Asee peer logo
Displaying all 12 results
Conference Session
Interdisciplinary Education
Collection
2008 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
HuiRu Shih, Jackson State University; Wei Zheng, Jackson State University; Wilbur L Walters, Jackson State University; Stevenson Paradeshi, Jackson State University
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Technology
( ) (1) n xnwhere f is known as the logarithmic decrement. The damping ratio can be obtained by using thefollowing equation3: f / 2r |= (2) 1 - (f / 2r) 2 The equation of motion of a structural system in modal coordinates can be written asfollows: q n + 2| n yn q% n + y2n q n = 0 %% (3)where yn and | n are natural frequency and damping ratio of the nth mode, respectively; qn,q% n and %q%n represent modal displacement, velocity and acceleration, respectively
Conference Session
Student Learning Techniques & Practices in Engineering Technology
Collection
2008 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
B. Sridhara, Middle Tennessee State University; Joseph Prince, Middle Tennessee State University
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Technology
from the higher to the lower points(Figure 1) in the least time.1 Figure 1. A curve along which a particle is falling under the action of gravity The time required to travel from point P1 to point P2 is given by1, 2 Page 13.1093.3Where v is the particle’s velocity and ds is the arc length through which it is falling. Applyingthe law of conservation of energy we can write for the particleOrSubstituting this for v in the integrand of the first equation and following the steps given inReferences 1 and 2, we can show that 2 x = ½ k (q – sinq), 2 y = ½ k (q – cosq
Conference Session
Manufacturing Engineering Technology Curriculum
Collection
2008 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Rex Kanu, Ball State University
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Technology
, 40, 290-296.4. Zhang, Q., Wang, K., Men, Y., Fu, Q., Dispersion and Tensile Behavior of Polypropylene/Montmorillonite Nanocomposites Produced via Melt Intercalation, Chinese Journal of Polymer Science, 2003, 21 (3), 359-367.5. Hull D., Clyne, T.W., An Introduction to Composite Materials, 2nd Edition, 1996, Cambridge University Press, UK, page 1.6. Agwarwal, B.D., Broutman, L.J., Analysis and Performance of Fiber Composites, 2nd Edition, 1990, John Wiley and Sons, Inc, New York, USA, page 2.7. Dasari, A., Lim, S-H., Yu, Z-Z., Mai, Y-M., Toughening, Thermal Stability, Flame Retardancy, and Scratch- Wear Resistance of Polymer-Clay Nanocomposites, Australian Journal of Chemistry, 2007, 60(7), 496-518.8. Winey, K.I., Vaia, R.A
Conference Session
Innovative Curriculum in Electrical Engineering Technology
Collection
2008 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Cheng Lin, Old Dominion University; Gene Hou, Old Dominion University; Yuzhong Shen, Old Dominion University; Hector Garcia, Old Dominion University
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Technology
+ (r ) i −1 T ij ∆rij ij l iji −1The collection of the lengths of six cylinders gives a matrix equation, ∆l ij = B∆q (16)  riji - 1 T I riji -1 ~ T r0   ∆s where B is a 1 × 6 matrix whose row is equal to  i -1 − i-1  and
Conference Session
Manufacturing Engineering Technology Curriculum
Collection
2008 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Wei Zhan, Texas A&M University; Jay Porter, Texas A&M University
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Technology
1st Q uartile -290.50 M edian -44.15 3rd Q uartile 193.50 -800 -400 0 400 800 M aximum 1060.00 95% C onfidence Interv al for M ean -78.18 -35.90
Conference Session
Projects & Laboratories in Mechanical ET
Collection
2008 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Razwaan Arif, Farmingdale State College; Han Chu, Farmingdale, SUNY; Yeong Ryu, State University of New York, Farmingdale; Adam Filios, Farmingdale, SUNY; Hazem Tawfik, Farmingdale State College; Kamal Shahrabi, Kean College of New Jersey
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Technology
