Conference Session

Computer Based Measurements

Collection

2005 Annual Conference

Authors

Weining Feng; Alberto Gomez-Rivas

Pincus, G., “Control and Signal Processing in a StructuralLaboratory,” Proc. of International Conference on Engineering Education, July 21-25, 2003, Valencia,Spain.[4] Ogata, K., Modern Control Engineering, (4th Ed.), Prentice Hall, 2001.Biographical InformationWEINING FENGWeining Feng, PhD, is Associate Professor of Process Control and Instrumentation in the EngineeringTechnology Department, University of Houston-Downtown. Dr. Feng received a Ph.D. from theDepartment of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, University of Strathclyde, Scotland, in 1990. She is incharge developing UHD’s Control and Instrumentation laboratories and serves as director of the ProcessControl and Instrumentation program.ALBERTO GOMEZ-RIVASAlberto Gomez-Rivas is

Conference Session

Teaching Strategies in Graphics

Collection

2005 Annual Conference

Authors

S. C. York; Tamara Knott

, Virginia Tech website (http://www.enge.vt.edu/) 2. The Frith Freshman Design Laboratory (http://www.enge.vt.edu/lab.html) Page 10.1184.5 Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright  2005, American Society for Engineering EducationBiographiesSTEVEN C. YORKSteve York is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. He received hisPhD in Chemical Engineering from Virginia Tech. He is one of the course-coordinators for the second semesterfreshman engineering design course.TAMARA W. KNOTTTamara Knott is an

Conference Session

Recruiting/Retention Lower Division

Collection

2005 Annual Conference

Authors

Paul DeNu; Connie Sketch

Online Technology Career Preparation Course Paul A. De Nu and Connie Sketch Cincinnati State Technical and Community CollegeCincinnati State Technical and Community College is a comprehensive community college withan enrollment of approximately 8500 students. Students attending Cincinnati State are providedan education that features a combination of theory and practice, delivered via appropriateclassroom, laboratory, and cooperative education experiences. Cooperative education isconsidered an integral part of the learning experience at the college. Cincinnati State’scommitment to co-op is demonstrated in part by the large number of student placements eachyear. The

Conference Session

Workshop, Program, and Toolkit Results

Collection

2005 Annual Conference

Authors

Allen Estes; Ronald Welch

textbooks),demonstrations of effective teaching, laboratory exercises requiring the participants to teachlessons followed by group assessment, and discussions on how to apply the presented techniques COURSE SCHEDULE SUNDAY MONDAY TUESDAY WEDNESDAY THURSDAY FRIDAY Admin & Gift Admin & Gift Admin & Gift Admin & Gift Admin & Gift 8:00 Demo Interpersonal Class I Lab III Rapport Principles of

Conference Session

Real World Applications

Collection

2005 Annual Conference

Authors

Youakim Kalaani

wind power systems: - The National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) is a Department of Energy lab involved in wind, solar, and other renewable energy field. Their web site has excellent information regarding the various renewable energy sources and an educational resource page at http://www.nrel.gov/education. - The DOE’s Energy Smart Schools program (http://www.eere.energy.gov/energysmartschools) lists guidelines for building energy smart schools and is also an excellent source of information and curriculum building resources. - Interstate Renewable Energy Council’s Schools Going Solar program contains information on other schools installing solar systems

Conference Session

International Engineering Education II

Collection

2005 Annual Conference

Authors

Sucharit Koontanakulvong; Direk Lavansiri

produced 102 Because the system had to dealprocedures covering all operations at with more than 600 staff members andthe departmental level and the Faculty 5,000 students among 12 departments,(Central Administration) levels such as the implementation was divided intostrategic planning, budgeting, two phases; Phase 1 on system setupcurriculum development, teaching and (2001-2002), and Phase 2 on selfevaluation, laboratory maintenance, quality assessment (2003). Theresearch management, etc. [3, 4]. implementation of quality system setup The assessment based on the started at the Central AdministrativeUniversity criteria (34 indexes) can be units and followed with thegrouped into 5

