or choosing inventions to address specific concerns.From a descriptive perspective, students with low scores in academic motivation (AMO),persistence (PST), social engagement (SCE), and decision making in college major (DMA)should be referred to the academic consulting center, those who have low scores in fit withmajor/career (FIT) could lead to a consulting in the career center. Also, a low score in masterylearning goal orientation (MLG), personal achievement goal orientation (PAG), deep learningapproach (DLA), surface learning approach (SLA), and problem-solving approach (PSA) maywarrant a referral for tutoring in the major.The SASI III could be used for intervention development and research for causality-relatedconcerns from an
. The GPSS aims to supportgovernment decision-makers in boosting efficient large-scale intervention strategies andinvestment plans to reduce disaster risks in schools and improve learning environments forchildren.ContextIn the learning experience examined in this paper, two student teams were formed during theWinter 2020 term to collaborate with a professional team from the GPSS of the World Bank todesign a solution aimed at improving baseline data to assess the vulnerability of schoolinfrastructure. Students from an upper-division undergraduate level Human-ComputerInteraction (HCI) course and a graduate-level Artificial Intelligence/Machine Learning (AI/ML)course participated. The AI/ML team developed a back-end automatic structural
and alumniperceptions might differ. Although we will also be using student surveys and focus groups in thisproject, we decided to start with program alumni as we feel they are uniquely well-positioned todiscuss their learning experience in the program with a juxtaposition to their career and graduateschool experience, and speak to the relevance of the program’s teaching and learning approachesbeyond the program itself. Comparing faculty perceptions with alumni perceptions is key indistinguishing between the intended and the enacted curriculum [19], [20].To engage in this research, we sought previous research on comparing instructor and alumniperspectives. Interestingly, despite an extensive literature review, the majority of studies focuson
future career than non-ETS honors students.This paper investigates the student experience in the ETS-IMPRESS program in three ways. Tocapture student experience of the use of the IDP and the faculty mentor relations, we solicitedlong-form responses to anonymous surveys. Analysis of reflections submitted in courses andcomponents allows for a window into longitudinal student development as well as their directreflections on the effects of the program. Finally, analysis of student questionnaires, a full reportof which appears as an appendix, sheds light on student development. We find that studentsbenefit from this program and encourage the incorporation of IDPs and other means of reflectioninto engineering curricula, particularly as a regular
and members fromUniversity corporate and external relations offices. This board provides accountability andguidance to support the ongoing success and growth of the Lab’s mission. The director alsoworks closely with University Relations to identify external partners and funding sources. Whilethe director ties together all the components of the Lab’s functions, the faculty mentors are theprimary interface with students. Once a project is initiated with a faculty mentor, the facultyperson acts as the liaison between the students and the external partner. This person manages theproject, provides area expertise, and teaches the students associated professional skills. Primarysuccesses for the faculty mentor are in the student outcomes and
was open to the entire university. The hours variedduring the week but were generally 10AM – 5PM with a few weekend hours. In additionto the manager, there was an additional full-time staff member who split their time 50%with the makerspace and other IT services, and 45-50 student employees. The managerhad created a large team structure for student staff, with sub-teams who focused ondifferent aspects of operational support and student team leads. After training from themanager, graduate students led faculty course prototyping and training requests.Covid-19 and ongoing: In Spring 2020, the space was closed and the manager led PPEproduction, mainly face shields. All student staff were offered the option to workremotely to finish out the
research in engineering education in areas of sustainability, resilience and fuel cell education.Dr. Samantha Ruth Brunhaver, Arizona State University Samantha Brunhaver is an Assistant Professor of Engineering in the Fulton Schools of Engineering Poly- technic School. Dr. Brunhaver recently joined Arizona State after completing her M.S. and Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering at Stanford University. She also has a B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from Northeastern University. Dr. Brunhaver’s research examines the career decision-making and professional identity formation of engineering students, alumni, and practicing engineers. She also conducts studies of new engineering pedagogy that help to improve student engagement and
