.x[11] Shymansky, J.A., Hedges, L.V. and Woodworth, G. (1990), A reassessment of the effects ofinquiry‐based science curricula of the 60's on student performance. J. Res. Sci. Teach., 27: 127-144. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660270205.[12] Hoyt, R.M. and Clemence, S.P. (1989). Uplift Capacity of Helical Anchors in Soil, InProceedings of the 12th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and FoundationEngineering, Vol. 2, pp. 1019-1022.[13] Hansson, Sven Ove and Grüne-Yanoff, Till, "Preferences", The Stanford Encyclopedia ofPhilosophy (Summer 2018 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL =.[14] National Society of Professional Engineers. “History of the Code of Ethics for Engineers,”https://www.nspe.org/resources/ethics/code-ethics/history-code
Education, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 162-177, 2000/12/01 2000, doi: 10.1080/08886504.2000.10782307.[2] G. M. Rafique, K. Mahmood, N. F. Warraich, and S. U. Rehman, "Readiness for Online Learning during COVID-19 pandemic: A survey of Pakistani LIS students," The Journal of Academic Librarianship, vol. 47, no. 3, p. 102346, 2021/05/01/ 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2021.102346.[3] AUTODESK. "Autocad." https://www.autodesk.com/education/home (accessed.[4] F. Shines. "Distance learning and student services." https://dlss.flvc.org/qm-about (accessed 2/2/2021, 2021).[5] Q. Matters. "Quality Matter." https://www.qualitymatters.org/ (accessed.[6] U. o. F. O. o. T. Excellence. "UF's pathway to
References[1] L. Starkey, M. Shonfeld, S. Prestridge, and M. G. Cervera, “Special issue: COVID-19 and therole of technology and pedagogy on school education during a pandemic INTRODUCTION,”doi: 10.1080/1475939X.2021.1866838.[2] W. Wagiran et al, "Online learning of mechanical engineering subject in the COVID-19 era:strategy, platform and media," Journal of Physics. Conference Series, vol. 1700, (1), 2020.[3] Watermeyer et al, "COVID-19 and digital disruption in UK universities: afflictions andaffordances of emergency online migration," Higher Education, vol. 81, (3), pp. 623-641,2021;2020;.[4] Widarto et al, "Explanatory of learning models and vocational teacher perceptions ofmechanical engineering during the COVID-19 pandemic," Journal of Physics
computational tools heavily (theclass used in this research was “Computational Tools”), will be another factor that needs to betraced in order to understand if learning with interactive books truly improves students’comprehension and applications ability. Being able to apply what is learned later in theiracademic career is a strong indicator of true mastery of a subject. 8Bibliography 1. Edgcomb, A., Vahid, F., Ferguson, R., Lysecky, R., and Lysecky, S., Getting students to earnestly do reading, studying, and homework in an introductory programming class SIGCSE ’17: Proceedings of the 2017 ACM SIGCSE Technical
. Talesnick, B. Amadei, and T. Tal, “Integrating Sustainable Development into a Service-Learning Engineering Course,” J. Prof. Issues Eng. Educ. Pract., vol. 140, no. 1, p. 05013001, Jan. 2014, doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)EI.1943-5541.0000169.[6] D. Bourn and I. Neal, “The Global Engineer: Incorporating global skills within UK higher education of engineers,” Engineers Against Poverty/Development Education Research Centre, 2008.[7] A. A. Stukas, E. G. Clary, and M. Snyder, “Service Learning: Who Benefits and Why,” Social Policy Report, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 1–23, Dec. 1999, doi: 10.1002/j.2379- 3988.1999.tb00039.x.[8] J.-L. Bertrand-Krajewski, S. Barraud, and B. Chocat, “Need for improved methodologies and measurements for sustainable
college students,” Journal of Higher Education, vol. 75, pp. 249- 284, May/June 2004.[2] E. Warburton, R. Bugarin, and A. Nunez, “Bridging the gap: Academic preparation and post- secondary success of first-generation students,” Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Educational Statistics. NCES Report 2001-153, 2001.[3] S. Spencer, C. Steele, and D. Quinn, “Stereotype threat and women's math performance,” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 4-28, Jan. 1999.[4] N. Fitzallen and R. Natalie, “Outcomes for Engineering Students Delivering a STEM Education and Outreach Programme,” European Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 42, no. 6, pp. 632–643, Nov. 2017.[5] R. Tillinghast
