Conference Session

Technical Session M5B

Collection

2022 First-Year Engineering Experience

Authors

Haritha Malladi, University of Delaware; Jenni Buckley, University of Delaware

Tagged Topics

Full Papers

-semester feedback poll relating to their perceptions of team discord. Across all course modalities,the presence of “slacker” team member(s) dominates as a reason for interpersonal conflicts. InFall 2021, on average, 35% of students indicated that they did not experience conflict. Incontrast, only 32% of student teams had CATME flags for Project 1 report at the end of thesemester (Figure 2). Thus, CATME peer-evaluations may not be fully capturing all interpersonalconflicts in these student teams. (a) Face-to-face (Fall 2019) Different levels of experience with subject matter Different expectations for success/grade in course One or more dominating team members One or more “slacker” team members

Conference Session

Technical Session T1B

Collection

2022 First-Year Engineering Experience

Authors

Charles E. Pierce, University of South Carolina

Tagged Topics

Full Papers

., & Thomas, L.D., & Sattler, B., & Atman, C.J.(2015), On an Upward Trend: Reflection in Engineering Education. Paper presented at 2015ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Seattle, Washington. 10.18260/p.24533[2] Mina, M., & Cowan, J., & Heywood, J. (2015), Case for reflection in engineering education-and an alternative, 2015 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), pp. 1-6, doi:10.1109/FIE.2015.7344252.[3] Heo, D., & Anwar, S., & Menekse, M. (2018), The relationship between engineeringstudents’ achievement goals, reflection behaviors, and learning outcomes. International Journalof Engineering Education, 34(5), 1634-1643.[4] Consortium to Promote Reflection in Engineering Education, 2014-2015 Reflection