Baltimore , Maryland
June 25, 2023
June 25, 2023
June 28, 2023
Graduate Studies Division (GSD)
Diversity
16
10.18260/1-2--43880
https://peer.asee.org/43880
336
Abimelec Mercado Rivera is a Puerto Rican doctoral student and graduate research assistant in the Engineering Education Systems and Design program at Arizona State University. Abimelec received his Bachelor of Science in Mechanical Engineering at the University of Puerto Rico at Mayaguez (UPRM) in 2016. After working in the aerospace industry, he returned to the UPRM for his MS in Mechanical Engineering in 2017, where he pursued ways to tailor ideation methods to interdisciplinary teams as part of his thesis work, and had the opportunity to teach undergraduate ME courses. His previous efforts and experiences in engineering education helped shape his overall goal of fostering human-centered education systems, which led him to pursue his PhD at ASU.
Mayra S. Artiles is an assistant professor in engineering at the Polytechnic School of the Ira A. Fulton Schools of Engineering at Arizona State University. Her research expertise includes engineering doctoral education structure, experiences of underrepr
Samantha Brunhaver, Ph.D., is an Assistant Professor within The Polytechnic School of the Ira A. Fulton Schools of Engineering at Arizona State University. Her primary areas of research include engineering career pathways and decision-making, undergraduate student persistence, professional engineering practice, and faculty mentorship. Brunhaver graduated with her B.S. in mechanical engineering from Northeastern University and her M.S. and Ph.D. in mechanical engineering from Stanford University.
The path to degree completion for graduate students in engineering disciplines is fraught with challenges, but one factor that consistently shapes their persistence and success is their advising relationship. The way students perceive the support they receive from this relationship can influence their self-efficacy concerning the competences needed to finish their dissertation, thesis or applied project report. Understanding the relationship between the student’s self-efficacy towards their culminating tasks and their perception of their advisor’s support is essential, as from a motivational standpoint, it can serve as a closer proxy for degree completion.
This research paper presents the development and validation of the Advisor Support and Self-efficacy for Thesis completion (ASSET) survey, which measures two constructs: Thesis Self-efficacy and Advisor Support. The former measures graduate students’ confidence to carry out activities to complete their final academic document, while the latter measures their perception of their advisor’s support. Items for these constructs were adapted and generalized to be relevant to either doctoral or master’s level students in engineering disciplines.
We collected survey responses from 170 engineering graduate students from a large public institution in the southwestern United States. Exploratory factor analysis yielded a single factor solution for the Thesis Self-efficacy construct, while Advisor Support yielded two factors, “Research support” and “Individualized support”. Future work includes the dissemination of the ASSET survey to various graduate engineering programs, to further explore the predictive relationships between our constructs and help institutions create strategies for the success of both their graduate students and their faculty.
Mercado Rivera, A., & Artiles, M. S., & Brunhaver, S. R. (2023, June), Perceived Advisor Support and Thesis Self-Efficacy: An Instrument Development Paper presented at 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Baltimore , Maryland. 10.18260/1-2--43880
ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2023 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015