Technology (CGT). The CGT program atPUC was created in 2000 and has grown from 18 students to approximately 200 in 2005. Whilemanaging such growth has presented challenging issues for CGT faculty, the faculty have alwaysperformed program development with an eye towards future Technology AccreditationCommission of the Accreditation Board for Engineering Technology (TAC/ABET) accreditationin mind. Hence, in creating the associates and bachelor’s degrees, and the various programoptions, the faculty at PUC have planned for future accreditation and job success of the graduatesby including technical courses along with many courses in the degrees which emphasize the “softskills” of engineering technology, such as communication, teamwork, and appreciation
. Program Created Needs/Interests Identified MESSAGES WHERE THE GIRLS ARE 1) Engineers help the world 1) Academically capable 2) Engineers think creatively 2) Sports teams 3) Engineers enjoy working with others 3) Lack of women role models 4) Engineers earn a good living 4) Want meaningful careers 5) Independent/career-minded 6) Don’t like isolation METHODS 7) Affected by culture 1) Provide academically challenging modules 8) Excel in some single gender 2) Enable teamwork environments 3) Enjoy sports
2006-1389: THE UNDERGRADUATE RESEARCH EXPERIENCE AS IT RELATESTO RESEARCH EFFICACY BELIEFS AND THE IMPOSTER PHENOMENONDe'Jeune Antoine, Xavier University of Louisiana De'Jeune S. Antoine is a dual-degree Physics and Biomedical Engineering major. She actively participates in several clubs and organizations, including National Society of Black Engineers (NSBE), Alpha Kappa Alpha Sorority, Inc., and youth mentoring. De'Jeune's research interests include cardiovascular instrumentation and engineering education.Mica Hutchison, Purdue University Mica A. Hutchison is a Ph.D. candidate in the Department Engineering Education and the Department of Chemistry with research interests focused on engineering
2006-1377: CHANGING STUDENT BEHAVIOR: IT CAN BE DONE!Scott Hamilton, U.S. Military Academy Scott R. Hamilton is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Civil & Mechanical Engineering at the United States Military Academy, West Point, NY. He earned a B.S. degree from the United States Military Academy, in 1984 an M.S. degree in Civil Engineering and an M.S. Degree in Engineering Management from Stanford University in 1994. Page 11.319.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2006 Changing Student Behavior: It Can Be Done!AbstractThis paper presents some general
2006-1903: INTERDISCIPLINARITY, FINANCIAL SOFTWARE PRODUCTDEVELOPMENT, AND ENTREPRENEURSHIP IN AN URBAN UNIVERSITYAnthony Joseph, Pace University Dr. Anthony Joseph is an associate professor in Pace University's computer science department. He performs research in time-frequency analyses and neural networks with emphasis on applications in economics/finance and bioinformatics. He also conducts research in applied pedagogy, including active and collaborative learning techniques and strategies. Page 11.812.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2006 Interdisciplinarity, Financial
2006-1665: PREPARING YOUR TENURE DOSSIER FROM DAY ONEMicah Hale, University of Arkansas Dr. Hale is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Civil Engineering where he teaches courses in structural engineering.Findlay Edwards, University of Arkansas Dr. Edwards is an Associate Professor in the Department of Civil Engineering where he teaches courses in environmental engineering.Norman Dennis, University of Arkansas Dr. Dennis is a Professor in the Department of Civil Engineering where he teaches courses in geotechnical engineering. Page 11.1021.1© American Society for Engineering Education
2006-1728: ISSUES IN TEACHING AND ASSESSMENT OF COURSES INRAPIDLY CHANGING AREASJana Whittington, Purdue University-CalumetKim Nankivell, Purdue University-CalumetJoy Colwell, Purdue University-CalumetJames Higley, Purdue University-Calumet Page 11.848.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2006 Issues in Teaching and Assessment of Courses in Rapidly Changing AreasAbstractThe past decade has shown an exponential growth in technology in all areas of the academiccurriculum, and especially in the technology based fields. This growth has put great pressure onthe academic community to preserve learning objectives and outcomes while still maintainingassessment criteria
2006-1448: ASSESSING THE COMPREHENSIVE DESIGN STUDIO COURSETHROUGH ALTERNATE METHODSJohn Phillips, Oklahoma State University John Phillips, an assistant professor of architectural engineering, is one of four faculty members teaching in the comprehensive design studio, where his expertise is structural design. He also teaches Analysis I, Foundations, Structures: Timber Steel & Concrete, Steel II, and Steel III courses. Professor Phillips is a registered engineer in the state of Texas, and a structural consultant for Brown Engineering, P.C., in Stillwater, Oklahoma. Page 11.244.1© American
