Conference & Exposition Proceedings, New Orleans, Louisiana, Jun. 2016, p. 26206. doi: 10.18260/p.26206.[6] J. D. Burton and D. M. White, “Selecting a Model for Freshman Engineering Design,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 88, no. 3, pp. 327–332, 1999, doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.1999.tb00454.x.[7] L. G. Richards and S. Carlson‐Skalak, “Faculty Reactions to Teaching Engineering Design to First Year Students,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 86, no. 3, pp. 233–240, 1997, doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.1997.tb00290.x.[8] K. Sanford Bernhardt and M. Roth, “Using Concept Maps to Assess Student Learning in a Multi-Section Introduction to Engineering Course,” presented at the 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Jun. 2018. Accessed: Jan. 21, 2020. [Online
, 20203. K.P.Brannan and P.C. Wankat, Survey of first-year programs, ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings, Portland Oregon, 2005.4. Orr, M. K., Brawner, C. E., Lord, S. M., Ohland, M. W., Layton, R. A., & Long, R. A. (2012). Engineering matriculation paths: Outcomes of direct matriculation, first-year engineering, and post-general education models. Frontiers in Education Conference, Seattle, WA.5. Clark, A., Desing, R., Wallwey, S.A., Louis Kajfez, R., Mohammadi-Aragh, J., Sassi, S., Tracking first-year engineering students’ identity metrics, International Journal of Engineering Education 36(5), 2020, pp. 1625-16396. Komlos, J, Walkup, S.L., Waters, K.A., Modernizing an introductory civil engineering
) hours of instructionover a two- week period was reduced to four (4) scheduled hours for the same period. The project-based hybrid experience allowed students to participate synchronously during any of the (3) hourstraditionally scheduled for the course, but students were only able to attend face-to-face on oneday each week. Enhancements to the course structure resulted in the opportunity for students toengage with formal course content in (5) hours during a typical week, more than the standard (3)hours offered in traditional, fully face-to-face formats offered in the past.TABLE 2: Anticipated Time Effort Towards Structured Learning Communication Project- s Based
Academy is on efficacy in this area, thenthere is some evidence to suggest the investment in the STEM Academy has paid off.References[1] New American Economy. (2017). Sizing up the gap in our supply of STEM workers: Data & analysis. New American Economy. https://research.newamericaneconomy.org/report/sizing-up-the-gap-in- our-supply-of-stem-workers/[2] Goldman, A., Schweig, J., Buenaventura, M., & Wright, C. (2017). Geographic and demographic representativeness of junior reserve officer training corps. Santa Monica, CA; Rand Corporation[3] Kamarck, K. N. (2020). Defense Primer: Junior Reserve Officers’ Training Corps (JROTC). In Focus. Congressional Research Service. December 2, 2020.[4] Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D
–679, 2011, doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2011.tb00031.x.[8] J. A. Smith, M. Jarman, and M. Osborn, “Chapter 14: Qualitative health psychology: Theories and methods,” in Doing interpretative phenomenological analysis., Sage Publications, 1999.[9] N. A. Mamaril, E. L. Usher, C. R. Li, D. R. Economy, and M. S. Kennedy, “Measuring Undergraduate Students’ Engineering Self-Efficacy: A Validation Study,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 105, no. 2, pp. 366–395, 2016.[10] T. Zorn, J. Roper, K. Broadfoot, and C. Weaver, “Focus Groups as Sites of Influential Interaction: Building Communicative Self-Efficacy and Effecting Attitudinal Change in Discussing Controversial Topics,” Journal of Applied Communication Research, vol. 34
): 1447-1451[12] Yeager, David S., Carissa Romero, Dave Paunesku, Christopher S. Hulleman, Barbara Schneider, Cintia Hinojosa, Hae Yeon Lee et al. "Using design thinking to improve psychological interventions: The case of the growth mindset during the transition to high school." Journal of educational psychology 108, no. 3 (2016): 374.[13] Brady, Shannon T., Geoffrey L. Cohen, Shoshana N. Jarvis, and Gregory M. Walton. "A brief social-belonging intervention in college improves adult outcomes for black Americans." Science Advances 6, no. 18 (2020): eaay3689.[14] Silva, Mariana, Matthew West, and Craig Zilles. "Measuring the Score Advantage on Asynchronous Exams in an Undergraduate CS Course." Proceedings of the 51st ACM
