recall andincrease their metacognition.Because the need to increase critical thinking is clear, engineering faculty have sinceimplemented many strategies and interventions 6(see Ahern et al. 2019). Most interventionsfocus on getting students to solve given problems via assigning case studies [ 7], [8], [9].Traditional case studies exploring ethics in engineering tend to isolate ethical issues into a formatwhereby they can be "solved" (often with reference to a code of ethics). Unfortunately, theseinterventions keep students from being able to even identify a problem on their own or, worse,incorrectly reinforce the notion of a singular, technical solution to complex problems. SinceABET’s asks students to go beyond identifying ethical and
Perceptions of Male and Female Undergraduates,” in 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings, Tampa, Florida, Jun. 2019, p. 33030. doi: 10.18260/1-2--33030.[11] B. Newberry, “The dilemma of ethics in engineering education,” SCI ENG ETHICS, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 343–351, Jun. 2004, doi: 10.1007/s11948-004-0030-8.[12] A. R. Bielefeldt, M. Polmear, D. Knight, C. Swan, and N. Canney, “Intersections between Engineering Ethics and Diversity Issues in Engineering Education,” Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, vol. 144, no. 2, p. 04017017, Apr. 2018, doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)EI.1943-5541.0000360.[13] P. D. Umbach, “The Contribution of Faculty of Color to Undergraduate
College of Engineering.” Darcie holds a Master of Engineering degree in Environmental Engineering (2019) and Bachelor of Science degree in Biological Engineering (2017), both from Utah State University. She is passionate about student success and support, both inside and outside of the classroom.Idalis Villanueva (Dr.) For the past 10 years, Dr. Idalis Villanueva has worked on several engineering education projects where she derives from her experiences in engineering to improve outcomes for minoritized groups in engineering using mixed-and multi-modal methods approaches. She currently is an Associate Professor in the Engineering Education Department at the University of Florida. In 2019, she received the Presidential
students. Williams’ publications on assessment, engineering and professional communication, and tablet PCs have appeared in the Journal of Engineering Education and IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, among others. She has been awarded grants from Microsoft, HP, the Engineering Communication Foundation, the Kern Family Foundation, and National Science Foundation. Currently she supports the work of the Revolutionizing Engineering Departments (NSF RED) grant recipients. She has received numerous awards including the 2015 Schlesinger Award (IEEE Professional Communication Society) and 2010 Sterling Olmsted Award (ASEE Liberal Education Division).Eva Andrijcic (Associate Professor of Engineering Management)Cara
Engineering Graduate Student Mentor Award in 2018, and was inducted into the Virginia Tech Academy of Faculty Leadership in 2020. Dr. Matusovich has been a PI/Co-PI on 19 funded research projects including the NSF CAREER Award, with her share of funding being nearly $3 million. She has co-authored 2 book chapters, 34 journal publications, and more than 80 conference papers. She is recognized for her research and teaching, including Dean’s Awards for Outstanding New Faculty, Outstanding Teacher Award, and a Faculty Fellow. Dr. Matusovich has served the Educational Research and Methods (ERM) division of ASEE in many capacities over the past 10+ years including serving as Chair from 2017-2019. Dr. Matusovich is currently the
the distinction of Fellow of AAAS and ASEE, a National Science Foundation CAREER Award, the Raymond W. Fahien Award from the Chemical Engineering Division of ASEE, and Michigan Tech's Fredrick D. Williams Instructional Innovation Award. She and her students have published over 100 archival journal publications, book chapters, or proceedings articles and earned 23 best paper/presentation awards. Adrienne previously served as the President of the AES Electrophoresis Society and on the ASEE's Board of Directors as First Vice President and Professional Interest Council I Chair. She also chaired ASEE's National Diversity Committee. Her research and service interests regularly intersect and involve underserved individuals
Paper ID #37318Four Pillars of Manufacturing Knowledge Revision andValidation ProcessJohn L. Irwin (Professor/Chair) Dr. John Irwin has presented published papers at ASEE conferences from 2002-present. He is Vice Chair for ETC, and ETD Secretary. Dr. Irwin is a tenured Professor, Mechanical Engineering Technology and Chair of the MMET Department in the College of Engineering, at Michigan Technological University. In addition, he is Director of the Research and Innovation in STEAM Education (RISE) Institute at Michigan Tech. He has a Doctorate in Curriculum and Instruction from Wayne State University, Detroit
