college [5]. However, EESI takes things one step further by incorporatingexperiential learning opportunities coupled with financial support, which changes students’personal income and builds an engineering identity. These factors not only create support inareas that alleviate external barriers, which assist black students' retention in college, but theprogram opens up opportunities to better prepare students once they graduate college to be readyfor the STEM workforce and/or graduate school.Some studies show that experiential learning can positively impact participants, but few focus onblack students and even less on a Historically Black College and University (HBCU).Consequently, this research highlights the impact of a structured community
mechanical engineering (n=9), electrical engineering(n=3), general engineering (n=4), civil engineering (n=2), and one student each frommanufacturing, computer science, and no major declared. The second class included in the study was Experimental Design and TechnicalWriting(ENGR:291). In this two-credit-hour course, students develop their writing skills throughassignments related to common types of scientific and professional communication, such asresearch essays, project proposals, professional memos, journal articles, professional emails, andpresentations. Students are also introduced to fundamental concepts in experimental design. Forthe final project, students are asked to design, execute, and document an experiment of their ownchoosing
EMSLC student participation in club meetings and projects as well as their interestin leadership opportunities and compare engagement levels to non-EMSLC students. We willinvestigate RQ5 by analyzing the demographic breakdown of findings related to the other fourresearch questions.ConclusionThis work-in-progress paper describes early development of a new learning community we aredesigning to welcome and support precalculus-level students into their engineering academicpathway. The approach leverages multiple high-impact educational practices to promote deepconceptual learning, motivate foundational skill development, explore social relevance andconnection, and ultimately seeks to strengthen students’ engineering identity, sense of belonging,and
alsofeatured opportunities to develop a shared lexicon for ARDEI concepts and interrogate one's ownidentity and positionality.By making this a required course, we set the expectation that considering the societal impacts ofresearch is an important and natural part of the entire research process. We chose to expand anexisting professional development course for graduate students that originally solely coveredtopics like laboratory safety, library use, grant writing, and communication, to include ARDEIand social justice content. Into this predominately passive content, we added active and complexreflections and discussions of identity, bias, and (in)justice. We believe that developing thisreflective skill early sets students up to think about social
Paper ID #37326Creating Social Capital: Developing Resources in a Cohort ProgramMiss Kiara Lynn Steinhorst, University of Nevada, Reno Kiara is a graduate student at the University of Nevada, Reno in the Department of Engineering Education. She received a Bachelor of Science degree in Chemical Engineering from the same institution in 2022. Her research interests include facets of undergraduate engineering student experiences relating to social capital, hidden curriculum, barriers to entry and engagement on campus.Miss Kelsey Scalaro, University of Nevada, Reno Kelsey is a doctoral student in the School of Engineering
fourth and final task while also following suggestions made previouslyregarding the easing of financial burdens [16]. The Graduate Research Experience and Transitioning to Grad School (GREaT GradS)program was developed to borrow from undergraduate bridge programs and interventions whilemaintaining that one does not need to approach graduate students who have already beenadmitted under the premise of a deficit model, such as the Meyerhoff Scholars Program [23] -[25] or Alliances for Graduate Education and the Professoriate (AGEP) program [26], [27].GREaT GradS is a 6-week, graduate foundational program for incoming students in STEMdisciplines, including engineering, materials science, chemistry, and physics. GREaT GradS wasdesigned to
Education Research & Development, vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 565-578, 2019.[4] G. M. Sallai, J. Vicente, K. Shanachilubwa, and C. Berdanier, “Coping landscapes: How graduate engineering students’ coping mechanisms correspond with dominant stressors in graduate school,” In American Society for Engineering Education 2022 Annual Conference, Minneapolis, MN, USA, June 26-29, 2022.[5] L. Osbeck, N. Nersessian, K. Malone, and W. Newstetter, Science as psychology: Sense-Making and identity in science practice. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press, 2010.[6] B. A. Burt, “Toward a theory of engineering professorial intentions: The role of research group experiences,” American Educational Research Journal