learning: Cognition in design education, vol. 5, C. M. Eastman, W. M. McCracken, and W. C. Newstetter, Eds. Oxford, UK: Elsevier Science, 2001, pp. 79-103.[4] D. Narayan and P. Petesch, "Agency, opportunity structure, and poverty escapes," in Moving out of poverty: Cross-disciplinary perspectives on mobility, D. Narayan and P. Petesch, Eds. Washington, DC: The World Bank, 2007, pp. 1-44.[5] A. Hutchinson and M. W. Tracey, "Design ideas, reflection, and professional identity: How graduate students explore the idea generation process," Instructional Science, vol. 43, no. 5, pp. 527-544, 2015.[6] D. VandeWalle, S. P. Brown, W. L. Cron, and J. W. Slocum Jr, "The influence of goal orientation and self
ID: 186; Line: 12) 1 Read the poem line as is I say it’s important to focus on what people want the most 2 Highlight words within the line that reference I say it’s important to focus on what people want the most supply chain key terms 3 Extract the phrases that reference supply focus on what people want the most chain key term(s) 4 Relate it back to the general supply chain Item Classification concept(s) referenced. In this case there are Different Level of Importance two. These now become the condensed codes Table 2. Identification and extraction of supply
, T.A. Lenox, K.J. Fridley, and R.O Anderson, “Accreditation Insights and the Next Body of Knowledge,” Proceedings of the 2016 ASEE Annual Conference, ASEE, 2016.[10] ABET, “Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs, 2020-2021,” https://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation-criteria/criteria-for-accrediting-engineering-programs-2020- 2021/ [Accessed February 21, 2021].[11] S. J. Ressler and D. Lynch, “The Civil Engineering Body of Knowledge and Accreditation Criteria: A Plan for Long-Term Management of Change,” Proceedings of the 2011 ASEE Annual Conference, 2011.[12] Civil Engineering Body of Knowledge 3 Task Committee, Civil Engineering Body of Knowledge: Preparing the Future Civil Engineer, 3rd Edition. Reston, VA
] National Academy of Engineering, The Engineer of 2020: Visions of Engineering in the New Century. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press, 2004.[2] National Academy of Engineering, Educating the Engineer of 2020. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press, 2005.[3] E. F. Redish and K. A. Smith, “Looking Beyond Content: Skill Development for Engineers,” J. Eng. Educ., no. July, pp. 295–307, 2008, doi: 10.1002/j.2168- 9830.2008.tb00980.x.[4] I. B. Mena, S. E. Zappe, and T. A. Litzinger, “Preparing the Engineer of 2020: Analysis of Alumni Data,” in ASEE Annual Conference, 2012, [Online]. Available: https://cms.jee.org/21819%0A%0A.[5] S. R. Daly, E. A. Mosyjowski, and C. M. Seifert, “Teaching creativity in
Academy Colonel Aaron Hill is an Assistant Professor and Design Group Director in the Department of Civil & Mechanical Engineering at the United States Military Academy, West Point, New York. He holds a Bachelor of Science degree from West Point, a Master of Science degree in Engineering Management from Missouri S&T, a Master of Science degree in Civil Engineering from Virginia Tech, and a PhD in Civil Engineering from The University of Texas at Austin. Aaron has served in the military for 23 years as an Engineer Officer with assignments around the world to include Afghanistan, Egypt, and Bosnia- Herzegovina. He is a licensed professional engineer in Virginia and a Project Management Professional. Aaron’s
and engineeringspecifically."CitationsAlimahomed, S. (2010). Thinking outside the rainbow: Women of color redefining queer politics and identity. Social Identities, 16(2), 151–168. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504631003688849Cech, E. A., & Waidzunas, T. J. (2011). Navigating the heteronormativity of engineering: The experiences of lesbian, gay, and bisexual students. Engineering Studies, 3(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/19378629.2010.545065Cooper, K. M., & Brownell, S. E. (2016). Coming Out in Class: Challenges and Benefits of Active Learning in a Biology Classroom for LGBTQIA Students. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 15(3), ar37. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.16-01-0074Jennings, M., Roscoe, R
