of Excellence that ad- vances interdisciplinary education and research. She served on the Naval Research Advisory Committee (2016-2018) . Gates received the 2021 Alfredo G. de los Santos Jr. Distinguished Leadership Award, the 2015 Great Minds in STEM’s Education award, the CRA’s 2015 A. Nico Habermann Award, the 2010 Anita Borg Institute Social Impact Award, and the 2009 Richard A. Tapia Achievement Award for Sci- entific Scholarship, Civic Science, and Diversifying Computing. She was named to Hispanic Business magazine’s 100 Influential Hispanics in 2006 for her work on the Affinity Research Group model.Dr. Elsa Q. Villa, University of Texas at El Paso Elsa Q. Villa, Ph.D., is a research assistant
. Instructors’ names were abbreviated asRR, MS, and SF. RR’s course evaluation methods include attendance and participation (Att&P),assignments and quizzes (A&Q), two term exams & a comprehensive final exam (E), groupproject (P). For fall 2017 on campus: Att&P 15%, A&Q 30%, E 40%, and P 15%. For fall 2017online: Att&P 10%, A&Q 35%, E 50%, and P 10%. For the fall 2019 online: Att&P 10%, A&Q30%, E 45%, and P 15%. MS’s course evaluation methods include attendance and participation(Att&P), assignments and quizzes (A&Q), mid-term exam & a comprehensive final exam (E),two group projects (P). For fall 2018 and 2019 on campus: Att&P 5%, A&Q 20%, E 45%, and P30%. SF’s course evaluation methods include
transportation engineering with lecture and laboratorycomponents at the Pennsylvania State University. Specifically, the study seeks to determine howthe transition to remote instruction impacted student perceptions of the learning environment asit relates to the development of their professional expertise. Students’ perception on the learningenvironment was measured using the Supportive Learning Environment for ExpertiseDevelopment Questionnaire (SLEED-Q) [1]. The SLEED-Q was administered to students in Fall2018 and Fall 2019 (normal instruction) and compared with responses obtained from Fall 2020(remote instruction). Prior data (2018, 2019) was collected for baseline comparison as part of alarger curricular revision project to examine the impact of
or deductive coding. This manual theming was supplemented using theNVIVO software to identify common words and phrases leading to any additional or missedthemes. Throughout this process, discussions and checks were conducted with the research teamfor agreement on final themes. Table 1: Interview questions with faculty Question Question No. Q.1 Tell me about yourself. Q.2 Explain how and why COVID pandemic impacted the functioning and behavior of your STEM students. Q.3 Explain how and why COVID pandemic impacted the performance of your STEM students. Q.4 Explain how and why you responded to changes in STEM student
: Changes in teaching philosophy and teachers’ competencies,” JOTSE: Journal ofTechnology and Science Education, vol. 7, (2), pp. 254-270, 2017.[6] D. Ratnapradipa and T. Abrams, “Framing the Teaching Philosophy Statement for Health Educators: What ItIncludes and How It Can Inform Professional Development,” Health Educator, vol. 44, (1), pp. 37-42, 2012.Available: https://eric.ed.gov/?q=teaching+philosophy&ft=on&pg=2&id=EJ968296.[7] C. O’Neal, D. Meizlish and M. Kaplan, “Writing a statement of teaching philosophy for the academic jobsearch,” Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, 2007.[8] N. G. Caukin and T. M. Brinthaupt, “Using a Teaching Philosophy Statement as a Professional DevelopmentTool for Teacher Candidates,” International Journal
acknowledged and valued. Theseteam discussions allowed for discussions on conflict resolution and intercultural differences inteamwork which allows for shared context to improve team dynamics [8]. This was an importantpiece of working on an inter-cultural, online team project to ensure team cohesion and distributionof work [5]. These discussions lead to conversations about how teamwork is done in Brazil andthe USA and the differences in work cultures.Project Details and OutcomesThe project was split into three deliverables: 1. Background research on a Google Site, 2. Grouppresentation and question and answer (Q&A) session, and 3. Group report. The project assignmentwith detailed explanation of deliverables can be found in Appendix A. The first
. 38.[6] Y. Xing, “Cultural identity: Synergy, motivation and self-organization,” Theoretical Exploration, no. 4, pp. 56-60, 2017.[7] Q. Xu, “Cultural foundation of entrepreneurship education in China’s universities: Theoretical interpretation and consolidated paths,” Journal of Higher Education Management, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 82-88,124, 2020.[8] Q. Xu, “Cultural foundation of entrepreneurship education in China’s universities: Theoretical interpretation and consolidated paths,” Journal of Higher Education Management, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 82-88,124, 2020.[9] S. Zhou, “The analysis on the types of enterprise education of higher institutions in America under the effect of pragmatic culture and its inspiration,” Studies In