2006-2416: DIFFERENCES IN CULTURAL EXPECTATION BETWEEN FACULTYAND STUDENTS IN AN INTERNATIONAL COLLABORATIONYuko Hoshino, Nihon University Education: 2003-, Ph.D. candidate, Nihon University; 1994, M.A., Asian Studies, University of Oregon; 1980, B.S., Clinical Pharmacology, Kyoritsu College of Pharmacy. Professional Experience: 1980-87 in Industry; 1987-1989 and 1994-1996, Harvard University; 1990, 1992, 1994, Engineering Alliance for Global Education Japan Program; 1996-, Kanazawa Institute of TechnologyWayne Sanders, Rose Hulman Institute Of Technology Education: 1975, Ph.D., Mechanical Engineering, Southern Methodist University; 1970, M.E.S., Lamar University; 1960, B.S.M.E., Texas A
. Page 11.1369.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2006 Use of graphics in multimedia instructional materials: Research-based design guidelinesAbstractEngineering education, along with other disciplinary areas, uses a wide range of mediaand sensory modalities to communicate ideas and concepts to and between students. Putinto the context of a modern classroom, text and graphic combinations are likely to comein a number of different forms. With the explosion of use of multimedia tools has comean increased interest in learning sciences research into the cognitive basis of multi-representational learning. This paper will explore current cognitive theory and the designheuristics that have been derived from it
fear of it hurting their evaluations. The moresenior faculty members could also share honestly without being observed by their supervisor.Frequently these meetings occurred during an off campus lunch. Even as administrators, regularinformal visits with junior faculty have been successful to keep them informed of broaderactivities within the department and college and have provided strong social interactions fordeepening communication and facilitating collaborative efforts to benefit the junior facultymember.Getting tenure (or worrying about not getting it) is almost always on the mind of the newprofessor. The third author has done the following in a program he led. As a department head ina very large College of Engineering, he reviewed the
and Mind-Set,” Journal of Engineering Education, April 2005, pp. 233 – 243.3. Barbe, David F., J. Robert Baum, and Karen S. Thornton, “Campus Entrepreneurship Opportunities,” Proceedings of the 2001 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, 2001.4. Ports, Ken, et. al. “Senior Design Project Commercialization and Entrepreneurship,” Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, 2005.5. Stanford Technology Ventures Program. Stanford University, Stanford, CA. http://www.stanford.edu/ group/stvp6. MIT $50k Entrepreneurship Competition. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA
in their efforts tobecome successful engineering students at Virginia Tech, and to provide them with the Page 11.708.3information necessary to become successful both academically and professionally. From anacademic viewpoint, the course is built around the theme that learning is both an individual and acollaborative process. The students must determine what works best for them while learninghow to utilize the skills and minds of others to assist them. It is explained to the students that thelearning skills taught in the course will not be beneficial to them unless they decide to implementthose skills in their daily routine. The professional
education,” Proceedings of the 2002 ASEE Conference, 2002. http://www.asee.org/about/events/conferences/search.cfm10. Prince, M. J. and R. M. Felder, “Inductive Teaching and Learning Methods: Definitions, Comparisons, and Research Bases,” to appear in Journal of Engineering Education, 2006.11. Kanter, D. E., Smith, H. D., McKeenna, A., Rieger, C., and R. A. Linsenmeier, “Inquiry-based laboratory instruction throws out the “cookbook” and improves learning,” Proceedings of the 2003 ASEE Conference, 2003. http://www.asee.org/about/events/conferences/search.cfm12. National Research Council, How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School. National Academies Press, 2000a. http://www.nap.edu
2006-2066: SHORT AND LONG-TERM INFLUENCE OF EXCELLENTINSTRUCTORS ON GRADUATES IN ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY: A CASESTUDYMaher Murad, University of Pittsburgh-Johnstown Maher Murad is an Assistant Professor of Civil Engineering Technology at the University of Pittsburgh at Johnstown. Dr. Murad was a visiting assistant professor at Bucknell University and had overseas teaching experience. He also worked as a highway project manager for Acer Freeman Fox International (Hyder Consulting). Dr. Murad received M.S. degree in Civil Engineering from the University of Toledo in 1987 and a Ph.D. in Engineering Science from the University of Toledo in 1994. His teaching interests include transportation, highway design
