definitely think that I could have made my presentation moreinteractive and engaging. I think for next time, I will try to incorporate several different activitiesinto the lesson instead of just one at the end.” Similarly, “I think I could have had more specificinstructions” or “I could also improve by providing relatable examples so that the audience canbetter understand the topic” indicated that students recognized that they needed to go more in-depth or explain their key concepts better (18%).Many made mention that discussion and Q&A sessions were successful as assessments (17%), “Ifeel that I had a well thought out topic that connected well back to content of this class. Thepresentation that I prepared was engaging and easy to follow, with
. • Schedule synchronous class times to open a few minutes before and stay open a few minutes after class time and use the time to have conversations with students.Figure 4. Summary of recommendationsReferences[1] K. A. Douglas, A. C. Johnston, J. Martin, and T. Short, “Instructor Decisions andStudents’ Perceived Support in Engineering Project-Based Courses During the COVID-19Pandemic.”[2] R. M. Felder and R. Brent, Teaching and learning STEM: A practical guide. Jossey-Bass, 2016.[3] X. Huang and E.-L. Hsiao, “Synchronous and asynchronous communication in an online environment,” Q. Rev. Distance Educ., vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 15–30, 2012.[4] C. Rapanta, L. Botturi, P. Goodyear
. Salomone. Investigating “sense of belonging” in first-year college students. Journal of College Student Retention, 4(3):227– 256, 2003.[13] P. Pintrich, D. Smith, T. Garcia, and W. McKeachie. A manual for the use of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ). Technical report, National Center for Research to Improve Postsecondary Teaching and Learning, Ann Arbor, MI, 1991.[14] P. W. Maloney, M. J. Grawitch, and L. K. Barber. The multi-factor structure of the Brief Self-Control Scale: Discriminant validity of restraint and impulsivity. Journal of Research in Personality,46(1):111–115, 2012.[15] B. M. Gadzella, M. Baloglu, W. G. Masten, and Q. Wang. Evaluation of the Student Life Stress Inventory
culture - and incorporating those findings into asset based reflections ofSNA data - will enable project leadership to achieve the highest levels of project success. It isour sincere hope that readers of this work (and viewers of the accompanying poster) will developtheir own mixed method SNA - cultural analysis educational research studies and reflectsuccessfully on the findings.This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation (DUE-1626287,DUE-1626185, and DUE-1626148) including two Graduate Research Fellowships (DGE-133486). References[1] M. Q. Patton, Utilization-Focused Evaluation (4th ed.). Sage publications, 2008.[2] J. E. Grunig, “Qualitative methods for
, 2020.[23] B. N. Hara and R. Kling, “Student distress in web-based distance education,” Educ. Q., vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 68–69, 2001.[24] S. Shafiq, S. N. Nipa, S. Sultana, M. R. U. Rahman, and M. M. Rahman, “Exploring the triggering factors for mental stress of university students amid COVID-19 in Bangladesh: A perception-based study,” Child. Youth Serv. Rev., vol. 120, no. August 2020, p. 105789, 2021.[25] L. T. Hoyt, A. K. Cohen, B. Dull, E. Maker Castro, and N. Yazdani, “‘Constant Stress Has Become the New Normal’: Stress and Anxiety Inequalities Among U.S. College Students in the Time of COVID-19,” J. Adolesc. Heal., vol. 68, no. 2, pp. 270–276, 2021.[26] G. J. Hwang, S. Y. Wang, and C. L. Lai
