Collection

2021 First-Year Engineering Experience

Authors

Anoop Singh Grewal, Arizona State University

Paper ID #35527Paper: Efficacy of teaching entrepreneurial mindset using a game-likeactivityDr. Anoop Singh Grewal, Arizona State University Anoop Grewal (agrewal6@asu.edu) is a lecturer at Arizona State University in the Ira A. Fulton Schools of engineering since 2014. He received his doctorate in Mechanical and Aerospace engineering (in the field of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics) from Cornell University. His research background is in robotics but his passion lies in engineering education. At ASU he is part of the instructional team for ”Introduction to Engineering”, a multidisciplinary project based course. He also

Collection

2021 First-Year Engineering Experience

Authors

Meagan Eleanor Ita, The Ohio State University; Laine Rumreich, The Ohio State University

engineering entrepreneurship. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 GIFTS: Preparing Teaching Assistants to Encourage an Entrepreneurial Mindset in First-Year EngineeringIntroduction This Great Ideas for Teaching, and Talking with, Students (GIFTS) paper focuses on anEntrepreneurial Mindset (EM), which is a collection of mental habits that augment engineering skillsets toamplify the societal impact and value creation of engineering solutions. In the first-year engineeringprogram at The Ohio State University, this mindset is defined using three key attributes referred to as the“3Cs” and developed by the Kern Entrepreneurial Engineering Network

Collection

2021 First-Year Engineering Experience

Authors

Anoop Singh Grewal, Arizona State University; Mark Vincent Huerta, Arizona State University

Paper ID #35504Workshop: Using Open-Ended Design Projects to Foster Creativity,Entrepreneurial Mindset, and MotivationDr. Anoop Singh Grewal, Arizona State University Anoop Grewal (agrewal6@asu.edu) is a lecturer at Arizona State University in the Ira A. Fulton Schools of engineering since 2014. He received his doctorate in Mechanical and Aerospace engineering (in the field of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics) from Cornell University. His research background is in robotics but his passion lies in engineering education. At ASU he is part of the instructional team for ”Introduction to Engineering”, a multidisciplinary

Collection

2021 First-Year Engineering Experience

Authors

Kurt Paterson, James Madison University; Justin J Henriques; Daniel Ivan Castaneda, James Madison University; Robert L. Nagel, James Madison University; Kyle G. Gipson, James Madison University; Shraddha Joshi, James Madison University; Callie Miller, James Madison University; Jacquelyn Kay Nagel, James Madison University; Jason Forsyth, James Madison University

High Resource / Low Impact ResourceFigure 1. Cost-benefit visualization conveying average annual summary information offour first-year co-curriculars. Bubble size is proportional to the average number ofstudents participating over the life of each program offering.References[1] D. Rae and D.E. Melton,“Developing an entrepreneurial mindset in U.S. engineering education: the KEEN project,” J. of Eng. Entrepreneurship, 2016, 7(3).[2] Castaneda, D.I., et al., “24for24: 24-minute engagements in a summer bridge program for the Collegiate Class of 2024,” in Sixth Int. Conf. on E-Learning, 2020, 6 pp.[3] A.C. Estes, R.W. Welch., and S.J

Collection

2021 First-Year Engineering Experience

Authors

Carolyn Skurla, Baylor University; Joseph Anthony Donndelinger, Baylor University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

authors implemented several significantmodifications to address needs manifest in students’ experience: 1. The instruction sheet was modified to forbid the use of the instruction sheet as construction material. 2. A barter policy was implemented to encourage an entrepreneurial mindset. Teams could barter with other teams for project materials. 3. The Rubik’s cube was replaced with a wooden block (3¼”W x 3¼”D x 2½”H) topped with a wireless doorbell to prevent use of the Rubik’s Cube as a structural member in a team’s design. The addition of the doorbell allowed us to define two modes of failure (described later). 4. Instructions sheets, supplies and/or tools were withheld until after the oral briefing to