. Each created a 10-20 minute video which was posted on the IEC website a few daysbefore the meeting. The session began with a short presentation on the video highlights, followedby an open Q&A. The stories shared were very powerful, demonstrating many opportunities lostby the panelist’s home institution. Mentoring was identified as a critical issue and a variety ofexamples were presented that showed the impact of both good and bad mentoring. Thepresentation and the Q&A both helped to motivate the Anti-Racism workshops being offered byIEC spring 2021.The next two sessions were organized and presented by Prof. Russ Korte of George WashingtonUniversity and IEC leadership.Session 6: Team Science Part 1 (October 2020) Teamwork and task work
their early experiences leading to the Bridge program. The secondinterview explored their experiences in the Bridge program and their aspirations for their co-op.Interviews were professionally transcribed and pseudonymized.Data were analyzed using a narrative approach that includes multiple readings [19]. Themultistep process included reading for: familiarization with the transcripts, identifying contentsuch as individuals mentioned and major storylines, detecting identity of the participant andothers, and uses of CCW and funds of knowledge. After the readings, a narrative case waswritten for each participant.Quality was considered internally and externally. Internally, we used the Q 3 framework [20],[21] as a reflexive tool to guide each phase
implementing Project COMPLETE in high schools 4) A Q&A session intended to solicit feedback from the teachers and counselors about their specific concerns with teaching the curriculumIt is important to note that speaking responsibilities were divided up among the project’s collegeand high school representatives, which allowed workshop participants to hear about variousaspects of the program. For instance, a high school counselor shared about how to enroll studentsin courses and get them specific credit. Since every school has to navigate their version ofcurricula, credit, and state education priorities/incentives, this was an important topic to cover. Itwas also valuable for the workshop’s teacher participants to learn what the
, 2018.[2] V. Eubanks, Automating inequality: How high-tech tools profile, police, and punish the poor. St. Martin’s Press, 2018.[3] C. C. Perez, Invisible women: Exposing data bias in a world designed for men. Random House, 2019.[4] D. Norman, The design of everyday things: Revised and expanded edition. Basic books, 2013.[5] D. E. Forsythe, “New Bottles, Old Wine: Hidden Cultural Assumptions in a Computerized Explanation System for Migraine Sufferers,” Med. Anthropol. Q., vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 551– 574, 1996.[6] National Science Foundation, “Women, Minorities, and Persons with Disabilities in Science and Engineering,” 2017. https://www.nsf.gov/statistics/2017/nsf17310/digest/occupation/overall.cfm (accessed Jun. 23
environment. Some of thoserecommendations included (1) a website video to introduce the project to the schools and engagefamilies and students; (2) an enhanced web presence to engage with students and families online,and (3) monthly industry spotlight videos to students to build program momentum. The researchteam also presented regular research Q&A talks to student cohorts within the first day of theircourse beginning with the goal of boosting research participation.Equitable Access to High Quality Teachers. Teachers are an essential partner in the collaborativemodel. Securing high-quality teachers in rural districts is a persistent challenge in the literature(Goodpaster, Adedokun, & Weaver, 2012). Data shows rural districts are more likely
changing postdoc and key predictors of satisfaction with professional training. Studies in Graduate and Postdoctoral Education, 11(1), 123-142. https://10.1108/sgpe-06-2019-0055Yadav, A., Seals, C. D., Soto-Sullivan, C. M., Lachney, M., Clark, Q., Dixon., K. G., & Smith, M. J. T. (2020). The forgotten scholar: Underrepresented minority postdoc experiences in STEM fields. Educational Studies, 56(2), 160-185. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131946.2019.1702552
