Displaying all 4 results
- Conference Session
- Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 7
- Collection
- 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
- Authors
- Leanne Kallemeyn, Loyola University Chicago; Gail Baura, Loyola University Chicago; Francisca Fils-Aime, Loyola University Chicago; Jana Grabarek; Pete Livas Jr, Loyola University Chicago
- Tagged Topics
- Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
- Women in Engineering
-as-usual. Social justice should not be invisible in engineering education and practice [52]. Facultyprovide social justice examples from all three specializations throughout the curriculum. In addition, faculty embed four social justice case study projects in four semesters of thecurriculum: ENGR 101: Introduction to Freshman Design, ENGR 201: Experiential Engineering,ENGR 321: Electronic Circuits & Devices, and ENGR 381/382/383: Specialty Capstone DesignI. The case study format varies each semester. Freshmen groups are introduced to the case studyapproach in ENGR 101, when each group reviews assigned documents of a case, and then laterdescribes the case to other groups during a reserved course meeting. These sets of case
- Conference Session
- Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 8
- Collection
- 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
- Authors
- Shelly Gulati, University of the Pacific
- Tagged Topics
- Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
- Women in Engineering
, quiet environment and then 5 min afterwards to write down theirreflections. During the session, some students shared their experiences with the visualizationand described their inner mentor.Session 2: Fear and Unhooking from Praise and CriticismThis session began with a discussion on distinctions of fear brought forward in the book.Pachad is defined as the fear of projected or imagined things. Yirah is a different fear thatcomes forward when connected to a calling or life’s dream. This inspired space brings outfeelings of expansiveness, exhilaration, or awe. In the session there was time to journal aboutexperiences with both fears. Then if there were willing participants, they shared experiences ofyirah with the group.The second part of the
- Conference Session
- Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 7
- Collection
- 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
- Authors
- Giannina Costa, Universidad Andres Bello; Juan Felipe Calderón, Universidad Andres Bello; David Ruete, Universidad Andres Bello; Danilo Leal, Universidad Andres Bello; Lilian Pamela San Martín Medina, Universidad Andres Bello
- Tagged Topics
- Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
- Women in Engineering
Engineering Sciences. At present, his position is Director of the School of Engineering of the Andres Bello University, and responsible for the curricular innovation processes of the undergraduate programs of the Faculty of Engineering. His research area is Educational Management, undergraduate and graduate programs, using predictive models based on machine learning algorithms.Ing. Danilo Leal, Universidad Andres Bello Doctor (c) in Statistics, thesis in Spatio-temporal point processes on the sphere, Master in industrial en- gineering, Master in Management (minor in Finance) and Commercial Engineer, professional experience in evaluation projects, and management control focused on budget control and provides several types
- Conference Session
- Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 1
- Collection
- 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
- Authors
- Susan Thomson Tripathy, University of Massachusetts Lowell; Kavitha Chandra, University of Massachusetts Lowell; Hsien-Yuan Hsu, University of Massachusetts Lowell; Yanfen Li, University of Massachusetts Lowell; Diane Reichlen, University of Massachusetts Lowell
- Tagged Topics
- Diversity
- Tagged Divisions
- Women in Engineering
ranging from the curriculum requirements of non-engineering courses andengineering capstone projects to the need for engineering instructors to be less negative and moreinformed about the best way to create equitable team projects and articulate their outcomes. Oneof the key recommendations was that students saw the need for and welcomed more suchopportunities to vocalize their concerns and collaborate together in a safe space. It was evidentthat the peer-facilitators were clearly able to convey the goals of the FGs and encourage an open-conversation.3.3 Data Analysis of Open-Ended Questions on Surveys of FG Participants and PeerFacilitators3.3.1 Survey One: Evaluations of the FGs by Student Participants and Peer Facilitators Immediately