his/her graduate research project, each student willstudy, design, or create experiences for people with disabilities that will empower them toovercome existing obstacles or barriers in their lives and learning. The findings are expected tobroadly impact learning among students.Overall Program StructureLWD was initially created as a concentration among four of WSU’s existing Ph.D. programs:BioMedical Sciences (BMS), Engineering (Eng), Computer Science and Engineering (CSE), andHuman Factors and Industrial/Organizational Psychology (HF/IO). While these programs reflectdifferent methodological and theoretical traditions, there are many potential points ofoverlapping interest and intersection that favor an interdisciplinary approach. For example
12.1571.3Due to the nature of the capstone design experience coupled with its timing which closely alignswith graduation, the learning outcomes for the MSD program directly support attributesidentified by ABET. The MSD experience also relies heavily on technical skills and knowledgethat students acquire through their respective engineering program coursework as well asfoundational courses. After a comprehensive MSD course assessment and evaluation during thesummer of 2006, the MSD program educational outcomes (student learning expectations),describing what students are expected to know and be able to do by the end of the MSDexperience, are as follows:1. Ability to explain the product development process in the context of the product life cycle.2
, thinking as part of a team, and thinking and communicating inseveral “languages” of design. Fry12 has also discussed the importance of “design thinking” inengineering education and underscores the value of multidisciplinary teams. Until designpractices are fully integrated into engineering curricula, capstone design programs will bear asubstantial burden to better prepare undergraduates for careers that inevitably emphasize the“practice” of design.At RIT, the infusion of multidisciplinary design into the curriculum represents a strategicimperative for the KGCOE. Without strong top-down commitment, the likelihood of making anoticeable impact on the broader challenge outlined above seems remote. In addition to theMSD program discussed in this paper
AC 2007-1826: ASSESSING AND IMPROVING A MULTIDISCIPLINARYENVIRONMENTAL LIFE CYCLE ANALYSIS COURSEDavid Richter, Virginia Tech DAVID RICHTER is a graduate student currently pursuing a M.S. in Mechanical Engineering at Virginia Tech. He is researching interdisciplinary collaboration in engineering and education. He also has interests in engineering design, outreach programs for youth, and communication in the engineering curriculum.Sean McGinnis, Virginia Tech SEAN McGINNIS is the Director of the Virginia Tech Green Engineering Program and a research faculty jointly appointed in Materials Science and Engineering and Biological Systems Engineering. Dr. McGinnis holds bachelor's degrees in
service-learning program enables each student team to maintain along-term relationship with its community partner and to successfully design and deliverproducts that have significant technical complexity and significant community impact. Theprogram is implemented as a track of courses, where a team corresponds to a division or labsection of the course. Each team is large – 8 to 20 students – and vertically integrated –composed of freshmen, sophomores, juniors and seniors. A student may be a member of a teamfor up to four years, registering for 1 to 2 credits each semester. When seniors graduate eachyear, returning students move up a year and new students are added to the team. Many teamshave developed formal training processes for new members
the practice of modern security and safety engineering programs, including the use of information technology and supporting software applications. 7. Apply a global mindset to security and safety issues related to people and assets. 8. Assess the impact of security and safety issues for the operation of corporations and businesses and develop appropriate action plans through detailed engineering analyses and design. 9. Integrate tools and techniques, resources, organizational systems, and decision- making processes for the successful implementation of security and safety plans.Possess the knowledge necessary to become certified as a safety (CSP) and security professional(CPP) and pass FEMA Certifications
therapeuticapplications, which are frequently referred to as BioMEMS or Biomedical Microsystems.Biomedical Microsystems research includes biological, biomedical, biochemical, andpharmaceutical analysis and synthesis using MEMS-based microsensors and microsystems. Atthe University of Cincinnati the state-of-the-art emerging MEMS and BioMEMS research wasintegrated within the graduate and undergraduate electrical engineering curricula. For the pastthree years a novel course Introduction to Biomedical Microsystems was offered. In these firstthree course offerings, enrollment has spread beyond the initial target audience of theDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, and now includes students from mechanicalengineering, environmental engineering, computer
TheEngineer of 2020. Professionals who graduate with engineering degrees of any discipline maydirectly use their undergraduate technical knowledge as well as use, in more general terms, theirengineering problem solving approaches in many fields. Today’s engineers work in traditionalas well as non-traditional fields perceived completely different from any design theory studied inthe classroom. Many industries, from mainstream business and consulting to design andmanufacturing, desire to hire engineers for their learned way of thinking and ability to applyavailable resources to improve quality of product, service and thus human life. A well-roundedengineer, with effective technical knowledge and analytical skills as well as effective soft skills
