– both in the classroom and online. This delivery method istypically termed Hy-Flex and is an instructional approach very familiar to one of the authors.The course was assigned a classroom with a standard capacity of 100 students, but distancingrestrictions in place for the semester required that no more than 25 students participate in thephysical classroom at one time. Therefore, if students were scheduled to attend alternately inperson, each student would be able to attend one in-person class session every two weeks(equating to approximately seven total per semester). Further, all students and faculty enteringthe classroom were required to always wear masks and maintain a distance of at least six feetfrom one another.Given the classroom
Minority Engineering Program and the Purdue Office of Institutional Assessment, Dr. Stwalley collects, analyzes and manages data pertaining to the outreach, recruitment, retention and graduation of engineering students from historically underrepresented groups.Dr. Robert Merton Stwalley III P.E., Purdue University at West Lafayette Dr. Robert M. Stwalley III, P.E. joined the Agricultural & Biological Engineering department as a faculty member in the fall of 2013. He earned his Bachelor of Science in Agriculture and Biological Engineering (ABE) and his M.S.E. and Ph.D. from Mechanical Engineering at Purdue University. Dr. Stwalley is the former Director of Professional Practice at Purdue, has more than 20 years in
education research, teacher professional development, and secondary STEM education. In 2021, Erica received the ASEE Pacific Southwest Early Career Teaching Award and two awards at UNLV for mentoring undergraduate and graduate students. She also received the Peter J. Bosscher Outstanding Faculty Advisor Award in 2019 from Engineers Without Borders and was recognized as a Nevada Woman in STEM by Senator Jackie Rosen.Prof. Eakalak Khan, University of Nevada, Las Vegas Eakalak Khan is a Professor in Civil and Environmental Engineering and Construction Department and the Director of Water Resources Research Program, University of Nevada, Las Vegas. From 2002 to 2017, he was a Professor in Civil and Environmental
migrators faced the sameproblems as students who dropped out of STEM majors (leavers) but chose another STEMmajor. A qualitative study [15] on students migrating to industrial engineering (IE) showedthat students left their initial engineering major because of negative experiences with facultyand classes, very low interaction with faculty, and change in career goals to an industrialengineer. The other studies which have researched migrators are quantitative [10, 13] anddescribe metrics such as major stickiness (percentage of students that enroll and subsequentlygraduate in a major) and odds of graduation in the major. Quantitative studies into whystudents drop a major cannot provide the rich description obtained from a qualitative studythat is
by others [10]. Thereverse belongingness is alienation, social isolation, or rejection, leading to depression in thelong term [11]. Among factors that influence the sense of belonging of women to a major areidentity or being valued [12]; stereotype-free educational environment [13]; formal and informalstudent organizations supporting female students [12]; family, faculty and peer support [7]. Onthe other hand, and specific to the construction industry, many prior studies indicate thatpresence of gender stereotyping, low sense of belonging, lack of support system, and lack offemale role models factor to women opting out of construction-related studies and careers [14],[15], [16].Previous research on sense of belonging found that only when an
ways, if any, do student understandings change between their first and second years?Broader Project BackgroundThis analysis used an existing data set generated as part of a larger project that encompasses sixuniversities across three countries. Member institutions are equally distributed, two each fromthe United States, United Kingdom, and South Africa. The research team for this project includesfaculty and graduate students from all three countries, with direct representation from five of thesix included institutions. The objective of the project is to capture various aspects of the studentexperience over the course of a student’s undergraduate career and is thus a longitudinalundertaking beginning in the first year and ending with the
students then become the person making the decisions and cannot duckor skirt around an issue, but must face the problems head on [9]. Figure 1. Opening statement for Scenario B, the biomedical device failure case.Since there are multiple decision points, the students can become more involved and invested intheir outcomes with each decision. Each case becomes more detailed as it plays out, such asincluding the full name of someone who died in each of the original scenarios (Fig. 2). Aspersonalized cases are more effective at developing critical thinking skills and rememberingfactual information [9], this allows the students to make the connection that their decisionsthroughout their careers will affect real people and not faceless