battle with thatperson. He does not promise that they will accept.team specifies its YouTube Science Communicator of 5000choice -- Prof K will pursue a YouTube collaborationwith that person. He does not promise that they willaccept.Prof K joins your team for one covid-safe Trivia Night 5000chosen to mutual convenience; you win because of hisTrivia Night superpowers.one signed copy of "[name of the book redacted]" by Prof 6500K. Team has to share.one signed copy of "[name of the book redacted]" by Prof 11000K. Team has to share.your team selects one Friday class to cancel--which 12000means Prof K still shows up and has an office hours/Q&Asession but the lecture is canceled. Subject to Prof Kapprovalunlock MAE3230
, buthappenedorganicallythroughtheenthusiasmandinitiativeofmanyparticipants.Inthispaperanattemptwasmadetocaptureinformationgeneratedinthiseffortinoneplace.Thispaper written like a case study on distributed innovation captures the many sources ofinformation needed to manufacture PPE, particularly open-source data, regulatoryinformation, as well as the lessons learned. The information provided here will be veryhelpfulformanufacturersparticularlythosewhoareventuringintheareaof3Dprintingaswellasstudentsandotherswhowouldliketobeinformedonthissubject. References[1] Larrañeta,E.,Dominguez-Robles,J.,&Lamprou,D.A.(2020,June5).Additive ManufacturingCanAssistintheFightAgainstCOVID-19andOtherPandemicsand ImpactontheGlobalSupplyChain.MaryAnnLiebert,Inc.,publishers. https://www.liebertpub.com/doi/10.1089/3DP.2020.0106.[2] Advincula,R.C.,Dizon,J.,Chen,Q.,Niu,I.,Chung,J.,Kilpatrick
-organized; the instructor was very in depth and allowed for a ton of Q&A. Overall great information on the topic of the course” ● “Hands on labs” ● “It was beneficial to learn to use the software and be able to actually see the operation of several different 3-D printers” ● “Learning the history and the future of 3d printing. I didn't know there is different types and methods of 3-D printing. I thought it was helpful in knowing because it could be a business venture in the future”As we continue offering this course, we will develop new materials and modules to deliver to thestudents. We also plan to collect and publish more formal assessment data with a standardgrading protocol in future iterations of the lab activities to
CHEM1412 General Inorganic and course was the bridge Grade General Chemistry I Environmental taken in fall course Chemistry II Totals (%) Chemistry 2020 ABC 11 (46%) YES DF 8 (33%) n=24 Q 5 (21%) N/A ABC 11 (41%) 1 (100%) NO DF 12 (44%) n=36 QW 4 (15%) 2 (100%) N/A
, online, 2020.[14] S. K. Gilmartin, H. L. Chen, M. F. Schar, Q. Jin, G. Toye, A. Harris, E. Cao, E. Costache,M. Reithmann and S. D. Sheppard, "Designing a longitudinal study of engineering students’innovation and engineering interestsand plans: The Engineering Majors Survey Project. EMS 1.0and 2.0 Technical Report.," Stanford, CA, 2017.[15] A. C. Kusimo, S. Sheppard, M. E. Thompson and S. A. Atwood, "2018 BEST DIVERSITYPAPER: Effects of Research and Internship Experiences on Engineering Task SelfEfficacy onEngineering Students Through an Intersectional Lens.," in Proceedings of the American Societyfor Engineering Education Annual Conference, Salt Lake City, Utah, 2018.
. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Q Longitudinal Study of a Project-Based Learning Methods Replacement for Lecture Based Courses Introduction Incorporating project-based learning into first year experiences for engineering studentshas been shown to improve student motivation and success [1], [2]. Using hands-on projects [3],interdisciplinary projects [4], or implementing project-based learning approaches in courses [5]during the first-year of an engineering curriculum also improves student retention [6]–[8].Project-based learning enhances student learning, improves student self-efficacy [9] and betterprepares students for workplace challenges [10]. However
., vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 742–753, 2017.[9] S. D. H. Hsu and J. Schombert, “Data Mining the University: College GPA Predictions from SAT Scores,” SSRN, vol. 35, 2010.[10] C. Romero, M. I. López, J. M. Luna, and S. Ventura, “Predicting students’ final performance from participation in on-line discussion forums,” Comput. Educ., vol. 68, pp. 458–472, 2013.[11] M. A. Al-Barrak and M. Al-Razgan, “Predicting Students Final GPA Using Decision Trees: A Case Study,” Int. J. Inf. Educ. Technol., vol. 6, no. 7, pp. 528–533, 2016.[12] D. Kabakchieva, “Predicting student performance by using data mining methods for classification,” Cybern. Inf. Technol., vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 61–72, 2013.[13] Q. a Al-radaideh, A. Al
and Q&A 3:15pm 3:45pm Instructional Philosophy Sola Adesope 3:45pm 4:00pm Break 4:00pm 4:55pm LC-DLM Set I: Breakout groups based on Hub Coordinators hub 4:55pm 5:00pm Closing BERNIE VAN WIE*Note: For day 2, please come with DLMs setup and prepared O CTO B ER 2, 2 0 20 START END ITEM SPEAKER TIME TIME 2:00PM 2:10PM Welcome to Day 2 – brief discussion of ac- BERNIE VAN WIE tivities 2:10PM 2:35PM Fluids DLMs Session 2:35PM 2:45PM Debrief / Questions 2:45PM
enrollmentstrategy have higher educational outcomes compared to students with mixed and part-timeenrollment strategies. In another study, Chen et al. [20] use HMM to categorize students based ontheir learning styles and investigate the relationship between learning style states and learningefficiency in massive open online courses (MOOCS).Hidden Markov Model, like any other Markov Models has a set of states Q = {q1 , q2 , . . . , qN }.However, in HMM, the states’ status are hidden, and the model aims to estimate the states given asequence of observations O = o1 , o2 , . . . , oT with the length of T , where each observation isdrawn from the set of M possible observations V = {v1 , v2 , . . . , vM }. Each Hidden MarkovModel has three parameters: (1) π0 , is
. 74, pp. 59-109, 2004.[4] N. Hao, H. Xue, H. Yuan, Q. Wang and M. A. Runco, "Enhancing creativity: Proper body posture meets proper emotion.," Acta Psychologica, vol. 173, p. 32–40, 2017.[5] V. R. Andolfi, C. D. Nuzzo and A. Antonietti, "Opening the mind through the body: The effects of postureon creative processes," Thinking Skills and Creativity, vol. 24, p. 20–28, 2017.[6] E. Skinner and M. Belmont, "Motivation in the Classroom: Reciprocal Effects of Teacher Behavior and Student Engagement Access," Journal of Educational Psychology, vol. 85, no. 4, pp. 571-581, 1993.[7] K. E. Voelkl, "Identification with school," Journal of Education, vol. 105, pp. 204-319, 1997.[8] J. J. Appleton, S. L
work at a college student conference.5. References[1] C. Herreid, "Case Studies in Science: A Novel Method of Science Education.," Journal of Research in Science Teaching, pp. 221-229, 1994.[2] V. Lee, "What is inquiry-guided learning?," New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 2012.[3] J. L. David, "What Research Says About Project-Based Learning," Educational Leadership, pp. 80-82, 2008.[4] R. D. De Veaux, M. Agarwal, M. Averett, B. S. Baumer, A. Bray, T. C. Bressoud, L. Bryant, L. Z. Cheng, A. Francis, R. Gould, A. Y. Kim, M. Kretchmar, Q. Lu, A. Moskol, D. Nolan, R. Pelayo, S. Raleigh , R. Sethi, M. Sondjaja, N. Tiruviluamala, P. X. Uhlig, T. M. Washington, C. L. Wesley, D. White and P. Ye, "Curriculum Guidelines for
. Peer-assisted teaching method to foster learning physiological basis of electrocardiography among 1st year medical graduate students: An interventional study. J. Educ. Health Promot., 8:64. Graduate Engineering Physiology II Lungs and Gas Transport: In-Class Exercises & Homework 5Ventilation, Perfusion, and V/Q Matching (3/25)IC5.1) For a person sitting quietly and breathing normally, calculate how many breathswould be required to replace 50% of the air in the alveoli at end-expiration. Assume “new”air entering the alveoli with each breath mixes completely with the remaining air beforeexhalation and explain how you derived your result. You can use Figure 38-6 (or Fig. 37-6 in 12th ed.) from Guyton &
/s40594-019-0185-0[15] M. Q. Patton, Qualitative research and evaluation methods. Sage, 2002.