] proposes using design thinking as a modelling tool and the organization of trainingand development programs for teachers to improve or redefine the engineering profession'straditional and outdated curriculum structures. Dym [11] underscores the importance ofenhancing the creative thinking skills of leaders of engineering programs, educational qualitymanagers, and curriculum leaders [37] through the adoption of an iterative design thinkingapproach. Integrating resources and disciplines is crucial to guide and improving curriculumprograms. Moreover, pre-service teachers [38] and prospective teachers [39] should also strive toimprove their design thinking skills.Build the teaching platform:The widespread use of design thinking in the business sector
better prepare developmental math community college students for transfer into STEM bachelor’s degree programs or entry into the STEM workforce.Cheryl Martinez, Growth Sector STEM Program ManagerIvanna Abreu ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Paid Pre-College STEM Bridge Programs: “Just-In-Time” Support and Engagement for Community College STEM LearnersINTRODUCTIONWhile America’s “Innovation Economy” continues to thrive and drive strong employment trendsin technology, advanced manufacturing, R&D, and defense, our country’s postsecondaryinstitutions fail to produce enough qualified graduates to meet employer demand (O'rourke,2021). To further
is an associate professor of mechanical engineering at Embry-Riddle Aeronautical Uni- versity in Daytona Beach, Fla. Her current research in engineering education focuses on cognitive load theory, deliberate practice, and effective pedagogicalJessica Gonzales, The University of Texas at San Antonio Jessica Gonzales received her MA in Learning, Design, and Technology from the University of Texas at San Antonio (UTSA). She currently works as a Learning Experience Designer with Academic Innovation at UTSA focusing on culture, identity, emergent technologies, and multimodal learning. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023Identify Challenges of Inclusive Practices at the Course Level1
minorityand female students. According to National Center for Education Statistics [2], [3] of the share ofUS Citizens who graduated with a bachelor’s degree in aerospace engineering in 2019 and 2020,56% were white males and only 14% were female. There is a need for more diversity in thespace industry and overall, more degrees in aerospace and related fields. SpaceLab* (SLI) wascreated to address these issues. The hope is that by creating accessible and interestingcoursework, students who would not otherwise be interested, learn about the opportunities andbenefits that exist in space-related careers. Literature suggests that engaging students in design-based science learning activities can help them develop problem-solving and science inquiryskills
practices, sociotechnical knowledge and skills, and queer student experiences in engineering. Their work is motivated by their passion for and experiences with inclusive teaching and holistic mentorship of students, seeking to reimagine what an en- gineer looks like, does, and who they are, especially for queer folks, women, and people of color, through empowerment, collaboration, and co-development for a more equitable world. Shannon is also a Senior Graduate Facilitator and Lab Manager with the Center for Socially Engaged Design.Berenice Alejandra Cabrera, University of Michigan Berenice Alex Cabrera (she/her) is a Ph.D. student in Higher Education at the Marsal School of Education at the University of Michigan. She
Experiences for Undergraduates (REU)program in a chemical engineering department at a large, Research 1 (R1) university. In additionto learning technical research skills through the REU program, REU administrators hoped topromote and assess a host of educational and psychosocial skills, including the interest andmotivation for participating in undergraduate research, the likelihood of attending graduateschool, engineering growth mindset, sense of belonging, and creative identity. To measure anypotential changes in participants in these areas from before to after participating in the REU,evaluators conducted both pre- and post-surveys and individual interviews with the participants.With the mentioned host of learning outcomes associated with
., 2014), it is important that every interaction establishes an inclusive community. Informalcommunity-building and relationships with faculty and staff help students develop a sense ofbelonging in college (Myers et al., 2015). Additionally, students should be encouraged tointegrate their outside lives with academics. Community involvement in research projects canhelp engage students in problem-solving (Loeser et al., 2021). This is important particularly forstudents who have a strong sense of cultural and community identity. At United Tribes TechnicalCollege, a primarily residential college, the entire community gets involved in STEM education,joining in on environmental research projects led by students (Bahnson, 2020). Qaqish et al.(2020
welcomedand recognize that I value them as individual learners, even in a large class.Future WorkThese teaching practices presented have specifically highlighted two main practices: clearlyarticulating the expectations in engineering classrooms and building a sense of belonging andcommunity in courses. Expanding the sense of engineering identity and belonging are bedrock toinviting students into a learning community where they can thrive. The authors hope that theseexamples are just the beginning of the anti-racist pedagogy collection. We would like to include acall to action to the educators reading this paper. We ask that you reflect on your own teaching andidentify any pedagogical practices that are focused on inclusive, anti-racist environments
