AC 2008-363: REAL-TIME, EMBEDDED-SYSTEMS NETWORKING: A NOVELWAY TO DEVELOP AN INTERACTIVE UNDERGRADUATE COURSEEce Yaprak, Wayne State University Dr. Ece Yaprak is a Professor of Engineering Technology in the College of Engineering at Wayne State University. Her areas of interest include computer networks and communications where she has published extensively. She has held engineering positions at General Electric and Ford Motor Company, and research fellowships at NASA (John Glenn, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Ames Research Center, and the Johnson Space Center) and the U.S. Navy (SPAWAR). She has received teaching excellence awards from her Division and the College of Engineering. She has received
‘run’portion of the crawl, walk, run methodology.Following the success of the Football Lab, three additional laboratories were introducedfor EDP 3. The goal of this series of laboratories was once again to introduce thestudents slowly to the theory behind their design and then to progress towards morecomplex concepts. The first of these laboratories dealt with gear trains. This ‘Gear Lab’focused solely on teaching students gear train construction principles and techniques.The student design teams built and tested static gear trains to lift a set amount of weightwith a pulley. The students’ goal was to lift the weight a set distance as quickly aspossible, and teams that performed well were rewarded with bonus points. The simplegear trains built by the
theparticipant teachers’ sense of science teaching efficacy and their perceptions of success ofthe first year of the BMERET program.BMERET Program Design/DescriptionThe BMERET program selected a cohort of middle and high school STEM teachers frompartnering urban area schools that primarily serve disadvantaged and minority students.A comprehensive application directed the recruitment process for the program. A total ofsix science teachers were chosen to participate in year of the program. Teams of teacherswere placed in a BMES ERC laboratory. Each teacher team was matched with a Ph.D.student and a faculty mentor in the given laboratory for most direct daily interaction aswell as to facilitate multi-directional expertise transfer between the teachers, the
has over 14 years of experience in applied research and teaching. Dr. Traub is the author of over 45 reviewed journal articles and 10 conference papers. Page 13.693.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2008 IMPACT OF RAPID PROTOTYPING FACILITIES ON ENGINEERING STUDENT OUTCOMESAbstractEmbry-Riddle Aeronautical University (ERAU) has formed a reputation for providingundergraduate students with a curriculum which has a strong emphasis on hands-on, applicationbased learning. In an effort to improve this learning environment, the campus has recently addeda Rapid Prototyping Laboratory which
AC 2008-384: ADDING BIOMEDICAL CONTEXT TO A TRADITIONALENGINEERING COURSE IN A BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING CURRICULUMHatice Ozturk, North Carolina State University Hatice Orun Ozturk is a Teaching Associate Professor of Biomedical Engineering and Electrical and Computer Engineering at North Carolina State University. She is also coordinator of assessment in both departments.Lianne Cartee, North Carolina State University Lianne A. Cartee is a Teaching Associate Professor of Biomedical Engineering at North Carolina State University. She is also the director of undergraduate programs. Page 13.150.1© American
AC 2008-2205: SIMULATION-BASED LEARNING OF DISTILLATIONPRINCIPLES IN HISTORICAL CONTEXT: FROM DA VINCI’S ALEMBICS TOMODERN APPLICATIONSYakov Cherner, ATeL, LLC Yakov E. Cherner, Ph.D. a Founder and President of ATEL, LLC, taught science, engineering and technology disciplines to high school, college and university students. He has extensive experience in writing curricula and developing educational software and efficient instructional strategies. Dr. Cherner introduced an innovative concept of multi-layered simulation-based conceptual teaching of science and technology. This instructional approach uses real-world objects, processes and learning situations that are familiar to students as the
. Rapuanob, “Remotely Accessible Laboratory for ElectronicMeasurement Teaching”, Computer Standards and Interfaces, Vol. 26, pp 489–499, 2004.5. Sam Lee and Mayur R. Mehta, “Establishing a Remote Lab for Teaching EnterpriseApplication Development”, Information Systems Education Journal, Vol. 4, No. 50, pp 1-7,August 8, 2006.6. James E. Corter, Jeffrey V. Nickerson, Sven K. Esche, Constantin Chassapis, “Remote VersusHands-On Labs: A Comparative Study”, 34th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference,Session F1G, 20–23 October 2004, Savannah, GA, USA.7. Qin Shuren, Bo Lin and Liu Xiaofeng, “Development of the Networked Virtual InstrumentLab for Vibration Measuring Based on Microsoft.Net”, Instrumentation and MeasurementTechnology Conference, IMTC
Aerospace Engineering. He received his BS degree from Mississippi State University and his MS and PhD degrees from the California Institute of Technology. Prof. Koenig teaches introductory courses in aerospace engineering and flight mechanics, and upper division courses in aerodynamics and propulsion. His research areas include rocket and scramjet propulsion and sports equipment engineering.Lorenzo Coley, Mississippi State University Lorenzo Coley is a first year graduate teaching assistant in the aerospace engineering laboratories. He obtained his BS degree in aerospace engineering from Mississippi State University, and is currently enrolled as a candidate for a master of science degree. He
