AC 2007-1286: PLANNING A SMALL-SCALE WIND-ELECTRIC SYSTEM INEAST-CENTRAL IOWAMichael E. Hay, University of Northern Iowa Michael Hay completed his masters degree in Industrial Technology at the University of Northern Iowa. Mr. Hay holds a BT in Industrial Technology/Mechanical Design from the University of Northern Iowa and an MA in Industrial Technology from the University of Northern Iowa. Mr. Hay has over 25 years of experience in various Engineering positions and is listed on six US patents. His graduate research was in planning small-scale wind-electric systems. He has worked on several other renewable energy and electric vehicle projects as well.Recayi "Reg" Pecen, University of
extracurricular activities, not just instruction in academic subjects. Formal education is consuming a smaller percentage of their time. Additionally, project-based courses require a great deal of out-of-class team meeting time, often late at night. • A Shortage of Hands-on Exploration: Pre-exposure to technical concepts is far less uniform among students from increasingly diverse educational and cultural backgrounds than it was a decade ago. Gone are the days when the majority of STEM-inclined students Page 12.861.3 were ham radio operators, played with Erector/LEGO sets and had tinkered extensively
extracurricular activities, not just instruction in academic subjects. Formal education is consuming a smaller percentage of their time. Additionally, project-based courses require a great deal of out-of-class team meeting time, often late at night. • A Shortage of Hands-on Exploration: Pre-exposure to technical concepts is far less uniform among students from increasingly diverse educational and cultural backgrounds than it was a decade ago. Gone are the days when the majority of STEM-inclined students Page 12.862.3 were ham radio operators, played with Erector/LEGO sets and had tinkered extensively
facilitate more widespread cross-disciplinary research collaboration among faculty?The study focuses on National Science Foundation-funded faculty at Carnegie doctoralinstitutions as a sample with a high level of credibility, representative of a wide distribution ofdisciplines and institutions. The participants represent physical and mathematical sciences,engineering, social sciences and some humanities.II. MethodA. SampleSurvey participants were selected from among primary investigators listed in the public awardsdatabase on the National Science Foundation’s web site (www.nsf.gov/awardsearch) under oneparticular directorate (unnamed to protect confidentiality) that funds a variety of projects inSTEM education settings. All PIs currently funded
increase with average employmentneeds ranging from 9 to 17%. [10] Currently, the gap between college graduates and the jobmarket is being filled by international or foreign born students. Approximately 60% of graduatestudents and 70% of post docs in engineering fields are foreign born students. [9]Funding Agency & the Associated Requirements Funding for the Summer Research Experience for High School Students and Teachersprogram was primarily through the Center for BioModular Multi-Scale Systems, a NationalScience Foundation’s EPSCOR grant and as such, the SEHS program had to meet therequirements stipulated in the mission and objectives of the research project. The grant’sEducation & Outreach (E&O) charge was to develop effective
variousengineering labs across the campus.Science, technology, society projectsAll students completed two science, technology, and society projects. Working in teamsof three and imitating the work in the “take-apart” lab, they studied an artifact of theHispanic world. Their task was to research and describe the historical significance andengineering importance of the artifact and then to explain how the artifact reflects theculture which produced it. The fruits of these activities were two group presentations inthe course of the semester –practicing the final methodology of the end project—and agroup paper in English to summarize their project in Sevilla, Spain, and inMilwaukee,Wisconsin, two cities seemingly disparate in culture.Evaluation and assessment
calculation that was a part of the lab.Visiting LecturesA series of engineering faculty visited the class and spoke, in English, about a favoritetopic. Students made vocabulary lists based on the lectures and wrote summaries of thesubstance of the lectures, in Spanish. Apart from the direct benefits to aims of the class,these lectures also gave the students an idea of the exciting work going on in variousengineering labs across the campus.Science, technology, society projectsAll students completed two science, technology, and society projects. Working in teamsof three and imitating the work in the “take-apart” lab, they studied an artifact of theHispanic world. Their task was to research and describe the historical significance andengineering
