unsuccessful participation of industry practitioners in academia describedabove, this research details an innovative teaching model in which the industry practitionersare integrated in the classroom to teach chapters of classes that take part of the curriculummandatory for students to graduate. The process of selection of the industry practitioners, andtheirs and students’ feedbacks on this model are assessed. This teaching model was applied ina newly founded Construction Management program at the University of Wyoming. Theprogram developed this teaching model as a supplementary feature for attaining AmericanCouncil for Construction Education (ACCE) accreditation status by Spring 2022. Thoughsome changes would be required, the model is expected to be
Advanced Electric Vehicles, and a thriving partnership for student recruitment with several universities in China. He has also been the dissertation advisor for and graduated many Ph.D. students. Dr. Das’s areas of research interests are modeling and simulation of multi-disciplinary engineering problems, modeling multi- physics problems in manufacturing, engineering education, and curriculum reform. He has worked in areas ranging from mechatronics system simulation to multi-physics process simulation using CAE tools such as Finite Elements and Boundary Elements. He has authored or co-authored five books on these topics. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022
mechanical engineering students to enhance their academic success and transition them into a career in STEM.Subha Kumpaty Dr. Subha Kumpaty is a professor of mechanical engineering and program director of master of science in engineering at the Milwaukee School of engineering. Besides teaching a variety of engineering courses in both undergraduate and graduate programs, he leads the research experiences for undergraduates program sponsored by the National Science Foundation. He has led Engineering Education track of the ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress for more than a decade. He currently co-leads the S-STEM grant with Dr. Fertig which provides scholarships and activities to 20 diverse mechanical
autoethnographic, ethnographic, and qualitative interview projects on a wide- range of topics, has taught research methods at the introductory, advanced, and graduate levels, and has trained research assistants in diverse forms of data collection and analysis.Robert L. Nagel © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com Student competency, autonomy, and relatedness in a practice-oriented engineering program: An application of self-determination theoryAbstractFor engineering students, how might three basic needs—competency, autonomy, andrelatedness—promote intrinsic motivation among students? In this
students as part of a sophomore-level systems analysis and design course. In this evidence-based practice paper, we report on students’ reflections regarding their perceptions of teamwork.This study approaches the following research questions: What are students' reflections about therole of communication while working in teams in a cooperative project-based learningenvironment?The guiding pedagogical framework for this course is cooperative learning. The course requiresthe students to work in teams in a semester-long software development project. To elicit reflectionon action about their teamwork experience. Specifically, we exposed students to concreteexperiences as part of their teamwork interactions, which became the basis for observations
support includes: (a) tuition waivers for any gap need beyond need-basedfinancial aid awards, (b) free use of textbooks, and (c) New York City transit cards(MetroCards).The ASAP model was evaluated using a random assignment experimental design and tested andproven to be successful when offered as the complete suite of supports just described, withassociate degree students (i.e., partial implementation and implementation with different cohortswas not evaluated). Students in ASAP had an impressive three-year graduation rate of 40.1%compared to 21.8% for matched non-participants (11). Previous internal research showed thatHispanic male students in ASAP had a 3-year graduation rate of 46.7% compared to 18.2% for amatched group.As students in this
chair of the department to assistantprofessors and lecturers in engineering) and one educational research faculty (from thedepartment of chemistry). The course design process started with a literature review onengineering bridge courses to understand prior work, followed by surveying current engineeringfaculty to propose goals for the course. The designed team met weekly after setting the coursegoals over two semesters. The design process was initiated with backward design principles (i.e.,start with the course goals, then the assessments, end with the learning activities) and continuedwith ongoing revision. The work herein presents this new engineering bridge course’s goals,strategy, and design process. Preliminary student outcomes will be
. Natarajarathinam teaches undergraduate and graduate capstone courses. She also teaches graduate and undergraduate courses in logistics, distribution, purchasing, supplier, and customer relationship management. She developed the distribution customer experience course for the graduate program and she has made significant curriculum changes to several courses in the department. Dr. Natarajarathinam’s research focuses on engineering education including service-learning and workforce skills development. She has received over $3.6 million in external research funding from several companies, governmental agencies, and National Science Foundation. Dr. Natarajarathinam has written 22 peer-reviewed journal articles, a business case with a