and David Thomas. 2000. The pragmatic programmer: from journeyman tomaster. Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc., USA.[4] Ramachandran, L., & Gehringer, E. F. (2012, June), An Automated Approach to Assessingthe Quality of Code ReviewsPaper presented at 2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition,San Antonio, Texas. 10.18260/1-2—20914.[5] Brown, T., & Walia, G. S., & Radermacher, A. D., & Singh, M., & Narasareddygari, M. R.(2020, June), Effectiveness of Using Guided Peer Code Review to Support Learning ofProgramming Concepts in a CS2 Course: A Pilot Study Paper presented at 2020 ASEE VirtualAnnual Conference Content Access, Virtual Online. 10.18260/1-2—34504.[6] B Hayes, D., 2019. Rubber Duck Debugging: The
: https://peer.asee.org/35089.[14] E. Cevik, M. Johnson, B. Yalvac, J. G. Whitfield,. M. Kuttolamadom, J. R. Porter, and J. A.Morgan, “A Study of Secondary Teachers’ Perceptions of Engineers and Conceptions ofEngineering," In Proc. of American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) AnnualConference and Exposition, Virtual Conference, 2020, Conference Paper. [Online]. Available:https://peer.asee.org/34058.[15] E. Cevik, M. Johnson, B. Yalvac, J. G. Whitfield,. M. Kuttolamadom, J. R. Porter, and J. A.Morgan, "Exploring Parents’ Knowledge and Awareness of Engineering through Middle SchoolStudents’ Summer Camps," In Proc. of American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE)Annual Conference and Exposition, Tampa, FL, 2019. [Online]. Available:https
, Ohio, 2017.[8] R. O’Neill,, A. Badir, L. D. Nguyen and D. J. Lura, “Homework Methods in Engineering Mechanics, Part Two,” in 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, New Orleans, Louisiana, 2016 .[9] K. Hekman, “Automated Grading of Microsoft Excel Spreadsheets,” in 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Tampa, Florida, 2019.[10] "Upload Questions - Blackboard Help," [Online]. Available: https://help.blackboard.com/Learn/Instructor/Original/Tests_Pools_Surveys/Orig_Reuse_ Questions/Upload_Questions. [Accessed 10 1 2022].[11] J. B. Garfield, “The role of statistical reasoning in learning statistics,” in American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA, 2000.[12] D. C. Montgomery, G. C. Runger
student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., vol. 111, no. 23, pp. 1–6, 2014.[14] C. E. Wieman, “Large-scale comparison of science teaching methods sends clear message,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., vol. 111, no. 23, pp. 8319–8320, 2014.[15] A. Dallal and R. M. Clark, “Progressive Use of Active Learning in Electrical Engineering Courses,” in ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2019.[16] A. Dallal, M. Zaghloul, and A. Hassan, “A Study of Students Perspectives on Different Pedagogical Practices for Remote Digital Signal Processing Courses,” pp. 1–5, Dec. 2021.[17] A. Dallal, A. Dukes, and R. M. Clark, “Student performance in partially flipped ECE laboratory classes,” in ASEE Annual
/?ASCE?1052- 3928?2007?133:2?99?[9] C. Wang, Do open-ended design projects motivate first-year engineering students?, ASEE Annu. Conf. Expo. Conf. Proc. 2020-June (2020). https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--34473.[10] N. Honken, P. a S. Ralston, Freshman Engineering Retention: A Holistic Look, J. STEM Educ. Innov. Res. 14 (2013) 29–37.[11] J.S. Curtis, A first-year career development course: Securing and succeeding in an engineering job, ASEE Annu. Conf. Expo. Conf. Proc. 2020-June (2020). https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--34001.[12] R. V. Adams, E. Blair, Impact of Time Management Behaviors on Undergraduate Engineering Students’ Performance, SAGE Open. 9 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244018824506.[13] R.D. Lopez
Departments," in ASEE Virtual Annual Conference, 2021. [3] EngineeringUK, "2019 Excel Resource: Chapter 6," 2019. [Online]. Available: https://www.engineeringuk.com/research/data/2019-excel-resource/. [Accessed 16 3 2022]. [4] Advance HE, "Cracking the concrete ceiling: Tracking the impact of the Diversifying Leadership programme," 2019. [5] G. Campbell, R. Denes and C. Morrison, "Race, Ethnicity, and the Scientific Enterprise.," 2000. [Online]. Available: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ed443901. [6] E. A. Cech and T. J. Waidzunas , "Navigating the heteronormativity of engineering: the experiences of lesbian, gay, and bisexual students," Engineering Studies, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 1-24, 2011.[7] H
senior years. To enable longitudinal study, different exams were developed forboth juniors and seniors, but the concepts included were the same on both. Each exam consistedof 10 questions covering the concepts listed in Table 1. The only reference permitted during theexam was a common reference sheet (see Figure 1). Students were permitted up to 55 minutes tocomplete the exam. Testing began with the seniors in the Class of 2019 and has continuedthrough the juniors in the Class of 2023. Students in the Classes of 2020, 2021, and 2022 havetaken both the junior and senior versions of the exam. Number of students who have taken eachtest are provided in Table 2. Further demographics were not gathered about the populations.Each year, the results have