. Platform issues such as multiple or single users, directed in-gameinteraction by an educator, remote site multi-user interaction over the internet, and asynchronouslearning are also addressed.In keeping with the systems engineering basis, the roots of this video game knowledge module,we will be outlining our project using a system engineering approach. The discussion will startby briefly describing the stakeholders’ requirements and goals, followed by the concept ofoperations. The stakeholder requirements and concept of operations are used to derive thesystem level requirements along with technical performance measures and a qualificationstrategy2. Next the feasibility studies, functional analysis, and design and prototype developmentsections
Performance IndicatorsCourse (percentage)Gradebooks Fall 1999 and every semester thereafter: Course average lab score for: ‚ IE 253 ‚ IE 351 ‚ IE 321 Course writing skills average score for: ‚ IE 351 ‚ IE 431 (461) ‚ IE 463 Project I ‚ IE 463 Project II ‚ IE 485 Project Course oral presentation average score for: ‚ IE 464 ‚ IE 463 Project II (client
Curriculum (MUSIC), Techtronics Program) and is currently co-investigator on a grant developing computer software to teach immunology to middle school students. Her special interests include developing ways to teach science/engineering to engage diverse populations especially females and underrepresented minorities.Paul Klenk, Duke University Paul A. Klenk, Ph.D., is a Visiting Scholar at Sigma Xi, the Scientific Research Society, developing K-12 engineering education programs. He received a Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering and Materials Science from the Pratt school of Engineering at Duke University in 2006. He is the Duke Project Director for the TeachEngineeirng Digital Library Project
Elizabeth Parry received her B.S. in Engineering Management-Mechanical Engineering from the University of Missouri-Rolla in 1983. After working for IBM for 10 years, Ms. Parry left to raise her children and start a science education business. Since 1999, she has directed two major grant programs for the College of Engineering at North Carolina State University. Currently, she is the project director for RAMP-UP (Recognizing Accelerated Math Potential in Underrepresented People), a five year program focusing on outreach to strengthen K-12 math, science and engineering knowledge and funded by NSF and the GE Foundation
become engineers who have ability, courage, andleadership, and can solve the problems” in international development projects. Its extensivecurriculum combining engineering and international development includes courses such as“Science and Society: Writing and Analytical Skills” and “Principles of International Co-existence,” which focuses on differences in culture, climate, and legal systems. But there is noevidence the program includes the ethical dimensions of international development work(http://www.ide.titech.ac.jp/index.html).Related curricular efforts in the U.S. include Engineering Projects in Community Service (EPICS,Purdue University), Engineering for Developing Communities (EDC, University of Colorado-Boulder), and Humanitarian
AC 2007-151: INSIDE THE CLASSROOM: CHALLENGES TO TEACHINGENGINEERING DESIGN IN HIGH SCHOOLSibel Uysal, Arizona State University Sibel Uysal is a Ph.D. student in Science Education, Department of Curriculum and Instruction at ASU. She earned her MA degree in Science Education at University of Missouri Columbia. Her BS degree is in Biology. Her principle research areas are inquiry-based learning and science and the equity in science education. She works on the project about investigating the efficiency of different type of induction programs on the development of beginning science teachers.Senay Yasar, Arizona State University Senay Yasar is a Ph.D. student in Science Education, Department of
4Islamic Studies 4Total Hrs/wk 28 Fifth Year First Semester Second SemesterSoil Mechanics 4 Foundation 4 EngineeringHighway 4 Design Project 2ConstructionConcrete II 4 Canalization 4Transportation 4 Technical Elective III 4Technical Elective II 4 Construction Engr 4 Mgt.Non-technical
coverage so far but needs some elaboration. - H2O2 can be quite hazardous depending on the concentration. This should be discussed some more, as well as the use of any personal protective equipment (PPE) needed (gloves, glasses, handling techniques, etc.) - In previous projects, the H2O2 – beef liver catalyzed reaction has been strong. How will you handle loading, mixing, and sealing the reaction vessel? Also, at the pressures you are considering, the steel pipe should not be a problem but the fittings and PVC drive unit may need some caution. - I suspect your pressure will need to be increased. It looks like there is a relief valve just downstream of the reactor output valve. Have you determined the relief pressure you should use? GENERAL: - Good
lectures for the entire200-person class. As of 2002, a seminar format was used. The course begins and endswith approximately two weeks with all 200 students in the large lecture, during whichtime engineering as a profession, each of the six majors, and professional ethics areintroduced. There is also an overall project which all students complete in teams duringthis time [2, 3]. The rest of the time students spend in discipline specific three-week seminarshosting ~30 students each. The key features of the seminars are that they are studentselected, and use a specific topic, which is of interest to the student, to introduceengineering. Eight different seminars are available, and students took either two (2002,2003, 2004) or three (2005, 2006
