New Orleans, Louisiana
June 26, 2016
June 26, 2016
August 28, 2016
Educational Research and Methods
The purpose of this theory paper is to illustrate possible approaches to the scholarship of integration and explore features, challenges and outcomes of these approaches. Among the forms of scholarship – i.e., discovery, teaching and learning, integration, and application – the scholarship of integration emphasizes bringing together otherwise isolated knowledge by making generative connections within and across different perspectives and disciplines. These connections lead to new insights and language, and place specialized knowledge in a broader context, often revealing patterns that can be useful to specialists and non-specialists.
Some argue that this form of scholarship is becoming more central to academic work because it is better equipped for building interdisciplinary partnerships, developing frameworks that transcend disciplinary paradigms, and responding to complex issues at the individual and societal level. For engineering education, this type of scholarship can provide a mechanism for scholars to create new language, theorize and develop conceptual frameworks, and make cross-disciplinary translations for use in discovery, teaching, and practice. Yet, although valuable, the scholarship of integration is relatively underdeveloped and under-theorized.
In this paper, we unpack four scholarship of integration cases – focused on systems thinking, innovation, design teaching and learning, and reflection – with a goal of enhancing our collective understanding of this form of scholarship and the ways to use it in engineering education. We employ a process of collaborative inquiry to reflect upon, unpack, and highlight common strategies and challenges in each of our cases. First, we provide individual accounts of our experiences, lessons learned, and scholarship of integration features revealed through our collaborative process that are embedded in our cases. We then highlight a common strategy and two common challenges revealed through the collaborative inquiry process. We conclude with a question about the implications for individual researchers, the community, and policy makers that warrant further conversation.
Solis, F., & Strong, A. C., & Adams, R., & Turns, J. A., & Crismond, D. P. (2016, June), Towards a Scholarship of Integration: Lessons from Four Cases Paper presented at 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, New Orleans, Louisiana. 10.18260/p.27067
ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2016 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015