media/interactive video) in comparison to a traditional instructor-led course.Several teaching instruments focused on exploiting the role of physical experience in teachingthe concepts. Ji and Bell12 argue that making abstract concepts more observable and tangibleenable students to better learn them. To make concepts observable and tangible, they use threethemes in their teaching: providing simple demonstration models, providing good engineeringexamples, and improving teaching material by including new research concepts. A goodcollection of the teaching material is available online13. Williams and Howard14 emphasize therole of laboratory experience for a physical insight. They outline the design of a versatile andeconomical apparatus for both
attend each week.The approach used in the engineering courses allows some 120 senior undergraduate students totake on the role of teaching assistants, where they accept the responsibility of co-teaching atutorial or laboratory. Teaching assistants always work in pairs or threes, and as often aspossible, experienced teaching assistants are matched with new ones. Unlike in many othercourses where teaching assistants simply work problems and review material in tutorials, theteaching assistants in the engineering courses are assigned new material that must be covered forthe students to succeed. The TA is given the task of teaching students new material not coveredin lecture, and is responsible for answering questions in class and on the web, and
course sequence is used for ABET accredited majors.This paper presents the approach used by the Electrical and Computer EngineeringDepartment at the Naval Academy to improve the technological literacy of non-engineering students. Electrical engineering fundamentals and applications areemphasized with the relevant mathematics introduced as needed. Applications of thefundamentals evolve to stress the relevance of a particular topic area. Key technicalconcepts are reinforced with practical laboratory exercises. The final practical exercisetakes place aboard a Naval Academy patrol craft. The students explore the electricalsystems on the ship and relate them to the fundamentals studied during the semester.Course outcomes show that students across a
Francisco, CA, April 17-21, 2006.11. S. J. Lee, E. L. Allen, and L. He, “A Bottom-up Approach to Interdisciplinary Engineering Education in Nanotechnology,” Materials Research Society 2006 Spring Meeting, Symposium KK, San Francisco, CA, April 17-21, 2006.12. V. Mitin, X. Liu, D. Vo, H. Van, and A. Verevkin, Presentation: “Undergraduate AFM/STM Laboratory,” The 3rd International Seminar on Teaching Nanoscience with Scanning Probe Microscopy, Chicago, IL, March 28, 2007.13. N. Jaksic, “Nanoscience, Nanoengineering and Nanotechnology Education at Colorado State University – Pueblo,” Materials Research Society 2006 Spring Meeting, Symposium KK, San Francisco, CA, April 17-21, 2006.14. N. Jaksic, “A Design
. Page 13.1275.2The disadvantage to the integrated approach is that more faculty must “buy in” to the programand be able to teach microcontroller applications, and that some material in each course will besqueezed out in order to teach microcontrollers. This paper will measure student perceptions ofthe approach taken in order to measure whether the advantages outweigh the disadvantages.MethodAs a starting point, an inexpensive microcontroller system is being developed with the followingspecifications: ‚ Cost less than $75 per lab station, and less than $25 per student unit. ‚ Be used to teach programming in a traditional programming class ‚ Be used for laboratories in an electronic circuits course ‚ Be used as a measurement
. Page 13.968.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2008 Pedagogy: Review of Best PracticesThe purpose of this paper is to identify and describe teaching tools and techniques thatwill help new faculty as well as experienced faculty become more effective teachers.Based on a review of the literature related to “teaching excellence”, the followingexcerpts have been divided into two major sections. The focus of the first section is thelearning process, and the second section discusses innovative methods of teaching.Topics included in the “Learning” section include: 1) Focusing on Learning and NotTeaching; 2) Problem Based Learning; 3) Facilitating Group Learning (PromotingAccountability, Linking Assignments, and
engineering from the University of Cincinnati in 2006, and is currently a Ph.D. candidate in the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering. His research interests include microfluidics and MEMS devices for chemical and biological assays. He was the teaching assistant for the microfluidics laboratory course discussed in this paper.Karen Davis, University of Cincinnati Dr. Karen C. Davis is an Associate Professor of Electrical & Computer Engineering at the University of Cincinnati. She has advised over 30 senior design students and more than 20 MS/PhD theses in the area of database systems. She has been the recipient of several departmental and college teaching awards, including