engineeringprocess. RP machines have more versatility today then ever before with their ability to createfully functional parts that can be tested immediately.Each year more companies are opting to purchase RP machines and develop their productsthrough an assortment of different types of physical modeling. According to a January 17, 2005press release by Z-Corp. a move was made to an 80 percent larger facility with 25 percent moreemployees. In 2005 the RP industry was projected to have sales around 655 million with roughlyfive million models being produced (Rowe, 2004)2. RIT’s MET department has seen an increasein enrollment in product realization courses that offer the chance to develop product with thesenew machines.discussion and analysisThere are a
. Crack was also observed to initiate at one side andpropagate to the other side (Figure 5-a). Crack branching, as well as multiple cracks wereobserved. One instance of crack bridging is seen in Figure 5(b). (a) (b) Figure 4 - Fracture of the monolithic and composite structures: (a) Monolithic, (b) QG: concrete with Gorilla GlueEducational ImplicationsThe Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering Technology (MMET) courses taught atNorthern Kentucky University include EGT-116: Introduction to Materials and ManufacturingProcesses, EGT-261: Engineering Materials, EGT-317: Senior Research in Technology andEGT-417: Senior Design Project. All deal with materials and manufacturing. Other
• Oral and written research project summaries prepared by the student participants • Social interaction between the student participants and their graduate mentors • Program evaluation by the student participantsWithin these key elements, interaction among student participants and their graduatestudent mentor, along with the program evaluation by the student participants during the2005 and 2006 program years will be addressed.Graduate MentoringTo assist student participants in the transition between the undergraduate and graduateexperience, they are paired with a graduate mentor. The main goal of this relationship isto aid the student participant in learning how to communicate in a graduate environment,along with increasing their
the need for engineering validation of their work. Thisassignment exposes students to basic mathematical methods needed for root determinationmethods and the inherent limitations of such methods.The third assignment poses as an engineering project proposal to control and maintainpopulations of animals - the problem itself is given as a project to the students and incorporatesethical complications. The students’ goal is the development of a predator-prey populationsimulation. Students extend and enhance a basic population model introduced in class byincorporating additional effects and influences of their choosing. Simulation results after themodel changes require both numerical and engineering validation. While the basic populationsimulation
Optic Communications, Technology and Society, and Project Management. He also advises students on their senior design projects. He is author of “The Telecommunications Fact Book, 2E” and co-author of “Technology and Society: Crossroads to the 21st Century,” “Technology and Society: A Bridge to the 21st Century,” and “Technology and Society: Issues for the 21st Century and Beyond.” He is a member of ASEE, and a senior member of IEEE.Gene Gloeckner, Colorado State University Dr. Gene Gloeckner is an associate professor of education and human resource studies, in School of Education, Colorado State University. He received his Ph.D. from the Ohio state university. He has authored a number of
all undergraduate students.Modules were developed for each engineering discipline represented at Wichita State University:aerospace, computer, electrical, industrial, manufacturing, and mechanical engineering. Amodule was also developed covering the engineering design process. The adaptation of existingmodules from various sources was used to achieve the pedagogical objectives. For example, atthe end of one module students will be able to describe the use of gears and how gear ratios canincrease torque and the environments in which increased torque would be beneficial.The second task was to develop the actual course. The WSU project team and the collaboratorsplanned to teach the course in the Summer of 2005. Example learning objectives for
efficient researchgroup quickly1. Unique research results need to be obtained almost immediately in order toincorporate them into manuscripts since the peer-review process can take over a year beforepublication. The new faculty likely has well-developed project plans for the beginning graduatestudent; however, the student also needs to be educated more extensively as they progresstowards their degree on independent problem solving and generation of ideas. While there is nosubstitute for experience in this endeavor, following certain guidelines can allow the new facultymember to optimize the development of their graduate students in these areas. To be as inclusiveas possible, we also discuss the development of undergraduate research students as
