described above. Students invariably have a final projectin many courses where they are assigned a design problem. In their senior year, they oftenhave a senior project which entails designing and building a unique prototype. The studentsare required to submit a proposal documenting the requirements, the proposed design, thematerials, the schedule, and the test plan. After review by the professor, the proposal mayrequire changes. Further modifications may be required at any point as unforeseen eventsoccur. In the end the prototype is expected to pass all tests and demonstrate on delivery thatit meets the original requirements. Many of these same steps occur on the job whengraduate engineers pursue engineering projects, so the project course is
acquired a wealth of abilities and perspectives. Thisskills inventory assessment uncovered many skills including “planning, scheduling, organizing,exploring, controlling, mentoring, communicating, and leading. Other skills … pertained tomanagement … incorporating budgeting, administrating, and allocating scarce resources”(Loendorf1, 2004, p. 2). In order to obtain a similar list from an educator’s point of view, foursenior faculty members in the department were asked to list the skills required of an engineeringprofessor. The results of their skills inventory were actually quite similar. While reviewing theirperceptions they used slightly different terms to describe the skills, however they matched almostexactly the assessment made by an
being taught (say, duringthe summer or between semesters) for more thorough maintenance. The new faculty member isencouraged to develop a lab plan for their facility, similar to what ABET requires for theprogram’s laboratories. This plan should include a maintenance budget and schedule, a budgetand schedule for equipment replacement, staffing needs, safety rules and enforcement, spacerequirements and specifications, and sources of funding.Staffing the LaboratoryAt undergraduate institutions, lab sessions are staffed by the instructor of the course who may beresponsible for up to three other courses during the given semester. This requires a considerablecommitment of time, but allows for significant interaction with the students. To enhance
professor is preparing his tenure dossier for histhree year review. As well as insights on preparing tenure dossiers, information onrecruiting graduate students and the benefits of attending conferences and workshops isalso presented.IntroductionFrom the first day a new faculty member begins their academic career, he or she shouldbegin preparing their tenure dossier. Preparing your tenure dossier can be likened to acoach preparing a game plan. This plan will allow them to define and accomplish thenecessary objectives as well as portray their work in each of these areas in the best light.They should stick to the game plan and collect evidence along the way rather thanwaiting until the last year to collect and compile the evidence they need. This
complete the work successfully. Thebroader impacts criterion looks for the integration of research and education, the capacityto leverage existing research and education facilities and infrastructure, and the keyaspect of broadening the participation of students from groups that are underrepresentedin the disciplines of higher education that are relevant to the proposal.The Project DescriptionThe project description has a 15-page limit. It is the most important section of theproposal. In the early years of the CAREER program it was called the CareerDevelopment Plan. To a certain extent, the project description is a detailed version of theproject summary. It must follow a logical sequence from the problem statement toexpected results. The narrative
plan to write a successful proposal at the national level. The NSFprogram solicitations often have a 10-20% funding rate, and it is the “cream-of-the-crop”investigators that have put in tremendous effort that get funded.Many universities often give their young faculty a “honeymoon period” with a lighterteaching load for one or two semesters (or years). If you have this opportunity, use it tocreate your identity within your new area of research Topic Y. Once the “honeymoon isover,” you may not be able to devote the time required during the academic year (youwill likely need one or two months) to write a competitive national proposal.Tip #2: “Diversify Your Portfolio” – Eventually you may wish to do research on one ofthe “hot topics” Topic A or
Page 11.1160.3beneficial to more students. Over the years, Dr. DeBartolo has become familiar with myinvolvement in extra-curriculars at RIT, likes and dislikes of co-ops, and plans for the future.Knowing about my involvement in outreach activities and desire to teach, she informed me of agrant received in sponsorship of a senior design project. After hearing the project description,designing activities to educate students about engineering and concepts involving energy and theenvironment, I was hooked. What a great way to tie all of my unique experiences into a capstoneproject. I am currently the project manager.Just as Dr. DeBartolo has been able to provide great recommendations to me, I definitelyrecommend this partnership to other students