2006-2166: DECISION-MAKING: WHAT DOES IT HAVE TO DO WITH MYTEACHING?Yi-Min Huang, University of Washington Yi-Min Huang is a Research Scientist for the Scholarship on Teaching element of the Center for the Advancement of Engineering Education (CAEE). She holds a Ph.D. in Educational Psychology from Washington State University. Her research interests include assessment and evaluation.Matt Eliot, University of Washington Matt Eliot is a doctoral candidate in the Technical Communication department of the University of Washington. His interests include product design, the structure of meaningful product experiences, human-centered design, and accessibility issues. He can be reached at
tocontemporary problems and technology solutions than strictly didactic instruction orcontrived laboratory problem approaches. Not surprising, students’ motivation increasesin these settings and their confidence in problem definition, option development andsolution grows. As with active learning approaches, the instructor role changes in clinicand project courses from one of talking head to facilitator, guide and resource [2,6]. Thestructure of an engineering clinic based ECE program is one that requires students tooperate at higher orders of abstraction earlier in their education while still requiring aconcrete “hands-on, minds-on” engineering solution to the real world problem at hand.These transformative changes are discussed as desirable in most of
2006-379: BRINGING STUDENT INNOVATIONS TO MARKET: A HINMANCEOS SUCCESS STORYAnik Singal, Affiliate Classroom, Inc. Mr. Singal is a 2005 graduate of the University of Maryland, College Park, earning a B.S. in Finance. He is an alumnus of the Hinman CEOs Program and was awarded the Program’s “Entrepreneur of Year” in 2004-2005. He is the founder and president of Affiliate Classroom, Inc. Mr. Singal is a recognized leader in affiliate marketing.David Barbe, University of Maryland-College Park Dr. Barbe is the Executive Director of the Maryland Technology Enterprise Institute, Professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering, and Faculty Director of the Hinman CEOs Program at the University
2006-961: A SCALABLE PROBLEM-BASED LEARNING SYSTEM FORENTREPRENEURSHIP EDUCATIONAnthony Warren, Pennsylvania State UniversityElizabeth Kisenwether, Pennsylvania State UniversityRalph Hanke, Bowling Green University Page 11.115.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2006 A Scalable Problem-Based Learning (PBL) System for Entrepreneurship EducationEXECUTIVE SUMMARYEntrepreneurship skills are vital to the future of the US economy and its ability to supportcontinual wealth creation. Traditional educational methods do not teach such skills; indeed theymay hinder them. The initiative described creates a new way to provide a valuable
Professor of Physics at Carthage College. After a career at Science Applications International Corporation as head of the Applied Physics and Engineering Division, Dr. Arion conceived, started, and directs the ScienceWorks: Entrepreneurial Studies program at Carthage. This program has for the last twelve years successfully integrated entrepreneurship and career training into the undergraduate science and technology curriculum. He works extensively with regional business development groups and municipal organizations, combining academic activities with new business creation and business revitalization. He is also technical director at the Center for Advanced Technology and Innovation, a
2006-488: GIRLS ARE IT--A WORKSHOP FOR RECRUITING GIRLS INTOINFORMATION TECHNOLOGYAnn Beheler, Collin County Community College Ann Beheler is Dean/Executive Director of the Engineering and Emerging Technology Division of Collin County Community College and is a Ph.D. student at Walden University. She is responsible for continuing education and credit engineering and technology programs on all campuses as well as Distance Education and the Teaching and Learning Center for the district. Additionally, she manages a $2.46 million National Science Foundation grant for a Regional Center in Convergence Technology that focuses on furthering careers in the emerging career area of convergence
2006-1501: DIFFERENCES IN CLIMATE FOR UNDERGRADUATE ANDGRADUATE WOMEN IN ENGINEERING: THE EFFECT OF CONTEXTElizabeth Litzler, University of Washington Elizabeth Litzler is the Associate Director for Research at the Center for Workforce Development at the University of WashingtonSheila Edwards Lange, University of Washington Sheila Edwards Lange is Special Assistant to the Vice President/Vice Provost at the Office of Minority Affairs, University of Washington Page 11.480.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2006 Differences in Climate for Undergraduate and Graduate Women
