Equity,” Harv. Educ. Rev., vol. 86, no. 2, pp. 206–232, Jun. 2016, doi: 10.17763/0017-8055.86.2.206.[5] B. M. K. Hagerty, J. Lynch-Sauer, K. L. Patusky, M. Bouwsema, and P. Collier, “Sense of belonging: A vital mental health concept,” Arch. Psychiatr. Nurs., vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 172– 177, Jun. 1992, doi: 10.1016/0883-9417(92)90028-H.[6] M. E. Andrews, Borrego Maura, and Boklage Audrey, “Self-efficacy and belonging: the impact of a university makerspace,” Int. J. STEM Educ., vol. 8, no. 1, Mar. 2021, doi: 10.1186/s40594-021-00285-0.[7] S. Hotchkiss, K. Talley, M. Londa, and A. Talley, “Do I Belong in a Makerspace?: Investigating Student Belonging and Non-verbal Cues in a University Makerspace,” in 2019 ASEE Annual
about the students’ motivation, identity, success, and involvement in engineeringwhile participating in a four-year-long engineering cohort. For this study, we leveraged directedcontent analysis to explore how participants accessed and utilized cohort resources through thelens of social capital theory [24].ParticipantsThis study was conducted at a large, land-grant, R1 university, with initial data collectionbeginning during students’ first semester in the fall of 2019. The participants were 16undergraduate engineering students who voluntarily applied to join a four-year scholarship-basedcohort program beginning just before the start of their fall semester. Selection criteria for theparticipants included full-time enrollment in an engineering
. M. Ivler, and J. E. Symons, “Litter Pickup MATLAB Teaching Resources,” Hydroshare, 2021. https://doi.org/10.4211/hs.3e43f198bdca40108fcf3e67d14a986d[22] B. E. Hughes, W. J. Schell, B. Tallman, R. Beigel, E. Annand, and M. Kwapisz, “Do I think I’m an engineer? Understanding the impact of engineering identity on retention,” in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Jun. 2019, pp. 1–17. doi: 10.18260/1-2--32674.[23] E. Cech, B. Rubineau, S. Silbey, and C. Seron, “Professional role confidence and gendered persistence in engineering,” Am. Sociol. Rev., vol. 76, no. 5, pp. 641–666, 2011, doi: 10.1177/0003122411420815.[24] A. Godwin and A. Kirn, “Identity-based motivation: Connections between first-year
Paper ID #38511Board 290: Faculty Experiences with Hands-on Models for CalculusInstructionProf. Eric Davishahl, Whatcom Community College Eric Davishahl serves as professor and engineering program coordinator at Whatcom Community College in northwest Washington state. His teaching and research interests include developing, implementing and assessing active learning instructional strategies and auto-graded online homework. Eric has been an active member of ASEE since 2001. He was the recipient of the 2008 Pacific Northwest Section Outstanding Teaching Award and currently serves on the ASEE Board of Directors as Zone IV Chair.Dr
-revision-method-for-homework-a-homework-method-for-metacognition- improves-post-secondary-engineering-students-attitudes-toward-homework[10] D. Breid, T. G. Wilson, and A. D. Christy, “Scalable Implementation of Metacognitive Homework: Comparing Experiences at Large and Small Institutions,” presented at the 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access, Jun. 2020. Accessed: Feb. 07, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/scalable-implementation-of-metacognitive- homework-comparing-experiences-at-large-and-small-institutions[11] D. Breid, “Replacing Cheating with Metacognition – Reevaluating the Pedagogical Role of Homework in Foundational Engineering Courses,” presented at the 2019 ASEE Annual Conference
Annual ASEE Conference & Exposition, Indianapolis, IN, USA, 2014.[3] United Nations. "The 17 Goals." United Nations. https://sdgs.un.org/goals (accessed: February 22, 2023).[4] B. Amadei, "Engineering for the Developing World," in The Bridge, vol. 34, no. 2, Washington, DC, USA: National Academies Press, 2004, pp. 24-31.[5] National Academy of Engineering. The Engineer of 2020: Visions of Engineering in the New Century. Washington DC, USA: The National Academies Press, 2004.[6] Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology. "Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs, 2022-2023." Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology. https://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation-criteria/criteria-for