,” Journal. Mass Commun. Q., vol. 93, no. 4, pp. 728–749, Dec. 2016.[21] A. Lorde, “and Sex : Women Redefining Difference *,” Sister Outs., no. April, pp. 114–123, 1984.[22] K.-Y. Taylor, How We Get Free: Black Feminism and the Combahee River Collective. 2017.[23] B. Moradi, M. C. Parent, A. S. Weis, S. Ouch, and K. L. Broad, “Mapping the Travels of Intersectionality Scholarship: A Citation Network Analysis,” Psychol. Women Q., vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 151–169, Jun. 2020.[24] B. Love, We Want to Do More Than Survive by Bettina L. Love. Penguin Random House, 2019.[25] B. Moradi and P. R. Grzanka, “Using intersectionality responsibly: Toward critical epistemology, structural analysis, and social justice activism,” J. Couns
can be evaluated in terms of t effectiveness ascompared to the other capstone courses to inform changes can be made to the Global Capstone.Citations(1 )Chubin, D. E., May, G. S., & Babco, E. L. (2005). Diversifying the Engineering Workforce. Journal ofEngineering Education, 94(1), 73–86. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168- 9830.2005.tb00830.x(2) De Graaff, E., & Ravesteijn, W. (2001). Training complete engineers: Global enterprise andengineering education. European Journal of Engineering Education, 26(4), 419–427.https://doi.org/10.1080/03043790110068701(3) Jesiek, Zhu, Q., Woo, S. E., Thompson, J., & Mazzurco, A. (2014). Global Engineering Competency inContext: Situations and Behaviors. 16.(4) Lucena, J., Downey, G., Jesiek, B., &
% ofstudents attended regularly. The rate of D’s, F’s, Q drops and withdraws (DFWQ rates) for SIstudents was 2.8% in fall 2020, compared to a 9.1% DFWQ rate for SI students in fall 2019. SIstudents who had less programming experience (potentially through systemic educationalinequities) than their advantaged counterparts, also had statistically significant higher courseGPAs when compared to non-SI students who had the same prior experience. The teamdetermined several emerging themes from the survey and interview responses, such as aburgeoning sense of community, comfort with peers over time, accountability and structure, andan awareness of SI session activities as diverse and different than other learning experiences. Wehypothesize these all had strong
-9411- y.[26] J. M. Holland, D. A. Major, and K. A. Orvis, “Understanding How Peer Mentoring and Capitalization Link STEM Students to Their Majors,” Career Dev. Q., vol. 60, no. 4, pp. 343–354, Dec. 2012, doi: 10.1002/j.2161-0045.2012.00026.x.[27] R. T. Fitch, “Characteristics and Motivations of College Students Volunteering for Community Service.,” J. Coll. Student Pers., vol. 28, no. 5, pp. 424–31, 1987.[28] J. L. Holland, The self-directed search professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources., 1985.[29] I. Simon Rampasso et al., “Preparing future professionals to act towards sustainable development: an analysis of undergraduate students’ motivations towards voluntary
High School,” The High School Journal, vol. 97, no. 2, pp. 92–106, 2013, doi: 10.1353/hsj.2013.0026.[12] S. L. Dika, M. A. Pando, B. Q. Tempest, and M. E. Allen, “Examining the Cultural Wealth of Underrepresented Minority Engineering Persisters,” J. Prof. Issues Eng. Educ. Pract., vol. 144, no. 2, p. 05017008, Apr. 2018, doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)EI.1943-5541.0000358.[13] R. M. Groves, F. J. F. Jr, M. P. Couper, J. M. Lepkowski, E. Singer, and R. Tourangeau, Survey Methodology, 2nd edition. Hoboken, N.J: Wiley, 2009.[14] D. C. Braun, C. Gormally, and M. D. Clark, “The Deaf Mentoring Survey: A Community Cultural Wealth Framework for Measuring Mentoring Effectiveness with Underrepresented Students,” LSE, vol. 16, no. 1, p. ar10
development of autobiographical memory,” Psychological Review, vol. 104, pp. 499-523, 1997.12. D. B. Pillemer, Momentous events, vivid memories. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1998.13. M. C. Green & T. C. Brock, “The role of transportation in the persuasiveness of public narratives,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol. 79, pp. 701-721, 2000.14. Q. Wang, Q. Song, & J. B. K. Koh, “Culture, Memory, and Narrative Self-Making,” Imagination, Cognition, and Personality, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 199-223.15. H. A. Bosma, & E. S. Kunnen, “Determinants and mechanism in ego identity development: A review and synthesis,” Developmental Review, vol. 21, pp. 39-66, 2001.16. A. Thorne, “Culture and cognitive development
).[26] V. Venkatesh, S. A. Brown, and H. Bala, "Bridging the Qualitative-Quantitative Divide: Guidelines for Conducting Mixed Methods Research in Information System.," MIS Q., vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 21–54, Mar. 2013.[27] M. Friedman, "Use of ranks to avoid the assumption of normality implicit in the analysis of variance.," J. Am. Stat. Assoc., vol. 32, no. 200, pp. 675–701, Dec. 1937.[28] J. Walther, N. W. Sochacka, and N. N. Kellam, "Quality in Interpretive Engineering Education Research: Reflections on an Example Study.," J. Eng. Educ., vol. 102, no. 4, pp. 626–659, Oct. 2013.[29] J. Saldaña, The coding manual for qualitative researchers., 3rd ed. SAGE, 2015.[30] H. W. Marsh and R. G. Craven, "Reciprocal Effects of Self
