Conference Session

Systems Engineering Division (SYS) Technical Session 1

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Mengyu Li, University of Florida; John Alexander Mendoza-Garcia, University of Florida; Andrea Goncher, University of Florida

Tagged Divisions

Systems Engineering Division (SYS)

ofstakeholder awareness skills and identify the area(s) of development (gaps). The results provide us withinsights to develop effective teaching strategies to address these gaps.Study participants were tasked to complete a scenario-based assessment proposed by Grohs, et al. [1] thatfocuses on systems thinking and problem-solving as engineers by responding to a scenario that addressedtechnical and social contexts. The activity focuses on participants’ responses to a given scenario and theprompts intended to guide respondents in a systems-thinking approach. Data were collected electronicallyand analyzed using qualitative coding methods by applying the assessment tool rubric to evaluate studentresponses using systems thinking constructs from the framework

Conference Session

Systems Engineering Division (SYS) Technical Session 1

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Andrea Ramirez-Salgado, University of Florida; Eric Wright, University of Florida

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Systems Engineering Division (SYS)

learning environments [18].References[1] M. Castells and C. Blackwell, “The information age: economy, society and culture. Volume 1. The rise of the network society,” Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, vol. 25, pp. 631–636, 1998.[2] H. V. Haraldsson, Introduction to system thinking and causal loop diagrams. Department of chemical engineering, Lund University Lund, Sweden, 2004.[3] M. A. Dolansky, S. M. Moore, P. A. Palmieri, and M. K. Singh, “Development and validation of the systems thinking scale,” Journal of General Internal Medicine, vol. 35, pp. 2314–2320, 2020.[4] K. E. Dugan, E. A. Mosyjowski, S. R. Daly, and L. R. Lattuca, “Systems thinking assessments in engineering: A systematic literature review,” Systems

Conference Session

Systems Engineering Division (SYS) Technical Session 1

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Amy Thompson, University of Connecticut; Matthew D. Stuber, University of Connecticut; Song Han, University of Connecticut; Abhishek Dutta, University of Connecticut; Hongyi Xu, University of Connecticut; Shengli Zhou, University of Connecticut; Qian Yang, University of Connecticut; Fei Miao, University of Connecticut; George M. Bollas, University of Connecticut

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Systems Engineering Division (SYS)

Conference Session

Systems Engineering Division (SYS) Technical Session 1

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Julie Drzymalski, Temple University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Systems Engineering Division (SYS)

," in IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), 2020.[22] S. Cotner and C. Ballen, "Can mixed assessment methods make biology classes more equitable?," PLoS One, vol. 12, no. 12, 2017.[23] C. Rogers and R. Valdez, "Designing for Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion in Systems Engineering Education," in American Society for Engineering Education, 2021.[24] H. Handley and A. Marnewick, "A Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Model for Engineering Curriculums," in 2022 IEEE International Conference on Recent Advances in Systems Science and Engineering (RASSE), 2022.[25] ABET, "Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs, Effective for Reviews during the 2022-2023 Accreditation Cycle," 2021. [Online].