Conference Session

Curriculum Development in Electrical ET

Collection

2005 Annual Conference

Authors

William Lehman; Asad Yousuf

of the 2004 American Society for EngineeringEducation Conference and Exposition.5. “Know your Lab Styff: Laboratory Proficiency Exam for an Introductory Circuits Class” by Ian M.Nauhaus and Susan M. Lord University of San Diego Proceedings of the 2002 American Society forEngineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition.6. “Computer Aided Design of Interally Compensated CMOS Operational Amplifiers” b M.G. GuvenchUniversity of Southern Main, Gorham, ME 04038 Proceedings of the 2002 American Society forEngineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition.7. “A Versatile Experiment in Electrical Engineering Technology”, Ahmad M. Farhoud, EngineeringTechnology Department University of Toledo, Proceedings of the 2003 American Society for

Conference Session

Mathematics Potpourri

Collection

2005 Annual Conference

Authors

John Schmeelk, Virginia Commonwealth University Qatar Branch

0 -0.5 -1 -1.5 -2 0 0.5 1 1.5Bibliography 1. Berglund, G.D., A Guided Tour of the Fast Fourier Transform, IEEE Spectrum, (July 1969), 41- 52. 2. Budrikis, Z. L., & Hatomian, M., Moment Calculations by Digital Filters, AT&T Laboratories Technical Journal, 63, No.2, (February 1984), 217-229. 3. Cochran, W. T., & Cooley, J., W., & Favin, D., L., What is the Fast Fourier Transform? Proceedings of the IEEE, 55, No. 10, (October 1967), 1664-1674. 4. Gabel, R. A., & Roberts, R. A., Signals and Linear Systems, Wiley, NY (1980). 5. Harris, F

Conference Session

Emerging Trends in Engineering Education Poster Session

Collection

2005 Annual Conference

Authors

Christine Kelly

systems.4. Develop regulatory documentation (standard operating procedure and batch record)for a given process.5. Develop and critique a peer’s written validation plan for a given process and carry outthe plan in the laboratory. Synthesize the results into a final validation document.6. Define the roles and describe the differences between Quality Assurance and QualityControl groups. Select analytical methods and quality tools appropriate for qualitycontrol of a biopharmaceutical process or medical devices manufacturing process andexplain the fundamental basis for the methods.7. Describe the purpose and components control strategies, including change controlsystems, process deviations, and quality investigations.Table 2. Required readingsParts of

Conference Session

Experiences with Experiential Learning

Collection

2005 Annual Conference

Authors

Walter Bankes; Michael Eastman; Anthony Trippe; Jeffrey Lillie; George Zion

their ownpersonal desires. The course and laboratory work is rigorous, consisting of 192 quarter-creditsover a 5 year period. Additionally the students are required to participate in a co-operativeeducation experience that totals a minimum of 50 weeks over the last three years of the program.The co-operative education requirement normally consists of two 6-month blocks and one 3-month block, but the exact configuration may vary from student to student. While on co-op,students are not required to pay tuition, and often make reasonable salaries. Recent salaryfigures have been in the range of $7.50 – $23.00 per hour with an average of $13.34 per hour.Typically students with one or two co-op experience under their belts command a higher salarythan

Conference Session

Innovation for ChE Student Learning

Collection

2005 Annual Conference

Authors

James Newell

Press, 1993.[11] J. S. Byrd and J. L. Hudgkins, "Teaming in the design laboratory," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 84, pp. 335, 1995.[12] E. Seat and S. M. Lord, "Enabling effective engineering teams: a program for teaching interaction skills," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 88, pp. 385, 1999.[13] P. Lewis, D. Aldridge, and P. Swamidass, "Assessing teaming skills acquisition on undergraduate project teams," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 87, pp. 149, 1998.[14] C. Weinstein and R. Mayer, The teaching of learning strategies. New York: MacMillan, 1986.[15] C. Johnston and G. Dainton, "Learning Combination Inventory Users Manual,",, unpublished manuscript 1997.[16] C. F. Yokomoto

Conference Session

Electrical & Computer Engineering Poster Session

Collection

2005 Annual Conference

Authors

Kedmon Hungwe; Seyed Zekavat; Sheryl Sorby

curriculum is formed by a merger of manycurriculum subspaces, which are the unique curricula for each non-EE area. Each curriculumsub-space is designed independently for one non-EE engineering field and includes the requiredtopics and their associated depth of coverage. The intersection of curriculum subspaces forms thecore of the final curriculum that will be taught in the lecture portion of the class. The areas thatare unique to each non-EE field forms the web-based curriculum. The laboratory will also bedesigned accordingly: some in-class lab experiments will be designed to address the needs of allnon-EE majors, and some in-class as well as web-based lab experiments, will be designed toaddress the special needs of each non-EE field.We started by

