Asee peer logo
advanced search
Displaying results 31 - 34 of 34 in total

Faculty Development Aimed at Sustaining and Enhancing Entrepreneurial-minded Learning

Conference Session
Faculty Development 3: Research, Practice, and Lessons Learned
Collection
2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Nadiye O. Erdil, University of New Haven; Ronald S. Harichandran, University of New Haven; Maria-Isabel Carnasciali, University of New Haven; Jean Nocito-Gobel, University of New Haven; Goli Nossoni, University of New Haven; Emese Hadnagy, University of New Haven; Joseph A. Levert, University of New Haven; Junhui Zhao, University of New Haven
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Faculty Development Division
years compared to earlier years as reflected in the sample data shownin Table 3, and we believe this is largely due to increased faculty engagement and positivityrelated to EML. Table 3 Average Student Ratings Related to E-learning Modules Question 2015* (n = 98) Fall 2020* (n = 133) The instructor reinforced what you learned in the e-learning 3.58 3.95 module through an assignment or a project The assignment or the project was effective in reinforcing 3.44 3.91 what you learned
Relevance Score: 0.005696932

A Rapid and Formative Response by the Engineering Education Faculty to Support the Engineering Faculty and Students Throughout the Extreme Classroom Changes Resulting from the COVID-19 Pandemic

Conference Session
Faculty Development Lighting Talk Session 1: COVID-19 Focus
Collection
2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Lance Leon Allen White, Texas A&M University; Donna Jaison, Texas A&M University; Samantha Ray, Texas A&M University; Kelly Brumbelow, Texas A&M University; Sherecce Fields, Texas A&M University; Luciana R. Barroso, Texas A&M University; Karan Watson P.E., Texas A&M University; Tracy Anne Hammond, Texas A&M University
Tagged Divisions
Faculty Development Division
equity, reflected in her publications, research, teaching,service, and mentoring. More at http://srl.tamu.edu. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 A Rapid and Formative Response by the Engineering Education Faculty to Support the Engineering Faculty and Students throughout the Extreme Classroom Changes Resulting from the COVID-19 Pandemic Lance L.A. White Donna Jaison Samantha Ray Dr. Kelly Brumbelow Dr. Sherecce Fields Dr. Luciana R. Barroso Dr. Karan Watson P.E. Dr. Tracy HammondIntroductionThe planning and consideration for complex issues
Relevance Score: 0.005696932

Learning from the Student Experience: Impact of Shelter-in-Place on the Learning Experiences of Engineering Students at SJSU

Conference Session
Faculty Development 4: COVID-19's Impact on Students
Collection
2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Patricia R. Backer, San Jose State University; Maria Chierichetti, San Jose State University; Laura E. Sullivan-Green, San Jose State University; Liat Rosenfeld, San Jose State University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Faculty Development Division
instructors adopted digital technologies “as a replacement forthe missing physical learning environments, with the learning process remaining the same. Thisresulted in ineffective learning when compared to traditional face-to-face learning environments”(p. 294). 82 students in the Qatar study participated in written reflections about their experiencesand eight students were interviewed. The students felt that the emergency remote learningenvironment needed to “be supported by teaching activities that involve more participationthrough interactive activities and teamwork” [15, p. 13]. Overall, the surveys and interviewsshowed that the quality of instruction suffered after the move to remote teaching in Spring 2020.MethodologyThe results in this paper
Relevance Score: 0.004747443

Work in Progress: The Challenges of Evaluating ADVANCE Initiative's Effectiveness in the Progress of Women Faculty in Engineering

Conference Session
Faculty Development Lightning Talk Session 2
Collection
2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Matilde Luz Sanchez-Pena, University at Buffalo; Syed Ali Kamal, Independent Researcher
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Faculty Development Division
level contributes to this vision. Despite some gains in recent decades, women faculty inengineering are still underrepresented. Between 2006 and 2016, the proportion of women facultyin engineering grew from 16% to 23% at the assistant level, from 11.9% to 18.3% at theassociate level, and from 3.8% to 10.6% at the full professor level [2], [3]. While the proportionof women faculty at the lower ranks has increased significantly, the limited representation ofwomen at higher faculty ranks limits their potential for reaching leadership roles andcontribution with significant decision-making to influence engineering education [4]. Althoughthe presented gains are of value, and may already reflect the effect of multiple initiativesimplemented to support
Relevance Score: 0.004747443