learningopportunities. As Eyler points out, such opportunities provide students with “‘real world’challenge” [5, p. 41], and through workplace experiences students often come to see “therelevance of the curriculum to life in a complex organization” [5, p. 50]. Eyler (1993) morespecifically found that co-op students learned how to be “an expert on people and organizations”[5, p. 47], including how to be an effective member of their employing organization. It has alsobeen argued that internship or co-op programs are helpful for students’ professional growth [6].Based on their empirical study with business students, Bhattacharya and Neelam reported thatstudents developed greater confidence, negotiation skills, social sensitivity, and cross-culturalunderstanding
. Adams, University of Texas at Dallas Dr. Stephanie G. Adams is the Department Head and Professor of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. She previously served as Associate Dean for Undergraduate Studies in the School of Engineering at Virginia Commonwealth University and was a faculty member and administrator at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln (UNL). Her research interests include: Teamwork, International Collaborations, Fac- ulty Development, Quality Control/Management and Broadening Participation. She is an honor graduate American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021
, North Carolina State University Julie Simmons Ivy is a Professor in the Edward P. Fitts Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering and Fitts Faculty Fellow in Health Systems Engineering. She previously spent several years on the faculty of the Stephen M. Ross School of Business at the University of Michigan. She received her B.S. and Ph.D. in Industrial and Operations Engineering at the University of Michigan. She also received her M.S. in Industrial and Systems Engineering with a focus on Operations Research at Georgia Tech. She is President of the Health Systems Engineering Alliance (HSEA) Board of Directors. She is an active member of the Institute of Operations Research and Management Science (INFORMS), Dr
skillswere developed through continual oral interaction between faculty advisor and team members,while reports were required to further enhance the use of technical writing.For this reason, the number of STEM undergraduate students engaging in research opportunitiesis rather significant given its short-term and long-term benefits [13], [15], [16]. In a surveyconducted by Russell in 2006, 53% of all STEM majors indicated some sort of researchcommitment throughout their undergraduate matriculation [12], [14]. Mogk and Tomovicsimilarly reported that partaking in undergraduate research is considered an effective educationaltool which enhances the overall undergraduate experience [6], [7]. Such tool has further proven toincrease the pursuit of STEM
not pursuing STEM fields [4]. They concluded that 42% of suchdemographic groups do not pursue STEM fields given their lack of access to quality education thatprepare them for such careers, while 41% because they were not encouraged to pursue STEM froman early age.II. PROPOSED WORKGiven the concerning and alarming statistics, it is imperative for supporting the cognitive andsocial development of underrepresented students. At the microlevel, which is the classroom,faculty members can and do play an important role the educational progression of students. Thismeans that faculty members can and should take a proactive role in supporting, promoting, andadvocating for educational equity that help advance the educational success of
Green Building Council. She is the faculty advisor for The Citadel’s student chapter of the Society of Women Engineers, and is the Link #224 Coordinator for the Order of Engineers. Her research focuses on materials in high performance buildings.Dr. Mostafa Batouli, The Citadel Dr. Mostafa Batouli is an Assistant Professor of Construction Engineering in the department of Civil and Environmental Engineering at The Citadel. Dr. Batouli received his PhD in Civil and Environmental Engineering from Florida International University. He also holds Master of Public Administration and Graduate Certificate in Homeland Security and Emergency Management from FIU, Master of Science in Civil Engineering/Construction Engineering and
your undergraduate career that influenced you to pursue an advanced degree?All interviews were recorded and transcribed. Each participant was given a pseudonym (whichare also used in the findings section).Data AnalysisFor this study, an interpretive phenomenological (IPA) approach was used as this is a qualitativeinquiry to discover the lived experiences of several individuals (i.e., Black Males) experiencing aphenomenon (e.g., graduate students in engineering, Black males with advanced degrees) [20],[21]. This method is iterative and ongoing. Two members of the research team independentlyreviewed transcripts. Portions of transcript text that gave insights into experiences of participantswere identified as examples of coding. After reviewing 5
in theirreflection “I found it fascinating that you can simulate the error in a way that leads to results likein the lab.” This led to increased agency over the analysis and conclusions of the experiment,unencumbered by the errors viewed as out of their control in in-person experimentation.When doing the analysis, students focused on the outcomes and grappled more deeply with theprocess. A member of the instructional team commented “I had more students come to ask forhelp because their answer didn’t make sense than I expected.” Rather than simply go through themotions and submit an irrational answer—something that did occur in the face-to-face variantwhere several students reported a heat of combustion suggesting the combustion