, all four teams ordered the parts and started working onthe projects in the second and third weeks of July. Since the MTSU campus was closed and theCOVID-19 cases surged in the summer, the students collaborated remotely using slack, Zoom,text messages, Discord, etc. Because the project involved writing code, some students also set upGitHub repositories in order to collaborate and perform version control. The faculty mentorshelped the students along the way by holding regularly status meetings and answering theirquestions.4. Project OutcomesAll four teams completed their projects by the end of July, and the last week was mostly used totinker and dabble. A final report detailing the design and outcomes was submitted by each team.Team #3’s work
day” for this question.” Respondents who chose something other than “almost every day” for thisresponse were coded as having failed the attention filter.7 The project is supported by funding from the National Science Foundation: “Collaborative Research: A Study ofInteractional, Organizational and Professional Mechanisms of Disadvantage in the Underrepresented andMarginalized STEM Workforce” (#HRD 1535385, 1665117). Any opinions, findings, and conclusions orrecommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of theNational Science Foundation.A question in both the ASEE-DIS and SIS surveys asked respondents whether they had any ofthe following (they could mark all that apply): “vison
largest manufacturer, is on the verge of using 3- D printing to make jet parts. MIT Technology Review,” Available Online: https://www.technologyreview.com/s/513716/additive-manufacturing/.[5] R. Agarwala and R. A. Chin, “Facilitating additive manufacturing engagement and outreach,” ASEE Annu. Conf. Expo. Conf. Proc., vol. 122nd ASEE, no. 122nd ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition: Making Value for Society, 2015, doi: 10.18260/p.24086.
, Tseng, & Akarasriworn, 2013). Furthermore, several studiesfound that collaboration improves students’ performance by developing higher order-thinkingwhen students discuss their ideas in the group (Chung, 1998; S. D. Johnson & Chung, 1999;Mergendoller, Bellisimo, & Maxwell, 2000). Students will more engaged in learning when theyfeel they are an accepted group member (Willms, 2003). For example, girls have positiveperceptions about team processes when they are in a group comprised of other girls. As shown inprior research on SEEK, girls felt less positive about their team processes and were less engagedwhen they were in a co-ed team (Beauchamp, Edwards, Knight, & Lee, 2019). Thus, in additionto focusing on the outcomes (i.e
://cvt.engin.umich.edu/ 4) Consortium for Nonproliferation Enabling Technologies (CNEC), https://cnec.ncsu.edu/ 5) Nuclear Science and Security Consortium (NSSC), https://nssc.berkeley.edu/AcknowledgementsThis material is based upon work supported by the Department of Energy / National NuclearSecurity Administration under Award Number(s) DE-NA0003921.This manuscript has been authored by UT-Battelle, LLC, under contract DE-AC05-00OR22725with the US Department of Energy (DOE). The US government retains and the publisher, byaccepting the article for publication, acknowledges that the US government retains anonexclusive, paid-up, irrevocable, worldwide license to publish or reproduce the published formof this manuscript, or allow others to do so, for US
the activities was on K-8 curriculum and waysthe CS concepts can be enacted with students via plugged and unplugged lessons. Thecurriculum focus also included numerous discussions about how to adapt provided curriculum tomake it appropriate for students with varied background experiences. During the last twoSaturdays for Cohort 1 (March/April 2020) and then for all of Cohort 2’s Saturdays (fall2020/spring 2021) an additional focus became discussing how to enact CS lessons in remotelearning environments, including asynchronously. Initially workshops were held in person,before COVID-19 pandemic required shifting to the online Zoom conferencing platform. Theworkshops were designed to be very interactive and discussion-based, with only