them if theyare the right fit for them. Copyrights are limited to creative works (e.g., writings, music, lyrics,programming code). Protection time is the life of the creator + 70 years for new creations, whichtraditionally has generated and protected the family revenue of successful authors and recordingartists for generations[16]. To create a ‘notice’ for a copyright, the work must be accompaniedby any one of the flexible notice option examples shown below: • Copyright © 2021, , All Rights Reserved; OR • © 2021 ; OR • Copyright Note, the needs to reference the individual(s) or the entity (e.g., ABC LLC, etc.) thatowns the copyrighted work.Copyright flexibility has increased with the advent of ‘Creative Commons
Study on Faculty Perceptions of Teacher-Student Interaction in Foundational Engineering Courses,” in The 2nd Annual Teaching Large Classes Conference, 2016.[2] K. VanLehn, J. Wetzel, S. Grover, and B. Van De Sande, “Learning how to construct models of dynamic systems: an initial evaluation of the dragoon intelligent tutoring system,” IEEE Trans. Learn. Technol., vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 154–167, 2016.[3] K. VanLehn et al., “The Andes physics tutoring system: Five years of evaluations,” 2005.[4] K. A. Ericsson, R. T. Krampe, and C. Tesch-Römer, “The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance.,” Psychol. Rev., vol. 100, no. 3, p. 363, 1993.[5] J. R. Grohs, T. Kinoshita, B. J. Novoselich, and D. B
," Digital Promise, San Mateo, CA, 2020.[3] M. Adnan and K. Anwar, "Online Learning Amid the COVID-19 Pandemic: Students' Perspectives," Journal of Pedagogical Sociology and Psychology, vol. 2, no. 1, 2020.[4] I. Chirikov, K. Soria, B. Horgos and D. Jones-White, "Undergraduate and Graduate Students' Mental Health During the COVID-19 Pandemic," SERU Consortium Reports, University of California Berkley, 2020.[5] J. Malisch, B. Harris, S. Sherrer, K. Lewis, S. Shepherd, P. MacCarthy, J. Spott, E. Karam, N. Moustaid-Moussa, J. Calarco, L. Ramalingam, A. Taller, J. Canas-Carrell, K. Ardon-Dryer, D. Weiser, X. Bernal and J. Deitloff, "Opinion: In the wake of COVID-19, academia needs new solutions to ensure gender equity
: A fourfold classification,” British Journal ofManagement, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 131-142, 2003.[2] J. R. Hackman and A. C. Edmondson, “Groups as agents of change,” in Handbook oforganization development, T. Cummings, Ed. Thousand Oaks: SAGE, 2008, pp. 167-186.[3] L. Long III. and J. A. Mejia, “Conversations about diversity: Institutional barriers forunderrepresented engineering students,” Journal of Engineering, vol. 105, no. 2, 2016.[4] E. J. Theobald, M. J. Hill, E. Tran, S. Agrawal, E. N. Arroyo, S. Behling, N. Chambwe, D. L.Cintron, J. D. Cooper, G. Dunster, J. A. Grummer, K. Hennessey, J. Hsiao, N. Iranon, L. JonesII, H. Jordt, M. Keller, M. E. Lacey, C. E. Littlefield…S. Freeman, “Active learning narrowsachievement gaps for
/ngv:78746.[3] K. A. J. Mohr and E. S. Mohr, “Understanding Generation Z Students to Promote a Contemporary Learning Environment,” J. Empower. Teach. Excell., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 84–94, 2017, doi: 10.15142/T3M05T.[4] H. Hyytinen, A. Toom, and L. Postareff, “Unraveling the complex relationship in critical thinking, approaches to learning and self-efficacy beliefs among first-year educational science students,” Learn. Individ. Differ., vol. 67, no. August, pp. 132–142, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2018.08.004.[5] S. K. Wang, H. Y. Hsu, T. C. Reeves, and D. C. Coster, “Professional development to enhance lecturers’ practices in using information and communication technologies (ICTs) as cognitive tools: Lessons
new future course offerings.References[1] G. E. Dieter and L. C. Schmidt, Engineering Design, 5th edition. McGraw-Hill, 2009.[2] H. Simon, The Sciences of the Artificial, 3rd edition. MIT Press, 1996.[3] E. van Dooren, E. Boshuizen, J. van Merriënboer, T. Asselbergs, M. van Dorst, “Making thedesign process in design education explicit: two exploratory case studies,” Design andTechnology Education, vol. 25, no. 1, 2020.[4] T. Song, K. Becker, J. Gero, S. DeBerard, O. Lawanto, and E. Reeve, “Problemdecomposition and recomposition in engineering design: A comparison of design behaviorbetween professional engineers, engineering seniors, and engineering freshmen,” Journal ofTechnology Education, vol. 27, no. 2, 2016.[5] E. Coleman, T. Shealy, J