American students to work with her as a Navajo principal investigator on the project and building an interdisciplinary, collaborative team of scientists with expertise in analytical chemistry, geoscience, cancer biology, and social sciences are also important to her research. She is a member of the Navajo Nation (born to the N´aneesht’ e´ zhi clan) and is involved in outreach activities for Native American students in undergraduate and graduate research. She is the principal investigator of the Partnership for Native American Cancer Prevention and the director of the Bridges to Baccalaureate program. She was named the 2018 recipient of the American Chemical Society Award for Encouraging Disadvantaged Students into
longer meets the 0.05 threshold.Further comparison of the small Engineering cohort and the BCOM cohort shows significantswings in the small Engineering cohort's improvement on Questions 9 and 11-13. This furtherconfirms both the effectiveness of training smaller cohorts and the effect of the communicationstraining on engineering students.ImplicationsSimilar to the smaller engineering cohort, the 105-member BCOM cohort consisted of smaller(35-person) classes. The business students’ prior experience working with more than two teammembers on open-ended projects appeared to help the BCOM cohort in this study navigate someof the areas explored by the Briggs [10] team health check: Team Leadership, Processes,Understanding Differences, and
a Life Member of APSIPA. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Work in Progress: Review of teaching strategies towards development of a framework for online teamworkAbstract:Teamwork and leadership (T&L) skills are highly valued skills in industries allover the world. These graduate attributes significantly influence studentemployability and improve chances of early career growth. Coronavirus (COVID19) pandemic has pushed the higher education sector to convert teaching deliveryfrom face to face (f2f) to online abruptly. Teamwork activities are traditionallyassociated with f2f engagement between students, peers, and faculty. Hence,cultivating teamwork and
institution requires we gain approval from the certifying body for theuniversity's state. All institutions in the state must evaluate the effectiveness of their UCC atregular intervals. Our teaching methods and content has evolved such that the institution's componentcourses and pedagogies of Team Teaching are vital to achieving the desired outcomes. Ourmodel is an "all in" team endeavor; our instructional team meets with all classes, and such is anenterprising dynamic, engaging faculty, staff, and near-peer teachers, working together. Modeling teamwork is a core attribution of our approach. Research-to-practice becomespractice-to-research as we learn new ways to help our students succeed while growing theirpreparedness for future success
Improve Student Engagement and Enhance the Curriculum of Engineering EducationAbstractIn February of 2019, the authors convened a workshop to explore ways to improve student engagement inengineering education. The two-day workshop assembled an uncommon range of stakeholders includingprofessional engineers, engineering faculty, psychologists, anthropologists, pedagogy and educationalscientists, students, curriculum developers, entrepreneurial evangelists, members of the diplomaticcommunity and representatives of industry. Collectively we sought to share existing approaches toimproving student engagement in order to discern what works and what does not. Uncovering strategies toimprove student engagement has meant
: Needs assessment and utilization of counseling services,” J. Coll. Stud. Dev., vol. 47, no. 3, pp. 247–266, May 2006, doi: 10.1353/csd.2006.0030.[10] C. M. Rummell, “An exploratory study of psychology graduate student workload, health, and program satisfaction,” Prof. Psychol. Res. Pract., vol. 46, no. 6, pp. 391–399, Dec. 2015, doi: 10.1037/pro0000056.[11] M. Deziel, D. Olawo, L. Truchon, and L. Golab, “Analyzing the Mental Health of Engineering Students using Classification and Regression,” 2013, p. 228 231.[12] E. Hocker, E. Zerbe, and C. G. P. Berdanier, “Characterizing Doctoral Engineering Student Socialization: Narratives of Mental Health, Decisions to Persist, and Consideration of Career
FoundationsQuestionnaire (MFQ) [1] and a novel instrument focused on the intersection of technology andethics developed by faculty at Duke University. With data collected in Fall 2020, we analyzedstudent survey data and found few significant results. In summary, the suite of developedmodules that are embedded into the first-year engineering design course should lead to thedevelopment of an ethical mindset at the outset of students’ engineering education.Overview of Ethics Education in EngineeringDespite a consensus that ethics is an important topic for engineering students, its incorporationinto undergraduate courses remains mixed [2] [3] [4]. Currently, the ABET Student Outcome #4in Criterion 3 requires that graduates have “an ability to recognize ethical and
would actout the roles of an entry-level engineer working on a problem located on ancestral landsintended to aid the local tribal community facing a particular resource-based problem.The participants were required to assess their knowledge of the scenario contents,describe a personal learning plan to better understand the situation and identify keyvariables that would impact decisions made about the situations within the scenario.These two additions to the summer program led to more emphasis on teamwork andleadership skill development to help students learn to communicate better, collaboratewith each other effectively and be more active in setting their own educational goals.These “beyond the curriculum” lessons were found to help students form
