manufacturing scheduling, systems control and automation, distributed control of holonic systems and integrated manufacturing, agile manufacturing, virtual reality and remote laboratory applications in edu- cation. He has authored or co-authored various journal and conference publications in these areas. Mert Bal is currently the Chair and Associate Professor at the Miami University, Department of Engineering Technology, Ohio, United States of America.Dr. Farnaz Pakdel, Miami University American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Integrating 3D Printing into Engineering Technology Curriculum1. IntroductionThree-dimensional (3-D) printing has witnessed
origins to the 1994 ASEE report Engineering Education for aChanging World, which, among many other recommendations, asserted that “engineeringeducation must take into account the social, economic, and political contexts of engineeringpractice…” [2, pp. 20–21]. The report emphasized that contextual skills should be deliveredthrough multi- and interdisciplinary coursework, integrated into the existing curriculum, andfocused on an understanding of the ethical dimensions of engineering. A decade later, theNational Academies report Educating the Engineer of 2020 re-emphasized the importance of thethemes of interdisciplinarity, societal context, and ethics to the engineer of the then-future [3].In 2018, Dr. Ruth Graham, in her report on The Global
education at the Tecnologico de Monterrey. Her main research areas are faculty development, teaching methods, and gender issues in STEM education. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Integrating Global Sustainability Challenges in an Organizational Management CourseAbstractPrevious studies indicate that there is a link between a country's engineering capacity and itseconomic development. Future professionals must be capable of integrating the social andenvironmental fields into their engineering solutions. Their vision of the world must answer anew development model that ensures resource availability and well-being for
engineeringcurriculum. To add to this gap in literature, this paper analyzes quantitative responses of genderand sexual minority students’ perceptions of the engineering curricula from the survey conductedin 2018.Relevant LiteratureThe predominant normative marker of science and scientists in the U.S. has historically andcontinues to be based on White cisgender male perspectives [1]–[7]. Not surprisingly, thishomogenous and heterogenous perspective leads to pedagogical practices in which minoritizedstudents underperform compared to when innovative pedagogical models are used, such asflipped classrooms [8], [9]. This long-standing conceptualization of science and scientists alsoresults in an engineering curriculum that deems “issues of communication, justice
asked. CVEN Rome Program critiques were country-specific (e.g. transportation);however, the persistent responses about the language barrier indicate an area in which the CVENRome Program may find room for improvement.xii. Student ImpactOne academic concern raised often with a study abroad program is whether or not students learnthe content they need to succeed academically as they return from the experience. During a studyabroad program, there are several competing priorities with learning the culture, traveling, andtaking advantage of this unique experience. The CVEN Rome Program was designed to maintainthe same rigorous curriculum of courses taught in College Station, while providing someschedule flexibility to allow students to travel and
interests includepersonalized learning, learning analytics, cyberlearning environments, educational digital libraries, schol-arly communications, human-centered computing, and interdisciplinary research methods for studyingcognition. I have written 140 articles on these topics, including over 80 peer-reviewed scholarly publica-tions. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Integrating Professional Mentorship with a 3D Printing Curriculum to Help Rural Youth Forge STEM Career ConnectionsIntroductionYouth residing in mountain tourist communities represent an important and underserved ruralpopulation. Science, engineering, and computing are hidden within the daily
. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Redefining Student Preparation for Engineering Leadership Using Model-Based Systems Engineering in an Undergraduate Curriculum University of Michigan George Halow, Professor, Aerospace Engineering and Principal Investigator Maia Herrington, Undergraduate, Computer Engineering and Instructional Aide, Aerospace Engineering Tony Waas, Department Chair and Professor, Aerospace Engineering Siemens Gil Morris, Strategic Project Manager (retired
Paper ID #32972Elementary Teachers’ Verbal Support of Engineering Integration in anInterdisciplinary Project (Fundamental, Diversity)Miss Sarah Catherine Lilly, University of Virginia Sarah Lilly is a PhD student in the Department of Curriculum, Instruction and Special Education at the University of Virginia. She holds a B.S. in Mathematics and English and an M.A.Ed. in Secondary Educa- tion from The College of William and Mary. Her research centers on STEM education, particularly using qualitative methods to understand the integration of math and science concepts with computational mod- eling and engineering design
