Paper ID #37708Engineering Start-Up Packages: Mixed Methods Analysis of CompositionandImplications for Early-Career Professional FormationDr. Monica L. Castaneda-Kessel, Utah State University Dr. Monica Castaneda-Kessel is the Grant Development Manager for the College of Engineering at Utah State University. She works with early-career engineering faculty and others to develop their research visions and writing, provides editing support, and connects faculty with potential collaborators and fund- ing opportunities. Her areas of interest are innovative professional development, faculty feedback, and competitive intelligence
Paper ID #38233Work in Progress: Recommendations for Early Career Faculty to Engage inInterdisciplinary STEAM CollaborationsDr. Renee M. Desing, Oregon State University Dr. Renee Desing is a postdoctoral scholar at Oregon State University in the School of Civil and Construc- tion Engineering. Her research interests include diversity, equity, inclusion in the engineering classrooms and workplaces. Dr. Desing graduated from Ohio State with her Ph.D. in Engineering Education, and also holds a B.S. in Industrial Engineering from the Georgia Institute of Technology and a M.S. in Industrial Engineering and Operations Research
persistence toward graduating with an engineering degree.Student attitudes and beliefs are known to be important. For example, student beliefs aboutengineering career security and salary are predictors for persistence [3]. Student career aspirationhas also been observed as an indicator of persistence [2]. Other studies have highlighted theimportance of guidance and clarification of the role of engineers through advising, as manystudents may have incorrect assumptions about the culture of engineering [4]. One studyidentified six broad factors that drive attrition from engineering: classroom and academicclimate, grades and conceptual understanding, self-efficacy and self-confidence, high schoolpreparation, interest and career goals, and race and gender
Stevens Institute of Technology and his Masters and PhD from Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute. He has served in numerous positions throughout his career at NJIT, including Director for the Computer Engineering Program, Executive Director of the Center for Pre-College Programs, and Associate Director of the In- stitute for Teaching Excellence. He has been designated a Master Teacher at NJIT. His research interests focus on engineering education at the pre-college and undergraduate levels. He is the author of the text- book Computer Systems Organization and Architecture and the upcoming open textbook An Animated Introduction to Digital Logic Design. ©American Society for Engineering Education
andsubmitting research proposals to different funding agencies or entities. Once you have decidedon the kind of research you will pursue, recruiting students is the next critical step.Experienced researchers know that the students who perform best in class are not necessarily thesame ones who will excel at research. Initiative counts for more in research, as does the abilityto address problems that are not well formed. At the beginning of their career, graduate studentsare knowledge consumers, with a need to learn what is the state of the art in their discipline.Later they become knowledge generators, contributing results to their research group and thecommunity at large. Successful graduate students walk a healthy balance between working withtheir
-campusinstruction.Key findings include the growth in civil engineering knowledge for each cohort regardless ofdelivery method. Learners consistently identified innovative activities like debates and livedemonstrations as the most impactful for student learning. They identified hands-on activitiesand field visits as the most engaging and memorable. At the end of each course, instructors self-identified as gaining knowledge of research-based educational methods, greater ease in teachingand managing a classroom, and confidence in assessing student learning. The innovativeteaching approach to pre-college education has encouraged new cohorts of high school studentsto pursue engineering as a career and current graduate students to pursue engineering educationas a
Arboleda, University of Miami Diana Arboleda, PhD, is a structural engineering Lecturer at the University of Miami, Florida. She re- ceived her B.S. in Computer Engineering from the University of Miami in 1988 and after a full career as a software engineer in corporate America she returDr. Aaron Heller, University of Miami Aaron Heller is a clinical psychologist and an Associate Professor of Psychology at the University of Miami having received a B.A. in Psychology from UC Berkeley and a Ph.D. in Clinical Psychology from the University of Wisconsin – Madison. His work focuses on understanding the relevance of real-world, naturalistic mood dynamics to psychiatric disease and psychological wellbeing.Ali Ghahremaninezhad
of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, with research in protein engineering. Her current research interests include retention, diversity, and career pathways among engineering students and professionals. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 What do Engineering and other pSTEM Faculty Need? Exploring the Nuances of Psychological NeedsAbstractWe conducted semi-structured interviews of 13 men and 18 women faculty in engineering, math,and physics (pSTEM) to explore their thoughts and feelings about their experiences in theacademic workplace. Interview transcripts were deductively and thematically coded according topsychological needs of autonomy, competence, and