postdoctoral scholar at the Engaged Teaching Hub at the UCSD Teaching+Learning Com- mons. Minju received her Ph.D in Experimental Psychology at UC San Diego. With Engaged Teaching Hub, Minju has designed TA training materials for oral exams and have conducted quantitative analysis on the value of oral exams as early diagnostic tool (Kim et al., ASEE 2022). Minju is interested in designing assessments that can capture and motivate students’ deep conceptual learning, such as oral exams and the usage of visual representations (e.g., diagrams and manual gestures).Josephine Relaford-Doyle, University of California, San DiegoDr. Carolyn L. Sandoval, University of California, San Diego ©American Society for
the summer research experiences.References[1] Rifandi, R., & Rahmi, Y. L 2019.. STEM education to fulfil the 21st century demand: a literature review. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1317, No. 1, p. 012208).[2] Ellis, Rebecca. 2018. Bridging the STEM Skills Gap Involves Both Education and Industry Commitments. U.S. News & World Report/Commentary. July 9, 2018. Available at: https://www.usnews.com/news/stem-solutions/articles/2018-07-09/commentary-industry- education-needed-to-bridge-stem-skills-gap.[3] Pimthong and J. Williams, “Preservice teachers’ understanding of STEM education,” Kasetsart. Journal of Social Sciences, Aug. 2018.[4] Wan Nor Fadzilah et al., “Fostering students’ 21st
theory, which has been used to analyze students’motivation to persist in rigorous engineering programs (Matusovich, 2013).Similarly, religious identity refers to similar characteristics, values, and beliefs and directly affectsbehaviors of many individuals within the communities. For more than a generation, studies have shownreligiously engaged individuals to be more civically engaged (Wuthnow, 1999; Lewis, Mcgregor &Putnum, 2013; Rockenbach, 2020). This characteristic may directly relate to women from religiouscommunities finding more meaning in careers such as engineering as they relate to contributions tobroader society.Women are less prominent in engineering fields than men (Pawley 2019). While there has been growthand change in recent
differences instudent background would help determine whether elements of the course should be adjusted toachieve a suitable balance of challenge and support for the students.This paper shares some of the motivation in developing the course structure, outlines the exercisedeveloped to gather information from the students, details an initial analysis of the data thatresulted, and describes next steps.Context: History and Structure of the ProgramCourse History and Student PopulationThe first-year engineering experience at CWRU began as a pilot course in 2019. The motivationbehind developing the program was to improve student satisfaction and retention, as has beenexperienced at other universities implementing similar programs [1, 2]. There were
; Nocito-Gobel, J., & Li, C. Q.(2018, June), Integrated e-Learning Modules for Developing an Entrepreneurial Mindset: DirectAssessment of Student Learning. Paper presented at 2018 ASEE Annual Conference &Exposition, Salt Lake City, Utah. 10.18260/1-2--30675[4] Mynderse, J. A., & Liu, L., & Gerhart, A. L., & Fletcher, R. W., & Vejdani, H., & Jing, W.,& Yee, K. E. (2019, June), Development of an Entrepreneurial Mind-set within a Three-Semester Mechanical Engineering Capstone Design Sequence Based on the SAE CollegiateDesign Series. Paper presented at 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Tampa, Florida.10.18260/1-2--32651[5] Desing, R., & Kecskemety, K. M., & Kajfez, R. L., & Grzybowski, D. M
microcontrollers (Bilkstein, 2018; Halverson &Sheridan, 2014; Irie et al., 2019; Martin, 2015). Engagement with the culture is associated with a“maker mindset” that is coupled with a strong sense of identity (Dougherty, 2016). The presentstudy investigates how non-major students change in their confidence and sense of identityrelated to making after completing a cornerstone engineering design project.We have created a semester-long (14-week duration) course about circuits, incorporating hands-on experiences that purposefully serve the educational needs and desires of students acrossdisciplines at Carnegie Mellon University. The goal of this “non-major” course is to trainstudents in basic electrical principles through soldering, building circuits on a
