arise, to when they sleep. Quite simply, it isimpossible for someone not to engage engineering in some manner on a reoccurring basis intoday’s modern world. This is a weighty concept for the profession and the practicingengineer. The relationship of engineering and society dictates that engineers operate in goodfaith to ensure the welfare of society is paramount. As such, engineering ethics are a part of thiscomplex relationship and the education of engineering students should be effective in makingthem more ethically minded. This paper will set up virtue ethics as a needed approach inengineering ethics education and exams four virtues as the hallmarks of an engineer: phronesis,justice, fortitude and honesty.engineering as a valued
science fiction novel; two award-winning books in the genre of body-mind-spirit, and numerous papers and articles.Dr. William J Davis, University of Virginia William J Davis, Ph.D. is an Assistant Professor in Science, Technology, and Society in the Department of Engineering and Society and the University of Virginia. William has degrees in literature and Science and Technology Studies, and has taught courses in English, philosophy, and sociology in universities in the USA and Mexico. His current research investigates the ethical and social implications of technology, including those related to artificial intelligence, automation, bioethics, machine ethics, and post and trans- humanism.Mr. Kent A. Wayland, University
”) AND(assessment) AND (validation) anywhere in the article. Since there was no function to set thepublication date on the journal website, every article published since 1991 was included in thesearch results. After screening the articles with titles and abstracts, eight articles remained aspotentially relevant papers, and those articles were all published after 2000. Among those, twopapers reported newly developed instruments for ethics-related outcomes with validity evidence:Hess et al. [8]’s Civic-Minded Graduate Scale (CMG) and Rambo-Hernandez et al. [9]’s ValuingDiversity and Enacting Inclusion in Engineering Scale (VDEIE). We introduce those studies inthis paper.For the journal Science and Engineering Ethics, we searched for articles
: Biotechnology and Science Fiction and Nanotalk: Conversations with Scientists and Engi- neers about Ethics, Meaning and Belief in the Development of Nanotechnology; a science fiction novel; two award-winning books in the genre of body-mind-spirit (including When the Horses Whisper), and numerous papers and articles. Her newest book, ”Animals, Ethics and Engineering” (working title) is under contract to be published in summer, 2024. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023Non-human Animals and a New Ethics for EngineeringIntroductionThe sixth mass extinction is underway. Earth's animal populations have declined by an averageof 69% since 1970 [1], partly due to unsustainable use of land, water and
O BJECTSTo integrate the above ideas into the classroom space, we can capitalize on some of the othermore recognizable configurations of learning for engineers before asking them to venture intothe more unfamiliar territory of ethics and philosophy: project-based, immersive learning.Engineers are usually comfortable working in teams and collaborating to solve complicatedproblems – relying on each other’s expertise to fill knowledge gaps and bounce ideas. Theclassroom can be broken into small teams of 3 -5 students to encourage these skills and situ-ate the game in a more comfortable structure. While this interactive lab idea has been framedwith undergraduate students in mind, we encourage playful adaptation for other spaces3 . 3
Paper ID #38251Assessing the Effects of a Short-Term Global Engineering Ethics Courseon the Development of Engineering Students’ Moral Reasoning andDispositions [Traditional paper – research/evidence-based, DEI/researchmethods]Dr. Rockwell Franklin Clancy III, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Rockwell Clancy conducts research at the intersection of technology ethics, moral psychology, and Chi- nese philosophy. He explores how culture and education affect moral judgments, the causes of unethical behaviors, and what can be done to ensure more ethical behaviors regarding technology. Central to his work
Paper ID #39165Impact of critical narrative on students’ abilities to recognize ethicaldilemmas in engineering workDr. Jeff R. Brown, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University - Daytona Beach Jeff Brown is a professor of civil engineering at Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University in Daytona Beach, FL. His research interests include ethics and professional formation in engineering education, service learning, and structural health monitoring of reinforced concrete structures. Dr. Brown received his PhD in structural engineering from the University of Florida in 2005.Chad Rohrbacher, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University - Daytona
of which are summarized below, provided critical feedbackwhich has been incorporated in the final course revision.Sample comments:(F): “I believe it is important for students to consider gender, URM diversity, cultural andeconomic background differences, and overall inclusiveness during engineering design andtechnology development … I teach BME senior design, and we teach students that stakeholderanalysis is a very important part of bioinnovation. As you mentioned in the course description,the "missing voices" could lead to design failure. Your course can be useful for all engineeringstudents.”(F-URM): “I especially appreciate the topics outlined in the new learning objectives. Thefollowing are a few thoughts that came to mind. For your