, “People need people: students feeling impacts of online school isolation,” Ryerson Folio, November 4th 2020[2] J. Bailenson, “Nonverbal overload: A theoretical argument for the causes of Zoom fatigue,” Technology, Mind, and Behavior, Volume 2, Issue 1, Feb 23, 2021[3] M.J. Callaghan, K. McCusker, J. Lopez Losada, J.G. Harkin & S. Wilson (2009) Engineering Education Island: Teaching Engineering in Virtual Worlds, Innovation in Teaching and Learning in Information and Computer Sciences, 8:3, 2-18, DOI: 10.11120/ital.2009.08030002
student respondents were neutral to positive in “Video lectures helped melearn the material.” And 60% were neutral to supportive of “I was satisfied with the flippedclassroom system.”ConclusionsFrom these data and the mitigating circumstances (Covid-19) it is too early to determine throughquantitative measures with significance if a flipped classroom approach is effective in aBiomedical Electronics course. However, student viewpoints are generally favorable and supportthe continued approach. Further data analysis will occur to determine how to further improve thecourse and the outcomes therein.[1] S. Dhawan, "Online Learning: A Panacea in the Time of COVID-19 Crisis," (in eng), Journal of Educational Technology Systems, p. 0047239520934018
ceiling for women leaders", Women in Management Review, Vol. 22 No. 6, pp. 482-496, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1108/09649420710778718[9] A. García-Holgado, A. Camacho Díaz, and F. J. García-Peñalvo, “La brecha de género en el sector STEM en América Latina: una propuesta europea,” (The gender gap in the STEM sector in Latin America: a European proposal). October 9-11, 2019. Madrid, SPAIN. V International Congress on Learning, Innovation and Competitiveness (CINAIC 2019). DOI: 10.26754/CINAIC.2019.0143[10] A. Garcia-Holgado, J. Mena, F. J. Garcia- Peñalvo, J. Pascual, M. Heikkinen, S. Harmoinen, L. Garcia-Ramos, R. Penabaena-Niebles, and L. Amores, “Gender equality in STEM programs: a proposal to analyse the situation of a
set of histograms,figure 1, show the students’ grades on both assignments while the second, figure 2, shows thosescores standardized, otherwise known as Z-score normalized. Figure 1: Student GradesFigure 1’s histograms show the counts of each score, with the binwidth and numbers of binsappropriate to the counts. The spread for the UN SDG Assignment was much larger than theFinal Written Report, with a range of 28, minimum of 68, and maximum of 96 relative to a rangeof 14, minimum of 82 and maximum of 96, respectively. This spread becomes considerablewhen looking at figure 2’s histograms: Figure 2: Student Grades, StandardizedWhen considering the standardized scores, the UN SDG
additionalcollege graduates with degrees in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. ExecutiveOffice of the President. Washington, DC.[3] Estrada, M., Burnett, M., Campbell, A., Campbell, P., Denetclaw, W. F., Gutierrez, C. G.,Hurtado, S., John, G. H., Matsui, J., McGee, R., Okpodu, C. M., Robinson, T. J., Summers, M.F., Werner-Washburne, M., & Zavala, M. E. (2016). Improving Underrepresented MinorityStudent Persistence in STEM. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 15(5), 1–10.[4] Yoder, B. L. (2017). Engineering by the numbers. Washington, DC: American Society forEngineering Education.[5] Fiegener, M. K. National Science Foundation, Division of Science ResourcesStatistics.(2010). Numbers of doctorates awarded continue to grow in 2009; indicators
students (S-STEM), Researcher Practitioner Partnership (RPP), IUSE, and EAGER.Alexandria Benedict, University of North Carolina at Charlotte Alexandria Benedict is a graduate student at the University of North Carolina at Charlotte pursuing her Master’s in Computer Science. She is a research assistant under the RPP STEM Ecosystem Project which helps study the effects of computational thinking inside classrooms.Audrey RorrerDr. David K. Pugalee, University of North Carolina at Charlotte Dr. David Pugalee is a full professor, and Director of the Center for Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Education (STEM) at UNC Charlotte. The recipient of millions of dollars in grant- funding, Dr. Pugalee has also