/. 1019. Somerville, M.H., Goldberg, D. E., Kerns, S. E. & Korte, R. (2010, October). A war of words: Using sticky language to effect change in engineering education. 2010 Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE). IEEE: T3B-1-T38-2.20. Turley, J. (1981, August). Mobilization manpower: A credible force or an empty promise? Military Review, 2012.21. U.S. Continental Army Command. (1973, April 5). CONARC soft skills training conference. Proceedings of a conference conducted at the Air Defense School, 12-13 December 1972.22. Wang, X., Bendle, N.T., Mai, F. & Cotte, J. (2015). The Journal of Consumer Research at 40: A Historical Analysis. Journal of Consumer Research, 42(1), 5-18.23. Whitmore, P.C. (1972, December). What are soft
Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals, New York: David McKay Company, 1956.[3] UNESCO, "Education: From disruption to recovery," UNESCO, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://en.unesco.org/covid19/educationresponse. [Accessed 2021].[4] D. W. Johnson and R. T. Johnson, Active Learning: Cooperation in the College Classroom, MN: Interaction Book Company, 1998.[5] S. Farmingdale State College, Proposed mode of instruction, Farmingdale: Farmingdale State College, State University of New York, 2020.[6] R. F. a. R. Brent, "Learning by Doing," Chemical Engineering Education, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 282-283, 2003.[7] J. V. TRANQUILLO, "KINESTHETIC LEARNING IN THE CLASSROOM," in ASEE, Pittsburgh, 2008.[8] R. F. a. R.Brent, "Cooperative
material are those of theauthor(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.References1. Kendall, M. R., Choe, N.H., Denton, M., Borrego, M., (2018). “Engineering IdentityDevelopment of Hispanic Students.” ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, ConferenceProceedings, 2018.2. E-mail from TAMUK Office of Institutional Research and Assessment, February 24,2021.3. Prince, S.P., Tarazkar, Y., (2013) “Mechanical Engineering Design Experience forHispanic and Low Income Students.” ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, ConferenceProceedings, 2013.4. Meyers, K., Cripe, K. (2015) “Prior educational experience and gender influences onperceptions of a first-year engineering design project.” International
understanding of each method's physics byconnecting the physical principles to the applications; compare various plausible NDEtechniques for common industrial applications; given an application, identify one or moreappropriate NDE technique(s) by providing convincing scientific reasoning and justification. Teaching ‘Nondestructive Evaluation of Flaws’, an all-around course in NDE, using thetraditional lecture-based methods is challenging because: (1) each NDE method is based on adifferent physical principle; it is difficult for the students to grasp all the different principles andmethods one after the other within the short 15-week timeframe of one semester, and (2) theclass is highly heterogenous; the students have very different backgrounds
homeworkwrappers.SummaryThis formative assessment of the use of homework wrappers focused upon completion andagreement rate (accuracy). The observed rates are both lower than hoped for, but the studysuggest ways that both the wrappers and their implementation might be improved.References[1] C. R. F. Lund, "Can Students Self-Generate Appropriately Targeted Feedback on Their OwnSolutions in a Problem-Solving Context," in ASEE Virtual Annual Conference, 2020: ASEE, p.17, doi: 10.18260/1-2--34256.[2] Ambrose, S. A. et al. How Learning Works: Seven Research-Based Principles for SmartTeaching. The Jossey-Bass Higher and Adult Education Series. 2010, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. 199pp.
