summarized in Table 1 and are organized according to phases ofthe ongoing project to develop the applets. Essentially, phase 1 has been completed and areavailable for use by instructors. Phase 2 will be completed during 2021 and available near the endof the calendar year.As structural steel design often comes in the beginning of students’ experience in structural design.Typically, there is a bit of a learning curve surrounding how design problems are approached. So,some initial applets are aimed at orienting the students’ view around building plans and flow offorces. Then, the typical flow of topics is tension members, connections, compression members,beams, and combined axial and bending. In addition, the later applets will cover some
Alliance (NCIIA). EMSresearch continued with support from the National Science Foundation (grant number 1636442).References[1] M. J. Fernandez, J. M. Trenor, K. S. Zerda and C. Cortes, "First generation college studentsin engineering: A qualitative investigation of barriers to academic plans.," in IEEE 38th AnnualFrontiers in Education Conference, Saratoga Springs, NY, 2008.[2] J. M. Trenor, S. L. Yu, W. C. L. and K. S. Zerda, "Influences for selecting engineering:Insights on access to Social Capital from two case studies.," in IEEE 38th Annual Frontiers inEducation Conference, Saratoga Springs, NY, 2008.[3] J. M. Trenor, " A phenomenological inquiry of the major choice processes of an overlookeddemographic: First generation college students in
1 deadlines for a given timeframe; documents team progress, planning and evolution of design plan ● Primary Research Lead: Plans and leads client interview, user observations, user testing; oversees documentation of this research ● Secondary Research Lead: Establishes relationships and conducts interviews with subject-matter experts, discovers and extracts standards, ideas, and opportunities from relevant and credible sources; oversees analysis, synthesis, and documentation of these findings ● Training-Building-Testing Lead: Establishes relationships with shop staff, lab directors, and key equipment vendors, arranges training on equipment, places materials orders, coordinates team
development platform. Students also worked together to createand submit their lab reports using MS OneNote. The instructors used code sharing and OneNoteto help students during lab sessions. The IoT capabilities of the microcontrollers made it possiblefor students and the instructors to monitor another student’s microcontroller [8] remotely andwas useful for debugging. Overall, the labs were successful as they retained hands-onexperiences with little compromise to the originally planned lab content. However, there wereseveral challenges. First, some students did not have reliable WiFi. This affected Zoommeetings, their ability to collaborate and debug remotely, and the IoT services to their devices.Second, helping students debug circuits was
(PjBL), engineering, and culturally relevant curriculum that fit the specific needs of the studentsthey serve.To ensure the alignment of the independent RET program's goals and the NSF's objectives, variousuniversity RET programs have utilized evaluation methods that capture short-term data such as theprogram's impact on the teacher or lesson plan implementation with diverse populations. This paperinvestigates the connection between our RET program and long-term female and minority studentachievement in the forms of high school graduation rates and undergraduate STEM major selectionrates using a state agency K-12 and higher education database. As a comparison, state agency datafrom students of nonRET teachers within the same schools and grade
Paper ID #33924Multiple Setups Analysis of Industrial Robotic OperationDr. Hayder Zghair P.E., Pennsylvania State University American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Multiple Setups Analysis of Industrial Robotic OperationAbstractAn operation motion program of industrial robots based on points location learning. Robotic’ speed andpath termination of the motion are cumulatively essential variables for the programming and analysis interms of resulting robotic trajectory resolution (RTR). An efficient cycle time is required to plan theutilization of industrial robotic
analysis included showing the participants a water and wastewater system and having them classify the various stages according to the Component Model elements.• Infrastructure Assessment Model- this model was developed at USMA to supplement the engineering education curriculum on infrastructure prior to being written into TR-14-14 and has been used in several Army officer education courses. The Assessment Model focuses on the following six prompts to rapidly assess and describe the status of infrastructure components and systems. 1. REQUIRED – What’s needed? 2. READY – What’s present? 3. ORGANIZED – How is the system coordinated? 4. REDUNDANT – Is there a spare? 5. PREPARED – Is there a plan for
part of the student experience. Therefore, it is desirable todevelop strategies and action plans enabling the continuation of the in-person lab experienceduring public health crises such as the COVID-19 pandemic.The purposes of this paper are: 1) to provide guidelines and best practices to Unit Operationscourses which have not yet returned to in-person instruction, 2) to record experiences andstrategies from the COVID-19 pandemic to inform future instructors and administrators in theevent of another pandemic or similar event, and 3) to present and discuss student perceptions ofthe lab experience.2 Unit Operations Course at Ohio StateThe Unit Operations course at Ohio State is one of the largest in the nation, with an averageenrollment of