computer engineering at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign. His goal is to connect his core engineering skills with fields in which he can make cross-disciplinary connections and accelerate progress, like physics education. He joined the POINT team (Physics Outreach and Instruction through New Technologies) to focus on the outreach and research efforts.Katherine Zine, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Paper ID #38032 I am a first year physics graduate student at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. I did my un- dergraduate at
University Elliott Clement is a doctoral student at Oregon State University. His current research is using grounded theory to understand identity and motivation within the context of capstone design courses. He is also part of a research team investigating context-specific affordances and barriers faculty face when adopting evidence-based instructional practices in their engineering courses.Dr. Prateek Shekhar, New Jersey Institute of Technology Prateek Shekhar is an Assistant Professor - Engineering Education division at New Jersey Institute of Technology. His research is focused on examining translation of engineering education research in prac- tice, assessment and evaluation of dissemination initiatives and
equitable learning environments through the development and implementation of strategies geared towards increasing student sense of belonging. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Centering Social Justice in Engineering: A new course model for first year engineering educationIntroductionThis complete evidence-based practice paper shares a new model for a first-year engineeringcourse that centers social justice within first year engineering education. The course combinestechnical and social justice content with a goal of developing student understanding of therelevance of social justice to their future as engineers. Included in the course are social topicsrelated to
. He is interested in the in- tersection of designerly epistemic identities and vocational pathways. Dr. Lande received his B.S. in Engineering (Product Design), M.A. in Education (Learning, Design and Technology) and Ph.D. in Me- chanical Engineering (Design Education) from Stanford University. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Learning through PBL with Emphasis of People, Process, and Product Across CoursesIntroductionThis Theory-based and Evidence-based Practice paper extends the frameworks of PBL asproject-based learning to define a concept of “product”-based learning – learning experiencesthat focus on the deliberate design and making of
US and 39 other countries around the world. ABET sets standardexpectations for college-level content in engineering and technology fields through consultationwith the discipline’s professional society (e.g. AAEES for EnvE and ASCE for CivE) andsupervision of the Engineering Accreditation Commission (EAC) [18]. In addition to specificareas of technical knowledge, ABET includes some professional-readiness skills such asteamwork, communication, and data analysis [19]–[21]. Accreditation in its modern form doesnot consist of a check list of requirements which could create high levels of curricular uniformityacross institutions. The old check list format led, in part, to the development of the modernEC2000 standards [22]. Modern accreditation
, and geosciences mobilized bonding and bridgingsocial capital to access academic and professional pathways. Specifically, this case studyinvestigated women in master’s programs participating in a National Science Foundation (NSF)S-STEM program and interdisciplinary community of practice, focused on a wicked problem ofunderstanding and balancing biogeochemical cycles in natural and engineered systems,incorporating a variety of strategies (e.g., mentoring, research opportunities, communityengagement, coursework) to ease transitions into and through master’s programs.Literature ReviewLimited research exists on graduate women in the STEM disciplines. Within the extant literature,we found that women were less likely to apply to graduate school than
school. Her research is focused on solving problems relating to educating and developing engi- neers, teachers, and the community at all levels (P12, undergraduate, graduate, post-graduate). A few of these key areas include engineering identity and mindsets, global competencies, failure culture, first year experiences in engineering, capstone design thinking, integrating service and authentic learning into the engineering classroom, implementing new instructional methodologies, and design optimization using traditional and non-traditional manufacturing. She seeks to identify best practices and develop assess- ments methods that assist in optimizing computing and engineering learning. Dr. Gurganus was one the inaugural
in characterizing graduate-level attrition, persistence, and career trajectories; engineering writing and communication; and methodological development. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Work in Progress: Toward a Holistic Understanding of Engineering Student Success in Mechanical Engineering across Educational StagesAbstract: This WIP paper will present our results to date in conducting a multimethod single casestudy, which is appropriate for deeply understanding multiple stakeholder perspectives within abounded environment, in our case, the Department of Mechanical Engineering at PennsylvaniaState University. The in-progress goal of our team in Mechanical Engineering at
