, period of retirement, and averageage at death (career and retirement planning).Mortality data from the National Vital Statistics System show large differences in the“expectation of life at age x.” The tabulated value at age 22 for a male American Indian orAlaska Native is 65.3 years and for a female Asian it is 21.1 years longer at 86.4 years.Differences like these are substantial, of major social importance, and highly relevant forpersonal financial planning by students—now and as retirement nears.We assert that engineering economy courses should include the use of relevant demographicbased information for personal financial decision making. Students will begin making financialdecisions regarding insurance, investing, and retirement planning
, and mental models were introduced. Examples were sharedby faculty who had already begun to incorporate sustainability concepts into their courses.During the workshop, the participants planned concrete changes to their own courses anddiscussed changing the curriculum across the 4 years of the undergraduate experience. BackgroundTraditionally, sustainability has not been part of the standard engineering curriculum. Bysustainability we mean meeting human needs (current and future) within planetary boundaries,covering social (including diversity, equity, and inclusion, DEI), environmental, and economicaspects. As an additional challenge, various disciplines across the campus are siloed, so thatstudents in business, the arts, engineering
new course entitled “Solar PV Planning and Installation”, (ii) summer workshopsfor K-12 students through Center for Pre-College Programs (CPCP) at NJIT, (iii) facultydevelopment workshops for the instructors of other 2- and 4-year institutions, (iv) undergraduateresearch and senior design projects, and (v) development of a dedicated public website to includeall the lecture notes, laboratory experiments, video recordings, publications, guidelines todevelop similar courses, and other instructional materials. This paper summarizes and presentsthe comments and feedback from external advisory committee (EAC), external evaluator, facultydevelopment workshop participants, K-12 workshop participants, and the students enrolled in thenew course. It
-efficacy as educators, empowering them to contribute moreeffectively to learning environments. We have offered the course in the Spring quarters of 2021,2022, and 2023. In each iteration, we sought to actively demonstrate evidence-based inclusivepedagogical techniques through our course design and instruction. In the future, we plan to 1)evaluate the effectiveness of our course design on participant accomplishment of learning goals,and 2) examine the impact of course participants as TAs on the broader bioengineeringcommunity.Course Design: Enabling effective learning of pedagogical skillsCourse Learning Goals: We designed a course to address a critical need in the training ofgraduate TAs by allowing them to build pedagogical skills before their
and then appliedthese skills directly to their current research projects (thesis). Applying PM skills to researchbenefits both the student and their research team by improving time management, taskcompletion, and communication. Ultimately, we anticipate that PM skills will increase students’likelihood of completing their degrees and equip students with transferable knowledge for theirfuture work.To assess the effectiveness of the course in meeting our goals, we developed a comprehensiveevaluation plan that included pre- and post-class surveys. These pre- and post-surveys askedstudents to rate their familiarity with and use of PM skills. In this paper, we provide a detaileddescription of the course and highlight the results of the pre-and post
fordeveloping and working to their own project-specific schedule to meet the prescribed milestones.Starting from the business stage gate model, students developed a list of tasks necessary to reachthe high-level milestones, estimated durations for those tasks, considered predecessors andsuccessors, formed an initial plan, and assigned individual responsibilities. To facilitate thisprocess, the instructors provided templates for the project management plan document, weeklyprogress reports, and project update meetings.The Design Control Pillar focused on gathering customer requirements, developing designrequirements, and creating and verifying design solutions. After identifying customerrequirements during an initial kick-off meeting with their sponsor
to Year 2, as well as the design and implementation of anew faculty orientation, called the Welcome Academy, specific to new engineering faculty andpractices related to diversity, equity, and inclusion. Finally, drawing on the principal investigator(PI) team’s reflections as well as feedback from external evaluators, we provide our insights withthe intention of sharing useful experiences to other colleges planning to form such FLCs.IntroductionOverwhelming evidence points to the need for diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) practices inthe profession of engineering in general, and in engineering education in particular. There arestrong arguments for embracing DEI practices, from both economics (to improve the nationaltechnical workforce