comfortable returning to face-to-face instruction. Kristina had not planned oncompleting her second practicum in an online and virtual context, but as expected, tackled thechallenge with enthusiasm and excitement. Her cooperating teacher, Holly, is considered bymany to be a technology leader in the school and across the district, and Kristina was eager toexperience online teaching and learning under her guidance.Kristina shared on several different occasions how much this experience impacted her thinkingabout science instruction and shared some notable impacts on her perceptions of engineering andhow to best teach STEM content. Most importantly, Kristina’s confidence in teachingengineering increased considerably from the start of the project to the
desired a way to see the progression of a student's coding. The auto-grader’s web interfacedoes provide links to all submitted code, but that was insufficient -- manually examining each code rundidn't provide a quick or easy way to gain insight on what the student changed in the code.This paper describes a tool we developed to automatically highlight differences between each run, and toprovide statistical data for those runs, forming the main part of our contribution. The current toolimplementation is language independent. We plan to make the tool freely available on the web (both theroster/statistics and the progression highlighting), to serve CS educators who may wish to gain insightson their students and/or to conduct research on programming
difficult to move those projects forward into the normal testingphase. Fortunately, we were able to anticipate this pending limitation and direct college funds topurchase standard quadcopter drone kits for almost every student (or pair of students who couldstill work together on the project). These kits allowed the students to independently conductflight planning and test flights with the autopilots. This technology is far easier with rotary wingdrone aircraft then with fixed wing aircraft. In the latter the aircraft cannot hover, so takeoffs,landings, and missions are far more difficult to program. Nonetheless, this helped students learnthe basic principles of programming drone missions.With no way for the students to test fly the fixed wing
Hydrodynamics, Turbulence, and Experimental Methods. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Quality Function Deployment (QFD) in the Late Stages of Capstone DesignAbstractQuality Function Deployment (QFD) is widely used to clearly define customer requirements andconvert them into detailed engineering specifications and plans to fulfill those requirements inthe design process both in industry and in academia. It allows for prioritization of the tasksassociated with achieving a solution in an analytical and systematic way by developing metricsfor the specifications of the solution. Employing QFD also creates a record of why
senior-level two-part sequential unit operations laboratory course series (ECHM 442and ECHM 443), required for all chemical engineering majors. The ECHM 442 course consistsof eight 50 min lectures, covering the basics of report writing and a refresh on statistics. Thestudents, in groups of 2-4, perform two lab experiment rotations on a 4-week schedule. Theyhave one week to write an experimental plan prior to the experiment and two weeks to analyzedata and write a final technical report or executive memo following the experiment. The ECHM443 course consists of two 50 min lectures. The first is an introduction that covers course format,schedule and structure, while the second occurs later in the semester and provides instructorfeedback on
) 16.70 6.18 20.70 5.25 0.80 Disciplinary (30) 22.35 7.88 24.65 6.98 0.75 Outcome Expectancy (30) 21.15 6.69 24.60 6.12 0.57Focus Group Teachers indicated that during typical professional development opportunities thefacilitator “throw[s] a lot of stuff at you and hope that you understand what's happening.” Thiscan be overwhelming and may result in teachers choosing only one aspect to implement or asmall tweak to their lesson plan. Overall, the teachers indicated only 25-50% of their pastprofessional development experience has been incorporated into their lessons. This lack of implementation was attributed to time
thesetechnologies. The two columns of data reflect participant group preferences. Thus, the first row(under Autonomous Robots) in Table 2, “Programming”, was among the top five selections for34% of the manufacturers and 52% of the college faculty.The plan for the data analysis was to address the five questions summarized in Table 3. The orderof the questions in the table does reflect the analysis progression through the aggregated data.Thus, the first order of events was to determine the popular skill selections for manufacturers andeducators. Once those selection percentages were reviewed, the degree of popularity by groupwas explored. After reviewing aggregated responses, the fourteen skills were grouped based ondifferences between the manufacturers’ and