, C., Phillips, S. M., and Allee, D. (2019). Online Undergraduate Laboratories in Electrical Engineering. 2019 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), 1-4.[7] Astatke, Y., Scott, C.J., Connor, K.A., Ladeji-Osias, J.O., (2012). Online Delivery of Electrical Engineering Laboratory Courses, 2012 ASEE Conference.[8] Perales, M., Pedraza, L. and Moreno-Ger, P. (2019). Work-In-Progress: Improving Online Higher Education with Virtual and Remote Labs, 2019 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON), 1136-1139.[9] Wijenayake, C., D'Souza, M., Khatamianfar, A., Bialkowski, K., Ros, M. and Sutton, P. (2021). Managing Hands-on Electrical and Computer Engineering Labs during the COVID-19 Pandemic, 2021 IEEE Intl
justice are connected: • General engineering and social justice o Free Radicals “Science Under the Scope” [21] o Donna Riley’s Engineering and Social Justice book [22] o Caroline Baillie’s “Engineering and Social Justice” chapter [23] o ASEE workshop on the “Foundations of Social Justice for Engineers” [24] • Specific case studies in fields o Case study bioengineering ethics “SUMO-1” [25] o Coded Bias documentary [26] o Nicholas Sakellariou’s “A Framework for Social Justice in Renewable Energy Engineering” chapter [27]This area is emerging. There are several scholars documenting their attempts at adding socialjustice to the engineering courses [28]–[31], though
Ethics and Societal Impacts," in ASEE Annual Conference & Exhibition, Salt Lake City, UT, 2018.[24] J. Lucena and J. Leydens, "From Sacred Cow to Dairy Cow: Challenges and Opportunities in Integrating Social Justice in Engineering Science Courses," in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Seattle, WA, 2015.[25] J. Davishahl, "Engineering faculty experiences teaching social justice to first year students," in IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, Lincoln, NE, 2021.[26] B. Dewsberry and C. Brame, "Inclusive Teaching," CBE- LIfe Sciences Education, vol. 18, no. 2, 2019.[27] C. Brown, "The Importance, and the Challenges, to Ensuring an Inclusive School Climate," Educational Psychologist, vol. 54, no. 4, pp. 322-330
)frameworks applicable to Ph. D. programs in engineering,” in 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition,2018.[5] D. Jonassen, J. Strobel, and C. B. Lee, “Everyday Problem Solving in Engineering: Lessons forEngineering Educators,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 95, no. 2, pp. 139–151, Apr. 2006, doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2006.tb00885.x. 13[6] E. Holloway, K. A. Douglas, W. C. Oakes, and D. Radcliffe, “Research Experiences Instrument ScoringGuide,” p. 3, 2021.[7] E. F. Crawley and A. E. Hosoi, “Moving Forward with the New Engineering Education Transformation(NEET) program at MIT-Building community, developing projects, and connecting with industry,” 2019.[8] E. F. Crawley, “Redesigning undergraduate
Selection in Mechanical Design. Elsevier Science, 2016.[7] M. Ashby, H. Shercliff, and D. Cebon, Materials: Engineering, Science, Processing and Design, 4th ed. Elsevier, 2019.[8] https://www.ansys.com/products/materials/granta-edupack, “Ansys Granta EduPack.”[9] “https://www.cpsc.gov/Recalls.”[10] S. A. Claussen, J. Y. Tsai, A. M. Boll, J. Blacklock, and K. Johnson, “Pain and Gain: Barriers and Opportunities for Integrating Sociotechnical Thinking into Diverse Engineering Courses,” in ASEE Annual Conference, 2019.[11] J. E. Mills and D. F. Treagust, “Engineering education-is problem-based or project-based learning the answer?,” Australian Journal of Engineering Education, 2003, [Online]. Available: http
of 2020 report [5, p. 125], noting “The questionsof… how much specialization there should be at the undergraduate level, how to preparestudents for careers that include both technical and managerial tracks, and how to meet the needsand expectations of society all seem timeless.” This tension is echoed in a more recent 2018NAE report [6]. Bear and Skorton [7] state, “the notion that disciplinary specialization andtechnical depth are the only important prerequisites for employment turns out to be false.” Kingand Pister [8] also advocate for broadening engineering Bachelor’s degrees, and present a varietyof ideas to achieve this aim.According to data from the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) [9] only asmall number of students