work supported by the National Science Foundation under awardnumber EEC-1647722. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressedin this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NationalScience Foundation.The authors wish to thank Jennifer Mamph and Cristina Farmus for the support in collecting thisdata.References[1] M. Drummond Oakes, M. E. Cardella, M. Sydlik, and K. M. Everett, “Board 41: DevelopingSummer Research Programs at an NSF ERC: Activities, Assessment, and Adaptation,” presentedat the 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Jun. 2019, Accessed: Jan. 07, 2021.[Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/board-41-developing-summer-research-programs-at-an-nsf-erc
study-abroadstudio, or this Mission-Driven Integrated Design (MDID) studio. Studio courses in the curriculumtraditionally carried the charge of providing familiarity and developing appreciation for architecturaldesign. Since 1952, studio courses have evolved in the program based on continuous improvementprocesses, reflections from faculty and alumni, and the changing dynamics in industry. Historicaldevelopment has included: • 1970’s and earlier – AE offered individual design projects and role-playing an architect • 1980 – AE introduced studio design teams more out of necessity do to a drastic increase in class enrollment. Studios were staffed by architecture faculty and operated in a similar fashion to studio classes for
in theSPF with the staff machinist teaching ~10 students to operate all of the equipment.Distancing requirements necessary for Covid made that final two-hour session impossible toconduct in the same fashion. In the fall 2020 semester “S” training sessions were reduced to onehour, but involved only two students at a time. This nearly tripled the number of hours that thestaff machinist spent in training, but resulted in comparable student training quality. For the 45students in Freshman Design I this meant nearly 30 hours of total training time. Fortunately,overall project activities during this time at WKU were lower so this was possible. In the spring2021 semester a total of 65 Mechanical and Electrical freshmen required “S” training
remotelearning environment.Bibliography[1] J. Wang, N. C. Golly, B. Herren, J. I. Macdonald, Z. Siddique and Y. Liu, "Enhancing Mechanical Engineering Education with an Integrated 3-D Printing Approach," in Mechanical Engineering Division, ASEE, Tampa, FL, 2019.[2] U. o. M. T. C. Lorraine Francis and Michael Manno, "Integrating 3-D Printing and CAD into a Materials Science and Engineering Curriculum," in Materials Division, ASEE, Tampa, FL, 2019.[3] U. C. BV. [Online]. Available: https://ultimaker.com/software/ultimaker-cura.[4] T. P. S. University, "Innovation Commons at Penn State Behrend," 2021. [Online]. Available: https://behrend.psu.edu/research-outreach/ignite-erie/innovation-commons. [Accessed 07 03 2021].[5] R. I. o. T. Spencer
-learning-and-ethical-reflection-framework-i-celer.[17] K. L. d’Entremont and A. S. Merryweather, “Board 87 : Integrating Product-Safety Curriculum to Enhance Design and Reinforce Engineering Ethics,” presented at the 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Jun. 2018, Accessed: Jan. 22, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/board-87-integrating-product- safety-curriculum-to-enhance-design-and-reinforce-engineering-ethics.[18] V. Subbian and L. R. Shaw, “Piloting an Adaptive Ethical Decision-making Tool for Engineering Students,” presented at the 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access, Jun. 2020, Accessed: Jan. 26, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/piloting-an-adaptive-ethical-decision
Saturday mornings,and students were expected to work independently and submit the week’s assignments byThursday evening. Office hours were held on Tuesday evenings for students to ask questions andget help on their designs. Overall, students had much more freedom as to the schedule andamount of time/effort put into the program. The weekly schedule is shown in Table 4. Table 3: Fall Young Scholars Program Moodle Modules Learning Module(s) Description/Activity Schedule Introductory Module • Introduction to ASSIST Center Week 1 • Faculty Research overview Engineering Design • Explain and