Conference Session

Emerging Trends in Engineering Education Poster Session

Collection

2005 Annual Conference

Authors

John Mingle; Tom Roberts

capstone courses between Xer faculty members;otherwise, one professor will have a lock on a course for more than two or three years. Further,when an Xer professor begins teaching a new course, that course should not be a basic course,but a secondary (higher level) one utilizing the basic course as a prerequisite. After teaching oneor more of these secondary courses, the more experienced professor is assignable to the basiccourse.This concept of having the senior, Boomer, professors primarily teaching basic courses whileleaving the more advanced courses for the Xers is reinforced by the learning differences in Mil-lennials and Xers. As noted previously, the Millennials are concrete/linear learners who learnwell in physical laboratories supporting

Conference Session

Curriculum Development in Civil ET

Collection

2005 Annual Conference

Authors

Aiman Kuzmar

execution of the project, while the instructor had supervisory andmonitoring roles. This approach enhanced the learning process. This paper outlined theelements of this approach, and it explained its effectiveness. Other instructors who teachsimilar or other engineering technology courses are encouraged to use this approach.However, they have to be aware of its limitations.Bibliography1. Ogot, M., Elliot, G., and Glumac, N., An Assessment of In-Person and Remotely Operated Laboratory, Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 92, No. 1, pp. 57-63, January 2003.2. Foulds, R., Bergen, M., and Mantilla, B., Integrated Biomedical Engineering Education Using Studio-Based Learning, IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine, Vol. 22

Conference Session

Emerging Trends in Engineering Education Poster Session

Collection

2005 Annual Conference

Authors

Jason Krupar; George Suckarieh

19th century, the American engineering systemparalleled the French model, but also incorporated elements of the hands-on traditions of theBritish approach. The continuation of shop work requirements and the development of co-operative education in most engineering curricula distinguished American engineeringinstruction from the French method.The twentieth century witnessed a rapid advancement of Engineering and Technology education.Applied laboratories coursework and formal co-operative experience enhanced the growingeducational programs. In addition, ABET accreditation introduced criteria to make engineeringand technology programs well balanced with mixes of basic sciences courses, technical theoryand laboratory courses, and a breadth of

Conference Session

TC2K Issues and Experiences

Collection

2005 Annual Conference

Authors

David Cottrell

mathematics, science, engineering, and technology. 3.5 3.75 4.0 4.25 4.5 OUTCOME COURSE ASSESSMENT VALUE 4.10 ET 200, “Graphics Communications” 4.03 CET 201, “Plane Surveying” 4.04 CET 242, “Civil Engineering Materials – 3.83 Concrete & Bituminous” ET 323, “Mechanics of Materials Laboratory” 4.31 CET

Conference Session

Assessment & Quality; Accreditation in Engineering Education

Collection

2005 Annual Conference

Authors

Tom Thomas; Mohammad Alam

were muchmore clearly understood. Samples of student coursework were compiled, all advising proceduresand transfer policies were updated, and student files were all reviewed for completeness.Compliance with professional component requirements and faculty qualifications were ensured.All laboratory equipment was determined to be functional and up-to-date. Documentation ofadequate facilities and institutional support was updated and made available. It was ensured thatall discipline-specific program criteria were met.Outcome of the EC 2000 Accreditation VisitThe ABET site visit in October 1999 identified two weaknesses: one under Criterion 2 (ProgramEducational Objectives) and one under Criterion 3 (Program Outcomes and Assessment). ABETgranted

Conference Session

Ethics Classes: Creative or Inefficient

Collection

2005 Annual Conference

Authors

Christy Moore; Stephanie Bird; Steven Nichols

educational programs that addressethical issues in science and engineering, professional responsibilities, and ethical issues in researchpractice and science more generally. She is a laboratory-trained neuroscientist whose research interestsnow focus on the ethical, legal and social policy implications of scientific research, especially in the area ofneuroscience. Her theoretical and laboratory training have been complemented by work in areas of ethicaland legal philosophy.Dr. Bird has taught in her areas of expertise at M.I.T. including both courses designed to examine variousaspects of the responsible conduct of research, and those that consider the ethical and social policyimplications of technology. Dr. Bird has written numerous articles on