engineeringeducation from educational principles to various teaching methods. However, thesestudents are not being trained in a so-called “technical area” within their discipline and,hence, it is unknown at this point how effective such training will be in landing a tenure-track faculty position. Another way to educate graduate students who plan to enteracademia is through a formal course during their graduate studies. Universities such asSouth Carolina and West Virginia offer these classes as an elective course in theirrespective Chemical Engineering departments. There are also TA instructional programsthat are provided in the form of teaching seminars, workshops, language tutorials fornewly appointed international TAs, etc [5]. Additionally, there are also
way.This is interesting because it indicates that the excellent instructor influenced the performance ofstudents while at school either during their undergraduate or graduate studies. Other areasaffected by excellent instructors that were checked by more than a third of the responses include“presentation skills” and “ability to plan and execute tasks,” both of which are skills essentialfor success as a student and as a professional. Few responses checked other areas in their livesinfluenced by excellent instructors. Such areas are a mix of personal and professional skills asshown in Figure 4. 100 90 85
was gently Page 11.273.5 guided away from the throne and towards the opposite side of the room, to the defendant’s seat, a crimson velvet chair. Mary Queen of Scots was on trial for treason. She had been accused of plotting to assassinate Queen Elizabeth in order to take the English crown for herself. Sir Francis Walsingham, Elizabeth’s Principal Secretary, had already arrested the other conspirators, extracted confessions, and executed them. Now he planned to prove that Mary was at the heart of the plot, and was therefore equally culpable and equally deserving of death. [1]At this point, the students are hooked. I talk
educationalbackground is not specified. Since research is usually not as critical for ET faculty as teaching,many ET programs will hire faculty with only a Master’s degree. As a result, a broader pool ofapplicants and experiences may be available from which ET programs benefit. Sabbaticals aretypically provided and may be used for a variety of professional development activities includingcourse development, discipline specific research and professional education activities.Rising expectations for scholarship without a corresponding reduction in other requirementshave resulted in excellent teaching no longer being the sole requirement for tenure.6-7 Thus ETfaculty must have a plan for professional development that will meet the institution’sexpectations
for five years as a MechanicalEngineering Program Chair. This past year the first author became a Department Chair at a newuniversity. As department chair he has responsibility to mentor new faculty, and as a newprofessor, he was also on the receiving end of an established mentoring program. The secondauthor moved to an endowed teaching chair after eight years of service as Program Chair andAcademic Director of multiple engineering programs at another university. The third author hasserved as a Department Head for a very large program. These new experiences of the first twoauthors will be integrated into the already developed activities to form an overall suggested plan
. Thediscussion questions strive to increase the depth of knowledge in each topic. Lastly, the studentinvolvement in discussions teaches critical thinking and aids in developing foresight to moreeffectively plan experiments. Outcomes of the Journal Club activity have been increased studentknowledge of the literature, decreased apprehension in younger students toward understandingtechnical publications, and a slight increase in productivity towards publication goals within thegroup. Including this weekly meeting as an independent study course for credit also encouragesall students to read the articles prior to the meeting and enhances participation in groupdiscussions.IntroductionNew faculty encounter many challenges as they strive to set up their
College BASE was justifiable when used as a general indicator ofachievement for two-year and four-year colleges and universities, but he cautioned againstextrapolating the validity to other instruments and/or across other types of institutions.12An example of institutional useIn order to assess its programs for curriculum improvement, the College of Technology at theUniversity of Houston compiles and analyzes student self-reports of concept and skillachievement just prior to graduation. This has been accomplished largely by the Assessment andContinuous Improvement Committee (ACI), which was formed to plan and implement programassessment for diverse program areas within the College. The ACI developed the GraduatingSenior Survey (GSS) instrument in
professional skills and abilities. This could imply that group discussions of their portfoliosmay help students reflect. Page 11.1000.11Surveys and interviews in Christy’s studies revealed student reticence in self-directed learning.9This obstacle could greatly hinder students’ motivation to direct their own learning and maybeeven their motivation to create thoughtful portfolios. Students in this study suggested thatinstructors should explain how and why portfolios enhance learning, provide an appropriate levelof structure, and integrate portfolios into curriculum planning.9 In designing a portfolioassignment for mechanical engineering students, Guan