, economy, and environment and graduate with thefoundation and technical skills supported by systems thinking, multidisciplinary training, andpractical engineering application to confront the challenges found in modern engineering practice[8].Based on data from our previous work with on measuring literacy in sustainable engineering andthe development and results of one teaching module, we proposed the creation of a course at theundergraduate level designed to help students develop sustainable thinking in engineering [9]. Thekey feature of introducing this course early in the curriculum is to ensure that the students aretrained in integration sustainability in their thinking which will help integrate sustainableengineering into whichever discipline
Paper ID #33351Engineering Curriculum Rooted in Active Learning: Does It PromoteEngagement and Persistence for Women?Leanne Kallemeyn, Loyola University Chicago Leanne Kallemeyn, Ph.D., is an Associate Professor in Research Methodologies at Loyola University Chicago. She teaches graduate-level courses in program evaluation, qualitative research methods, and mixed methods. She has been the PI on seven major evaluation projects that ranged from one to five years in length. Her scholarship focuses on practitioners’ data use and evaluation capacity building within non-profits through coaching. She received a Bachelors in
Paper ID #32762What Strategies do Diverse Women in Engineering Use to Cope withSituational Hidden Curriculum?Dr. Victoria Beth Sellers, University of Florida Dr. Victoria Sellers is a postdoctoral research associate in the Department of Engineering Education at the University of Florida. Her current research is focused on determining how engineering students respond to hidden curriculum. Victoria has previously served as an editorial assistant to the Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, as well as the communications intern for the Journal of Engineering Education. Victoria received a PhD in
at minority serving institutions. For example, at the historically Black collegeand universities University of the District of Columbia, an elective biology course forjunior-level biology majors integrates the physiological determinants of health and socialdeterminants of health (SDOH) via seminars with guest speakers who research HD [10].At City College of New York, a Hispanic serving institute, their undergraduatebiomedical engineering program engages students in HD challenges with establishedcurricula on HD modules, undergraduate research initiatives in HD, and design projectsfocused on HD [11], [12]. Often, these two disciplines include students on a premedicaltrack, which has also encouraged exposure to HD and SDOH in medical curriculum
Paper ID #33584Inclusivity in Engineering Curriculum in the Age of Industry 4.0: TheRole of Internet of ThingsDr. Shuvra Das, University of Detroit Mercy Dr. Shuvra Das started working at University of Detroit Mercy in January 1994 and is currently Pro- fessor of Mechanical Engineering. Over this time, he served in a variety of administrative roles such as Mechanical Engineering Department Chair, Associate Dean for Research and Outreach, and Director of International Programs in the college of Engineering and Science. He has an undergraduate degree in Mechanical Engineering from Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur
professionals in systems engineering and related fields that have integrated DEIinto their work to provide recommendations for how DEI principles can be integrated intoengineering education. Participants were recruited online and through snowball sampling. Semi-structured interviews were completed with 15 participants either over the phone or on a videochat platform. These interviews were analyzed through inductive content analysis, which yieldedthree themes related to integrating DEI into systems engineering education: curriculumdevelopment, course design, and educator development. The results from this study align withrecent calls in higher education to decolonize the curriculum. Beyond strategies like ensuringrepresentation in class readings and
increasingly difficult to facilitate due to the COVID-19 pandemic, is an integral component of any comprehensive engineering education program. Aproject-based approach using low-cost, pre-made kits offers practical experience in teamworkand collaboration, system design and implementation, problem solving and refinement ofinterdisciplinary skillsets through projects that can be completed at home or in the classroom.Robotics instruction and experimentation provides a means to achieve robust interdisciplinarylearning outcomes, facilitating long-term retention of engineering concepts by illustrating theconnections between theory and practice. This paper aims to establish the need for designintegration throughout the undergraduate curriculum, identify