; but engineering will only contribute to success if it is able to continue toadapt to new trends and provide education … to arm [graduates] with the tools needed for theworld it will be, not as it is today.”4Strategies and ChallengesEngineering educators are well aware of the need to provide students with an education thatextends well beyond the fundamentals and design-oriented, practical embodiments of thestudents’ particular area of specialization. Indeed, the new ABET criteria clearly articulate that“engineering programs must demonstrate that their students attain … (c) an ability to design a system, component, or process to meet desired needs within realistic constraints such as economic, environmental, social, political, ethical
professionals is growing and has been recognized(Atkins et al., 2003). This new workforce will be comprised of individuals with expertise in aparticular science domain, as well as in computer science and mathematics. The faculty andpartners at VBI are already aware of the need for interdisciplinary training of graduate students.Interdisciplinary training allows students to be more productive in research projects early in theirgraduate training and effectively prepares them for more productive and satisfying careers in ournew knowledge-based economy.A typical research project requires multiple disciplines coming together to work on a specificresearch problem. This demonstration project at the undergraduate level brought professorstogether from different
]. Mission: Our program provides a theory based, application oriented general engineering education that serves as a basis for career success and lifelong learning. Our graduates possess and demonstrate the engineering and scientific knowledge required for analysis, design, improvement, and evaluation of integrated technology based systems. Our program equips graduates to be applied problem solvers who develop solutions that consider system interrelationships and meet or exceed customer needs. Program Objectives Graduates of the BS Engineering program are: 1. Prepared for professional practice as licensed engineers with a broad knowledge of general systems and problem solving
impact of globalization can be viewed as a revolution in the organization of work, production of goods and services. The homogenization of productive activity had meant that engineers had to move their gaze from local perspective to a world-view; 2. Applied Information and Communication Technologies. Professional engineering discourses were now separated by time-zones not time of travel; 3. Environmental Sustainability. Increasing international accountability for sustainable practices meant that professional engineers needed to possess global environmental sensitivities; and 4. Advances in Biological Technologies. Engineering graduates needed broader scientific literacy. In a similar vein to other
. Zemke, S. & Elger, D. (2006). Curricular elements that promote professional behavior in a design class. ASEEConference Proceedings, session 187.7. Seat, E. & Lord, S. M. (1999). Enabling effective engineering teams: A program for teaching interaction skills.Journal of Engineering Education, Oct., 385-390.8. Artis, S., Scales, G., & Griffin, O. (2006). From the classroom to the boardroom: The use of role play in graduateeducation. ASEE Conference Proceedings, session 1590.9. McKeachie, W. J. (2002). Teaching tips: Strategies, research, and theory for college and university teachers.Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.10. Steinert, Y. (1993). Twelve tips for using role-plays in clinical teaching. Medical Teacher, 15 (4), 283-291.11
.”• Project Mentoring – “The Project Mentor’s task is providing guidance in relation to your project. Note that the project work is intended as ‘guided research’ and that the whole Master of Sustainable Practice program has been designed around this concept (among others).” Each participant is assigned a mentor within the university who is able to provide some expert guidance (a little like a research supervisor) around their project.• Portfolios – “Your portfolio is a primary source for assessment and evaluation in this program. It is both a container of evidence of your skills and a portrait of your development throughout the program. It is a purposeful collection of work that exhibits your efforts, progress and achievements in
innovation awards, including an NSF PYI, IEEE CVPR Best Paper 2004 and U. Colorado's Innovator of the year. He is chair of the IEEE PAMI TC and in 2006 was inducted into the IEEE Golden Core. Dr. Boult's research spans computer vision, image processing, medical imaging, biometrics as well as Computer Networks and wireless sensor networks. Dr. Boult's Vision and Security Technology Lab as over $2M in research funding, with 1 postdoc, 9 graduate students and 16 paid undergraduate students. He has been the primary advisor for more than two dozen Ph.D. students; has published over 150 Papers and holds 5 patents with 8 pending. He has been involved in 3 startup companies, all
words of our corporate champion, “The morewe work together, the better it gets.”Case Study: Accurate Heart ModelThe impact of this program on individual students can best be illustrated by an example from ourfirst trial experience. A typical case involves a Biomechanical Engineering student with noprevious research experience, and pre-class survey results illustrating her belief that she hadbelow-average aptitude for computer use and independent learning. The industrial challengeoffered to her team came from a pacemaker manufacturer: create both an accurate CAD modeland a mechanically-accurate physical model of the human heart to be used in the development of