Conference Session

Engineering Technology Curriculum and Programs

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Riem Rostom, Indiana State University; Sheikh Fahad Ferdous, Indiana State University; A. Mehran Shahhosseini, Indiana State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Technology

. Instructors’ names were abbreviated asRR, MS, and SF. RR’s course evaluation methods include attendance and participation (Att&P),assignments and quizzes (A&Q), two term exams & a comprehensive final exam (E), groupproject (P). For fall 2017 on campus: Att&P 15%, A&Q 30%, E 40%, and P 15%. For fall 2017online: Att&P 10%, A&Q 35%, E 50%, and P 10%. For the fall 2019 online: Att&P 10%, A&Q30%, E 45%, and P 15%. MS’s course evaluation methods include attendance and participation(Att&P), assignments and quizzes (A&Q), mid-term exam & a comprehensive final exam (E),two group projects (P). For fall 2018 and 2019 on campus: Att&P 5%, A&Q 20%, E 45%, and P30%. SF’s course evaluation methods include

Conference Session

Engineering Technology Pedagogy 2

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Mert Bal, Miami University; Farnaz Pakdel, Miami University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Technology

-organized; the instructor was very in depth and allowed for a ton of Q&A. Overall great information on the topic of the course” ● “Hands on labs” ● “It was beneficial to learn to use the software and be able to actually see the operation of several different 3-D printers” ● “Learning the history and the future of 3d printing. I didn't know there is different types and methods of 3-D printing. I thought it was helpful in knowing because it could be a business venture in the future”As we continue offering this course, we will develop new materials and modules to deliver to thestudents. We also plan to collect and publish more formal assessment data with a standardgrading protocol in future iterations of the lab activities to

Conference Session

Engineering Technology Potpourri

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Maher Shehadi, Purdue University, West Lafayette

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Technology

using equation (2), as shown.Qact = Qfan × Cc = 750 cfm (354 lit/s) (1)V = Q / A = 750 / 0.25 = 3000 fpm = 34 mph (2)The scaled F1 car was compared to full size F1-car. Thus, assuming the dynamic viscosity forair in the wind tunnel was the same as in real race and equating the Reynolds number gave theneeded velocity of air inside the testing section as shown in equation (3), where Vm is the modelcar velocity, Vcar is the actual car velocity, and 𝜌 is the density. With a model air velocity of 34mph inside the testing section, using a volume ratio for car-to-model of 18:1 and if density of airat 20 C is 1.2 kg/m3 then when using the ideal gas law, the velocity of the