learning quickly - for example, you might review new curriculum, prep for the lesson, and teach, all within a short period of time. Do you think your development in these areas will be of benefit in the future, either as a student or in your career? ● In our previous conversations, you spoke about the teaching and learning environment in university - and how it can be quite limited and uninspiring in its focus on transmission-based lectures. In contrast, you described your work with (outreach program) as reflecting a broader set of teaching and learning activities, giving you an opportunity to explore subject matter and your understanding of it in different ways. Can you speak a little more to this
Paper ID #33372The Benefits of an Engineering Field Trip for Women StudentsDr. Kerry Meyers, University of Notre Dame Dr. Kerry Meyers holds a Ph.D. in Engineering Education (B.S. & M.S. Mechanical Engineering) and is specifically focused on programs that influence student’s experience, affect retention rates, and the factors that determine the overall long term success of students entering an engineering program. She is the Assistant Dean for Student Development in the College of Engineering at the University of Notre Dame. She is committed to the betterment of the undergraduate curriculum and is still actively
Paper ID #34267Graduate Curriculum in Mechatronics and Robotics: Development andImplementation Challenges for Engineering TechnologyDr. Avimanyu Sahoo, Oklahoma State University Avimanyu Sahoo received his Ph.D. and Masters degree in Electrical Engineering from Missouri Univer- sity of Science and Technology, Rolla, MO, and Indian Institute of Technology, Varanasi, India, in 2015 and 2011, respectively. He is currently working as an Assistant Professor at the Division of Engineering Technology, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK, USA. His teaching interests include mechatron- ics, control systems, electrical
Paper ID #33453Migrator Stories in an Aerospace Engineering ProgramDr. Devayan D. Bir, Loras College Prior to teaching at Loras College, Devayan pursued his doctorate in Aerospace Engineering at Iowa State University and has worked as a Computer Aided Analyst in India. He earned his B.E. in Aeronautical Engineering, and has been passionate about Aerospace Engineering all his life. Hobbies include playing the guitar, soccer, and photography. Research interests include innovative pedagogies (Active, Flipped, and Online instruction) and applied numerical methods. Devayan has published peer reviewed papers, presented at
historically underrepresented groupsin STEM, and the PREM program, which is designed to increase diversity in materials researchdisciplines by creating research/education partnerships between minority serving institutions(MSI) and universities which are “leading sources of degrees in materials-related fields” [5].Traditionally, our PREM partners send a select group of their PREM-funded student scholars tocontinue their materials science research at Penn State during the 10-week REU summerprogram. PREM REU student-scholars are in a unique position because a summer REU at PennState is a continuation of their own research from their home institution, integrated within thelarger PREM-MRSEC collaboration. Thus, an intrinsic goal of the in-person PREM
educators are aligned to the Next Generation Science Standards and provide suggestions for integrating neuroscience content, neuroethics, andengineering design challenges. The teachers implemented the lessons in their own classroomsand then revised them based on piloting feedback before the units were published.Currently, nine teacher-authored curriculum units for secondary STEM courses are available,with more added each year. Many units utilize engaging technologies—such aselectromyographically-controlled robotic gripper hands, circuit boards, SnapCircuits, ArduinoUno rigs, and SpikerBoxes—that illustrate basic concepts of the sensorimotor feedback loop.The study of bioethics is
keep your integrity? Do youcopy and cheat on homework assignments just to get through the end of the semester? Doyou fail a course and retake over the next semester/summer? Not everyone has the money,mental health, nor the support to adapt to these changes in such a short timeframe. Yethere we are as students contemplating the value of an honest education. I know I certainlydidn't pay nearly $22,000 for this semester only to be taught by a pre-recorded lecture andpowerpoints, so why should I be perfectly honest? The system is flawed currently and Icannot blame our staff for the nature of their emergency plans, after all this was veryunexpected. What we should be discussing is how we can better teach and reinforcelearning, rather than enforcing
technology in engineering education. He has served on the ASEE Pacific Southwest Section Board of Directors since 2014, including as the PSW Section Chair for 2018-2019.Ms. Deanna Miranda BarriosMs. Cecilia Nguyen, California State Polytechnic University, Pomona American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Assessing the influence of an online video tutorial library on undergraduate mechanical engineering studentsAbstractSince 2013, the Mechanical Engineering Department at California State Polytechnic University,Pomona (Cal Poly Pomona) has created over 600 videos for its curriculum across 12 courses.These videos are available to the public as an
