- Conference Session
- TELPhE Division Technical Session 2: The Broadening Face of Engineering Education
- Collection
- 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
- Authors
-
Angela R. Bielefeldt, University of Colorado Boulder
- Tagged Topics
-
Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
-
Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering
may be more universally achievable. Kindness avoids setting up ahierarchy. There are not ‘victims’. We don’t need to understand the particulars of circumstancesand sit in judgement. Kindness is also associated with the positive emotions of happiness andjoy, in contrast with compassion [27]. Further discussion of the affordances of kindness as amodel for engineering are discussed after the literature survey process.Connections between kindness and other concepts that resulted from an attempt to summarizethe literature are shown in Figure 1. While certainly not exhaustive, keeping these relationshipsin mind is helpful.Figure 1. Concept map for kindnessLiteratureA number of publications discuss the idea of kindness and the related concepts of
- Conference Session
- TELPhE Division Technical Session 2: The Broadening Face of Engineering Education
- Collection
- 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
- Authors
-
Katherine Robert, University of Denver
- Tagged Topics
-
Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
-
Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering
Paper ID #34465WIP Knowing Engineering Through the Arts: The Impact of the Film Hid-denFigures on Perceptions of Engineering Using Arts-Based Research MethodsKatherine Robert, University of Denver Katherine is a doctoral candidate at the University of Denver’s Morgridge School of Education in the higher education department. In her dissertation research, she uses arts-based research methods, new materialist theory, and is guided by culturally responsive methodological principles to collaborate with underrepresented engineering students to uncover their experiences of socialization into the professional engineering culture
- Conference Session
- TELPhE Division Technical Session 1: Expanding Technological and Engineering Literacies
- Collection
- 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
- Authors
-
Alan Cheville, Bucknell University; John Heywood, Trinity College Dublin
- Tagged Topics
-
Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
-
Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering
Engineering Education. Practice and Policy. Hoboken, N. J.: IEEE Press, 2016.[19] S. L. Goldman, “The Social Captivity of Engineering,” in Critical Perspectives on Nonacademic Science and Engineering, P. Durbin, Ed. Bethlehem, PA: Lehigh University Press, 1991.[20] J. Krupczak and G. Bassett, “Work in progress: Abstraction as a vector: Distinguishing engineering and science,” in Proceedings - Frontiers in Education Conference, FIE, 2012.[21] J. Trevelyan, The Making of an Expert Engineer. London: CRC Press, 2014.[22] J. Bruner, Actual Minds, Possible Worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1987.[23] C. P. Snow, The Two Cultures and the Scientific Revolution. London: Cambridge University Press, 1959.[24] R
- Conference Session
- TELPhE Division Technical Session 1: Expanding Technological and Engineering Literacies
- Collection
- 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
- Authors
-
John Heywood, Trinity College Dublin
- Tagged Divisions
-
Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering
influences values, but values do and should influencetechnology. At the same time values also inform organizational behaviour and structure; thus,in understanding any failure, these have to be taken into account since they might be theultimate cause of failure.Another variant of the diagram shows a two tiered base with the bottom tier being labelledconscience. Employees may be faced with adapting to a culture that leads to poor design, afew may speak their mind, others may be afraid to speak out. Such problems easily becomematters of conscience and personal (mental) conflict. Issues of this kind have been largelyignored by contributors to TELPhE.Krupczak et als view of engineering as process requires some amplification. In essence it is asocio
- Conference Session
- TELPhE Division Technical Session 1: Expanding Technological and Engineering Literacies
- Collection
- 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
- Authors
-
Neelam Prabhu Gaunkar, Iowa State University of Science and Technology; Sara Kaye Jones; Mani Mina, Iowa State University of Science and Technology
- Tagged Topics
-
Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
-
Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering
Paper ID #33921The Challenge: The Role of the Student in Engineering and TechnologicalLiteracy Programs, Perspectives, Discussions, and IdeationsNeelam Prabhu Gaunkar, Iowa State University of Science and TechnologySara Kaye Jones Sara Jones has a BS and MS in Electrical Engineering from Iowa State University. She currently works as a certification engineer in the aviation sector.Dr. Mani Mina, Iowa State University of Science and Technology Mani Mina is with the department of Industrial Design and Electrical and Computer Engineering at Iowa State University. He has been working on better understanding of students’ learning