of cohort, andstudent burnout. To avoid these barriers, which disproportionately affect students fromunderrepresented backgrounds [5], it is critical to help students understand their plans of studyand the rigor of these plans, and provide accessible support mechanisms early in the collegeexperience.In order to begin addressing these barriers to academic success and degree attainment, the CEprogram at Boise State conducted a review and subsequent remodel of its curriculum. Thisreview included input from faculty, current students, alumni, academic advisors, and theirIndustry Advisory Board. After these narratives were gathered, the faculty and a member of theadvising staff worked to address major negative themes such as a lack of a sense of
,time, classroom/curriculum, instructor’s disposition, and networking/community. Infrastructureand culture refer to what is emphasized by an instructor’s institution, including evaluations,research emphasis, and institution policies. Knowledge of effective teaching practices speaks tothe instructor’s access to material about effective teaching practices or support offered in order touse these best practices. Student experience can refer to how students react to active learning,how responsive or attentive the students are, or the rapport built between the instructors andstudents. Time denotes the amount of time it would take an instructor to learn about bestpractices as well as the amount of time required to restructure and plan for a course
, students in thesections that were taught remotely (all but Spring 2019) reported greater increases in confidencethan those in the in-person section (Spring 2019). All students in the remote sections wererequired to build and share individual prototypes using a kit of supplies that they received,whereas in the in-person section students built prototypes as a team. We plan to continue torequire every student to build at least one prototype on their own in future in-person sections ofthe course. Pre 3.831 (=1.99) Women Men Women Men Women Men Women Men Fall '20 Post
response to itemsmeasuring engineering identity, belonging in engineering, belonging in class, physics identity,mathematics identity, and controlled regulation. The fourth interview focused on students’ short-and long-term career plans and asking them to reflect on their involvement in the CAREER project.Lastly, in response to the dynamic shift in engineering education, the fifth interview probed onstudents’ school environment (e.g., traditional in-person, virtual, or hybrid modalities), co-curricular support (e.g., plans to participate and how their plans changed over time), and the impactof COVID-19 on their journey as an engineer, career plans, and belonging in engineering.In addition to conducting narrative interviews each semester, we
/11, researchindicated students were severely at risk for Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder and other anxietydisorders after terrorist attacks [2], [3] and argued for broadening access to mental healthservices. Studies conducted in the context of Hurricane Katrina revealed school systems’ lack ofpreparedness in supporting the needs of students in implementing disaster-focused programs [4],[5]. The studies recommended strengthening communication lines between administration, staff,and parents along with improving emergency preparedness plans to provide for large-scaledisasters. Studies conducted to examine the impact of the 2009 H1N1 pandemic on educationfocused on the difficulties and effectiveness of school closures in preventing the spread of
Spring 2020, thiscourse had a lively in-person format. In the transition to remote learning necessitated by thepandemic starting in Spring 2020, the instructor was able to convert the course more deliberatelyfor a Fall 2020 delivery. Now the course is offered in a fully online, synchronous fashion. Herewe discuss both student reaction to the course over time as the design process became moreexplicitly scaffolded and future plans for studying the incorporation of design across thecurriculum.IntroductionThis work-in-progress paper shares the redesign of a chemistry-for-engineers course to includemore opportunities for learning the design process.Engineers grapple with ill-structured problems that have multiple solutions [1]. Therefore,providing
Copeland Professor of Civil Engineering and Director of Construction Engineering at The Citadel in Charleston, SC. His academic experience includes: trans- portation infrastructure planning and design, infrastructure resilience, traffic operations, highway safety, and geographic information systems. His research interests include: constructing spatial databases for better management of transportation infrastructure, improving transportation design, operation, safety and construction, understanding long-term effects of urban development patterns, and advancing active living within the built environment for improved public health. He teaches courses in interchange design, transportation engineering, highway design
invitation to “make the space their own” [3]. Senses of playfulness andcommunity is also a key component of game jams to generate creativity and innovation [28].The structure should align with the type of participants recruited and intended educationaloutcomes. If a hackathon decides on an open format with little facilitation, which is more typicalof technical events, preliminary planning can ensure inclusivity in team formation and idea-pitching [9]. Understanding priorities, such as technical education versus ideation, can bebeneficial. Think Global Hack Local partnered teams with local organizations to produce webtools, reducing potential harm by directly providing a requested product while increasing drivefor civic participation [4]. On the