factors as important to accomplishing the mission of teachingengineering. In the intellectual excitement column there is preparation, planning, technology,motivation, active, organization, enthusiasm and experience – all adjectives that lead to inspiringstudents to learn and be interested in the subject. In the interpersonal rapport column there isstudent involvement, teamwork, interaction, enthusiasm, communication, motivation, trust,connectivity, and student responsibilities – all adjectives and phrases that lead to a relationshipbetween teacher and student. Teachers who use some number of these ideas have theopportunity to excel as teachers and be efficient in the classroom, thus providing more time forother important efforts such as research
and some suggestions on textbooks, but Dr. Nguyen still has to determine how to plan the day to day lessons to teach. He wants to make sure that the classes he teaches are effective for the students, but also since several of his colleagues will visit the class this first quarter, he wants to make a good impression on them too. Dr. Doris Johnson teaches a required engineering course with over 100 students. She has taught the class a number of times before but this time has noticed that her students don’t seem to be paying attention. During the lectures, they talk amongst themselves, a few fall asleep, and as the semester progresses, she notices that attendance is slipping. Dr. Johnson knows that
2006-1066: INCREASING THE CLASS PARTICIPATION EXPERIENCE FORENGINEERSKenneth McDonald, U.S. Military Academy Kenneth McDonald is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Civil and Mechanical Engineering at the US Military Academy. He has served in numerous assignments throughout his military career to include the U.S., Iraq, Germany, Kosovo, and Korea. He is a registered Professional Engineer in the states of Virginia and Wyoming and has a PhD in geological engineering, master’s degrees in geomorphology, city/regional planning and environmental engineering and a bachelor's degree in civil engineering
teaching excellence. It is anticipated that a SPIE FORM will serveas evidence of teaching effectiveness for annual reports and promotion and tenure dossiers.Continued use of SPIE FORM is planned. The author welcomes feedback from anyoneelse who has similar experiences or attempts to use a SPIE FORM.Bibliographic Information1. ABET, Inc. http://www.abet.org/, last accessed on the 17th January 2006.2. Committee on the Use of Human Subjects Research, Purdue University, http://www.irb.purdue.edu/.3. Devine, David, P. “ExCEEd Impact on a New Professor” Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Conference & Exposition, Portland, OR. June 2005.4. Estes, Allen C. and Ressler, Steven J. “ExCEEd Teaching Workshop
policy, 2005 version. DESIGN REVIEW POLICYIt is important in Civil Engineering to take the steps necessary to get the correct answer.Remember Hammurabi’s Law? In the "real world" practice plans, drawings and specificationsare reviewed and a responsible licensed PE is required to stamp them. In academia publicationsand research are also subjected to peer review prior to publication.Thus, this semester all your problem sets will be reviewed by two of your classmates prior totheir being turned in. This approach to having your work reviewed is called DESIGN REVIEW,and this idea, if not our process, may be familiar to you from other courses. The objective ofDESIGN REVIEW in our course is two fold. First and primarily
on the research team for four to six years. In contrast, at an undergraduateinstitution students may start in the group with only one or two engineering courses completed,and will remain in the group for only two or three years. Other constraints at these schools arehigh teaching loads and limited research facilities. Because of these concerns, some faculty maychoose to avoid research activities while others may perform only research that requires limitedstudent involvement. However, as the primary focus at these institutions is the education ofundergraduates, the ideal research plan will provide opportunities to include studentssignificantly in the process.One way to perform research with heavy undergraduate involvement is to select an
classroom examinations fromdeveloping the course test plan, writing objective test items, administering the exam, to assigningthe grades. Stevens and Levi12 discuss rubrics, stressing the time savings resulting from the useof rubrics. The book provides detailed explanation about the purpose of rubrics and guidance onhow to construct them. It also gives suggestions on how to effectively use rubrics for grading.3. Grading Exam ProblemsProblems with numerical answers are one of the most common types of exam questionsencountered in engineering courses. In this section, we provide an insight on how to optimize thetime spent on grading such problems while still getting an accurate assessment of how studentsare learning.Tip 1: Design exams with grading in