how to develop the program, including the framework of the certification,the development process, market size, and business plan (estimated revenues and expenses)(Phase II).GSX conducted market research using various certification forms, accreditation options,psychometric best-practices, and feedback from key ASCE stakeholders. This included an on-line survey with over 3,000 responses, four focus groups (with 20 total participants), and 60individual interviews. The target audience for this research were practicing engineers,engineering students, engineering faculty, engineering owners/principals, insuranceprofessionals, facility owners, and other purchasers of engineering services.Some key findings of this research include: Most civil
’ funds of knowledge related to their students’ confidence in theirengineering performance, classroom belonging, and in graduating with an engineering degree.Samuelson & Litzler [18] utilized the concept of community cultural wealth, based on the workof Tara J. Yosso [19], which uses an asset-based approach to understand minoritized studentpersistence by examining different types of capital developed by students in their families andcommunities. Martin and Newton [20] combined the concepts of funds of knowledge andcommunity cultural wealth to connect together multiple forms of capital and wealth presentamong recent underrepresented and/or socially marginalized engineering Bachelor’s degreeearners.These forms of community cultural wealth have
small group sessions with students andemail between faculty mentors and scholars was used to improve communication. Additionally,six seminars were held with follow up discussions and student reflections. While the averagenumber of program activities in which students participated increased somewhat, the program teamwas concerned that these program-specific activities were having limited reach and impact. During the grant period, loss of the team’s clinical faculty member led to a reevaluation ofthe program structure, specifically the role of the cohort facilitator. In the academic year 2018/2019the program team made the decision to hire a graduate student to serve as the coordinator ofactivities and primary point of contact for students
remotely are not fully meeting ABET course outcomes nor are they being adequately prepared for their internships and post-graduation jobs not having had the experiences normally obtained in the MET program. e. When classes started in person, Spring 21, for many of the students, it was the first in-person lecture they had attended in almost a year. Feedback from those students and their professors indicates teaching in person in a classroom is a much better, more authentic experience than remote instruction. Student feedback about in-person class and lab is largely positive because of the amount of interaction between students and faculty. f. I am concerned that
the number of attendees based on availability of physical computer labs.Additionally, the decision was made to decrease the cost of the camp from $100 the previousyear to free in order to provide the opportunity of attendance to a more diverse population andenrollment was increased to 80. Within approximately 72 hours the camp was filled. Within aweek there was a waitlist of 100 at which point no other students were added to the waitlist.Delivery OverviewIt became apparent in May that a face-to-face in person delivery would not be possible due toCOVID restrictions. At that point the decision was made to pivot to a 100% virtual delivery.Several options were explored including synchronous, asynchronous and hybrid (i.e. partsynchronous and part
frameworks, social constructivist andfeminist theories.Preliminary ResultsGendered Motivation for Learning Military Technology: (Im)possibility of Caring Male and female students shared several pre-dispositions that motivated them to enroll inthe course as an elective. Among them were personal interest in military-related topics and adesire to expand their understanding of future employment opportunities. Some students had apersonal connection to the military either through their own service or prior/current service of afamily member or significant individual, which prompted their curiosity and motivation to takethe class. It is worthy to note that male students’ motivations exhibited “an individual focus”(Severiens, Dam, &
, financial assistance (even when limited), and information about resources on campus.Opportunities to meet with other students and faculty members, especially in social settings, waswelcomed and valued, although many students reported having difficulty with events conflictingwith their schedule. The students who missed the events had the opportunity to reach out to thepeer mentors in Computer Science and Computer Engineering, but based on the discussions withthe peer mentors, very few took on this opportunity. Since starting with Fall 2020 the eventswere held virtually on zoom, we decided to record the events, with the permission of theparticipants, post them on ASSURE-US website, and send an email to the stu8dents with the linkto the recording. If