AC 2008-1371: ARIZONA -TEXAS CONSORTIUM FOR ALTERNATIVE ANDRENEWABLE ENERGY TECHNOLOGIESLakshmi Munukutla, Arizona State University Lakshmi Munukutla received her Ph.D. degree in Solid State Physics from Ohio University, Athens, Ohio and M.Sc and B.Sc degrees from Andhra University, India. She has been active in research and published several journal articles. She is the Chair of the Electronic Systems Department at Arizona State University at the Polytechnic campus.Richard Newman, Arizona State University Richard L. Newman recently retired from the Arizona State University at the Polytechnic campus as Director of Training Operations for the Microelectronics Teaching Factory. Prior to joining
planning theeStudio Laboratory was that it be as hardware free and easy to support as possible.In an effort to achieve the same outcome as the General Engineering Department’s Studio90 environment, the eStudio Laboratory Planning Committee creatively did more withless. First, the original look and feel of the space prior to renovation was stale andindustrial. It was not a collaborative space that students would choose to congregate in orstudy. The room’s white walls were painted yellow and the grey linoleum tile wasoverlaid by red and yellow carpet. The final product is a collaborative teaching spacethat is attractively decorated in Arizona State University’s colors. It promotes Universitypride, spirit, and is one of the most attractive rooms at
their institution. In one Page 13.1257.8 recent case, a well-qualified Ph.D. student at a major research university was interested in teaching a hydraulics and hydrology course and two sections of laboratory as an adjunct faculty member at another institution. The compensation for the course and laboratory section, however, did not justify the time involved in preparation, travel and actual teaching, and as a result, the individual had to decline the position.Insights from Personal ExperiencesWhen discussing the role of adjunct faculty in engineering education, personalexperiences provide a sense of reference and add insights
created in thenano/bio-related field world wide2. Such growth of jobs and technologies will have a profoundimpact on all sectors of the economy (as well as society)3. To prepare the future work force withthe necessary skill set, this paper focuses on a collaborative approach which involves threeuniversities to develop, integrate, and assess a teaching module on smart actuators for threedifferent courses in the ME undergraduate curriculum: system dynamics and controls,mechatronics, and capstone design. The teaching module is specifically designed to address theimportant aspects of modeling, control, and design of smart actuator-based systems. In particular,the module consists of lecture and laboratory components, and each component can be
AC 2008-1374: USING ELECTRONIC PORTFOLIO REPOSITORIES AS ASTUDENT RESOURCE FOR MSE APPLICATIONSAaron Blicblau, Swinburne University of Technology "Aaron Blicblau graduated as materials engineer and worked in the manufacturing and steel industry for ten years. He then commenced lecturing at Swinburne University of Technology specialising in materials science and engineering to students ranging form first year to final year. . He has been involved in implementing novel teaching procedures to improve the learning aspects of students as well as his own teaching processes. Over the past few years he has adopted and implemented active learning measures including problem based and project based
AC 2008-937: INCORPORATION OF BROADBAND ACCESS TECHNOLOGY INA TELECOMMUNICATIONS ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY PROGRAMWarren Koontz, Rochester Institute of Technology Warren is currently a professor in the College of Applied Science and Technology at RIT and chair of the Telecommunications Engineering Technology program. He joined RIT in December 2000 after retiring from Bell Laboratories. He began his thirty two year career at Bell Labs as a member of technical staff in the Electronic Switching Division in Naperville Illinois. He was involved in a variety of projects at a variety of Bell Labs locations, including international assignments in The Netherlands and Germany. At the time of his retirement, he
Professor of Engineering & Technology at Ohio University, and formerly taught at the University of North Texas. Currently a Professor in the Department of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering Technology at Georgia Southern University, he teaches courses involving metal forming, plastics/composites, lean manufacturing, and industrial/environmental safety, along with a manufacturing enterprise simulation course for which he co-authored the text and was presented a 2004 Leavey Award for Excellence in Private Enterprise Education. He is faculty sponsor of student chapter S85 of the Society of Manufacturing Engineers, has chaired two SME senior chapters and currently is a member of the
69, 180.11. Norman, D. (1980). “What Goes on in the Mind of the Learner,” in McKeacie, W.J., ed. Learning, Cognition,and College Teaching, New Directions for Teaching and Learning, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA.12. Biggs, J. and Moore, P.J. (1993). The Process of Learning, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.13. Newell, J.A. (2005). Survivor: classroom. A method of active learning that addresses four types of studentmotivation. Chem. Eng. Ed. 39, 228-231.14. Sommer, C.A. Silva, F.H., and Novo, M.R.M. (2004). Teaching molecular biology to undergraduate biologystudents. Biochem. Mol. Biol. Educ. 32, 7.15. Larkin, P.D. and Hartberg, Y. (2005). Development of a green fluorescent protein-based laboratory curriculum.Biochem. Mol. Biol. Educ. 33