water quantity and quality in both natural and built hydrologic systems. She is also a Diversity and Inclusion Faculty Fellow at RWU and interested in evaluating evidence-based teaching and mentoring practices in STEM education, particularly those which may increase retention of underrepresented students in the engineering discipline.Dr. Selby M. Conrad, Roger Williams University Selby Conrad, Ph.D. is an Assistant Professor at Roger Williams University, Adjunct Assistant Professor (Clinical) at Brown University Medical School and a licensed psychologist on staff at Rhode Island and Bradley Hospitals. Dr. Conrad’s program of research has largely been focused on gender differences in risk and recidivism within the
said they were most looking forward to learning, making friends, finding theirpassion, working towards their career and exploring new places [7].Early research on the effects of COVID19 on student populationThere has been an influx of studies that investigated various immediate effects of COVID-19 onstudent populations. Due to the immediacy of the pandemic, there have not been any studieswhich look at the long-term effects of COVID-19 on students and it is unknown whetherstudents who started college during the pandemic were more affected than those who had alreadystarted college. Most papers written thus far have found that students reported increased stress,anxiety, and depression [20][21][22]. This included difficulty in concentrating
Engineering at York University, Canada. Before beginning his academic career, Dr. Czekanski worked for over 10 years in the automotive sector. Dr. Czekanski attention is dedicated to newly established Lassonde School of Engineering (York). He devotes his efforts towards the enrichment of Renaissance Engineering program by including interdisciplinary learning, industry collaboration and designing for positive social impact which contributes to the uniqueness of York’s engineering program. As an active participant in the establishment of the undergraduate and graduate Mechanical Engineering programs, his attention is devoted to providing students with both experiential learning and soft skills
Paper ID #32323An Overview of the Hornet Leadership Program in the College ofEngineering & Computer Science at California State University, SacramentoDr. Harindra Rajiyah, California State University, Sacramento Dr. Harindra (Raj) Rajiyah’s career spans six organizations from Academia to Industry. He currently teaches as an adjunct faculty in the college of engineering & computer science at CSU. • Raj started his career at Georgia Institute of Technology in Atlanta as an Assistant Professor in Engi- neering Science and Mechanics. He taught 5 undergraduate and graduate level courses, mentored graduate students and
virtues. 1IntroductionTeamwork is an integral component of engineering education. This significance is reflected inABET Student Outcome 5, which guides programs to graduate students that have “an ability tofunction effectively on a team whose members together provide leadership, create a collaborativeand inclusive environment, establish goals, plan tasks, and meet objectives” [1]. Employers,engineering graduates, and faculty recognize teamwork as an important professional skill [2],[3]. In fact, one study showed that engineering alumni rated teamwork as the most important ofall ABET outcomes [4]. Other recent studies report that teamwork is one of the
Professor in Higher Education Counseling/Student Affairs at Califor- nia Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo. He is Lead Principal Investigator for the NSF-funded California State University Alliance for Graduate Education and the Professoriate (AGEP) Alliance for Diversity and Strengths of STEM Faculty: A Culturally-Informed Strengths-Based Approach to Advance Early-Career Faculty Success. Dr. Almeida is also Co-Principal Investigator for the NSF Scholarships in Science, Technology, Engineering & Mathematics (S-STEM) grant, Engineering Neighbors: Gaining Access Growing Engineers (ENGAGE). Dr. Almeida’s graduate training is in Urban Education Policy – Higher Education from the University of Southern
themopportunities to make autonomous discoveries in team-based design projects. Another might beto recognize that engineering students, who are taught to communicate design decisions throughtechnical tools and software, often struggle to describe complex information effectively to a laypublic. These subtle but important considerations in becoming empathetic to the needs ofengineering students make up an important component of effective teaching. It follows thatimplementing this type of consideration in engineering curricula is necessary for preparingstudents for a modern-day workforce that is less focused on academic achievement (knowledgeand scholarship) and more on emotional intelligence and skills like personality, independentthinking, and ability to
. Within the IBL model, student assessment is notperformed via the traditional methods of homework or exams. Instead, students are evaluated ontheir ability to relate and apply core course concepts towards a team innovation that introducesnovelty.This Innovation-Based Learning model has been implemented within a cardiovascularengineering course currently offered across four institutions. The diversity of the participatinguniversities and the enrolled students (both undergraduate and graduate) fosters an environmentfor innovative thinking. However, being an innovative multidisciplinary course createsdifficulties when evaluating students on their course outcomes. Based on their individualbackgrounds and skills, each student creates learning