. R. Tenenbaum, F. J. Crosby, and M. D. Gliner, “Mentoring Relationships in Graduate School,” J. Vocat. Behav., vol. 59, pp. 326–341, 2001.[26] N. Van der Linden et al., “Gaining insight into doctoral persistence: Development and validation of Doctorate-related Need Support and Need Satisfaction short scales,” Learn. Individ. Differ., vol. 65, 2018.[27] J. H. Waldeck, V. O. Orrego, T. G. Plax, and P. Kearney, “Graduate student/faculty mentoring relationships: Who gets mentored, how it happens, and to what end,” Commun. Q., vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 93–109, Jun. 1997.[28] J. S. Wrench and N. M. Punyanunt, “Advisee‐advisor communication: An exploratory study examining interpersonal communication variables in
online teaching. Respondents were not certain about theviability of online learning in replacing traditional face-to-face lectures. They observed lessengagement in students’ interactions via online discussion and increasing academic dishonesty.They were also uncertain about how to evaluate the students’ learning progress.Ramlo [10] employed Q methodology, a mixed methodology, to study the subjective experiencesof 78 college and university faculty across disciplines related to COVID-19 in a way thatfacilitated differentiated rather than aggregate viewpoints. Data analysis revealed three mainviewpoints. The first viewpoint, summarized as “techies who like to teach,” included faculty whohad taught online before or had extensive experience with
? *Q#T - Traditional instruction mode; Q#V - Virtual instruction mode Figure 1. Survey Results © American Society for Engineering Education, 2021There was no overwhelming consensus since only 50% of participants appreciated the overallcourse design and project alignments. Of all the projects, most students enjoyed working on thewind turbine project in mechanical engineering. Table 1. Understanding of Major Questions 2019 2020 Before Now Before Now
al., “Racial/Ethnic Minority Community College Students’ Critical Consciousness and Social Cognitive Career Outcomes,” Career Dev. Q., vol. 68, no. 4, pp. 302–317, 2020, doi: 10.1002/cdq.12238.[14] K. Crenshaw, “Demarginalizing the Intersection of Race and Sex: A Black Feminist Critique of Antidiscrimination Doctrine, Feminist Theory, and Antiracist Politics [1989],” Fem. Leg. Theory, pp. 57–80, 2018.[15] K. Cross, K. Clancy, R. Mendenhall, P. Imoukhuede, and J. Amos, “The Double Bind of Race and Gender: A Look into the Experiences of Women of Color in Engineering,” 2017 ASEE Annu. Conf. & Expo. Proc., 2017.[16] S. M. Malcolm, P. Q. Hall, and J. W. Brown, “The double bind: the price of being a
) “Effect of think-pair-share in a large CS1 class: 83% sustained engagement,” In Proceedings of the ninth annual international ACM conference on International computing education research (ICER '13). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2013, pp. 137-144. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/2493394.249340823. Nagappan, N.; Williams, L.; Ferzli, M.; Wiebe, E.; Yang, K.; Miller, C.; and Balik, S. (2003) “Improving the CS1 experience with pair programming,” In Proceedings of the 34th SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education (SIGCSE '03). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2003, pp. 359-362. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/611892.61200624. Porter, L.; Bouvier, D.; Cutts, Q.; Grissom, S.; Lee, C.; McCartney, R.; Zingaro, D.; and Simon
Proceedings, 2018, doi: 10.18260/1-2--30204.[56] J. A. Mejia, D. Ruiz, V. Popov, A. Esquinca, and D. Gadbois, “Board 104: Asset-based Practices in Engineering Design (APRENDE): Development of a Funds-of-Knowledge Approach for the Formation of Engineers,” in Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2019.[57] S. L. Dika, M. A. Pando, B. Q. Tempest, and M. E. Allen, “Examining the Cultural Wealth of Underrepresented Minority Engineering Persisters,” J. Prof. Issues Eng. Educ. Pract., vol. 144, no. 2, pp. 1–9, Apr. 2018, doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)EI.1943-5541.0000358.[58] S. L. Dika, M. A. Pando, B. Q. Tempest, K. A. Foxx, and M. E. Allen, “Engineering self- efficacy, interactions with faculty
professional responsibilities in engineering situations and makeinformed judgments considering the impact of engineering solutions in global, economic,environmental, and societal contexts. All other all-section average scores were above 3.0. That is, Table 4. Summary of Survey Results on Student Outcomes Section 1 Section 2 Section 3 All Sections Q# Av. Std. Dev Av. Std. Dev Av. Std. Dev Av. Std. Dev Q1-a 2.77 1.20 2.82 1.10 3.11 0.94 2.89 1.10 Q1-b 2.64 1.26 2.88 0.96 3.11 0.87 2.86 1.08 Q2-a 2.91