questions about the student’s perceptions ofthe visits from GLs. To encourage meaningful responses, the students were offered extra crediton one of the course exams for providing complete and thoughtful responses. 27 students (of apossible 28, 96%) participated. Survey questions are listed in Table 2.Table 2: Questions asked in the survey. Subset Q Question(s) # Word Cloud 1 List 3 words to describe the experience of having presentations and Analysis of video interviews from visiting engineers and scientists during this overall tone class this semester. Benefits of the 2 What were the benefits, if any, of these visits
Cardoso, L. F., Mariano, F. C. M. Q., & Zorzal, E. R. (2019). A survey of industrial augmented reality. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 139, 106159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2019.106159Ha, I., Yoon, Y., & Choi, M. (2007). Determinants of adoption of mobile games under mobile broadband wireless access environment. Information & Management, 44(3), 276–286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2007.01.001Hsi, S., Linn, M. C., & Bell, J. E. (1997). The Role of Spatial Reasoning in Engineering and the Design of Spatial Instruction. Journal of Engineering Education, 86(2), 151–158. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.1997.tb00278.xIbáñez, M. B., Uriarte Portillo, A., Zatarain Cabada, R., & Barrón, M
Learning Community: A Student Perspective," Psychology Learning and Teaching, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 406-412, 2012.[6] C. N. Loes, K. C. Culver and T. L. Trolian, " How Collaborative Learning Enhances Students’ Openness to Diversity," The Journal of Higher Education, vol. 89, no. 6, pp. 935-960, 2018.[7] B. J. Lemuel, "Collaborative Learning: A Program for Improving the Retention of Minority Students," ED384323, Virginia, 1991.[8] L. A. Guion, D. C. Diehl and D. McDonald, "Triangulation: Establishing the Validity of Qualitative Studies," EDIS, vol. 3, 2011.[9] M. Q. Patton, Qualitative evaluation and research methods, Fourth ed., Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications, 2015.[10] T. D. Jick, "Mixing Qualitative and Quantitative Methods
throughplatform demos, usage trials, and Q&A sessions with the platform’s sales representatives. Wewill refer to the three used in the final evaluation as Platform 1, Platform 2, and Platform 3. Allthree of these do have the necessary interactivity capabilities to create active learning videos.Platform 1 was specifically created for education and can-do progression bar hotspots, branching(in-video), and multiple quiz formats. However, Platform 1’s use and campus integration isstructured for entire departments/institutions, and is only able to offer a cost estimate for theentire department, rather than on a course-by-course basis. The department proposal was tooexpensive to justify for piloting for one class. After explaining this to Platform 1’s team
students.Furthermore, information about the ACCESS program was shared with the local and statecommunities and appropriate recruiting materials were developed.3.1 Recruitment of High School StudentsRecruiting efforts focusing on high school students included making presentations to prospectivestudents and their families at the WVU Statler College High School Visitation Days eachsemester (on-campus for fall 2019 and spring 2020 and virtually for fall 2020) and sendingemails to prospective and admitted incoming students for the 2020-2021 and 2021-2022academic years. Students in the Fundamentals of Engineering Program (FEP) learned aboutACCESS through presentations given by project personnel in fall 2019 (in-person) and fall 2020(recording and live online Q&A
Studentsthrough Enhanced Mentoring and Summer Research Programs”, 124th ASEE AnnualConference & Exposition, Columbus, Ohio, June 2017[10] R. Whalin and Q. Pang, “Emerging Impact on Graduation Rates/Times From A SummerEngineering Enrichment Program”, 121st ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Indianapolis,IN, June 2014[11] J. Volcy and C. Sidbury, “Developing a Summer Bridge Course for Improving Retention inEngineering”, 120th ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Atlanta, GA, June 2013[12] E. Perez and O. Castillo, “Summer Immersion Program for First-Year Engineering Studentsas a Strategy to Increase Retention: First-Year Results”, 123rd ASEE Annual Conference &Exposition, New Orleans, LA, June 2016[13] Hunter, Mary Stuart, et al. Helping
