interest of two disparate but equally challenginggroups of introductory physics students; nontraditional part-time students in multi-hour eveningclass sessions at IUPUI’s commuter campus and Air Force Academy cadets focusedwholeheartedly on their future military careers. Their solution was to follow and adapt Toyota’sJust in Time production model to the classroom, resulting in JiTT.3 JiTT involves maintainingfrequent student/faculty communication to deliver small amounts of material for nearlyimmediate use4. In the case of JiTT, the material being delivered is “packets” of course content,and the primary communication mechanism is electronic, typically based upon coursemanagement software such as WebCTTM or BlackboardTM. The fundamental premise of
theseprograms are also employed as building control surveyors and services engineers. They arethree-year degree programs.AustraliaConstruction industry in Australia is one of the largest employers in the nation. Most of theAustralian universities offer undergraduate education in construction to prepare the students for aprofessional career in building and construction related industries 5. These programs helpdevelop skills in how to manage people, materials, equipment and plant while focusing on issuessuch as cost, time, quality, safety and environment. They are geared toward educating students tobecome effective construction managers with comprehensive technological knowledge,management principles and communication skills. Like the programs in the US
study within engineering; and,secondary / flexible -- a secondary program that facilitates interdisciplinary study in areasoutside of engineering for students with unique career interests. All PEVs should understand thatany of these classes, or any variation or combination of these classes, can describe a validengineering or technology program under the set of titles represented by ASEE. Since there will Page 11.1035.5be substantial diversity in the goals and objectives of the various programs, as well as diversityin their constituencies, it may be expected that there will be substantial variation in their areas ofemphases.The rest of the ASEE
2006-1484: SERVICE LEARNING PROJECTS AS PLATFORMS FOR ANUNDERGRADUATE PROJECT MANAGEMENT COURSEPhillip Sanger, Western Carolina University PHILLIP A. SANGER Phillip Sanger is an Associate Professor of Engineering and Technology and serves as the Director of the Center for Integrated Technologies at Western Carolina University. He holds a B.A. in Physics from Saint Louis University and earned his M.S. and Ph.D. in Nuclear Engineering from the University of Wisconsin Madison. Technology development including MRI magnets and SiC power devices plus economic development has been his career foci
2006-1543: INTRODUCING ‘TOTAL DESIGN’ IN AN ENGINEERING DESIGNCURRICULUM: A PILOT EXPERIENCERashmi Jain, Stevens Institute of Technology RASHMI JAIN is Associate Professor of Systems Engineering at Stevens Institute of Technology. Dr. Jain has over 15 years of experience of working on socio-economic and information technology (IT) systems. Over the course of her career she has been involved in leading the implementation of large and complex systems engineering and integration projects. Dr. Jain is currently the Head of Education and Research for International Council of Systems Engineering (INCOSE). She teaches systems integration, systems design and architecture, and rapid systems
withhigh-quality interdisciplinary learning experiences that challenge them academically anddevelop their problem-solving, critical thinking, and communication skills. By buildingstrong local partnerships with business and higher education, Ford PAS encourages andprepares students for success in college and professional careers in fields such asbusiness, engineering, and technology.Several institutions of higher education have become actively involved in the Ford PASprogram. Ford PAS has partnered with Kettering University for the purpose of advancingthe topic of environmentally responsible engineering. The modules used in Ford PASprovide a framework upon which the Kettering University undergraduate course IME540Environmentally Conscious Design
, explore majors within the College of Engineering, meetfaculty members in their chosen major, and meet and work with their peers.The ROSES students in the mechanical engineering seminar course section were chosen as thecohort group for the pilot program. During summer freshman orientation, when they enrolled forfall 2005 semester classes, these students were advised to take the new ME 101 course alongwith the ROSES seminar course. A handout was developed and distributed to advise thestudents and it is shown as Attachment 1. Typically, these students are highly motivated, strongacademically, and tend to complete their academic careers in mechanical engineering, whichmakes them ideal for the pilot program. For the fall 2005 semester, the ME ROSES