Education Conference (FIE). 2016, (pp. 1-4). IEEE.[15] ] E. J. Abrica, T. B. Lane, S. Zobac, & E. Collins, Sense of belonging and community building within a STEM intervention program: A focus on Latino male undergraduates’ experiences, 2022. Journal of Hispanic Higher Education, 21(2), 228-242.[16] T. L. Tevis, & Z. Foste, From complacency to criticality: Envisioning antiracist leadership among white higher education administrators, Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, (2022), Advance online publication.[18] C. A. Young, B. Haffejee & D. L. Corsun, Developing cultural intelligence and empathy through diversified mentoring relationships. Journal of Management Education, (2018), 42(3), 319-346.[19] M. L. Boucher Jr, More
Associate Director of Educational Innovation and Impact for UGA’s Engineering Education Trans- formations Institute (EETI). In addition to coordinating EETI’s faculty development programming, Dr. Morelock conducts research on institutional change via faculty development, with an emphasis on innova- tive ways to cultivate and evaluate supportive teaching and learning networks in engineering departments and colleges. He received his doctoral degree in Engineering Education at Virginia Tech, where he was a recipient of the NSF Graduate Research Fellowship. His dissertation studied the teaching practices of engineering instructors during game-based learning activities, and how these practices affected student motivation.Dr
quantitative description of students’ community and belonging at IRE.1.1 Iron Range EngineeringIRE students complete lower-division coursework at community colleges around the nation [1]. Thenstudents join IRE for one semester on campus for preparation focused on developing students’professional, design, and technical skills. After this first semester, students earn their degree whileworking in a co-op and earning an engineering salary (average $21.5k per semester). Students remain fulltime students through the co-op based learning format by taking 1-credit hour technical competencies anddesign, seminar, and professionalism coursework, and earn course credit for coursework related to theirvaluable co-op experience by applying and further developing
Paper ID #39174Applying STS to Engineering Education: A Comparative Study of STS Mi-norsProf. MC Forelle, University of Virginia MC Forelle is an assistant professor, teaching track, in Engineering & Society at the University of Virginia School of Engineering and Applied Science. Their work examines the intersection of law, technology, and culture, with particular interests in materiality, sustainability, and practices of resistance and change. Currently, they are developing a a book project that studies the technological challenges faced by users, tinkerers, and repair communities working to repair, maintain, and
andimportance of milestones in the Ph.D. program, it is imperative that engineering programs keeppreparation for milestones in mind when thinking about students’ transition into the program. The NSF-funded Dissertation Institute (DI) is one of few nationally-scaled examples inthe engineering community that is focused on graduate student success on a milestone (i.e. thedissertation proposal) (Hasbún et al., 2016; Miller et al., 2020). It is a one-week writingworkshop that gives Ph.D. students a secure place to support one another among like-mindedpeers while they modify their task assumptions about the dissertation and develop good habitsthat might lead to degree completion. Although this is an excellent resource for Ph.D. students at later
Program: Students’ PerspectivesAbstractEffective advising ensures students take the proper classes to stay on track for their graduation.For example, in an engineering curriculum, it is crucial that students maintain the propersequence of courses that results in the culmination of the program's required capstone designcourse(s). Any human error during the advising process can risk the disruption of the smoothprogression through the program for a student. Thus, a computerized web-based advising toolcan be highly useful to eliminate such human errors in identifying the most needed coursesduring an advising session. Currently, many advising tools are available through commercialbusinesses or developed by those working in the field of education. In
-world engineering problems rarely have such tidyformulations, so to conflate this type of solution generation with a core identity as expert“problem solver” is analytically clumsy if not presumptuous. It also radically collapsesengineers’ imagination for the breadth and complexity of most problems worth solving and thecontextual sophistication needed to effectively navigate most real-world problems.To explore how engineering education can engage more holistic and complex problems byelevating problem framing as a precursor skillset to problem solving, we review a variety ofprovocations based on our experience in program and curriculum building throughsociotechnical integration in multiple academic initiatives within the Engineering, Design