K-12 outreach and research experiences for high school students, teachers, and undergraduates in this role.Dr. Matthew W. Ohland, Purdue University, West Lafayette Matthew W. Ohland is the Dale and Suzi Gallagher Professor and Associate Head of Engineering Edu- cation at Purdue University. He has degrees from Swarthmore College, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, and the University of Florida. His research on the longitudinal study of engineering students and forming and managing teams has been supported by the National Science Foundation and the Sloan Foundation and his team received for the best paper published in the Journal of Engineering Education in 2008, 2011, and 2019 and from the IEEE Transactions on
to acknowledge the financial support of Writing Lab, Institutefor the Future of Education, Tecnologico de Monterrey, Mexico, in the production ofthis work and with funding for attending the 2023 ASEE Annual Conference.References[1] Rodriguez-Paz, M.X., Gonzalez-Mendivil, J.A., Zarate-Garcia, J.A., Zamora-Hernandez, I., Nolazco-Flores, J.A., “A Hybrid Teaching Model for EngineeringCourses Suitable for Pandemic Conditions”, (2021) Revista Iberoamericana deTecnologias del Aprendizaje, 16 (3), pp. 267-275.https://doi.org/10.1109/RITA.2021.3122893[2] Rodriguez-Paz, M. X., & Gonzalez, J. A., & Zamora-Hernandez, I., & Sayeg-Sánchez, G., & Nuñez, M. E. (2020, June),”A Hybrid Online/Lectures Teaching
; Exposition Proceedings, Tampa, Florida, June, 2019, p. 33030. doi:10.18260/1-2--33030.[3] J. Erickson, S. Claussen, J. Leydens, K. Johnson, and J. Tsai, “Real-world Examples andSociotechnical Integration: What’s the Connection?,” in 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual ConferenceContent Access Proceedings, Virtual On line, Jun. 2020, p. 35120. doi: 10.18260/1-2--35120.[4] J. Blacklock, K. Johnson, R. Cook, N. Plata, and S. Claussen, “Faculty Interpretations ofSociotechnical Thinking in their Classrooms: Techniques for Integration,” in 2021 ASEE AnnualConference & Exposition Proceedings, Virtual On line, Jul. 2021, p. 19.“Understanding theFormation of Sociotechnical Thinking in Engineering Education.” [Online]. Available:https://www.mines.edu
, had a low self-efficacy.Almost all participants indicated that more exposure to engineering would help them becomemore confident with teaching engineering. In future work, we will investigate the impact ofparticipating in a class designed to provide students with more exposure to engineering on theself-efficacy and perceptions of pre-service teachers.References[1] NGSS Lead States. Next Generation Science Standards: For states, by states. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2013.[2] E.R. Bannilower, P.S. Smith, K.A. Malzahn, C.L. Plumley, E.M. Gordon, and M.L. Hayes. Report of the 2018 NSSME+. Available: http://horizon-reserach.com/NSSME/wp- content/uploads/2019/06/Report_of_the_2018_NSSME.pdf [accessed Nov
Framework for Transition with Greater Fidelity in Artifacts Supporting Student Performance ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, 2020, Conference Paper ID #28668.2. B. Pejcinovic, Design of Rubrics for Student Outcomes in 2019-2020 ABET Criteria International Conference on Information and Communications Technology, Electronics and Microelectronics (MIPRO), 2020.3. A. Battistini, Kitch, W.A., Make Assessment Straightforward: A Case Study on the Successful Implementation of ABET Student Outcomes 1-7 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, 2021, Conference Paper ID #34918.4. K.S. Grahame, Pfluger, C., WIP: A Comparison and Assessment of Capstone and Cornerstone Student’s Perceptions of the Application of ABET Design Criteria ASEE
~35% (12/34 students). To address thislimitation, we will collect end-of-course perception data from this year’s students. We will alsoadminister the survey to next year’s senior design cohort, which is projected to have ~60students. This year’s small cohort is atypical for our institution and is likely the result of theimpact of COVID (most students in our 2022-23 cohort were first years in AY 2019-2020). References[1] K. Jaeger-Helton, B. M. Smyser, and H. L. McManus, “Capstone Prepares Engineers for the Real World, Right? ABET Outcomes and Student Perceptions,” presented at the 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Tampa