Science (traditional), Computer Engineering, Software Engineering and ComputerNetworking. The curriculum content for the Computer Science degree is based on the 2001ACM Curriculum Report. The CNS department has 11 full time faculties. Half of the faculty hasearned a Ph.D. degree and the other half masters degrees. The Computer Science degree atUVSC is accredited by ABET in 2002 and currently has 869 students.The Bachelor of Science in Computer Science program was one of the first Bachelor of Scienceprograms implemented at UVSC in 1993. The program’s goal has been to provide a qualityprogram that meets accreditation standards while providing the students with a skill set thatallows them to succeed in computing careers.2Computing Curriculum
for the course and instructor evaluation, student feedbackappears to be very positive. Introduction Mechanics of Materials (MoM) is the first course in solid mechanics, which coversstress, deformation and strength of simple shaped members, and their applications.Topics include concepts of stress and strain, uni-axial loading, torsion, beam bending,column buckling and stress/strain transformation, etc. As a mandatory course, it has farreaching effects in students’ future learning and career development. Since the introduction of Timoshenko’s book, [1] Strength of Materials, the subject Page 11.839.2has become
to later career life. For the instructor,grouping students reduces the amounts of assignments to be graded. For both, groups promotecooperative learning and enhance speed and thoroughness of communications from the instructorto students. Changes in assignments or schedules are more confidently communicated as long asgroup members assist by telling other group members. Perhaps most importantly, the quality ofprepared submissions is improved if group members represent a diverse range of skills andexperiences from which to draw.Chadha and Nicholls (2006) emphasize the need for teaching transferable skills to students.They highlight several definitions for “transferable skills” as follows: 1. “skills that are developed within one
careers. Working with clients to define requirements, specifications, and designcannot be outsourced. Professional software engineers will be the architects of future software systems.Programming, like home construction, can be done by just about anyone. What is really critical is to getthe design blue print done right. This is the key to a successful software engineering industry in the U.S.The SSI Hub is an important step supporting this effort.Community-Based Capstone EducationThe author has been the instructor in four capstone courses at A&M-CC in which all students work onprojects for non-profit organizations and a few that are university-related. Before initiating a capstone
provided funding for school to develop new ways of increasing the number of engineering graduates in Utah. The objective of this initiative called for tripling the number of engineering graduates by 2008. The Integrated Engineering program was created to expand the pool of engineering branches offered in Utah’s schools of higher education, without duplicating any of them. It addresses the needs that are not covered by the traditional engineering programs; 3. many students are interested in a blend of engineering disciplines rather than a specific branch. This is especially true for those wanting to pursue a career in operations and/or management. Because of its multidisciplinary nature, the Integrated
careers. Journal of College Science Teaching 33: 24-26. 6. Huang, P.M. and S.G. Brainard. 2001. Identifying determinants of academic self-confidence among science, math, engineering and technology students. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering 7: 315-337. 7. Meinholt, C. and S.L. Murray.1999. Why aren’t there more women engineers? Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering 5: 239-263. 8. Nauta, M.M., D.L. Epperson and K.L. Waggoner. 1999. Perceived causes of success and failure: Are women’s attributions related to persistence in engineering majors? Journal of Research in Science Teaching 36(6): 663-676
team members who do not fullycontribute to the project. These uncomfortable group dynamics stifle creativity and degradeenjoyment. Therefore, allowing students to participate in challenging design projects outsideof any official coursework can greatly improve their educational experience. This can proveto be a difficult proposition, as student experiences and interests vary. In addition, thepriorities of the students will change throughout their educational careers, often making itdifficult to retain students during multi-year projects. In order to attract and retain studentparticipants, projects must be both scalable in difficultly and complexity and offer a varietyof engineering challenges.One project that fulfills these criteria is ARLISS
Division’s computing resources and it is the platform on which faculty haveinstalled the software applications and will demonstrate them to students in class. Other formfactors, including tablets, were discarded for their limited computing power and their price pointfor computing power.The Division’s Laptop Policy intentionally permits students to purchase a laptop that does notmeet specifications. The minimum specifications are designed to guide a purchase in thesophomore year that ensures that laptop’s features will be adequate until graduation three yearslater. The policy is flexible and permits students to purchase cheaper laptops early in theircollege careers with the expectation the computer will likely need to be upgraded