].Just as race and ethnicity may impact the inner workings of engineering teams [11], issues ofrace and ethnicity may influence who benefits from technology [12]. Hence, it is critical for first-year engineering students to begin to understand engineering and engineering design asprocesses that are inherently social and subject to unconscious bias.Course Description & PartnershipsEngineering 110: Design Your Engineering Experience is an introductory course in whichstudents explore the breadth of opportunities available to engineers in both their education andtheir career. The course is structured around three key themes: What is Engineering?, ExploringMichigan and Michigan Engineering, and Self-Understanding. The complete vision, mission
peerinteractions as well as interactions with faculty members, and these interactions could encouragemore effective understanding of materials and exploration of topics. Second, liberal artseducation focuses on cultivating adaptive problem-solving skills based on critical thinking,collaboration, and effective communication. These skills make students valuable collaborators inengineering projects and afford them a smooth transition into professional life [3]. That means aliberal arts education can potentially lead to a successful engineering career.In the meantime, the integration of engineering education into liberal arts universities posesseveral challenges to the engineering faculty members. For instance, faculty members may lackthe knowledge needed to
higher rates of mental health conditions in engineeringand understand factors that influence students’ decisions to seek help. Wider scale studies andcross-institutional engineering-specific studies can provide additional evidence for understandingthe mental health issues faced by our students and how engineering education plays a role inthem and their ability to address such issues timely. Aligned with that objective, this studypresents an initial exploration of the relationship between the stigma typically associated withmental health conditions and help-seeking behavior of students. It is a first step toward a morethorough examination of the engineering culture and its effect on students’ mental health.Engineering culture and mental
to think more aboutengineering (Jones, 2009). Also, principals, can make better policy and implementation decisionswithin their high schools to support their students’ outcome expectations. Accordingly, the purpose of this qualitative study is to explore teachers’ and principals’perceptions of students’ postsecondary career outcome expectations in two Virginia highschools. This study stems from a National Science Foundation (NSF) funded project on studyingsystemic gatekeepers and how they may influence students’ decision to pursue engineering. Weground this particular study within the Social Cognitive Career Theory (SCCT) (Lent et al.,1994) to answer the following research question (RQ): How do teachers and principals in twoVirginia
skills insummer 2021, and develop pre and post assessments for a more rigorous study on studentsdevelopment of professional skills. We are also working to pilot an additional program with the2021 Summer Undergraduate Research participants to explore how building electronic researchportfolios may reinforce professional development. Lastly, our work with undergraduatesindicates that many graduate students may be entering Masters and PhD programs lacking in avariety of research and professional skills. We are currently working with members of theengineering faculty to transition some of our workshops towards graduate students, with the hopeof designing a multiyear study on the impact of professional skill development on graduatestudent
the program is new, regional campuses had to explore outreach strategies and attractstudents to the major. One of the strategies was to have an overlap between engineering andengineering technology programs for the first year. This overlap of coursework would allowcampuses to retain students and offer opportunity for students to explore engineering technologymajor and make an informed decision on which educational path to take. First-year courses suchas physics, fundamentals of engineering and general education courses remain same forengineering and engineering technology students. In addition to these courses, new courses weredeveloped to teach introductory topics in engineering technology in the first year. Thecurriculum is shared with the
Chairman of the Department of Computer Science at Howard University. His primary research interest is in distributed computing. Dr. Burge is also interested in Computer Science Education and Diversity, and Tech En- trepreneurship and Innovation. His work in CS Education and Diversity has primarily been focused on informal and personalized learning, and on the use of technology to aid in the socio-technical encultur- ation of underrepresented students in CS, K-12 initiatives, and diversity, equity, and inclusion beyond compliance. Dr. Burge practices design thinking as an innovative teaching methodology and promotes immersive learning and learning by doing. He co-teaches the Bison Startup and Bison Accelerate courses
MIDFIELD research project on engineering education; she has served as a Co-PI on three research projects, including one on transfer students and another on student veterans in engineering.Dr. Marisa K. Orr, Clemson University Marisa K. Orr is an Assistant Professor in Engineering and Science Education with a joint appointment in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at Clemson University. Her research interests include student persistence and pathways in engineering, gender equity, diversity, and academic policy. Dr. Orr is a recipient of the NSF CAREER Award for her research entitled, ”Empowering Students to be Adaptive Decision-Makers.”Dr. Catherine E. Brawner, Research Triangle Educational Consultants