Conference Session

Emerging Trends in Engineering Education Poster Session

Collection

2005 Annual Conference

Authors

C. Richard Helps; Stephen Renshaw

laboratory redesign or updating as frequently as yearly. The attendant financialcosts and time invested by the faculty to provide well-designed laboratory experiences canbecome overwhelming. For example, in teaching a class related to modern computer operatingsystems involving, say the Windows and Linux operating systems, it is probable that at least oneof them will go through significant changes as often as once per year, particularly if the varioustools that are used to work with them are also considered. Updating lab configurations to reflectthese changes requires changing lab computer software, and possibly hardware too.In this changing environment it is highly desirable to explore paradigms of thought andmethodologies which enable technology

Conference Session

Innovative ET Leadership

Collection

2005 Annual Conference

Authors

Scott Danielson; John Hansen; Thomas Hall

from the University of Wyoming and Ph.D. in Engineering (MechanicalEngineering concentration) from North Dakota State University. He holds P.E. registration and worked in industryfor over eight years.THOMAS M. HALL, JR.Tom Hall is Professor and Head of the Department of Engineering Technology at Northwestern State University.He holds a BS degree in Engineering from the United States Military Academy, an MBA from the University ofUtah, the MSEE and Engineer degrees from Stanford University, and an Ed.D. in educational technology from NSU.He retired as a Colonel from the US Army after serving 26 years. His research interests are in using simulationsoftware in lieu of hardware laboratories in electronics engineering technology laboratory

Conference Session

Manufacturing Program Innovation

Collection

2005 Annual Conference

Authors

Lenea Howe; Jr., Elijah Kannatey-Asibu

students and have been instrumental in the success of Center-sponsored events,organizing volunteers, initiating special study sessions and countless other ways that havedrawn our diverse group of students together.All graduate students are housed together in the Student Office Space in the IntegratedManufacturing Systems Laboratory and are assigned desks based on their research ThrustArea affiliation. As a result, students within each Thrust Area consult with their peers ona daily basis and assist each other. This space helped in creating the “ERC spirit” amongstudents and was highly beneficial for team development. In the words of Dr. ShirleyJackson, president of Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, “it takes a village comprised ofintergenerational

Conference Session

College/University Engineering Students K-12 Outreach

Collection

2005 Annual Conference

Authors

Brecca Berman; Gordon Kingsley; Donna Llewellyn; Marion Usselman

1991 and places onaverage 75 teachers per year in 6-8 week research positions in academic and industry labs. GIFTparticipation by teachers in the four primarily minority STEP high schools since 2001, whenSTEP begin, is shown on the following page in Figure 1. These internships, where teachers Page 10.1135.8form close personal relationships with faculty, graduate students, and other laboratory staffmembers, lead to numerous spillover benefits. Teachers gain new and cutting edge STEM Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2005, American

Conference Session

Innovative Ideas for Energy Labs

Collection

2005 Annual Conference

Authors

Jessica Moffitt; Jennifer van Rij; Jeffrey Wolchok

experiences.These classes will involve a diverse set of topics such as scaling issues, micromachining,interfacial phenomena, and thin-film energy transport. The students will participate in formalclassroom and laboratory training, industrial and government laboratory internships, a monthlyinterdisciplinary seminar, and international educational experiences.Throughout the duration of the fellowship students participated in small group (3-4 members)projects that were intended to complement the coursework. Projects were microsystems focusedand designed to encourage the involvement of an interdisciplinary design team. Projectprogression was intended to track with the coursework with the goal of applying class learning toa complex project with no clear solution

Conference Session

Capstone & Educational Resource Developments

Collection

2005 Annual Conference

Authors

Yong Yang; Andrew Bennett; Steve Warren

Analysis," IEEE Transactions on Education, vol. 39, Aug 1996, pp. 287-296.[9] Lu, Han-Pang Huang and Chiou-Hwa. "Java-Based Distance Learning Environment for Electronic Instruments," IEEE Transactions on Education, vol. 46, Feb 2003, pp. 88- 94.[10] Titcomb, S.L. "Computer-Based Interactive Tutorials for Electrical Engineering Laboratory Instruction," presented at 27th Annual Conference Frontiers in Education Conference, 1997. Proceedings ’Teaching and Learning in an Era of Change’. 1997.[11] Gronhovd, Sudhir Ι. Mehta and Sandy M. "Instrumentation and Communication Modules on CD-ROM’s for Enriching Engineering Education," IEEE Transactions on Education, vol. 39, Aug. 1996, pp. 304-308.[12