examination versus assignment essay. Higher Education, 1998. 35(4): p. 453-472.7. Boud, D. and R. Soler, Sustainable assessment revisited. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 2016. 41(3): p. 400-413.8. Watling, C.J. and S. Ginsburg, Assessment, feedback and the alchemy of learning. Medical Education, 2019. 53(1): p. 76-85.9. Carless, D., Excellence in university assessment: Learning from award-winning practice. 2015: Routledge.10. Joughin, G., Dimensions of oral assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 1998. 23(4): p. 367-378.11. Bryan, C. and K. Clegg, Innovative
includes primarilyprogramming concepts, covered using MATLAB, as well as smaller topics touching on solid modeling,digital logic, programmable logic controllers (PLCs), and microprocessors.Prior to Spring 2019, the course was offered in a highly active, but traditional instruction mode. Lecturestypically consisted of content delivery interspersed with example activities for students to complete.Outside of class, students completed regular homework assignments and three mid-term exams and acomprehensive final exam were used as the primary assessment tools for student learning.In Spring of 2019, the course was moved to a flipped instruction mode. The details and impacts of thismodel were previously discussed [12]. To summarize, this iteration of the
engineeringjob site engineerjobs.com for five different engineering disciplines: mechanical, civil, chemical,electrical, and biomedical. These disciplines were chosen because they are listed as the topengineering disciplines based on the total number of bachelor degrees awarded by engineeringdiscipline according to the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Engineering andEngineering Technology by the Numbers 2019 annual report [20]. The two disciplines that werealso in the top seven but were not included for analysis in this study were computer science andcomputer engineering. Computer science (CS) was intentionally excluded since many CS jobsdeal with software development, which utilize different types of programming languages thannon-CS
Oregon State University. He has over 100 publications and presentations, including 3 books, 4 best paper awards at conferences, the 2009 Grant award (TEE), and the 2005 Eschenbach award (EMJ). Neal is a Fellow and Associate Executive Director of ASEM.Ted Eschenbach (Professor Emeritus) Dr. Ted Eschenbach, PE, is the principal of TGE Consulting, an emeritus professor at the University of Alaska Anchorage, and the Engineering Management Journal’s founding editor emeritus. He is a Fellow of ASEE, ASEM, and IISE. His Ph.D in IE is from Stanford and his MCE from UAA. He has over 300 publications and presentations, including 21 editions of 4 engineering economy titles, 8 best paper awards at conferences, and the 2009 Grant
student attitudes and identity,” In 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, June 15-19, 2019, Tampa, FL. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/33455. [Accessed January 20, 2022].[6] J. P. Saxe, “Teaching empathy through a stakeholder-focused engineering communications course,” In Middle Atlantic ASEE Section Spring 2021 Conference, April 9-10, 2021, Virtual. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/36321. [Accessed January 20, 2022].[7] D. C. Barnlund, “A transactional model of communication,” in Language Behavior: A Book of Readings in Communication, A. Johnnye, A. Goldberg, G. Myers, J. Stewart, New York: Humanities Press, 1970, pp. 43-61.[8] “The 8 functions of communication,” November 14, 2020. [Online].Available
performance tests, their final product,and the next time the robot would need to perform the tasks from the test they had justcompleted.Context and Details of the Revised AssignmentThe revised assignment was included in the spring 2019 offering of the course. The tasks therobots needed to perform were presented through the scenario of assisting at an arcade. Theseincluded starting when a light in the floor was illuminated, pushing one of two buttons, insertinga lost token in a slot, sliding some foosball counters, flipping a lever, and signaling the end of arun by pushing a large button. There were four performance tests during the semester thatcollectively included each of the tasks required of the robots. Each week also included a “stretchbonus
-8765.2008.01005.x.[3] M. Forehand, "Bloom's taxonomy," Emerging perspectives on Learning, teaching, and technology, vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 47-56, 2010.[4] J. Paul and F. Jefferson, "A Comparative Analysis of Student Performance in an Online vs. Face-to-Face Environmental Science Course From 2009 to 2016," Journal Frontiers in Computer Science, vol. 1, November 2019. [Online] Available: Frontiers in Computer Science, https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcomp.2019.00007/full [Accessed: January 25, 2022].[5] R. Bennett. "Formative assessment: A critical review," Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, vol.18. 2011. DOI: 10.1080/0969594X.2010.513678.[6] A. Khan, O. Egbue, B. Palkie, B. & J. Madden, J. "Active