Autoethnographic StudyIntroductionAn academic career may involve a semester or even years away from the classroom as onepursues research or enters administration. Unlike a sabbatical, where you may engage studentswhile expanding relationships in industry or another university, returning to the classroom after awhile in an administrator role has challenges and opportunities. This paper describes some of myexperience as a veteran administrator who recently returned to the classroom after nearly adecade away and shares lessons learned that I hope new educators find valuable.My early academic career was focused almost entirely on teaching and advising. For more than adecade, each year, I taught over a thousand students. In addition, I supervised nearly a
conserve energy and resources butalso reduce the production costs of realized products. The concept of Sustainable Manufacturingencourages the manufacturing of products using processes that minimize the overall negativeimpact through the conservation of energy and resources. One of the challenges in SustainableManufacturing is that many currently available processes are not economically sound comparedto other traditional processes. However, this dynamic is changing very rapidly. The othersignificant challenge is the shortage of skilled workers in this area. This pressing need hashighlighted the clear Skills Gap in the workforce. This paper reviews Sustainable Engineeringoutlining the career options and learning objectives that need to be addressed
itself — a key macro-objective of the course. Indications of this appear in suchcomments as: I really enjoyed it! Definitely an engineering discipline for me to think about possibly exploring! I didn't think I would be good at geotech but I'm glad I took the class because I love it and can see myself doing geotech as part of my career. I know so much about soil now! I go around thinking about all the soils I step on, what type they are, how saturated they are, how strong they are, and how they would drain or consolidate. Especially at the barn because it’s so muddy, I’m trying to think of ways to drain it better. Maybe installing wick drains would help
in their courses. As in any teaching-learning process, one of the main actors isthe teachers [8]. They may require specific skills and training to achieve a successfulexperience. Additionally, for instructors, this educational format can provide benefits such asenhancing their career portfolio or resume, expanding their professional community, andexchanging teaching practices and feedback [9]. In this line, it is clear that a definition of theinstructor's profile is required since the courses with the COIL strategy are relatively new.Moreover, no formal faculty training programs include founding techniques to design courseswith faculty of different universities, developing evaluation techniques for acquiringknowledge, and the correct
should be used in the classroom because it has been shown to deepen students’ criticalthinking, increase student interest in their area of study, and increase students problem-solvingskills [1, 2, 3]. PjBL is an instructional method that aids students in deeper learning anddevelopment of non-cognitive skills that are necessary for their future career [4]. The main issuewith these two instructional methods is that it can present significant challenges for students thatare under-prepared or are not provided adequate resources (e.g., instructor office hours or tutors)[5,6]. A variety of PBL and PjBL methods utilize programming software such as MATLAB toallow students to simulate their model and various conditions.At the Virginia Military Institute
their career. The essential(E) and advanced (A) skills are still important, but they are not pre-requisite material for othercourses. If a student is able to master all the fundamental skills, they will have a C- and they willpass the class as shown in Table 2. While students who only pass the fundamental skills may notget as much practice with the essential and advanced skills, they will still be exposed to theseskills on instruction days and through homework and laboratory exercises. By achieving masteryon the fundamental skills, students should have a full understanding of these topics which theycan apply to future engineering courses. This is where mastery based learning and traditionalgrading differ—mastery-based learning prioritizes
oral communication skills tothe humanities courses or faculty is not beneficial for a future career in engineering (Newell etal., 1997; Kmiec, 2004). It may be for this reason that Vanderbilt’s Chemical EngineeringDepartment dedicated a technical communication co-instructor to their junior and senior level labcourses (Sharp, 2003). The technical communication element of Vanderbilt’s chemicalengineering senior course was presented by Sharp (2003). She counts alumni guest lectures as avaluable addition to this lab course. The alumni talked about the communication needs of theirjobs during the dedicated technical communication lectures. The other positive experience thatshe cites is the peer feedback on student teams’ presentations. After each
phase.References[1] J. Qadir, K. L. A. Yau, M. A. Imran, and A. Al-Fuqaha, “Engineering education, moving into 2020s: Essential competencies for effective 21st century electrical & computer engineers,” in IEEE Frontiers in Edu. Conf., Uppsala, Sweden, Oct 21-24, 2020, doi: 10.1109/FIE44824.2020.9274067.[2] R. L. Duyff, “The value of lifelong learning: Key element in professional career development,” J. of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics, vol. 99, no. 5, pp. 538-543, 1999, doi: 10.1016/S0002-8223(99)00135-2.[3] Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology. “Criteria for accrediting engineering programs, 2022-2023”. https://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation- criteria/criteria-for-accrediting