-centered research anddevelopment activities sponsored by the local industry.In this paper, we mainly focus on the curriculum, laboratory modules and other student-centricactivities for training on robotics and integrated manufacturing systems. We will also present anddiscuss the challenges and opportunities learned during the development of the new program.2. Impact and Learning OutcomesEducation and workforce development focusing on industrial robotics and automation willtransform the way that Engineering Technology courses are delivered, maximizing hands-on andexperiential learning and providing students with a high-tech, industry-based skill set [4]. TheRET program initiative described in this paper is uniquely positioned to engage with the
according to theacademic calendar. There are multiple software applications integrated into the synchronousvirtual meeting. Microsoft PowerPoints was used to present slides; Microsoft OneNote wasused as a whiteboard to solve examples and derive formulas in real-time with a writing tablet'sassistance; MATLAB was used to do simulation and demonstration in class. Other featuresfrom Zoom, such as reactions, whiteboard, chat room, and poll, were used during the class tofacilitate the discussion and communicate with students. Another significant advantage ofZoom is that it has an option to record a meeting on a password-protected cloud environment.This feature is beneficial because students can review these materials any time after the class
this study was to understand how an integrated teaching model (e.g., science,engineering, and mathematics) influenced 5th-grade students' perceptions of their mathematicsand engineering abilities. We sought to answer the following research question using a sequentialmixed methods research design: how do 5th-grade students' mathematics and engineeringself-efficacy and instrumentality for abstract mathematics concepts change because of anintegrated teaching experience?We utilized self-efficacy [1] and perceived usefulness [2] frameworks to explore how studentsdevelop their perceived abilities and usefulness of mathematics through integrated instruction.Seventeen students from a Title-I elementary school worked in teams to design solutions
past few decades, there has been a push for engineering curriculum to better engagewith the global, ethical, and societal impacts of the field and to prepare students to engage in amulticultural and diverse workspace and world. In an effort to introduce diversity in design andto troubleshoot the concept of the universal user, we adapted the display compatibilityquestionnaire from Smith’s study of display-control stereotype designs, and presented the samedesign questions to 21st century first-year engineering students, non-engineering students, andnon-engineering professionals. This work explores current societal impacts such as gender, age,and occupation on the user expectation of a control’s display and user-interface design.Additionally, the
. Czekanski et al. studiedthe challenges in engineering education from both educators' and industrials points of view. Theyproposed a vertical and lateral method based on incorporating the strength of existingeducational systems and integrating them with fundamental engineering core courses. From theirstudy, they found that the use of this proposed vertical and lateral learning method can narrowthe gap between academic, industrial, and students' expectations. Their study was based on afour-year curriculum though and it did not zoom on the challenges of the individual courses [16].The question remains how to deliver an educational environment where engineering studentsgraduate with a good comprehension of general engineering design skills, practical
basis) from two of her songs: "Set" and"Melanin." The competition initially focused on "Set," with "Melanin" added to the EarSketchlibrary midway through the submission window to boost enthusiasm.Curriculum: While EarSketch has been integrated into many different CS curricular experiences,it was decided to create a 3-module, competition-focused curriculum for this pilot program.While EarSketch has been used in experiences as short as 1-hour, we felt 3 hours (3 classperiods) would be a more realistic length of time for students to accomplish the challenge: tocode an original song remixing Ciara's song "Set” in EarSketch. The curriculum is grounded inProject-based Learning and each module is aligned to elements of the AP/Computer
still underway. Each year new workshop and facilitation teams are added.Existing workshops are evaluated, improved, and evolved based on the feedback loops established. At theindividual faculty member level, one workshop Integrating Curriculum with Entrepreneurial Mindset(ICE) focused on helping an individual faculty member change classroom practice. At the department orunit level, new workshops have been tested that focus on the needs of a specific school or unit. Anexample is a workshop for Montana State University in 2020 that took elements of two other workshopsand structured the material in the context of the institutional focus. At the national level the prototypingincludes workshops focused on leadership and culture change.The testing