Page 13.199.9Sources, Volume (83), 128-133, 1999.[5] T. H. Yang, Y. G. Yoon, C. S, Kim, S. H. Kwak, and K. H. Yoon, “A novel preparationmethod of a self-humidifying polymer electrolyte membrane,” Journal of Power Sources,Volume (106), pp. 328-332, 2002.[6] D. Staschewski, and Z. Q. Mao, “Hydrogen-air PEMFC operation with extraordinarily lowgas pressure and internal humidification-conception and experimental prototype stack,”International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, Volume (24), 543-548, 1999.[7] D. Picot R. Metkemeljer, JJ. Bezian and L. Rouveyre, “Impact of the water symmetry factoron humidification and cooling strategies for PEM fuel cell stacks,” Journal of Power Sources,Volume (75), 251-260, 1998[8] P. Sridhar, R. Perumal, N. Rajalakshmi
Conference Session
Computer ET Innovation
Collection
2008 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
David Forsman, Pennsylvania State University-Erie
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Technology
e M a t h c a d Q u a d E q S w i m m e r P r o b l e m T i m
Conference Session
Web-Based Learning in Engineering Technology
Collection
2008 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Ronald Uhlig, National University; Ali Farahani; Howard Evans, National University; Shekar Viswanathan, National University; Mark Sotelo, National University
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Technology
Q u J u l 0 7 J a 0 8 C h a
Conference Session
Electrical ET Curriculum and Projects
Collection
2008 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Kathleen Ossman, University of Cincinnati
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Technology
their own filter for this analysis. Students will thensee a lot of variance in results among the class depending on how stringent the original filterrequirements are. That is, low pass filters with fairly wide transition bands will not requirenearly as many bits for good performance as high Q-factor band-pass filters will.Following simulation, students implement the IIR filters for a couple of choices of bits (good andrqqt+"qp"Vgzcu"KpuvtwogpvuÓ"VOU542E8933"FUMu to verify the simulation results Page 13.872.5experimentally. Figure 4: IIR Filter Performance for Biquad RealizationImage Processing Using Digital FiltersStudents
Conference Session
Assessment of Engineering Technology Programs
Collection
2008 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Carol Lamb, Youngstown State University; David Kurtanich
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Technology
Student O 98 83.0 7.0 5.0 12.0 8.0 16.0 10.0 25.0 Student P 95 81.0 8.0 5.0 12.0 8.0 16.0 10.0 22.0 Student Q 0 0.0 Student R 51 43.0 7.0 4.0 7.0 0.0 4.0 4.0 17.0 Student S 80 68.0
Conference Session
Distance Learning in ET
Collection
2008 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Meral Anitsal, Tennessee Tech University; Ismet Anitsal, Tennessee Tech University; Ismail Fidan, Tennessee Tech University; Bonita Barger, Tennessee Tech University; Michael Allen, Tennessee Tech University
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Technology
Systems Research, and School of Interdisciplinary Studies andExtended Education. The authors appreciate the valuable research assistance of Jennifer Hayesand Dustin Chaffin. The authors are also grateful for the helpful comments of four anonymousreviewers.References1 http://www.distancelearningnet.com/reports/11/12 http://www.tntech.edu/classsched/07s/webcourse.html3 Hollenbeck, C. R., Zinkhan, G. M., & French, W. (2005, Summer). Distance learning trends and benchmarks: Lessons from an online MBA program. Marketing Education Review, 15(2), 39-52.4 Minh Q., H., Umesh, U. N., & Valacich, J. S. (2003). E-Learning as an emerging entrepreneurial enterprise in universities and firms. Communications of the Association for
Conference Session
Industrial Technology/Industrial Engineering Technology Forum
Collection
2008 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Kenneth Stier, Illinois State University
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Technology
are used to tally up the quantity of inventory used by each group andthe costs involved. The data is entered into an Excel spreadsheet as shown in Figure 5. Grp # 1 2 3 4Init. Invest. $5,600 $8,840 $7,040 $10,640 Add. Mat. $650.00 $300.00 $2,000.00 $1,500.00Total Cost $6,250 $9,140 $9,040 $12,140A. Rating $3.00 $2.00 $2.00 $2.00 A. Value 126 36 115 117Q. Rating 16 18 16 12Height (in) 42 18 57.5 58.5 Q. Value $672 $324 $920 $702 TAV $33,516 $6,480 $59,512 $47,911 Profit $27,266 $2,660 $50,472 $35,771Figure 5