and schema theory. Educational Psychology Review, 11(4), 291-324. [10] Zhu, Q., & Zoltowski, C. B., & Feister, M. K., & Buzzanell, P. M., & Oakes, W. C., & Mead, A. D. (2014, June), The Development of an Instrument for Assessing Individual Ethical Decision Making in Project-based Design Teams: Integrating Quantitative and Qualitative Methods. Paper presented at 2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Indianapolis, Indiana. 10.18260/1-2--23130[11] Linstone, H. A., & Turoff, M. (Eds.). (1975). The delphi method (pp. 3-12). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.[12] Reed, J.,Streiner, S., Burkey, D., Cimino, R., Pascal, J., & Young, M., "Mapping the Landscape of First
, 5, '| >');54 PutGPoint(White,' ',0,0,'O ');55 LabelJoint(White,0,0,xA,yA,' A');56 LabelLink(White,0,0,xA,yA,'');57 RRT_0(Magenta, xA,yA,vxA,vyA,axA,ayA, xP,yP,0,0,0,0,58 xQ,yQ,0,0,0,0, r3, +1, xB,yB,vxB,vyB,axB,ayB, Delta);59 PutGPoint(White,' ',xP,yP,'P ');60 PutGPoint(White,' ',xQ,yQ,' Q');61 PutDist(White, 0,0,xB,0, -15, '| >|');62 S:=LastDimValue;63 PutAng(White, xB,yB+20, xB,yB, xA,yA, 8, '| >');64 Theta3:=LastDimValue;65 LabelJoint(White,xA,yA,xB,yB,' B');66 LabelLink(White,xA,yA,xB,yB,'');67 WriteLn(FT,MyStr(t,9),' ',MyStr(Theta2,9),' ',MyStr(Theta2*DEG,7),' ',68 MyStr(xB,9),' ',MyStr(vxB,9),' ',MyStr(axB,9),' ',MyStr(Theta3,9));69 END;70 until
using equation (2), as shown.Qact = Qfan × Cc = 750 cfm (354 lit/s) (1)V = Q / A = 750 / 0.25 = 3000 fpm = 34 mph (2)The scaled F1 car was compared to full size F1-car. Thus, assuming the dynamic viscosity forair in the wind tunnel was the same as in real race and equating the Reynolds number gave theneeded velocity of air inside the testing section as shown in equation (3), where Vm is the modelcar velocity, Vcar is the actual car velocity, and 𝜌 is the density. With a model air velocity of 34mph inside the testing section, using a volume ratio for car-to-model of 18:1 and if density of airat 20 C is 1.2 kg/m3 then when using the ideal gas law, the velocity of the
review,” Electronics, vol. 9, no. 2, p. 272, 2020.[15] M. Prakash and A. Abdrabou, “On the fidelity of ns-3 simulations of wireless multipath tcp connections,” Sensors, vol. 20, no. 24, p. 7289, 2020.[16] N. Kuse and B. Jaeger, “Network simulation with ns-3,” Network, vol. 67, 2020.[17] N. Jovanovi´c and A. Zaki´c, “Network simulation tools and spectral graph theory in teaching computer network,” Computer Applications in Engineering Education, vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 2084–2091, 2018.[18] Q. Gu, Y. Zhang, and H. Yang, “Application of “computer network teaching platform+ flipped teaching model” in online education-taking “information technology teaching method” as an example,” in International Conference on Machine Learning and Big
, pp. 34–50, 2019, doi: 10.1080/19378629.2019.1567521.[5] T. Brown and B. Kats, Change by design: how design thinking transforms organizations and inspires innovation. Harper Collins Pusblishers, 2009.[6] ISO, “ISO 6385:2016(en) Ergonomics principles in the design of work systems,” 2016. [Online]. Available: https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/#iso:std:iso:6385:ed-3:v1:en.[7] O. Crosby, “Usability engineer,” Occup. Outlook Q., vol. 44.4, no. 202, pp. 48–49, 2000.[8] ABET, “Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs 2020-2021.” https://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation-criteria/criteria-for-accrediting- engineering-programs-2020-2021/.[9] J. Rubin and D. Chisnell, Handbook of usability testing [electronic
metric from the “Topical Content Post-Tests”will then be used to test the learning effectiveness by performing another two-way ANOVA between thepost-test survey results and the topical post-test results. The learning engagement will be measured based Table 1: RIMMS 2015 Questions Plus Two Rewrites (RIMMS++) RIMMS ARCS Prin- Original RIMMS Ques- RIMMS++ Question Q ciples tion [22] R7 Confidence - As I worked with these huser As I worked with this industry standard Learning re- instructionsi, I was confident tool or practice, I was confident that I quirements that I could learn how to work could learn how to