Conference Session

Technical Session M1

Collection

2022 First-Year Engineering Experience

Authors

Jennifer I Clark, Montana State University - Bozeman; Bryce E. Hughes, Montana State University - Bozeman

Tagged Topics

Diversity, Works In Progress

thebottom notes the contribution of the Figure 1: How Self-Efficacy Theory Nests intoChronosystem (Time). Bioecology Theory In a qualitative approach this framework allows a shift in perspective. Bandura [13]presents the sources of self-efficacy as individual influences working together in developing aperson's ability to develop confidence, the top 4-part circle in Figure 2. Measuring sources ofself-efficacy in student academic development in STEM disciplines are found in work by Loo etal. [28], Usher et al. [29], and Mamaril et al. [30]. Their work quantitatively describes theamount of influence self-efficacy sources have in student confidence in their ability to besuccessful with challenging STEM

Conference Session

Technical Session T1A

Collection

2022 First-Year Engineering Experience

Authors

Susan L. Amato-Henderson, Michigan Technological University; Jon Sticklen, Michigan Technological University

Tagged Topics

Full Papers

the level of utility value students perceived could explain approximately half of thevariance (51%) in their intention to pursue an engineering career. [6]. Based on this research, we expect thatsuccess and usefulness will both predict empowerment.The success factor of the MUSIC inventory measures the perception that one can succeed in the relevantacademic work if they put forth the effort [1]. Several different human motivation theories serve as thefoundation for this factor. Bandura’s now-classic self-efficacy theory [7], Covington’s self-worth theory [8],goal orientation theory [9], and expectancy-value theory [10] all address achievement motivation and success/competency. In fact, competency is now considered to be a basic human need [11

Conference Session

Technical Session M3A

Collection

2022 First-Year Engineering Experience

Authors

John Krupczak Jr, Hope College; Katharine Hopkins Polasek, Hope College

Tagged Topics

Workshops

conducting these hands-on design projects. Materials will be provided for thoseinterested so they can try some of these activities with their own students. The workshop organizers willbe available via teleconference after the FYEE Conference to help instructors that would like to try theprojects in their own classes.Acknowledgement: This work was supported by the National Science Foundation under award 1650889.Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of theauthors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NSF.References:1. Carberry, A.R, Hee Sun Lee, Matthew W. Ohland, Measuring engineering design self-efficacy, Journalof Engineering Education, V99n1, January 2010

Conference Session

Technical Session M5B

Collection

2022 First-Year Engineering Experience

Authors

Michael Cross, Norwich University; David M. Feinauer P.E., Virginia Military Institute; Roger J Marino P.E., Drexel University; James R McCusker PhD, Wentworth Institute of Technology; Johanna P Casale, Drexel University

Tagged Topics

Full Papers

inspection reveals a body of work that includes thought leadership, collegialconversation, and critical analysis of the impacts of the pandemic on all areas and concernstypically considered in the engineering education community. Scholars have documented andexplored emergency remote teaching (ERT) and the implications to or impacts on acceptedteaching pedagogies and teaching modalities, student learning and self-efficacy beliefs,challenges and opportunities with hands-on learning, and the systemic challenges related toinclusivity, equity, access, and engagement in engineering higher education. The enormity of theimpact of the pandemic is underscored by the language of the pandemic ERT literatureincorporating terms like disruption, survival, and