June 12, 2005
June 12, 2005
June 15, 2005
10.1422.1 - 10.1422.14
Using Project Portfolios to Assess Design in Materials Science and Engineering M. C. Paretti
Department of Engineering Education & Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Virginia Tech
This paper evaluates the effectiveness of capstone design project portfolios as tools to assess student performance with respect to ABET’s EC2000 Criterion 3 outcomes. After reviewing the potential for comprehensive review inherent in capstone design projects, the paper describes the project portfolio approach that expands the traditional project report into a broader spectrum of communication activities to more fully capture the design cycle. It provides strategies for meaningfully implementing such assignments and summarizes the results of portfolio use over two years of capstone design sequences in a materials science and engineering curriculum. This approach leverages and expands the kinds of assignments common to many design courses (proposals, progress reports, final reports) to provide assessment information directed specifically to ABET. By carefully designing and evaluating capstone assignments with the full range of Criterion 3 outcomes in mind, departments can provide ample concrete evidence to document student performance.
Introduction: Capstone Design and Assessment
Communication assignments in capstone design courses traditionally range from a single comprehensive final project report (often with extensive appendices) at one end of the spectrum to a series of small documents that include proposals, progress reports, and final reports at the other end. Even in courses that include the full spectrum of written and oral documents, however, assignment design and assessment may not take full advantage of the broad range of information represented by those texts. By explicitly designing a portfolio of writing and speaking assignments to capture and assess student performance across the design process, faculty can create a concrete, measurable representation of student outcomes with respect to ABET a-k. Such portfolios, when combined with targeted assessment rubrics, can provide meaningful avenues to track program development and success over time.
In recent years, these capstone courses have been the subject of extensive discussion among engineering educators. The design, development, teaching, and assessment of these courses have provided a rich focus for presentations at both FIE and ASEE conferences as well as for articles in the Journal of Engineering Education, the International Journal of Engineering Education, and many disciplinary educational journals. In fact, the subject is so critical to engineering education the International Journal of Engineering Education devoted a special double issue to “Design Education for the 21st Century,” drawing heavily on the Mudd Design Workshop
Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright 2005, American Society for Engineering Education
Paretti, M. (2005, June), Using Project Portfolios To Assess Design In Materials Science Paper presented at 2005 Annual Conference, Portland, Oregon. 10.18260/1-2--14814
ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2005 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015