development for engineers is an essential part of career advancement and caninclude a wide variety of learning opportunities, ranging from asynchronous short courses tocomprehensive synchronous in-person courses. Adult learning theory supports the positiveinfluence of student engagement, but this engagement may be different from universityclassroom settings. There is an abundance of literature that indicates student engagement in thelearning experience is important for student learning and other important educational outcomes.There is also evidence that the adoption of engaging teaching practices in professionaldevelopment settings is limited. Much of the research on adoption is done in K-16 settings,which fails to address the impact among a
goals, the curriculum of the successful program was modified to feature theengineering design process in a culturally responsive manner through collaboration with anengineering college and school of education to create the new program. In addition to thecurriculum, this paper demonstrates the conceptual frameworks of Communities of Practice,Culturally Relevant Pedagogy, and a technique called Transformational Intergroup Dialogue toscaffold the emergence of mutually satisfying mentor-mentee relationships among individuals ofdiffering social identities. To accomplish this, a mixed methods research design, capturingqualitative and quantitative data is being used. Qualitative methods include student journals,class observations, interviews, and
Paper ID #37921A Cultural Approach to Teaching Teamwork inUndergraduate Engineering CoursesJoanna G Burchfield Dr. Joanna Burchfield is an Assistant Professor of Communication for the College of Engineering at the University of South Florida. Her current research interests focus on the links between interpersonal and intercultural communication competency and undergraduate engineering students’ professional proficiencies and professional identity development. Specifically, Burchfield’s research explores how the application of an interpersonal communication based curriculum impacts undergraduate engineering
Paper ID #37261Working Full Time and Earning an Engineering Degree:Wellbeing in a Co-Op-Based Engineering ProgramCatherine Mcgough Spence (Assistant Professor)Luke John NybergJustine Chasmar (Assistant Professor and Quantitative Reasoning CenterDirector)Jodi NelsonMarissa Tsugawa Marissa Tsugawa is an assistant professor in the Department of Engineering Education at Utah State University. Their research interest is in neurodivergence and how it manifests in engineering education. Past work includes exploring motivation and identity of engineering graduate students, women of color's experiences on engineering teams, and
, something that had not been anticipated when theprogram was proposed. In other words, a pivot was needed to support the faculty in waysbeyond simply addressing pre-pandemic issues. As such, the CIMC mentors and groupsfollowed a “just in time” format in terms of topics addressed in their discussions, such asmentoring on remote teaching, support for graduate students as research labs were shutdown, balancing work with childcare, and many other relevant and timely topics. As anexample, mentors learned from their new faculty mentees that, due to the pandemic, theywere having a lot of trouble adjusting given socialization (e.g., lunches with colleagues) thatwould have given them much-needed information about their departments and theuniversity. This
dedicated academic instructors understand the valueof exploring new methodologies in teaching, both to reach different students and to moreeffectively promote mastery of the subjects in others, there are rarely reasons to truly reevaluatewhy we do what we do. This is one of the primary challenges that drove me to volunteer to teachin the prisons system.I have agreed to teach Physics 101, a lab based, conceptual physics course in a local federalprison. This class is offered at our institution in a variety of formats for primarily non-sciencemajors fulfilling their general education requirements for graduation. Despite the range ofclassroom experience I’ve had for this course, 5-15 weeks, 15-350 students, numerous teachingand evaluation modalities
mentioned earlier, the design of our study assumes that the body of papers published in theproceedings of ASEE annual conferences is representative of practices and trends in engineeringcommunication pedagogy and research. Following the method used by Neeley and Alley (2020),we used the search function in the PEER repository to identify papers dealing with engineeringcommunication. Specifically, we conducted a title search for “communication or writing orspeaking or presentations.” Papers that served one or more of the four functions listed belowqualified as relevant to engineering communication as we have defined it here:(1) develop or assess the communication abilities of engineering students,(2) assess engineering students’ attitudes and
Paper ID #37935Work-in-Progress: Redesigning an Introductory MechanicsCourse to Include Meaningful Design ExperiencesDamon KirkpatrickMichael Lawrence Anderson (Associate Professor) Mike Anderson is an Associate Professor and Director of Capstone Programs, Department of Mechanical Engineering, US Air Force Academy. He has pursued research in engineering education for several years in the areas of curriculum design and assessment, capstone design experiences, innovative design methodologies, and enhancing student creativity. In addition, he pursues technical research in autonomous systems, design of terrestrial and