temperature plasma. He currently studies the characteristics of injection molded medical plastics in various testing conditions.Richard Fasse, Rochester Institute of Technology Richard Fasse, Ed.D., is currently an Instructional Technology Specialist in the Teaching, Learning, Technology group at RIT. He earned a BS in Business and Computer Science at the University of Kansas and an MBA in Information Systems at Pennsylvania State University before beginning his career at Xerox Corporation in Rochester, New York. He was a systems designer and later manager of the Xerox Billing Systems group responsible for planning and implementing changes to large scale administrative systems. He returned
accreditation handbook: “Industrial Technology is a field of study designed to prepare technical and/or technical management-oriented professionals for employment in business, industry, education, and government. Industrial Technology degree programs and professionals in Industrial Technology careers typically will be involved with the: a. Application of theories, concepts, and principles found in the humanities and the social and behavioral sciences, including a thorough grounding in communication skills. Page 11.946.3
, University of the District of Columbia Dr. Esther T. Ososanya is a professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering at the University of the District of Columbia. During her career, Dr. Ososanya has worked for private industry as a circuit development engineer and as a software engineer, in addition to her academic activities. She received her education in the United Kingdom, where she achieved her Ph.D. in Electrical Engineering from the University of Bradford in 1985. She was also a Visiting Professor at Michigan Technological University for five years, and a faculty member at Tennessee Technological University for 7 years prior to arriving at the University of the District of
address further in their careers. Also, other entities such as General Dynamics and BAESystems have come into the classroom to support the sessions which address how one is tonavigate within organizational structures and cultures effectively, as well as engineering ethics.Feed-forward Assessment: Components of the Feed-Forward Evaluation ProcessThe evaluation process for PD-1 and PD-3 is multifaceted and continuous throughout the year.A variety of measures are used to examine the effectiveness of the instructional design. Theseinclude: ‚ Weekly Analysis of Curriculum ‚ Assessment of Student Learning ‚ On-going Exam Analysis ‚ Course Evaluation/Instructional Effectiveness ‚ Redesign of Course Evaluation
) theintroduction to students of the proper calibration and use of instrumentation that they are likelyto encounter in their careers and 2) the facilitation of learning of concepts taught primarily in alecture format.The first objective is assessed using the practicum exams given at the end of each of the junior-level traditional laboratory courses. These exams measure student ability to perform simpleexperiments on instrumentation used in that semester’s laboratory course and to analyze theresults of these experiments. The expected performance level is that 80% of students willreceive a score of 70 or better on these exams. A performance of less than 80% will trigger adiscussion and possible changes in the pedagogy associated with this learning outcome
started by communicating, listening and studying with thecommunity to learn about our identity, and what it is that we value.While the UW COE remains in many ways homogenous, there is a tremendous diversity ofreasons for believing that change is worthwhile. For some, it’s a desire to continue to competesuccessfully (for students, for funding, for prestige). For others, it’s a desire to find newchallenges in a career. For still others, it’s a nagging sense that we can do better, and that weneed to stretch if we are going to reach our full potential.The Task Force has faced numerous challenges in the apparent dichotomy that exists betweenefforts to fully engage the community in study and conversation about the challenges facing thecollege and how
engineering education have largely judged the Aachen Resolutionsas the key impetus in reforming the system and implementing most of Riedler’s ideals.23Riedler later became the head of the Royal Technical University of Berlin’s automobiletesting laboratory, the first systematic testing facility in Europe. He retired at age 70 in1920.24ConclusionIn conclusion, the results of Riedler’s efforts at the turn of the 20th century to reformGerman engineering education demonstrated the high quality of American methods inpreparing young men and a few young women for careers in engineering, quality held inhigh esteem by knowledgeable European observers. But this example also shows theconvergence of methods in the two most advanced industrial nations of the time
prepared for a career of professional excellenceand service to the Nation as an officer in the United States Army.”6 To achieve thismission, the Academy instructs cadets in the military, physical, and academic domains,and each is essential for a cadet’s development. Academically, cadets choose a majorfrom one of thirteen academic departments. Regardless of their major, all graduates earna Bachelor of Science degree, a result of the high concentration of math and sciencecourses required as part of the core curriculum.The Dean of the Academic Board recently wrote Educating Future Army Officers for aChanging World, which states the Dean’s developmental goals for cadets. Thatdocument sets the standard that “graduates apply mathematics, science