Paper ID #37054Student Use of Artificial Intelligence to Write Technical EngineeringPapers – Cheating or a Tool to Augment LearningDr. Ronald P. Uhlig, National University From 2010-2014, Dr. Ronald P. Uhlig was Dean, School of Business and Management, National Univer- sity, La Jolla, CA. He returned to the engineering faculty in 2014 and is currently Chair, Department of Engineering, School of Technology and Engineering. During 2005-2010 he served in multiple positions including Chair of the Department of Computer Science and Information Systems, and Academic Pro- gram Director for the Master of Science in Wireless
proceedings, and books. For more information about her background and accomplishments, please refer to her LinkedIn profile: https://www.linkedin.com/in/youna-jung-4755b28.Mr. Jacob Ray Johnston, Virginia Military InstituteAidan Noonan ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Analysis of Ethics Education in Undergraduate Computer Science Programs in the United States Youna Jung*+, Aidan Noonan+, and Jacob R. Johnston+ * Khoury College of Computer Science, Northeastern University, Arlington, Virginia 22209, United States + Computer and Information Sciences, Virginia Military Institute, Lexington, Virginia 24450, United
in Japan and Malaysia and found that greaterethics integration in engineering curriculum correlated more positively to students attitudetowards ethics and their educational objectives for ethics being attained. We observed similaradvantages to having greater ethics exposure in our curriculum.Students found that the access to engineering-related ethics education within the engineeringcurriculum was limited, and the existing philosophy and ethics courses were interesting andexposed them to thought-provoking material. Still, students struggled to relate their philosophyand theology education to their careers in the engineering industry. In our work, we have foundthat dialogue drives expanding of the mind. A lot of the discussion, even on
model of training criteria to assessment of learning outcomes and program evaluation in Higher Education”. In: Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability (2010), 22(3), pp.215-225[4] Robert E. McGinn. “ ‘Mind the gaps’: An empirical approach to engineering ethics, 1997-2001”. In: Science and Engineering Ethics (2003), pp. 517-542[5] Steve Roach, Jules Simon. “Teaching and assessing graduate ethics in Engineering, Science and Technology”. In: Innovative Techniques in Instruction Technology, E- learning, E-assessment, and Education, (2008) , pp.509-513[6] Golnaz Hashemian, Michael C. Loui. “Can Instruction in Engineering Ethics Change Students' Feelings about Professional Responsibility
Paper ID #38245[Full Research Paper, Ethical Engineering in Industry and AppliedContexts] Responsibility and Accountability: Faculty Leaders, EthicsFrameworks, and Disciplinary EnculturationDr. Laurie A. Pinkert, University of Central Florida Laurie A. Pinkert is an Associate Professor of Writing and Rhetoric and Director of Writing Across the Curriculum at the University of Central Florida. Her research examines the role of communication practices and writing infrastructures in disciplinary development within fields such as engineering.Prof. Jonathan Beever, University of Central Florida Jonathan Beever is Associate Professor
Peking University.References[1] Lin J, Yi FQ. “Future-oriented Engineering Ethics Education”. In: Research in Higher Education of Engineering (2021), pp. 1-11[2] J. R. Herkert, “Continuing and emerging issues in engineering ethics education and research: integrating microethics and macroethics”, In: IEEE Power Engineering Society General Meeting, 2004., Denver, CO, USA[3] Herkert J R. “Engineering ethics education in the USA: Content, pedagogy and curriculum”. In: European Journal of Engineering Education (2000), pp. 303-313[4] Robert E. McGinn. “ ‘Mind the gaps’: An empirical approach to engineering ethics, 1997- 2001”. In: Science and Engineering Ethics(2003), pp. 517-542[5] Steve Roach, Jules Simon. “Teaching and assessing
Paper ID #38939Character Development in the Engineering Classroom: An Exploratory,Mixed-Methods Investigation of Student Perspectives on CultivatingCharacterDr. Jessica Koehler, Wake Forest University Dr. Jessica Koehler is a Visiting Scholar of Leadership and Character for the Wake Forest Department of Engineering supporting with the development and assessment of character and ethics education in the engineering program.Dr. Olga Pierrakos, Wake Forest University Dr. Olga Pierrakos is Founding Chair and Professor of the new Department of Engineering at Wake Forest University - a private, liberal arts, research
Paper ID #39322Recognizing Principles of AI Ethics through a Role-Play Case Study onAgricultureMr. Ashish Hingle, George Mason University Ashish Hingle (he/him) is a Ph.D. student in the College of Engineering and Computing at George Ma- son University. His research interests include technology ethics, interactions and networking in online communities, and student efficacy challenges in higher education. He received his bachelor’s degree in Information Systems and master’s degree in Information Assurance (Cybersecurity – Forensics – Audit) from sunny Cal Poly Pomona.Dr. Aditya Johri, George Mason University Aditya Johri