determine the best ways to introduce computing into early undergraduatemechanical engineering curriculum, focusing particularly on numerical methods and analysis.Given the importance of computing in professional engineering practice, this project seeks toimprove students’ facility with computers while moving away from ‘cookbook’ approacheswhich emphasize software-specific skills at the expense of more fundamental mathematical andconceptual knowledge.One aspect of this research project was to determine what computer experiences (STEM --Science, Technology, Engineering, Mathematics -- or otherwise) students have when they entercollege-level engineering classes. We surveyed sophomore engineering students in“Introduction to Applied Numerical Methods
luniversities undertook between November 2005 and November 2006. The results were firstpresented at a press conference in Frankfurt, Germany on November 10, 2006. We would bedelighted to give you a copy of the entire study at the end of our session.Globalization is radically changing the way national economies around the world design,produce, distribute, and consume goods and services. Engineers are in the midst of this dynamicdevelopment. They use their knowledge of foreign cultures in designing products and servicesfor global markets. They often work in teams on projects with members from different continentsand cultures. They must be internationally mobile, whether physically or virtually.These requirements raise critical questions: Is tomorrow's
institutionalizedand last minute ABET visit preparation minimized.IntroductionThe assessment of student attainment of program outcomes as required by ABET accreditationcriteria presents challenges for engineering education programs. Criterion 3 of the 2007/2008criteria for accrediting engineering technology programs states that programs must demonstratethat student assessments are being used as part of a broad, documented continuous improvementprocess. In addition, multiple assessment methods are to be used to “triangulate” data to ensurethat program outcomes and objectives are being met. The Criteria goes on to suggest possibleassessment methods, including “student portfolios, student performance in project work andactivity-based learning; results of
metals and alloys from the University of Birmingham, England and the University of Tehran. He is a Full Professor in the area of Materials Science and Engineering in the Engineering Technology with joint appointment in the Materials Science and Engineering Departments. He has been a Principal Investigator and Project Director for several engineering education grants for undergraduate research experience, a bridge and mentoring program, departmental curriculum reforms, and innovative interdisciplinary project oriented engineering education programs. Page 12.938.1© American Society for Engineering
of a product; then developbusiness and marketing plans for the product, while gaining an understanding of thepatent process. All of these activities are part of a capstone project that is alreadyincluded in the curriculum at ASU‘s Polytechnic campus, Department of ElectronicSystems.Introduction ASU defines entrepreneurship as “the spirit and process of creative risk takingand innovation that leverages university knowledge to spur social development andeconomic competitiveness.”1 Additionally, in a contributed article to Mechanical Engineering Magazine,Ephraim Suhir, President and CEO of ERS/Siloptix Co. in Los Altos, CA, wrote that “atechnological professional with entrepreneurial skills has a better chance than a
articulationagreement with Virginia Dominion Power3. These students must take MET 471, NuclearSystems I, and MET 472, Nuclear Systems II, as part of their senior electives. By adding thisfourth option in Marine Engineering Technology allows students to be in an accredited program,meeting the MET program criteria, as the new option evolves. Students in the existing optionsand the proposed Marine Engineering Technology Option would still take common courses inareas such as computer-aided drafting, statics, strength of materials, dynamics, thermodynamics,fluid mechanics, automation and controls, and computer solid modeling. All four options thenculminate in three senior technical electives and a senior project that integrates course work witha practical project
available budget. Since buying a chamber wasnot feasible, a decision was made to have one built. A student was asked to design and build thechamber as a part of his undergraduate summer research project. The 10 week-long summerresearch was sponsored by the University Committee on Undergraduate Research (UCUR) at theUniversity of South Alabama. The student received a summer stipend of $2500. Under thesupervision of his faculty mentor, the student spent two weeks to survey the related literature andcome up with a suitable design and a cost estimate. Page 12.962.3After the design was approved by the faculty mentor, the student spent three weeks to