2006-2384: FIRST-TIME ACCREDITATION: LESSONS LEARNED FROM THEABET ACCREDITATION PROCESSAndrew Jackson, Texas A&M University-Commerce ANDREW E. JACKSON, Ph.D., P.E., CSIT, Professor of Industrial Engineering Dr. Jackson teaches a variety of IE courses, including: Engineering Economics, Human Factors Engineering, Production Systems Engineering, Systems Simulation, and Risk Assessment. His career spans 37 years in the fields of aviation, aerospace, defense contract support engineering, systems acquisition, academics, and systems engineering. His research interests include Human Factors Engineering and Ergonomics in Large-Scale Systems.Delbert Horton, Texas A&M University-Commerce E
his interest in international affairs and engagement throughout his career. He was keen to explore the additional opportunities, perspectives and experiences which Purdue University could offer him and DIT students.• Explore opportunity for joint research or other scholarly collaboration Our first exchange was an asynchronous in nature. One of the benefits of this model was that we got a joint opportunity to fully explore the research interests and background of our exchange partner. For instance, at Purdue University, Mr. McHale was given the opportunity to engage with current members of the faculty engaged in post-graduate research. He also had an opportunity to review some important undergraduate project work which is undertaken in
PBL experience, that every student interviewed either agreed or strongly agreed with, is that they gained a deeper understanding of the construction industry. This is a critical advantage of PBL in that it provides students with an introduction to the industry prior to their first employment. This can significantly reduce the number of students who graduate and then find they are dissatisfied with their career choice. Example comments included, “PBL was an eye- opening experience that exposed me to the construction industry and gave me relevant experience” and, “The real-world experience that I gained from PBL was unattainable through the standard classroom procedures.”In summary, the students
engaged in engineering on a day today basis. Knowledge is transferred from experienced engineers to students as they study fortheir technical careers. The collaborative organizations gain access to the students and caninfluence their education leading to better prepared graduates that they can hire. Both partieswin, but the biggest winners are the students.This type of social interaction has lead to a team effort that excels in the sharing of information.“This has occurred because of a growing demand for specialization, the pressure of a globalmarketplace, the rise of the Internet as a collaborative tool, and … it takes collaboration to movea field of investigation forward” (Allen1, 2003, p. 158). Synergism and social capital are created,both
from industry talk and agree on whatthey would like us to add/change in the degree programs.In this way we get a consensus view of needed changes to keep the degree programs relevant tothe needs of industry. I agree that doing this we produce graduates with a more broadbackground than a narrow focus for a particular industry, but it also allows the student morevaried opportunities for employment and career growth. This flexibility has value not just in ourregion but nationally as particular industries changes due to changes in our global economy.What Funding Partners are Looking ForFunding agencies have a variety of grant proposal characteristics they look for. First andforemost the funding agency is looking for a good investment on their
asked tobe involved with assessment of overall program quality, both for institutional accountability andfor accreditation. Thus, it is important for freshman faculty to be familiar with a variety ofassessment techniques as they begin their careers in higher education.Student self-assessment is a technique that can be used together with other techniques tocomprise an assessment effort. Student self-assessment refers to a student rating his/her ownachievement of skills or knowledge. If new engineering educators encounter this technique aspart of a program assessment approach, or if they wish to use it to help evaluate students or theirclass effectiveness, then an understanding of what it is, how it is developed, and why it is usefulis
1993-2004. She was named the SHPE Educator of the Year 2005 and selected for the National Engineering Award in 2003, the highest honor given by the American Association of Engineering Societies. In 2002 the Society of Women Engineers named her the Distinguished Engineering Educator. She has received many other awards for her support of students. An ASEE Fellow, she is a frequent speaker on the career opportunities in engineering, especially for women and minority students.Faye Navabi, Arizona State University FAYE NAVABI is a lecturer in the Department of Computer Science in the Fulton School of Engineering at Arizona State University. She teaches CSE 110, Introduction to JAVA.Debra Banks, Consultant