their motivations, identity development, and impact of prior engineering-related experiences. Her work dwells into learning in informal settings such as summer camps, military experiences, and extra-curricular activities. Other research interests involve validation of CFD models for aerospace and industrial applications, as well as optimizing efficiency of thermal-fluid systems.Dr. Cheryl Q. Li, University of New Haven Cheryl Qing Li joined University of New Haven in the fall of 2011, where she is an Associate Professor of Mechanical Engineering. Cheryl earned her first Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering from National Uni- versity of Singapore in 1997. She served as Assistant Professor and subsequently Associate
prepare anelevator pitch based on the two-semester-long capstone design project as part of a companioncourse called Senior Innovation. The competition starts in class and then moves to extra-curricular rounds for cash prizes. The semi-finals and finals were traditionally held as 3-minutelive pitches made in front of a panel of judges with a follow-up of 2 minutes of question andanswer (Q&A) period. Due to COVID-19, Stevens went entirely online after seven weeks of in-person classes in the Spring semester. While coaching can be online, the elevator pitchcompetition required a new format for the pitch competition.Conducting live-video pitches has the risk that an internet connectivity disruption during thepresentation can scuttle a perfectly
. 38.[6] Y. Xing, “Cultural identity: Synergy, motivation and self-organization,” Theoretical Exploration, no. 4, pp. 56-60, 2017.[7] Q. Xu, “Cultural foundation of entrepreneurship education in China’s universities: Theoretical interpretation and consolidated paths,” Journal of Higher Education Management, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 82-88,124, 2020.[8] Q. Xu, “Cultural foundation of entrepreneurship education in China’s universities: Theoretical interpretation and consolidated paths,” Journal of Higher Education Management, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 82-88,124, 2020.[9] S. Zhou, “The analysis on the types of enterprise education of higher institutions in America under the effect of pragmatic culture and its inspiration,” Studies In
timeto wrap up conversations before resuming. Once in presentation mode, the host can share theircamera, screen, websites, and videos they may wish to show. Hosts can also invite guests on a"stage," where they can share their camera and screen. Presenters also can record the entiresession to share later. While in presentation mode, another helpful feature is the "Q&A" option,where guests can create questions anonymously that they wish to be answered by the presenterand arrange these questions by importance and popularity. This feature can also be used forpolling the audience about selected topics or as a quiz to check for understanding [8]Use of Remo for Classes, Workshops, and Community Outreach Programs Even though the original
. Proceedings of the 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Tampa, FL.Kuratko, D. F. & Morris, M. H. (2018) Examining the Future Trajectory of Entrepreneurship. Journal of Small Business Management. 56(1): 11-23.Li, C. Q., Harichandran, R. S., Erdil, N. O., Carnasciali, M., & Nocito-Gobel, J. (2019). Assessing the growth in entrepreneurial mind-set acquired through curricular and extra- curricular components. Proceedings of the 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Tampa, FL.London, J. S., Bekki, J. M., Brunhaver, S. R., Carberry, A. R., McKenna, A. F., (2018). A Framework for Entrepreneurial Mindsets and Behaviors in Undergraduate Engineering Students: Operationalizing the Kern
. Carberry, J. S. London, and A. F. Mckenna, “Development of the Engineering Student Entrepreneurial Mindset Assessment (ESEMA),” Advances in Engineering Education, 7(1), pp. 1–12, 2018. 6. C. Q. Li, R. S. Harichandran, M. I. Carnasciali, N. O. Erdil, and J. Nocito-Gobel, “Development of an instrument to measure the entrepreneurial mindset of engineering students,” ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings, June 2016. 7. S. E. Zappe, “Avoiding construct confusion: An attribute-focused approach to assessing entrepreneurial mindset,” Advances in Engineering Education, 7(1), 1–12. 2018. 8. J. D. Novak and B. Gowin, Learning How to Learn, Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, 1984, pp. 36
students. The overallstructure and organization of the class, weekly presentations, and discussions, and learning socialinnovations as an interdisciplinary topic were well received by the students.Table 4: Summary of student feedback on the class Survey Q: We welcome your written comments below. What is something/are some things that the instructor does well e.g. something you hope that the instructor continues to do in the class in the future? “In general the course is perfect, but it is too much material for the time of a summer class” “The instructor has great ideas that he introduced to the class and fostered discussion. Introduced a great number of innovations” “Well-thought topics, organized discussions, good moderation, and
Experience, Proceedings of the ASEE 126th Annual Conference and Exposition,” 2019.[8] S. Luryi et al., “Entrepreneurship in engineering education,” in 2007 37th annual frontiers in education conference-global engineering: knowledge without borders, opportunities without passports, 2007, pp. T2E-10.[9] N. Duval-Couetil, T. Reed-Rhoads, and S. Haghighi, “Engineering students and entrepreneurship education: Involvement, attitudes and outcomes,” Int. J. Eng. Educ., vol. 28, no. 2, p. 425, 2012.[10] Q. Jin et al., “Entrepreneurial career choice and characteristics of engineering and business students,” Int. J. Eng. Educ., vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 598–613, 2016.[11] M. W. Ohland, S. A. Frillman, G. Zhang, C. E