in the next section.Table 2: This table shows the activities throughout the module and the week they occur within a15 week semester. Lectures show the week they occur and assignments include the week they areassigned and due. It also describes the learning outcomes for each activity. Activities are listed inchronological order. Learning Outcome(s) (in parentheses are the associated Activity Week Occurred ABET Student Outcomes) Personal and - Describe and reflect on current state and desired future Professional Assign: Week 1 states as a person, student, and professional. (SO7) Interests & Due: Week 2
assignments at every step of the EDP.At the end of the semester, most teams have to-scale, functional prototypes.Table 1. Sample Design Projects Project Client Project Goal Duke Lemur Center Develop an enrichment device for the aye-aye lemurs that delivers a small amount of food Dr. S. Rent Develop a device that simultaneously measures the temperature of five newborns placed in one crib (for use in Ethiopia) X-Prize Team Design a drone that can attach to a tree branch to deliver a camera Museum of Life & Design a device that randomly delivers food to skunks in their enclosure Science Bridge2Sports Develop an easy method for wheelchair users to
Drivers 2 Slingshot Atmega328P SlingshotsDigital: 2 DriversPulse: Pop(s) PopsBus: Flipper DriversAnalog: SwitchesPower: (a) System Diagram
, exploring the world of craft cocktails, and making a fuss over her Boston Terrier, Gatsby. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021Understanding Gen Z’s Declining Engagement with WE@RIT, a Woman in Engineering ProgramIntroductionAround 2016-2017 we began noticing sharp declines in current student engagement with ourwomen in engineering program, WE@RIT, within Rochester Institute of Technology’s KateGleason College of Engineering. The program itself was launched in the early 2000’s during theMillennial era, and the programming playbook was one of large, one-off events spearheaded byone full-time Director, and a handful of student employees. That
competition either as part of student teams or asfaculty advisor. The competition website includes competition guidelines, evaluation rubric,submission files to be part of the design proposal, winning packages, resources to help studentteams, and deadlines [1].Airport Cooperative Research Program (ACRP) conducts an annual airport design competitionfor university-level students in which U.S. student teams propose innovative designs to solvechallenges facing U.S. airports [1]. Undergraduate and/or graduate students are eligible toparticipate in the competition either as part of a course or as an independent project with facultysponsor(s). The students, either individually or in a team, prepare a 40-page design packageproposal addressing innovative
, “Experiences and Perceptions ofSTEM Subjects, Careers, and Engagement in STEM Activities Among Middle School Studentsin the Maritime Provinces,” Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and TechnologyEducation, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 153–168, Feb. 2016.[12] P. R. Aschbacher, M. Ing, and S. M. Tsai, “Is Science Me? Exploring Middle SchoolStudents’ STE-M Career Aspirations,” Journal of Science Education and Technology, vol. 23,no. 6, pp. 735–743, Jun. 2014.[13] A. J. Hayter, Probability & Statistics for Engineers and Scientists, 4th Edition. CengageLearning, 2005.[14] J. Saldana, The Coding Manual for
allies programs to support and promote gender equity in Academia,” ASEE Annu. Conf. Expo. Conf. Proc., vol. 122nd ASEE, no. 122nd ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition: Making Value for Society, 2015, doi: 10.18260/p.24242.[7] L. Abrams, S. G. Shoger, L. Corrigan, S. Y. Nozaki, M. Narui, and A. Jayakumar, “Empowering male students as allies for gender equity within an engineering college,” in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings, Jun. 2016, vol. 2016- June, doi: 10.18260/p.26945.[8] E. E. Liptow, M. H. Bardini, N. R. Krigel, M. L. Singer, and C. Carrigan, “Engaging engineers in inclusive cultural change through a new method, articulating a succinct description
. USA: SAGE Publications, pp. 69-103, 2013.[7] S. J. Tracy, Qualitative Research Methods: Collecting Evidence, Crafting Analysis,Communicating Impact. Chichester, England: John Wiley & Sons, 2019.[8] M. Vaismoradi, H. Turunen, and T. Bondas, “Content analysis and thematic analysis:Implications for conducting a qualitative descriptive study,” Nursing & Health Sciences, vol. 15ED-3, pp. 398-405, 2013.[9] N. A. Mamaril, E. L. Usher, C. R. Li, D. R. Economy, and M. S. Kennedy, “Measuringundergraduate students' engineering self‐efficacy: A validation study,” Journal of EngineeringEducation, vol. 105 ED-2, pp. 366-395, 2016.Appendix 1List of questions for students participating
Paper ID #33586Biologically Inspired Design For Engineering Education: Online TeacherProfessional Learning (Evaluation)Dr. Meltem Alemdar, Georgia Institute of Technology Dr. Meltem Alemdar is s Associate Director and Principal Research Scientist at Georgia Institute of Tech- nology’s Center for Education Integrating Science, Mathematics and Computing (CEISMC). Her research focuses on improving K-12 STEM education through research on curriculum development, teacher pro- fessional development, and student learning in integrated STEM environments. Dr. Alemdar is currently co-PI for research on various NSF funded projects