potential benefits and challenges encountered by students and facultymembers at Penn State Harrisburg when using the tablet portable computers in themultifunctional classroom. This paper will also discuss some applications and functions thatimprove teaching, learning, and research initiatives through using tablet portable computers in aclassroom environment for both laboratory and lecture use.IntroductionTwo years ago, Penn State Harrisburg (PSH), which was an upper division and graduate college,expanded to offering lower level classes and started to accept freshman. This change waschallenging but exciting to the college. The college became a highly sought after campus withenrollment significantly growing which required offering more courses
sophomore level. The key to teaching design isto step the students through the design process in varying degrees. By having three projects in asemester of increasing complexity, the students are given plenty of chances to learn through mistakes.The students must learn project management skills, interfacing skills, documentation skills, and theactual lecture material of the textbook. By the third project, the students know what to expect and aremore independent when designing. The USB ToolStick Starter Kit from Silicon Laboratories offers anexcellent design platform to accomplish the embedded design. The kit is economical and very studentfriendly.6. AcknowledgementsThe authors would like to thank Dan Pratt of Lattice Semiconductors for generous
studentswith the focused knowledge they need to master in a single course. Currently, there are notenough ECE faculty to teach the CS students separate from the EE students.)3.2.3 Advanced Electronic Systems Page 13.421.7The Advanced Electronics Systems lecture and laboratory courses that students take in the Fallterm of the junior year are additional courses constructed to fulfill the philosophy of the spiral Figure 3: Final Project System Block Diagramcurriculum. In earlier courses in the spiral containing electronic circuit topical content, a mixeddevice-system treatment was adopted. Here a transition is made to a
, partition the designinto subcomponents, design, build, test, and verify that the system requirements have been met.The authors have enhanced and implemented three courses to develop system engineeringknowledge and skills that better prepare students for their senior design experience. This papergives an overview and lists the learning outcomes for each of these courses and includes someexamples of laboratory projects that are used to meet these learning outcomes.IntroductionIn the current global environment it is imperative that engineering graduates are prepared to enterthe workforce with the skills necessary to make immediate contributions. Today, companiesoften outsource engineering tasks and projects that could otherwise be done by entry
authored more than 25 refereed journal and conference publications. From 2003 through 2006, he was involved with Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, IL in developing direct computer control for hydrogen powered automotives. He is also involved in several direct computer control and wireless process control related research projects. His interests are in the area of industrial transducer, industrial process control, wireless controls, statistical process control, computer aided design and fabrication of printed circuit board, programmable logic controllers, programmable logic devices and renewable energy related projects.Niaz Latif, Purdue University Niaz Latif, Purdue University Calumet Dr. Niaz
this paper, we detail the ongoing efforts at Drexel University, aimed at adapting the successesof previous experiences in teaching sensor networks at the undergraduate level1-6, to create a newlaboratory-based undergraduate course in sensor networks, and to make extensive use of the newlaboratory’s modular experiments in other courses and disciplines. The project is funded by NSFCCLI program of the Division of Undergraduate Education.Sensor networks as a pedagogical toolWe believe that sensor network experiments can be very pedagogical in illustrating manyabstract concepts in other courses/disciplines. For example, medium access and routing protocolscan be used in undergraduate networking sequence courses; basics of radio communication
, initiate testing, and to collect experimental data. The data can then be accessed and downloaded from a remote web server for further analysis.These proposed laboratory experiments are examples of possible educational laboratory uses ofthe smart flexible beam. More detailed descriptions of such laboratory and experimentimplementations of the smart flexible beam in engineering education are planned.Student Survey ResultsBoth the vertical and horizontal smart flexible beams have been demonstrated in severalengineering courses in different, but related, disciplines. Students completed anonymous surveysfollowing the demonstration of the smart flexible beam to evaluate the ability of the beam toachieve its teaching goals. Students were asked to