significantly different from each other. Table 1summarizes these results. Figure 1 shows the comparison of the pre- and post-test scores for the three groups. Table 1. Tukey’s grouping of pretest and post-test means Group Tukey’s grouping of Tukey’s grouping of post- pretest means test means I Hypermedia I 19.7a I 24.94b I I Paper I 19.2a I 23.37b I I Control I 18.lla I
to undergraduate students more effectively than text-basedlanguages?", is being run using the new teaching materials at Texas Tech during the 1995-96 school year.Future research hopes to extend this program to series of pilot programs at other institutions.1. Introduction Research has been undertaken to answer the following question: Can icon-based programming languagesbe used to teach first year programming concepts to undergraduate students more effectively than text-basedlanguages? 5 6 Many noted researchers (e.g. Glinert and Scanlan ) have empirically established the cognitive advantagewhich graphical methodologies provide over textual ones. Research undertaken by the co-authors
thedevelopment of an innovative delivery system. In 1993, a faculty committee consisting of representatives from various departments was formed by thedean to develop an “innovative curriculum” for the college. In carrying out the task, the committee consideredand used as reference several models from other institutions, including Drexel University’s “E4 EducationalProgram1” and the “Integrated, First Year Curriculum2” at Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology. The newengineering curriculum developed at the University of Miami had the following objectives: 1. Facilitate the transition of students from high school to college environment, 2. Expose students to engineering in their freshman year, 3. Make the study of mathematics, basic sciences
brought into the first year and integrated withintroductory calculus and science courses. The goals of the curriculum are to provide (1) motivation andcontext for the fundamental material taught in the first-year mathematics and science courses; (2) arealistic and positive orientation to the engineering profession, and (3) training in the problem-solving, study,and communication skills that correlate with success in engineering school and equip individuals to belifelong learners.Curriculum Structure and Instructional Approach In the fall semester of 1994, IMPEC students took the first courses in calculus and physics(mechanics) as well as a one-credit engineering course. In the spring of 1995, students continuing in thesequence took the
: (1) to provide a laboratory environment whereinterdisciplinary experiments relating to integrated manufacturing and control can be performed, (2) to providean opportunity for each of the engineering programs (electrical, industrial, mechanical, and bio) to conductindependent experiments relating to manufacturing and control, (3) to provide for the students necessaryexperience in the interdisciplinary nature of engineering practice, and (4) to provide a facility for the design,development, testing, and manufacture of plastic products.Background American industry is well aware of the necessity for effective teamwork in competitive businesses.Teams have become a common form of organization for activities that range from business planning
classmates on homework assignments.Student-formed “base groups” are naturally created by students as their need arises; such groups often stay intactover the entire semester. Page 1.245.2 ---- - fiiii’ } 1996 ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings ‘.,+,~yHll’.’ 1 . ..Group Activities Group activities come primarily in the form of a collaborative group quiz during the last 20 minutes ofeach class period. The main
variety of devices distributed across a site. CIManager provides the toolsnecessary to specify system control logic, develop device drivers, and create graphical displays of systeminformation. The research done by Johnson addressed the technical and practical aspects of the serial interfacebetween a personal computer running CIManager and the Adept One robot running the V+ operating system.Multiple design alternatives were specified and evaluated by Johnson for the development of this AdeptOne/CIManager interface. This project was executed over a four-month period and resulted in thedevelopment of two separate programs - the Serial Interface Monitor (SIM) on the Adept robot and theADEPT 1 driver under CIManager. The two systems are connected
University of South Alabama(USA) began, in Fall 1993, an evaluation of the undergraduate program to meet the challenge ofengineering education for the 21st Century. Restructuring of the mechanical engineering curriculum atUSA is also prompted by the changing ABET (Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology)requirements for design. Under the current criteria, design is defined as "an experience that must grow withthe student's development," and "the design experience is developed and integrated throughout thecurriculum"1. In addition to the development of student creativity, formulation of design problemstatements and specifications, consideration of alternative solutions, and feasibility considerations, ABETsuggests that design should also
fusible links are actually blown to create the design. Other PLD devices, similar to EEPROMmemory devices, allow the reprogramming of devices so that new designs may be implemented. Page 1.248.1 $iii’ } 1996 ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings ‘..,,~yy’;? 1 Session 3548Companies that
design rather than deterministic factors of safety. A more specific proposal defining a world-class engineer for the 21st century has been recently put forwardby the Penn State Center for Enhancement of Undergraduate Engineering Education. The following qualitieswere identified (Kearns et al., 1995) for this purpose:1. Aware of the World: sensitive to cultural-differences, environmental concerns, and ethical principles; alert to market opportunities.2. Solidly Grounded: thoroughly trained in the fundamentals of engineering and science; having a historical perspective of advances in science which can impact engineering prepared to continue life-long learning.3. Technically Broad: understands that real-life problems are interdisciplinary