with the research mentors and graduatestudents who were working on complimentary research problems. Each teacher defined aresearch problem unique to them, for a total of 11 individual research projects within the fourmain research areas of Blast Furnace Fuel Simulation, Reheat Furnace Simulation, FiniteElement Analysis of Structures, and Safety Training. Teachers completed the research andpresented results at the end of the 6-week summer session. Each teacher also developed andpresented a lesson plan related to their research which was to be implemented in their classroomduring the 2022-23 school year.Evaluation included pre & post measurement of teacher’s self-reported ability to completeresearch tasks such as defining a research problem
providing teacher professional development. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Developing An Assessment Toolkit for Precollege Summer Engineering Workshops (Works-in-Progress)Abstract Many universities have engineering outreach programming that expose students toengineering that include day camps, overnight camps, and multi-week programs. As the projectsoccur over hours, days, or weeks, rich content is delivered in a very abbreviated timeframe.Often only anecdotal evidence or evaluative surveys reflect what students’ experience. Thisworks-in-progress project describes the strategic plan and first stage towards development oftools for assessing engineering learning in weekly summer
analyze a design, construction, and testing. We put considerable effortbusiness problem or opportunity and consider current and into up-front planning, and the various life cycle phases arefuture states to determine an optimal solution that will provide typically not revisited when complete. For example, if productvalue and address the business need; the results from this design is completed and product construction begins, it is notpreliminary analysis will provide decision-makers with desirable to review the design phase again. At the otherrelevant information to determine whether an investment in extreme is the adaptive development approach. It
) that provide studentswith the skills necessary to complete an integrated core project (ICP). This semester long ICP isa group project that thematically ties together CEE concepts, guiding students through thesequence of a residential site development project. Part 1 of the ICP requires a comprehensiveassessment of the existing site, including topography, slopes, land use, soils, and zoningcalculations, which provide real constraints and regulations for the students to adhere to whendeveloping a conceptual site plan layout. Once provided with a final site plan design for Part 2,students apply spatial analysis tools to evaluate drainage patterns and earthwork volumes, extractprofiles from existing and proposed surfaces, calculate quantities for
development of suchcompetencies of both students and teachers for active learning. We want to use the data to seekevidence of better practice in promoting student learning in engineering core courses, especiallythe traditional lecture-based ones.Course structureThis study has been conducted in a sophomore-level Biothermodynamics class for two semesters(2022 Spring and Fall). Previously, the course was taught with lecture-based materials relying onnote-taking and individual homework traditionally. Under the new design, students will receive adetailed content structure at the beginning of the semester, shown in Appendix, Figure 1.Students will obtain a general view of the course content, types of assignments/exams, and theirdue times from this plan
leanstartup style "build-measure-learn" cycles [12, 14] but tailored for curricular innovation. Thissummer innovation workshop can itself be considered as an “incremental innovation” and seekto answer a key question: "whether and to what extent the innovation training workshop seriescan help faculty with framing/planning their curricular or pedagogical changes". We then seekto use the evidence gathered to re-examine our assumptions and to suitably modify ourworkshop. This Evidence-Based Practice seeks to provide our preliminary insight into thisquestion.Methods1. Initiation of Educational innovation teamsTCORPS recruited its first cohort of instructors in March 2021 and the second cohort in April2022 for participation in the summer 2021 and summer
. 1. Connection Plan – Future GR.A.D.S. utilized a ten-week connection plan that laid out the schedule with goals and tasks for each week. This connection plan included tasks for both the mentor and mentee regarding the goals, meetings, and surveys. For some tasks, email notifications were sent to the participants to remind them of the timeline. For other tasks, the platform also sent multiple reminders if the task went uncompleted. 2. Messaging Portal – The messaging portal allowed participants to communicate in a thread viewable in their connection. This single continuous thread is convenient for tracking. 3. Meeting Tracker – Participants were encouraged to link their calendars to their profile in the
