023

Conference Session

College Industry Partnerships Division (CIP) Technical Session 2

Tagged Division

College Industry Partnerships Division (CIP)

Page Count

16

DOI

10.18260/1-2--43426

Permanent URL

https://peer.asee.org/43426

Download Count

1972

Paper Authors

biography

Edward Latorre University of Florida

visit author page

Dr. Edward Latorre-Navarro is the Director of the Integrated Product and Process Design (IPPD) program within the Department of Engineering Education at the University of Florida. He joined UF from his previous role as Associate Professor of Computer Science at the University of Puerto Rico at Arecibo. As an educator, he is interested in improving the academic experience based on student engagement with educational goals. Research interests include co-teaching, teamwork, engineering leadership skills, natural language processing and human computer interaction for educational applications. https://www.eng.ufl.edu/eed/faculty-staff/edward-latorre-navarro/

visit author page

author page

Catia Silva University of Florida

author page

Elizabeth Louise Meier University of Florida

Download Paper |

Abstract

In multidisciplinary engineering capstone courses, students of a variety of disciplines work in teams to complete design projects. This study stems from a well-established industry-sponsored capstone design program where students work in multidisciplinary teams for two semesters in designing, building and testing projects. The process of placing students on teams is critical to ensuring students are successful in the program and project results meet sponsor expectations. Students are placed on teams by the program staff based on a project ranking survey they must submit after attending presentations about each project. These presentations are given by the faculty who will coach each project. The survey asks students to rank the projects based on their preferences and how their skills best serve the project objectives. Students must also state their commitments outside the program, GPA, academic major, minor and certificates, participation in student organizations and military experience, details on previous work experience, and describe any relevant software, hardware, or other technical experience and skills. Students are told that they have a high probability of being placed in one of their top three choices, and they are generally comfortable with their project placement. However, the process can be improved with respect to helping sponsors and coaches attract students through their presentations, and helping the students complete the survey to increase their opportunity to join their preferred project. Therefore, this study will evaluate the project descriptions, the coaches’ presentations, and the students’ survey results from the past four years to explore the following questions: (1) How much effort do students place on project placement? (2) How does student effort relate to their project choices during project ranking for placement? (3) Which elements of the project have a high impact on student project ranking for placement? (4) What makes a project engaging based on students’ written justifications for placement? This study will also consider the teaching record of the coach, the demographics of the students and coaches, and the project source (industry, academic or community service). As a mixed-methods analysis, this study will explore creating a predictive model that will utilize informative attributes automatically extracted from natural language, such as topic modeling with Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA), as well as qualitative attributes, such as the effort student placed in writing responses. These attributes will be organized in a structured way to train interpretable models such as XGBoost for project ranking predictions. These models will allow us to quantify which attributes are the most informative for making accurate predictions in student rankings, allowing us to determine which project attributes must be emphasized in order to maximize student interests. Awareness of student interests would help sponsors and coaches propose more compelling projects and provide insight to improving academic-industry collaborations. The results of this study will also lead to improving the guidelines for students to complete the survey to increase their odds of being placed on the team of their choice.

Latorre, E., & Silva, C., & Meier, E. L. (2023, June), Evaluating Student Project Ranking in an Industry-Sponsored Multidisciplinary Capstone Program to Improve Student Placement and Project Proposals Paper presented at 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Baltimore , Maryland. 10.18260/1-2--43426

ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2023 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015