, certainly the institutions of higherlearning which are able to minimize tuition inflation will have an advantage if this is consistent withcontinually improved quality and delivery time. Delivery time is also critical since the student as we] 1 ascurrent and potential employers would like a degree in a reasonable time, or even in a minimum time. Asteachers we insist on our students achieving defined competencies before a degree is granted and thestudents and employers also require this, certainly when they are given professional responsibility. So inlearning and in facilitating student colleagues to do quality work we need deliberate processes to help us. Wehave found William Glasser’s SESIR process for developing quality work to be very helpful in
women are more likely than executive men to movein new and original directions“1. Since executive positions more often go to employees coming from thetechnical ranks, increasing the number of women who study engineering should also, over the long run, increasethe number of women executives in industry. The engineering profession and its image will be enhanced bygreater participation of women. It may become a more caring and balanced profession that considers the impact .of engineering designs and projects on society, the environment, and the health of individuals The abilities ofwomen cannot be ignored if this country is to solve its problems
ofintroducing high-performance dc machines and servo systems, improved understanding of the inductionmachine through practical speed control, and more flexible laboratory investigation opportunities.Emphasis in this paper is on working within the existing curriculum; suggestions are presented about howto modify the curriculum to accommodate these ideas. Capstone design projects also present an expandedopportunity for marrying a variety of subjects to energy conversion in a group setting. The advent of theadjustable speed drive presents a wonderful opportunity for increased excitement in the teaching ofelectromechanical energy conversion.References[1] Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI), Adjustable Speed Drives Directory (Pleasant Hill, CA:EPRI
Tester.Acknowledgments: The authors would like to acknowledge the contributions made by G. S. Kohne and W. L. Elban,Associate Professors at Loyola College, and D. S. Richards, formerly Assistant Professor at Loyola College, inrefining the goals of the capstone design course.References:1) Criteria For Accrediting Programs In Engineering In The United States (1994-95 Accreditation Cycle),Accreditation Board For Engineering And Technology, Inc.2) Design and Construction of a Tensile Tester for the Testing of Simple Composites, Mark A. Borst and F.Xavier Spiegel, National Educators’ Workshop: Update 93, NASA Conference Publication 359, April 1994.3) Continuous Unidirectional Fiber Reinforced Composites: Fabrication and Testing, W. D. Wampler, F. X.Spiegel
contribution. Without at least three members a team dynamic fails to occur and theprofessor becomes de facto leader. This situation is shunned because it thwarts the educationalprocess. Mathematical applications can be easily addressed in the classroom. When confrontedwith the cacophonous, grimy, economic reality, students learn to use science to understandproduction systems. On the factory floor all variables save one are not generally given. As thestudents overcome problems and analyses despite gaps in readily available data, the meaning ofengineering education takes hold. Solving meaningful problems amid the din is the bestexperience. Figure 1 depicts the syllabus for Industrial Energy Management. The current text isPlant Emzineers and Managers
in the cooperative study groups has been analyzed,along with their evaluation of the sessions. On a scale of 1 (high) to 5 (low) the students reported that due tothe study groups, they: • Did better on exams 1.6 • Became more confident about computing 1.7 • Were more able to solve problems on own 1.6 • Would attend for enrichment 1.8Half of the students voluntarily participated in group study for the final exam. Page 1.66.2 1996 ASEE Annual Conference ProceedingsThe study groups have excited the
of his design. He chose ageodetic framework for these units with a tile roof over a lamella vault. While this design provedexceptionally strong, the value of studying these hangars is in the changes that were made in the designbetween hangars no. 1 and 2. Construction of hangar no. 1 required extensive form work and welding ofthe reinforcing steel. With hangar no. 2 the roof members were prefabricated on the ground, lifted intoplace and then welded together. This system of prefabrication also produced exceptionally strong units.However, of importance in this study, the prefabrication allowed hangar no. 2 to be constructed at a costsubstantially lower than the cost of hangar no. 1. The remaining lectures in this series also were chosen
—— —-. ---- Session 2563 An Innovative Approach to Educating Students on Manufacturing Murali Krishnamurthi, Mohamed I. Dessouky Northern Illinois University 1. INTRODUCTION The accelerated rate at which new technologies are being introduced today has created a large demand for people competent in the new technologies. The widening gap between the steady rise in the level of skill requirements and the reduced
Session 1626 An Innovative Course on Elements of Manufacturing Systems for Non-Engineering Students Murali Krishnamurthi, Mohamed I. Dessouky Northern Illinois University 1. INTRODUCTION The rapid changes in technology, the associated increase in skill requirements for technology-orientedjobs, and the shrinking population of people with the necessary skills are making it difficult for U.S. industriesto compete in the international market. The knowledge of technology is essential for functioning effectively intoday’s technological society, contribute to
enable system design and project management for effective and efiicient humaninteraction. In today’s technology, the total Systems Engineering Life Cycle from womb-to-tomb may take asmany as 40 years or more (e.g., the B-52 and C-13 O aircraft), and each stage in the System Life Cycle and itssystem ramifications must be clearly understood by the engineer. The Fundamental SE ConceptsThe subject of Systems Engineering has been discussed by many researchers and authors [1 - 12]. According toRhode, et al. [1], SE can be viewed in many different ways: a discipline involving engineering and managementscience; a design process technology; a methodology for defining or designing “anything”; an
