of ABET, and is currently Secretary/Treasurer of the ABET Foundation Board of Directors. She has also served as a program evaluator for J.D. pro- grams for the ABA, for universities’ regional accreditation for SACSCOC, and for Business Schools for AACSB. She also has served as the Chair of the ECE division of ASEE, the President of the Education Society of IEEE, and the chair of the Women in Engineering of IEEE. She served as the Treasurer and a Board of Directors member for WEPAN.Dr. Christine A. Stanley, Texas A&M University Christine A. Stanley is professor of higher education, holder of the Ruth Harrington Endowed Chair, and vice president and associate provost for diversity emerita in the College of
engagement and achievement in school,” J. Educ. Psychol., vol. 82, no. 1, pp. 22–32, 1990, doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.82.1.22.[26] H. De Loof, A. Struyf, J. Boeve-de Pauw, and P. Van Petegem, “Teachers’ Motivating Style and Students’ Motivation and Engagement in STEM: the Relationship Between Three Key Educational Concepts,” Res. Sci. Educ. Australas. Sci. Educ. Res. Assoc., 2019, doi: 10.1007/s11165-019-9830- 3.[27] G. Crosling, M. Heagney, and L. Thomas, “Improving Student Retention in Higher Education: Improving Teaching and Learning,” Aust. Univ. Rev., Jan. 2009, Accessed: Feb. 10, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://search.informit.org/doi/abs/10.3316/ielapa.159225407205474.[28] E. A. Skinner and J. R. Pitzer, “Developmental
students at their institutions,” Teach. Learn. Inq., vol. 7, no. 2, Art. no. 2, Sep. 2019, doi: 10.20343/teachlearninqu.7.2.7.[8] J. H. Waldeck, V. O. Orrego, T. G. Plax, and P. Kearney, “Graduate student/faculty mentoring relationships: Who gets mentored, how it happens, and to what end,” Commun. Q., vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 93–109, Jun. 1997, doi: 10.1080/01463379709370054.[9] W. Wright-Harp and P. A. Cole, “A Mentoring Model for Enhancing Success in Graduate Education,” Contemp. Issues Commun. Sci. Disord., vol. 35, no. Spring, pp. 4–16, Mar. 2008, doi: 10.1044/cicsd_35_S_4.[10] N. A. of S. Medicine Engineering, and, P. and G. Affairs, B. on H. E. and Workforce, and C. on E. M. in STEMM, The Science of Effective Mentorship in
future.Ms. Reya Magan, Duke University Electrical and Computer Engineering and Computer Science student at Duke UniversityDr. Ann Saterbak, Duke University Ann Saterbak is Professor of the Practice in the Biomedical Department and Director of First-Year En- gineering at Duke University. Saterbak is the lead author of the textbook, Bioengineering Fundamen- tals. Saterbak’s outstanding teaching was recognized through university-wide and departmental teaching awards. In 2013, Saterbak received the ASEE Biomedical Engineering Division Theo C. Pilkington Out- standing Educator Award. For her contribution to education within biomedical engineering, she was elected Fellow in the Biomedical Engineering Society and the American
theory.Student Learning Approach and Course DevelopmentIn the Summer of 2019 the authors participated in their Center for Advancement of Teaching’ssummer course (re)design program to design their Control Systems and Instrumentation course.During this program, the authors worked through the book, Building a Pathway for StudentLearning [13]. Before this program, the authors approached the course design as “how can wepossibly consolidate all these topics to one course?” The course changed the authors’ narrative to“what do our students look like after they have completed our course? What can they do thatthey could not before taking our course?” From this crucial change in perspective, the authorsbegan to work backwards from a final project, build an
real-time feedback onhand-drawn free body diagrams for students. The system is driven by novel sketch recognitionalgorithms developed for recognizing and comparing trusses, general shapes, and arrows indiagrams. We have discovered students perform as well as paper homework or other onlinehomework systems which only check the final answer through deployment to five universities with450 students completing homework on the system over the 2018 and 2019 school years. Mechanixhas reduced the amount of manual grading required for instructors in those courses while ensuringstudents can correctly draw the free body diagram. Keywords: FBD, sketch, statics, dynamics, engineering education.IntroductionFree body diagrams are an integral part of
Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Paper ID #33574 AACSB. She also has served as the Chair of the ECE division of ASEE, the President of the Education Society of IEEE, and the chair of the Women in Engineering of IEEE. She served as the Treasurer and a Board of Directors member for WEPAN.Dr. Kerrie A. Douglas, Purdue University, West Lafayette Dr. Douglas is an Assistant Professor in the Purdue School of Engineering Education. Her research is focused on improving methods of assessment in large learning environments to foster high-quality learning opportunities. Additionally, she studies techniques to validate findings from
Disparity in STEM Disciplines: A Study of Faculty Attrition and Turnover Intentions,” Research in Higher Education, vol. 49, no. 7, pp. 607–624, Nov. 2008, doi: 10.1007/s11162-008-9097-4.[29] K. Buch, Y. Huet, A. Rorrer, and L. Roberson, “Removing the Barriers to Full Professor: A Mentoring Program for Associate Professors,” Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, vol. 43, no. 6, pp. 38–45, Oct. 2011, doi: 10.1080/00091383.2011.618081.[30] C. Grant, J. Decuir-Gunby, and B. Smith, “Advance Peer Mentoring Summits For Underrepresented Minority Women Engineering Faculty,” in 117th ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Louisville, KY, Jun. 2010, p. 15.129.1-15.129.20, Accessed: Jun. 29, 2016. [Online]. Available: https
everyone, even though everything in the society pressures you into sameness – it is a handicap in the end. A handicap to live without knowing the struggle of difference – in all of its pain, its fear, its celebration, its compassion [2].”AbstractThis is an archival record of a proposed panel discussion for the 2021 ASEE Annual Conferenceand Exposition. It reflects a year-long conversation between the six co-authors. Panel attendeeswill be invited to join and expand upon that conversation. Further analyses and integration areplanned after the conference when we will have the benefit of other panel attendees’ commentsand their own narratives.Under ideal circumstances, engineering cultures in academia and industry bring out the best