Conference Session

Multidisciplinary Engineering by Design II

Collection

2005 Annual Conference

Authors

Paul Leiffer

electrical students. This is alaboratory to teach students how to design and build electrical systems, with an emphasis on thepractical use of theory in the creation and testing process. In this laboratory the instructor (RWG)is careful to choose pairs of students or singles if an odd number is enrolled. Part of the teamformation is related to perceived growth needs of the student. Three students should never be puton one team because one will be left out. Students are allowed a voice in choosing a partner butthe instructor will veto a decision if there is a difference of two letter grades between them, usingthe previous lab grade as a measure. For instance, A-B and C-D students can work together butnot A-C or B-D. Experience has shown that female

Conference Session

Emerging Trends in Engineering Education Poster Session

Collection

2005 Annual Conference

Authors

Zbigniew Hladysz; Robert Corey; JASON ASH; Glen Stone; Dale Skillman; Charles Kliche; Larry Stetler; David Dixon; Larry Simonson; Stuart Kellogg

development effort. Other programs foundthat many of these same gains can be obtained through incorporating freshman design projectsand laboratory exercises [6-11]. For programs which incorporate vertically integrated teams,newer developments include the use of a service learning component within the designexperience [12-13]. Most recently, programs are expanding the first year engineering experience toincorporate experiential learning through the co-curriculum. Such programs might collaboratewith Student Affairs [14], through freshman grouping in the dormitories, or through formaldevelopment of learning communities [15-16]. Page 10.1033.1

Conference Session

K-12 Programs for Women

Collection

2005 Annual Conference

Authors

Elizabeth DeBartolo; Margaret Bailey

they participate in a series of laboratory activities provided by studentsand faculty in the departments of Electrical, Industrial and Systems, Mechanical, andMicroelectronics Engineering. The young women also spend the night on campus with RITstudents. Attendance has grown in recent years, and RIT hosted over 40 girls for the 2004 SWESleepover.Colleges and Careers DayColleges and Careers Day is an annual summer event targeting high school students betweentheir 11th and 12th grade years. It is an institute-wide recruitment event designed for male andfemale students. Students interested in engineering are able to participate in hands-on activities

Conference Session

K-12 Poster Session

Collection

2005 Annual Conference

Authors

Wayne Burleson; Noah Salzman; Christopher Emery; Kevin Kloesel; Sandra Cruz Pol; Omnia El-Hakim; Kathleen Rubin

• Shortcoming of modern radar systems • How CASA will allow for better tracking of severe weather eventsRadar Kit (30 minutes) Noah Salzman • Radar applications (air traffic control, police radar, satellite mapping of other planets) • The Doppler effect • Demonstration of a speed radar assembled from a kitMIRSL Tour (30 Minutes) • Teachers toured the Radar laboratories at the University of Massachusetts • Spoke with undergraduate and graduate students about the projects that they are working on • Demonstration of a radar • Learned about and saw a truck with radar developed by the university used for chasing tornadoes in OklahomaCurriculum Project Session (120 minutes) • Time to work on grant proposals and brainstorm

Conference Session

Useful Assessment in Materials Education

Collection

2005 Annual Conference

Authors

Edward Goo; Maura Borrego

conceptualquestions. Data analysis is provided to begin to evaluate the effectiveness of this method,and future work collecting more detailed data and combining concept inventories withlecture sessions is discussed.Course-Specific Background and MotivationTable 1 outlines the topics included in University of Southern California (USC) MASC110, Introduction to Materials Science and Engineering. Unlike many introductorymaterials science courses, this course includes significant chemistry content andsubstitutes for the first-semester chemistry requirement for aerospace, mechanical,electrical and industrial engineering majors. A chemistry textbook is used9, and materialsscience concepts are introduced through laboratory activities and lectures later in

Conference Session

Electrical & Computer Engineering Poster Session

Collection

2005 Annual Conference

Authors

Samuel Craig; Maurice Aburdene

issue of assessment itself, it cansimplify the necessary recordkeeping and provide consistency within an educational program.BackgroundAs our department began to prepare for a visit by a team of ABET evaluators, we discovered thatthe evaluation process had changed. Instead of counting square feet of laboratory space andlooking at the age of our equipment, the emphasis had shifted to setting educational outcomesand measuring how well they were met. The assessment of outcomes had become a key issue. Page 10.100.1The results and analysis of those assessments were to guide us in revising course content and “Proceedings of the 2005 American