Displaying all 12 results
- Conference Session
- Technological and Engineering Literacy-Philosophy of Engineering (TELPhe) Division Technical Session 3 / Perspectives on Advances in Promoting Technological Literacy
- Collection
- 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
- Authors
- Rachel Shannon, Iowa State University of Science and Technology; Mani Mina, Iowa State University of Science and Technology
- Tagged Topics
- Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
- Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering
,andconclusionsorrecommendationsexpressedin thismaterialarethoseoftheauthor(s)anddonotnecessarilyreflecttheviewsoftheNSF. References [1]Jolly,J.L.(2009).HistoricalPerspectives:TheNationalDefenseEducationAct,Current STEMInitiative,andtheGifted.GiftedChildToday,32(2),50–53. https://doi.org/10.4219/gct-2009-873 [2]Zeidler,D.L.(2016).STEMeducation:Adeficitframeworkforthetwentyfirstcentury?A socioculturalsocioscientificresponse.C ulturalStudiesofScienceEducation,11(1),11-26. [4] Riley,D.(2008).Engineeringandsocialjustice.SynthesisLecturesonEngineers, Technology,andSociety,3(1
- Conference Session
- TELPhE Division Technical Session 2: The Broadening Face of Engineering Education
- Collection
- 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
- Authors
- Mousumi Roy P.E., University of Connecticut
- Tagged Divisions
- Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering
, “Disciplinarities: intra, cross, multi, inter, trans”, 2012, [Online] Available:https://www.arj.no/.2012/03/12/disciplinarities-2 (Accessed Feb. 2, 2020)[13] Mishra, P., Terry, C. A., & Henriksen, D. (2013). Square peg, round hole, goodengineering. TechTrends, 57(2), 22.[14] Nobel Media AB 2020, “The Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine 1962”, Sun. 2 Feb2020. [Online] Available: https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/medicine/1962/summary/ 19[15] S. Silverthorne, “Remembering Alfred Chandler,” 15 JUN 2007, [Online] Available:https://hbswk.hbs.edu/item/remembering-alfred-chandler(Accessed Feb. 2, 2020)[16] Chien, S. (Ed.). (2010). Tributes to Yuan-Cheng Fung
- Conference Session
- TELPhE Division Technical Session 2: The Broadening Face of Engineering Education
- Collection
- 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
- Authors
- Katherine Robert, University of Denver
- Tagged Topics
- Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
- Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering
- Conference Session
- TELPhE Division Technical Session 2: The Broadening Face of Engineering Education
- Collection
- 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
- Authors
- Angela R. Bielefeldt, University of Colorado Boulder
- Tagged Topics
- Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
- Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering
word count for compassion than kindness) and 21 papersalso discussed empathy (6 with higher word count for empathy than kindness). Related termsthat commonly appeared in these 29 papers also included: caring (20 papers), respect(ful) (17papers), ethic(s/al) (15 papers), and altrui(sm/stic) (14 papers). A detailed exploration of notionsof care in engineering was conducted by Strobel et al. [41]. Kindness may be more active andpersonal than care, as in showing kindness to others (or even oneself), and avoids potentialconfusion around notions of care and diligence in conducting accurate calculations. This quickanalysis shows the inter-relatedness of the ideas of kindness, compassion, empathy, and caring,illustrated somewhat more clearly in the
- Conference Session
- TELPhE Division Technical Session 2: The Broadening Face of Engineering Education
- Collection
- 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
- Authors
- Corey T. Schimpf, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York (CoE)
- Tagged Topics
- Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
- Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering
qualitative approach for examining language mediated frames that highlight someaspects of social reality while obscuring other aspects [52]. These frames or discourses may bespoken or communicated through “texts”, including the multimodal texts like videogames [11],[53]. To identify any discourses in Iconoclasts, the author analyzed the recorded dialogue fromthe game and associated notes on the story or storytelling from the research journal. Particularattention was given to engineering and technology topics and what was being included or excludedabout the topic, what assumptions the discourse(s) carried and which characters were invoking thediscourse(s). Previous engineering education research was reviewed to help connect the discoursesin
- Conference Session
- TELPhE Division Technical Session 1: Expanding Technological and Engineering Literacies
- Collection
- 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
- Authors
- Neelam Prabhu Gaunkar, Iowa State University of Science and Technology; Sara Kaye Jones; Mani Mina, Iowa State University of Science and Technology
- Tagged Topics
- Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
- Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering
ideationsKeywords: Inquiry-base, student role, real-time feedback, dynamic classrooms, autonomyAbstractIn this work, we address the role(s) students play during their education. While the students’ mainrole is to learn, it is observed that in most classrooms, students approach learning through the lensof the instructor’s vision. The authors have experienced it in engineering as well as technologicalliteracy classes, with some differences. For this paper we focus on the engineering students. Inrecent years, newer pedagogical approaches and improvements in instruction techniques haveexpanded the student’s view from this lens [1,2]. Nonetheless, students who are taking more thana few classes with heavy syllabi tend to focus on finishing the classes with
- Conference Session
- TELPhE Division Technical Session 1: Expanding Technological and Engineering Literacies
- Collection
- 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
- Authors
- Alan Cheville, Bucknell University; John Heywood, Trinity College Dublin
- Tagged Topics
- Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
- Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering
definitions, general criterion 3 student outcomes, and general criterion 5 curriculum,” 2015.[3] B. Seely, “‘Patterns in the History of Engineering Education Reform: A Brief Essay,’” in Educating the engineer of 2020: Adapting engineering education to the new century, Washington D.C.: National Academcy Press, 2005, pp. 114–130.[4] M. S. Schiro, Curriculum Theory: Conflicting Visions and Enduring Concerns. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2012.[5] E. T. Pascarella and P. T. Terenzini, How college affects students. 2005.[6] A. Akera, D. M. Riley, R. A. Cheville, J. Karlin, and T. A. DePree, “The Distributed System of Governance in Engineering Education: A Report on Initial Findings,” in Proc. of the Amer. Soc
- Conference Session
- TELPhE Division Technical Session 2: The Broadening Face of Engineering Education
- Collection
- 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
- Authors
- Y. Curtis Wang, California State University, Los Angeles; Jim Kuo, California State University, Los Angeles; He Shen, California State University, Los Angeles; David E. Raymond, California State University, Los Angeles; Mathias J. Brieu, California State University, Los Angeles
- Tagged Topics
- Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
- Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering
Multicultural Education: A Renewed Paradigm of Transformation, p. 20.[7] G. May, M. Taisch, A. Bettoni, O. Maghazei, A. Matarazzo, and B. Stahl, “A New Human- centric Factory Model,” Procedia CIRP, vol. 26, pp. 103–108, 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.procir.2014.07.112.[8] S. Hadjerrouit, “Learner-Centered Web-Based Instruction in Software Engineering,” IEEE Trans. Educ., vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 99–104, Feb. 2005, doi: 10.1109/TE.2004.832871.[9] B. Altay, “User-centered design through learner-centered instruction,” vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 138–155, Feb. 2014, doi: 10.1080/13562517.2013.827646.[10] P. Debiec, “Effective Learner-Centered Approach for Teaching an Introductory Digital Systems Course,” IEEE Trans. Educ., vol. 61, no. 1, pp. 38–45, Feb
- Conference Session
- TELPhE Division Technical Session 1: Expanding Technological and Engineering Literacies
- Collection
- 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
- Authors
- John Krupczak Jr, Hope College; A. Mehran Shahhosseini, Indiana State University; Darin R. Stephenson, Hope College
- Tagged Divisions
- Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering
/sea_fac_articles/201. 7. J. Froyd, L. Pchenitchnaia, D. Fowler, and N. Simpson, Systems Thinking and Integrative Learning Outcomes paper presented at 2007 Annual Conference & Exposition, Honolulu, Hawaii. 8. D.V. Behl, and S. Ferreira, “Systems Thinking: An Analysis of Key Factors and Relationships.” Procedia Computer Science, Complex Adaptive Systems, Philadelphia, PA Nov. 3-5, 2014, vol. 36, pp. 104–9, Jan 1, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2014.09.045. 9. F. Camelia and T. Ferris, “Systems Thinking in Systems Engineering,” INCOSE International Symposium, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 1657–74, Jul. 1, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2334- 5837.2016.00252.x. 10. R.D. Arnold and J.P. Wade, “A Complete Set
- Conference Session
- TELPhE Division Technical Session 1: Expanding Technological and Engineering Literacies
- Collection
- 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
- Authors
- John Heywood, Trinity College Dublin
- Tagged Divisions
- Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering
technologicalliteracy is not a “knowledge(s)” but a “competence” as the term is commonly used. It followsthat technological literacy is not a discipline but a way of understanding the technologicalworld in which we live in order for us to control it.A technologically competent public requires of any serious failure, to know if its cause can becontributed to any person or persons. If a public enquiry is held into an event, the publicneeds to know that the person in charge of the enquiry can be trusted: but, they also need toaccept that the specification, that is the question asked of that person, will provide theanswers they need, that attempts will be made apportion blame, and that where rectification isrequired that it will be expedited and done properly
- Conference Session
- Technological and Engineering Literacy-Philosophy of Engineering (TELPhe) Division Technical Session 3 / Perspectives on Advances in Promoting Technological Literacy
- Collection
- 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
- Authors
- Jayanta Kumar Banerjee, University of Puerto Rico, Mayaguez Campus
- Tagged Topics
- Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
- Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering
; Productivity Press, Norwalk (Connecticut). 8. Banerjee, J.; The Gap Management; Journal of Computer and Industrial Engineering; 1997, v. 33, n. 1 - 2, pp. 173 – 178. 9. Dewey, J.; Experience and Education (60th Anniversary edition); 1998; Delta, Kappa, Pi; West Lafayette (Indiana). 10. Kuhn, T. S.; The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (Encyclopedia of Unified Sciences); 1962; University of Chicago Press. 11. Banerjee, J.; “Integration of Mechanical Properties of Materials in an Undergraduate Course on Manufacturing Processes for both Mechanical and Industrial Engineering Students”; ASEE Annual Convention ( virtual), June 2020.12. Reif, R.; Tech Day Presidential Welcome Speech;2014; Massachusetts
- Conference Session
- Technological and Engineering Literacy-Philosophy of Engineering (TELPhe) Division Technical Session 3 / Perspectives on Advances in Promoting Technological Literacy
- Collection
- 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
- Authors
- Sayyad Zahid Qamar, Sultan Qaboos University; Ramanathan Arunachalam, Sultan Qaboos University; Sayyad Basim Qamar, Texas A&M University
- Tagged Divisions
- Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering
conceptualizing, applying, analyzing, synthesizing, and/or evaluatinginformation gathered from, or generated by, observation, experience, reflection, reasoning, orcommunication, as a guide to belief and action.” In simpler words, CT involves the three majorskills of analysis, synthesis, and evaluation which are the higher order thinking skills accordingto Bloom’s Taxonomy [9]. A more general and rudimentary definition of CT was coined by Qiao[10], proposing that critical thinking is the same as “scientific thinking.” This instinctivelyredirects us to what is known as the “scientific method” [11] that consists of the well-knownsteps: define a question; gather relevant information; form an explanatory hypothesis; conductexperiment/s to test the hypothesis