needs of different majors, and hence, enhances the effectiveness of coursedelivery. This paper presents some of the experiences for engineering technology students inthis laboratory.IntroductionThe increasing speed with which technology is changing forces educators to incorporateinnovative methods in order to keep pace with technical advances. Several papers (1-10) ofthe last decade reveal a common theme: Engineering is a holistic integrative process and thusengineering and engineering technology education should be designed toward that end. Frominnovative teaching methods come innovative ideas that industry needs to achieve aleadership role or to gain markets. The mission of engineering technology educators mustinclude the cultivation of each
improve their efficiency. The object ofthis communication is, therefore, to describe the innovative measures that we have taken in order to improve ourperformances and the supervision of our post-graduate students.1. An Evolving Situation: Enrolment, Rate of Degrees Awarded and the Length of Studies In the last ten years, the development of post-graduate studies has shown a rapid increased followed by a declineobserved in the last two years. The future leaves us with three main problems: the decline in clientele, theinsufficiency in the rate of degrees awarded and the prolongation of the length of studies. Such an evolution has adirect impact on our resources and as a consequence we can no longer manage our establishments in the same wayand
been reported in the literature1 and will be brieflysummarized. Page 1.258.1Hardware Considerations 1996 ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings A major component of the interface is the decoder for port addresses. A 74154decoder is used in the implementation. This decoder has two enable pins, E1* and E2*,and will decode four address lines. Its wiring is shown in Figure 1. The output portaddresses are asserted low. For the decoder to be enabled, the M/IO* input must be low.The port addresses are therefore in "IO space". The M/IO* signal is low when thesoftware is executing either an IN or OUT instruction. Simultaneously
break "loose wheels" from teams and put them in teams of their own2. During the first fiveweeks of the quarter, approximately 15-20 minutes is spent each Monday going "around the room" and havingeach student briefly describe their concept for a design project. Generally by the fourth week, approximately70% of the students have decided on a reasonable project and have formed into design teams3. Table Isummarizes the student design projects in this class over the past five years.1 It is quite easy to "lead" the students into a particular project direction. I have found that such projects are dramatically lesssuccessful than those the students select totally on their own.2 Many studies show the value of NOT permitting students to form their own
efficiency and product differentiation may be the key to the new Page 1.72.1 1 We thank Bruce Kirchhoff for helpful comments. The authors are responsible for any remaining errors. {hi&’> 1996 ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings ‘. 1996 ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings ‘yml.? .by redesign of course content and instructional materials, The emphasis of the integrated courses hasbeen broadened to include manufacturing and industrial concerns as well as social and policy issues. The faculty
complete a sequence of three labora- overall design spirit. According to the personal experiencetories culminating in the senior capstone design laboratory. of the investigators, many students performed poorly due to a number of deficiencies which can be attributed as follows:The first two electrical engineering laboratoritis are takenduring the sophomore and junior years, respectively, and are 1. Meaningful senior design projects require inter-common to all electrical engineering disciplines. ln t hfise disciplinary teamwork between students of various elec-introductory laboratories, students are introduced to the trical engineering backgrounds
of concurrentactivities, organized by multi-disciplinary teams that are intensively customer-focused. In this concurrentprocess model, the participants actively collaborate to reduce risks and improve the product developmentprocess by examining the downstream engineering and production consequences of early design and marketing 3decisions. You can see the differences in the two approaches to product development compared in Figure 1. Performance Service Design Redesign Design Testability Cost
‘.,.,~yyc+? .students choose a research topic from a list of prepared abstracts submitted by the faculty members. Studentsare also encouraged to pursue their own ideas for a project and to discuss these with potential faculty advisors.Approximately twenty percent of the projects are initiated by the students; the remainder originate from thefaculty. A list of project titles from Spring Semester 1995 is shown in Figure 1. The topics encompass many ofthe research interests of the department’s faculty and students. Low-Drag Su~aces for Satellites E#ect of Massive Roughness on Ai@oil Lijl Li$t and Drag E#ects of Alternate
powersystems and their performance by graphically modeling the active control elements of the power systemon a color computer screen.In recent years, there have been a number of papers written on the development of educational electricmachinery laboratories geared towards the use of computers. For example, Case Western ReserveUniversity has set up a facility for computer control of electrical drives and machines[ 1]. Similarfacilities have been set up at the University of Missouri-Rolla[2], Ohio State University[3], and NewMexico State University[4]. Concordia University has implemented a computer-aided power electronicslaboratory[5], while Auburn[6] has implemented computer controlled protective relays systemslaboratory. The above projects show that