Asee peer logo
advanced search
Displaying all 6 results

Visual Teaching Philosophy Empowering Inclusive Learning and Managing Expectations

Conference Session
Working Together: Approaches to Inclusivity and Interdisciplinarity
Collection
2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Tawfik Elshehabi, University of Wyoming
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
New Engineering Educators
Senior Lecturer, University of WyomingAbstractEducators revisit their teaching philosophy statement (TPS) when applying for new jobs orpromotion and tenure. However, sharing our teaching philosophy with our students could make asignificant difference. This research presents the results of creating a visual model of myteaching philosophy and sharing it with my students. My teaching philosophy informs mystudents that we learn in teams to gain not only technical knowledge but also skills and ethics. Itexpresses to students that my core values are to care, share, and be fair. I care about their life-long learning, as well as achieving fair grades. The visual model also shows the different levelsof engagement and communication; student-to-student and
Relevance Score: 0.02202883

Tools for Detecting Plagiarism in Online Exams

Conference Session
Tools and Strategies for Teaching Online Courses
Collection
2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Edward F. Gehringer, North Carolina State University at Raleigh; Ashwini Menon; Guoyi Wang
Tagged Divisions
New Engineering Educators
., Englander, F. & Wang, Z. Do Online Exams Facilitate Cheating? An Experiment Designedto Separate Possible Cheating from the Effect of the Online Test Taking Environment. J. Acad Ethics 12,101–112 (2014).[7] R. Harmon, Oskar, and James Lambrinos. 2008. "Are Online Exams An Invitation To Cheat?".Journal of Economic Education 39:2, 116-125 (2008). https://doi.org/10.3200/JECE.39.2.116-125.[8] M. Alessio, Helaine, Nancy Malay, Karsten Maurer, A. John Bailer, and Beth Rubin.. "ExaminingThe Effect Of Proctoring On Online Test Scores". Online Learning 21:1 (2017)https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1140251.pdf.[9] Richard Ladyshewsky, “Post-graduate student performance in ‘supervised in-class’ vs. ‘unsupervisedonline’ multiple choice tests
Relevance Score: 0.015738158

Building Research Skills through Being a Peer Reviewer

Conference Session
Enhancing Teaching and Research
Collection
2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Lisa Benson, Clemson University; Rebecca A. Bates, Minnesota State University, Mankato; Karin Jensen, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign; Gary Lichtenstein, Arizona State University; Kelsey Watts, Clemson University; Evan Ko, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign; Balsam Albayati
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
New Engineering Educators
from https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-020-01622-z[23] J. Walther, N. W. Sochacka & N. N. Kellam, “Quality in Interpretive Engineering Education Research: Reflections on an Example Study,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 102, no. 4, pp. 626–659, 2014. doi.org/10.1002/jee.20029[24] N.W. Sochacka, J. Walther & A. L. Pawley, “Ethical Validation: Reframing Research Ethics in Engineering Education Research To Improve Research Quality,” Journal of Engineering Education, 107(3): 362-379, 2018. doi:10.1002/jee.20222
Relevance Score: 0.013489849

Inclusivity Meter: Tracing How it Worked and What Was Learned

Conference Session
Working Together: Approaches to Inclusivity and Interdisciplinarity
Collection
2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Kenya Z Mejia, University of Washington; Yen-Lin Han, Seattle University; Jennifer A. Turns, University of Washington
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
New Engineering Educators
ethics, and implicit bias. Students constantly replied to other’s posts and shared knowledge among themselves on the board. This was a common, but intentional practice. 5. Created a dedicated Microsoft TEAMS site for all senior design teams to communicate virtually. This was a common practice, but more important during the virtual quarter. 6. Met with each team throughout the quarter to identify any changes in team dynamics. The educator asked “how are you doing” each time. 7. Used the "Inclusivity Meter" to check in with students weekly, which provided an avenue for students to reflect and voice their concerns using an
Relevance Score: 0.009538764

A Take on the Process of Proposal Development and the Scaling of Teams Towards Development of Competitive Proposals: A “Group Genius” Approach

Conference Session
Working Together: Approaches to Inclusivity and Interdisciplinarity
Collection
2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Pedro E. Arce, Tennessee Technological University; Andrea Arce-Trigatti, Tallahassee Community College; Stephanie Jorgensen; Robby Sanders, Tennessee Technological University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
New Engineering Educators
with an aim to adopt a more responsible view ofsocial and environmental concerns. The proposal was submitted to and funded by VentureWell, anorganization that supports, trains, and aids science and technology innovators in building networksand securing resources to solve societal problems.(4.2.1) The ChallengeThe T-shaped style engineering model requires training in societally-responsible approachesincluding sensitivity about concerns that affect nature, such as the environmental pollutiongenerated by the development of new technology. Members of the RFRG piloted a PIT through therevitalization of a course centered on professional ethics supported by a Quality EnhancementProgram (QEP) proposal from our university [28] which focused on case
Relevance Score: 0.009538764

Differences in Perceptions of Instructional Support between U.S. and International Students Before and During COVID-19

Conference Session
Perspectives on Engineering Education During COVID-19
Collection
2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Ziyan Bai, University of Washington; Denise Wilson, University of Washington; Shruti Misra, University of Washington; Morgan Anderson, University of Washington, Seattle; Neha Kardam, University of Washington
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
New Engineering Educators
cultures of college and universitycampuses across the U.S., international students still face difficulty as they enter the U.S. andbegin their education. Difficulty with the English language, culture shock, and differencesbetween the education systems in their home country and those of the U.S. are compounded bydiscriminatory behaviors and biases that many international students face in their everyday livesand classroom experiences [5]. Gaining a greater understanding of these experiences, how theydiffer from those of U.S. students, and how faculty and TAs can better support internationalstudents not only benefits the U.S. in many ways but is also an ethical responsibility for faculty,staff, and others involved in the lives of these
Relevance Score: 0.0079489695