- Conference Session
- Innovation in Teaching Engineering Economics
- Collection
- 2006 Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
Karen Bursic, University of Pittsburgh
- Tagged Divisions
-
Engineering Economy
. (1997), “Problem Based Learning via Open Ended Projects in Carnegie MellonUniversity's Chemical Engineering Undergraduate Laboratory,” Frontiers in Education Conference, 1997, 27thAnnual Conference. 'Teaching and Learning in an Era of Change'. Proceedings, 350–354.[3] Criteria For Accrediting Engineering Programs (Effective for Evaluations During the 2005-2006 AccreditationCycle); Engineering Accreditation Commission; ABET, Inc. Baltimore, MD November 1, 2004.[4] De Camargo Ribeiro, L.R. and Mizukami, M.G.N. (2005), “Student Assessment of a Problem-Based LearningExperiment in Civil Engineering Education,” Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice,131(1), 13-18.[5] Dym, C.L., Agogino, A.M., Eris, O., Frey, D. D., and
- Conference Session
- New Topics in Engineering Economics
- Collection
- 2006 Annual Conference & Exposition
- Authors
-
Charles Nippert, Widener University
- Tagged Divisions
-
Engineering Economy
cheating6 Using a computer/laptop during in-class tests 4.2 0.0 4.2 54.2 37.5 makes the tests more like engineering practice.7 Allowing students to use laptops during tests 4.2 16.7 45.8 25.0 8.3 favors students who can afford them8 The use of computers during tests should be 4.2 0.0 8.3 62.5 25.0 allowed when the tests take place in a computer laboratory.9 The use of laptops during tests should be allowed 8.3 12.5 8.3 50.0 20.8 when the tests take place in a regular classroom.N= 25Additional statistical information can be obtained by using a chi square test to compare responsesto pairs of questions. The chi