the group process talk, the topic proposal, andthe problem-solution talk (explained next).2. Researching an independent technical topic Students in the targeted communication course have the autonomy to choose a technicaltopic to explore for a sizable part of the semester. The student’s topic choice spans twoconnected talks; a topic proposal (3 – 4 minutes) followed by a problem solution talk (8 – 10minutes). Various in-class exercises, readings, and lectures are built into the course to helpstudents choose and research a topic that sparks a personal connection or interest. Students maychoose a societal problem followed by an engineering solution, or students may find aninnovative solution and pair it with a societal problem that the
Associate Vice Provost for Digital Learning at UT San Antonio, where he established the Office of Digital Learning that created a unit focused on innovative delivery across the entire spectrum of technology enabled learning - from in-class to online. Over his career, he has helped a few hundred faculty from varied disciplines develop hybrid and online courses. He has also taught traditional, hybrid and online courses in various STEM disciplines ranging in size from 28 to 250. He is also co-developer of a Digital Academy which was a finalist for the Innovation Award by the Professional and Organizational Development Network and an Innovation Award winner. He was also named as the Center for Digital Education’s Top 30
Toronto District School Board. Teachers of both classes werefamiliar with Discovery and had previously participated in multiple in-person program offerings.Discovery-related deliverables graded by class-specific teachers made up 10-15% of final coursegrades.Discovery mentors were volunteer undergraduate and graduate students from the University ofToronto Faculty of Applied Science and Engineering. Prior to student interaction, mentors wereprovided a pedagogical approach “cheat sheet” that included technical specifics of the projectsand was compiled based on the experience of previous Discovery mentors and teachers.Program OutcomesEvaluation of the Fall 2020 offering of Discovery was completed using a combination of studentgrade data, student
, documentation of work conducted throughout the semester, and completion of a finalprototype.The research and design stages of an independent study can be similar to that of an EngineeringCapstone project however there are some key differences in the student experience. First, in anindependent study, the student usually initiates the creation of the project to explore a topic ofmutual interest with a faculty member. At smaller teaching-focused institutions, many advancedtechnical topics in a student’s major are not covered in-depth and some students would like moreexperience in a particular area out of pure interest or to prepare themselves for a future career inthat field. Secondly, the student is not part of a student design team and often works
socialrelationships and an understanding of social issues is extremely valuable for the development ofengineering students. Unfortunately, engineering programs emphasize the technical content sointensely that most engineering students do not get the opportunity to work with social issuesthus never creating that awareness.The focus on technical aspects of engineering, and the perception that engineering work isobjective, has also led engineering students to think about the profession as apolitical [8, 9].This depoliticization frames engineering as a technical space where the social and politicalsides are tangential to engineering decision-making. Cech argued that students'conceptualization of engineering as apolitical has also created issues related to
universally accepted intercultural competence assessmentinstrument that can be used in every context does not exist. Our decision to use the IDI for ourquantitative analysis is rooted in our belief that the development of intercultural competence is aprogressive and ongoing process [2], [34], [35]. The IDI is recognized as a cross-nationallyvalidated psychometric instrument developed based upon Milton Bennett’s DMIS that spansfrom monocultural orientations to intercultural orientations to cultural differences. Theinstrument provides an indication of respondents’ predominant orientation to cultural differences,referred to as their Developmental Orientation. The IDI is well established as an instrument tomeasure student gains in intercultural
ofreal-world experience as a factor in the ENGINE student experience is not surprising. Similarly,given the generally important role that faculty and teaching assistants (TAs) play in studentlearning as well as the importance of grades to undergraduates, the emergence of instructionalsupport and assessment as factors in the capstone design experience is also justified. Andfinally, the fourth factor, task value serves as an indication of students' motivation to participatein the ENGINE capstone experience. Task value draws from expectancy-value theory and hasbeen demonstrated to be a distinct contributor to academic engagement and effort [26, 27] aswell as educational and career aspirations [28].RQ2: Was there a difference in student perceptions