2006-190: DEVELOPING A VIRTUAL REALITY-BASED SPATIALVISUALIZATION ASSESSMENT INSTRUMENTNathan Hartman, Purdue University Nathan Hartman is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Computer Graphics Technology at Purdue University, and he has been an ASEE member since 1997. He currently teaches or has taught courses in introductory engineering graphics, 3D solid modeling, 3D surface modeling, and engineering design graphics standards and documentation. Nathan also teaches graduate courses in the foundations of graphics in technology and instrumentation and measurement in research design. He also serves as Graduate Coordinator for the Computer Graphics Technology Department. He has worked
2006-2056: CRITICAL SUCCESS FACTORS FOR TECHNOPOLIS CREATIONCarmo D'Cruz, Florida Tech Dr. Carmo A. D’Cruz is Associate Professor in the Engineering Systems Department at Florida Tech. A twenty-year veteran of the semiconductor industry, Dr. D’Cruz has studied and taught at Engineering and Business schools. His experience ranges from R&D and engineering to manufacturing, operations, marketing and Business Development. His research areas include Technopolis Creation and Engineering Entrepreneurship. He has developed pioneering courses in Systems Engineering Entrepreneurship, Technical Marketing, High Tech Product Strategy and Technology Commercialization Strategies. He has a BSEE from the
縕 緫 緫 緱 緹 縈 縑 縕 緱 緹 縈 縑 縕 膄芷荑莒舃荃糫芷莆芮膴舃荃 苾莆舃荑荕艆芾芷 翟艆舲綌繢糫耺莆舃荑荕艆芾芷糫縈糫綋糫耺縈 翟艆舲綌糫繮糫耺莆舃荑荕艆芾芷糫縑糫綋糫耺縑Conclusions It is originally one of the great missions for engineering to enhance creativity and promotecreative thinking in youngsters. The authors hope that students develop inventive minds and thattheir delivery classes (using science fairs) will be a positive contribution to this mission. (6) Theyalso
University Page 11.1422.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2006 VaNTH Observation System Component AssessmentAbstract- Since 1999, the VaNTH Observation System (VOS), a direct classroom observationsystem, has been used to collect data about classroom activities within bioengineering courses.Two components of the VOS, the Classroom Interaction Observation and the Global Ratings,specifically collect data about whether observed courses contain elements of the “How PeopleLearn” (HPL) framework, as set forth in the National Research Council publication How PeopleLearn: Mind, Brain, Experience, and School.1 VOS observers use
NNCS Leadership Symposium: Adding a Leadership Component to Science EducationAbstractThe NSF Navy Civilian Service (NNCS) program is now in itssecond year of operation and has embarked on a course to add asignificant leadership training component for participatingstudents. This paper will describe the nature and history of NNCS,the rational for the leadership component, and a description of thesymposium itself. Also included will be a programmatic overviewfrom the perspective of its origins in ONR’s workforcedevelopment programs.NNCS has the following main three goals:• To identify and fully develop a diverse group of science,technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) professionalswith advanced
2006-736: KAMIKAZE: INVESTIGATIONAL AUTONOMOUS UNDERWATERVEHICLE FOR COLLABORATIVE RESEARCH AND UNDERGRADUATEEDUCATION AND TRAININGBrian Howell, Western Carolina University Dr. Howell is the Program Director for Electrical and Computer Engineering Technology at Western Carolina UniversityStephen Wood, Florida Tech Dr. Wood is an Assistant Professor in Ocean Engineering at the Department of Marine and Environmental Systems Page 11.853.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2006 KAMIKAZE: INVESTIGATIONAL AUTONOMOUS UNDERWATER VEHICLE FOR COLLABORATIVE RESEARCH AND UNDERGRADUATE
education research by examining the ISEE model. We also describe the successesand challenges experienced as we near completion of the second of three cycles, andimplications for future community building efforts. One finding is that community at the locallevel is crucial. While expanding the national community of engineering education researchersis important, scholars who are new to the field need a community of like-minded colleagues withwhom they can give and receive feedback on works-in-progress. We also found that engineeringfaculty tend to have difficulty with particular aspects of educational research, such as navigatinga new disciplinary language, utilizing qualitative research methodologies, and analyzingqualitative data. We found that
on module design, to Jairam Eswara for providing the exam data from theoriginal curriculum, to Itty ‘James’ Samuel for his work implementing the tutorials, to Ragu Vijaykumarfor his work implementing the simulation, and to Professor Robert Linsenmeier of NorthwesternUniversity for his valuable insights on module design.References1. How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School. Eds: Bransford, J.D., Brown, A.L., Cocking,R.R.. National Academy Press (Washington; 1999).2. Gunter H.E., Bonventre, J.V., D’Avila M.A., Sadeghpour S., Vijaykumar R. (2003), “EducationInnovation in Physiology” Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education AnnualConference. Nashville, TN, June 22-25, 2003.3. Henrickson S.E., Gunter H.E