Implementation - ArchivingWe have revised our implementation strategy to help us achieve our goal of expandinginstitutional participation. We received NSF approval to reallocate funds from our unallocatedsubcontract budget – that part of our budget used to support institutions as they compile data tocontribute to MIDFIELD. We have moved some of these funds to support a partnership with theAmerican Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) that has yielded a plan to make ASEE thearchivist instead of the Interinstitutional Consortium for Political and Social Research (ICPSR).Although ICPSR is better known as an archivist, ASEE is certainly better known amongengineering education researchers. When the data are available from ASEE, we (and ASEE) canpublicize
of the Data Science and Engineering Summer School was to provide students aconnection between nuclear non-proliferation applications and data science. Lectures provided areview of key topics and introduced data science methods via hands-on tutorials. Students wereimmersed in a collaborative environment.The Data Science and Engineering Summer School was originally planned to be in-person.However, pandemic concerns in 2020 forced the school to transition to an on-line format. ThisPNNL-SA-160054transition had both benefits and challenges. One of the primary benefits was that the on-lineformat allowed for more participants resulting in 214 registrants for the course. The largenumber of registrations exceeded expectations and provided a challenge
. The team wasunsure of many things including the uncertainty of when to end the limited operation. The teamkept going and it ended up in the limited mode from the point of Spring break until all the waythrough the end of the project in Fall semester. This uncertainty and limited mode of operation have impacted the team significantly in manyaspects. In spite of these challenges, the team could keep moving forward. Fortunately, this teamhad prior knowledge and experiences relevant to this project. It helped this team make progressand complete the project at the end. However, due to the unexpected and drastic changes in themode of operation, the project scope change was inevitable. Initially, it was planned toimplement 2-axis movements. This
originally constructed for in-person student groups to work on their projectseither in pairs or individually. Providing remote access was not originally planned but after themove to remote instruction the laboratory stations were modified to accommodate the newreality.The diagram below shows the layout of the laboratory station equipment required for the remotecourse. The following sections provide descriptions for each of the major components. Figure 1: Laboratory Station ArchitectureThe laboratory plays an important role in this course due to the technologies used in the projectassignments. The workstation computers provide the computation, memory, and storagerequirements needed to build a full, cross-compiled Linux
: Self-Efficacy for Advanced Manufacturing Competencies. The competencies that wereincluded in this scale, as well as the Implicit Theories of Advanced Manufacturing CompetenciesScale, stemmed from prior grant-related work of industry professionals (described in the followingsection).Current Progress on Research StudyBecause of the COVID-19 pandemic, some of the research tasks were delayed as the researchersinvolved had to focus on helping faculty at their respective institutions shift to remote teaching.The development plan was refined at the program launch and again after the impact of COVID-19to readjust the timeline and working parameters (i.e., working fully-remotely). We are on track toaccomplish all goals by the end of the project.As of
applied and participated in the year-long PD engagement. Theeducators, made up of seven (7) librarians and 17 classroom teachers, self-selected to participatein a week-long summer experience that was supplemented with academic-year supports.The educators participating in this activity provided researchers invaluable mixed-methods data,insights and feedback which developed future CS engagements. Ultimately, the 24 educatorparticipants provided group leaders with over 49 lesson plans and another 30 implementationplans.MethodsIn order to address the research questions the researchers employed a mixed methods study tocollect, and address open questions within the field of CS education. A formative evaluation ofthe WySLICE project, conducted annually
authors).When asked to reflect on operational changes he might continue to utilize in the future,the manager of this space indicated that touchless sign-ins would be kept. However, heworried about changing the ways of greeting newcomers to the space. Indeed, previously,he had always instructed his student staff to shake hands, “making a physical connection[enables students] to go back up to [the staff] and ask questions about safety” and createdan equalizing physical connection to the new environment. He emphasized theimportance of these informal interactions in building a welcoming atmosphere in themakerspace but struggled to envision how that might look post-pandemic.Discussing how he might plan to re-open the makerspace, he emphasized the need