extremely common. Current work presented at ASEE 2023 quantitativelyvalidates this common theme, with ~50% of engineering graduate students listing sunk cost as oneof their top three reasons for persisting in their PhD. We also have elicited a conversation ofgender informed opportunity cost: Particularly for women engineering graduate students,conversations around future career balance and the physical ability to have children begins toemerge at the graduate level in ways not previously discussed in engineering education literature.Publications:Sallai, G., Bahnson, M, and Berdanier, C.G.P. (2023). Exploring graduate engineering students’reasons for original enrollment and current persistence in engineering Master’s and PhD programs.130th ASEE
, F. Aqlan, J. Brockman, D. Lapsley, and K. L. Meyers, "Building andReplicating a Community-Engaged Educational Ecosystem - a STEM Learning Commons,"presented at the National Science Foundation Improving Stem Undergraduate EducationSummit, Washington, D.C, June 1-3 2022, 2022.[10] D. Wood, A. Gura, and J. Brockman, "Critical Findings in the Development of theCommunity-Engaged Educational Ecosystem," in American Society for Engineering Educationproceedings: ASEE, 2020.[11] D. Wood, A. Gura, J. Brockman, A. Rayna Carolan-Silva, S. Boukdad, and J. C. Alarcon,"Informing Replication of the Bowman Creek Educational Ecosystem Pilot," in American Societyfor Engineering Education proceedings, A. Genau Ed.: ASEE, 2019.[12] D. Wood, A. Gura, J
Mentor Perspectives of Apprenticeships for Community College STEM CareersAbstractThe National Science Foundation’s Eddie Bernice Johnson INCLUDES Aspire Alliance hasestablished several RC (Regional Change) Collaboratives of two-year and four-year highereducation institutions, focused on preparing a diverse and inclusive future community collegefaculty. Each RC collaborative recruits graduate students enrolled at research-intensive orcomprehensive universities to participate in semester-long apprenticeships under the mentorshipof community college professors. In Texas, two of these RC collaboratives have been operatingcontinuously since 2019 with the participation of institutions that serve diverse studentpopulations from
course description changes for their courses. This research addssignificantly to the literature as there is very little research on the impact of course descriptionson students’ course selection process.1. IntroductionEfforts to broaden the participation of women and people of color within engineering andcomputing education have made incremental improvements in the U.S. but, overall, continue tohave challenges. The under-representation of women and ethno-racial minorities in STEM fieldsis nothing new [1]. Based on a 2021 report, the share of women in computer occupationsdeclined from 30% in 2000 to 25% in 2016 and has remained stable until 2019 [2]. Womencontinue to be vastly underrepresented in the ranks of engineers and architects (15% in 2019
arepersisting in theCoE at a much higher rate; i.e., 10 percent Table 4. Retention of BEE compared to CoEhigher for year 2 retention based on 2020 and historical data 2008-2019. Year 2 cohorts2021 cohorts, and 34 percent year 3 retention 2020 and 2021. Year 3 data only 2020 cohort.based on 2020 cohort. The three changed BEE All Historicalmajors and went into business majors (2) and Retention Year Cohorts CoE Meanart (1). Three participants additional students Year 2 77% 67%from cohort 2020 and 2021 are no longer LSU In CoEstudents for several reasons
development.” Literacy Teaching and Learning, 3(2), 1998.[14] E. M. Melvin, B. Bowles, A. Steele. “Fostering a Relationship with a Corporate Sponsor to Grow an Engineering Leadership Development Program.” in Proceedings of the 2019 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Tampa, FL USA. June 15 – 19, 2019[15] H. Warmelink et al., "AMELIO: Evaluating the Team-Building Potential of a Mixed Reality Escape Room Game," presented at the Extended Abstracts Publication of the Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play, 2017. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1145/3130859.3131436.[16] V. Alice, Liesbeth, P. J. K. Marie-Christine, and R. Wouter, "Escape education: A systematic review on escape rooms in