, 53rd AIAA/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference, 2017[4] M. Kobald, U. Fischer, K. Tomilin, A. Petrarolo, C. Schmierer, Hybrid Experimental Rocket Stuttgart: ALow-Cost Technology Demonstrator, Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, Vol. 55, No. 2, 2018[5] K. Schuttauf, A. Stamminger, Operation of Solid Rockets in Comparison with Hybrid Rockets Duringthe STERN Project, SpaceOps Conference, 2016[6] F. Heeg, L. Kilzer, R. Seitz, E. Stoll, Design and Test of a Student Hybrid Rocket Engine with an ExternalCarbon Fiber Composite Structure, Aerospace, Vol. 7, Issue 5, 2020[7] M. Kobald, C. Schmierer, U. Fischer, K. Tomilin, A. Petrarolo, M. Rehberger, The HyEnD STERN HybridSounding Rocket Project, Progress in Propulsion Physics, Vol.11, 2019[8] S.D
targeted constructsReferences[1] U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (2021). Employment Projections: Employment by detailed occupation, 2019 and projected 2029. Retrieved from https://www.bls.gov/emp/tables/emp-by-detailed-occupation.htm[2] Robinson, T., Kirn, A., Amos, J.R., & Chatterjee, I. (2019). Influencing student engineering interest and identity: A study investigating the effect of engineering summer camps on middle and high school students (work in progress). ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings.[3] Hofacker, S.A. (2014). Diversity and Inclusion in the Engineering Workplace : A Call for Majority Intentionality to Increase Career. ASEE Southeast Section Conference, 10 pages.[4] Lent
dollars in research awards. Her research on evaluation of online learning (supported by two NSF awards #1544259,1935683, ) has resulted in more than 20 peer-reviewed conference and journal publications related to engineering learners in online courses. She was a FutureLearn Research Fellow from 2017-2019; a 2018 recipient of the FIE New Faculty Fellow Award and was the 2021 Program Chair for the Educational Research Methods Division of ASEE.Julie Martin Julie P. Martin is a Fellow of ASEE and an associate professor of Engineering Education at The Ohio State University. Julie’s professional mission is to create environments that elevate and expand the research community. She is the editor- in-chief of Journal of Women
1 0 1 2 3 4 5 T Q L H P T Q L H PFigure 1: Box plots of the standardized grades of the 53 students who took CSSE386 and MA384in the 2021–2022 academic year. T: Tests, Q: Quizzes, L: Lessons, H: Homework, P: ProjectsReferences[1] Reza Sanati-Mehrizy, Kailee Parkinson, Elham Vaziripour, and Afsaneh Minaie. Data mining course in the undergraduate computer science curriculum. In 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2019.[2] Mine C¸ etinkaya-Rundel and Victoria Ellison. A fresh look at introductory data science. Journal of Statistics and Data
student performance. Future work will consider longitudinalanalysis of learning outcomes as well as student preferences in non-pandemic conditions.Lessons learned from hybrid delivery will also be considered for use in classroom-basedenvironments.References[1] C. Hodges, "Educause," 6 May 2020. [Online]. [Accessed January 2021].[2] K. Grasman and S. Long, "Strategic Design of an Introductory Engineering Management Course for Active and Flexible Hybrid Delivery," in ASEE, Virtual, 2021.[3] H. Chevreux, V. Henriquez, J. Guerra and E. Scheihing, "Agile Development of Learning Analytics Tools in a Rigid Environment like a University: Benefits, Challenges, and Strategies," in European Conference on Technology Enhanced Learning, Delft, 2019.[4
/jee.20054.[29] M. A. Guerra and C. Gopaul, “IEEE Region 9 Initiatives: Supporting Engineering Education During COVID-19 Times,” IEEE Potentials, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 19–24, Mar. 2021, doi: 10.1109/MPOT.2020.3043738.[30] L. Masserini and M. Bini, “Does joining social media groups help to reduce students’ dropout within the first university year?,” Socioecon. Plann. Sci., vol. 73, p. 100865, Feb. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.seps.2020.100865.[31] K. Tanner, K. M. Kecskemety, and R. L. Kajfez, “Examination of Student Choice to Remain in Engineering,” presented at the 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Jun. 2019. Accessed: Feb. 04, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/examination- of-student-choice-to
-flippedsections offered in Spring 2018 and Spring 2019, the online flipped classroom students earned a3.5% higher average score on the same final exams. Overall, improvement in both studentengagement and learning outcomes has been observed for the online flipped Fluid Mechanicscourse. Finally, the paper discusses the advantages, implementation strategies, and limitations.IntroductionSince the late nineties, web-based remote teaching and learning, namely online courses, havebeen growing rapidly to meet the educational demands of those limited by location, time, andavailability. Based on studies performed prior to COVID-19 pandemic, students perceived onlinelearning to be more convenient [1], but less effective for learning compared to face-to