performance of existing campus • Document the Existing Policies and Procedures to buildings achieve credits • Work with Facilities Planning and Management team to collect performance data • Recognize the limitations and • Work with Facilities Planning and Management possible improvements in the team to collect performance data existing campus infrastructure • Collect and Report the Existing condition of the Selected Site and Building • Examine campus sustainability • Collect and Report the Existing condition of the efforts Selected
, Effort/Importance, Pressure/Tension, PerceivedChoice, and Value/Usefulness. It is designed based on self-determination theory [1]. Stu-dents respond on a 5 point Likert scale of “Strongly agree” to “Strongly Disagree” to thefollowing 2 questions from each subscale. “I think this class is going to be boring” and “Ithink this class is going to be enjoyable”, “I think that I am going to be pretty good at thisclass” and “This is a class that I cannot do very well in”, “I plan to put a lot of effort intothis class” and “It is important to me to do well in this class”, “I am anxious about thisclass” and “I feel very relaxed about this class”, “I feel like it is not my own choice to do thisclass” and “I feel like I am taking this class because I have
California, Irvine (Irvine, California) and a B.S. from the University of Florida (Gainesville, Florida). She teaches graduate classes on transportation planning and transportation data analysis. Dr. Hernandez is the faculty advisor for the student chapter of the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) and a member of ITE. Her research focuses on new and advanced technology applications in transportation systems engineering and is cen- tered on developing tools and methods to collect and analyze freight and commercial vehicle operations data for long range freight planning. Her project portfolio includes work for the Arkansas Department of Transportation, the US Army Corps of Engineers, the National Science Foundation
curriculum and AI concepts. This research focuses onleveraging 6th and 7th-grade science curricula related to state standards to introduce machine learningconcepts by using fossil shark teeth. Researchers from engineering, education, and paleontologycollaboratively developed learning modules to upskill Title I schoolteachers to meaningfully integrate AIfundamentals within their existing curriculum. With a special emphasis on machine learning (ML), fivelesson plans were presented during a week-long teacher professional development. Teachers conceptualizedand implemented ML models that distinguish fossil shark teeth by their taxonomy and primary functionsto recognize ecological and evolutionary patterns. After introducing a lesson, each teacher
international accreditationmovements of business schools around the world, is of interest to the management of curricula assystematic processes and assessment plans that collectively demonstrate that students achievecompetences of learning for the programs in which they participate. The objective of this work is toanalyze the implementation of the management of learning process at Unisinos University’sPolytechnic School, examining its impact on the curriculum management from the programcoordinators' perspective. This implementation process was designed as a training program forcoordinators of the 19 undergrad programs involved aiming at their development as managers of theprocess as the get involved in the process itself and organized in different
transfer students shows that different groups of transfer students need different kindsof assistance in order to succeed at their new college or university ([10] and references therein).Factors affecting transfer student success include: • Emotional factors (feeling of isolation, transfer shock, lack of sense of belonging), • Financial factors (cost), • Educational planning factors (credits earned, time to completion, clarity on credit transfer), • Academic factors (GPA, academic preparedness, required remedial courses), • Institutional factors (size of school, distance of school).Research on the STEM transfer pathway involves two sides of efforts: On the side of communitycolleges, they mainly focus on factors that can
planning and product design.Based on this review, we developed our survey as follows: • The existing surveys primarily targeted CXOs. Our survey targeted plant technical managers. As the focus of our project is on Industry 4.0 tools and technologies, we anticipate that we can learn more about what is happening on the plant floor if we gather data where “the rubber meets the road.” • In surveying managers about the technologies they are using, we followed Frank et al’s conceptual framework, which provides a useful taxonomy of Industry 4.0 technologies. However, Frank et al.’s sample consisted of Brazilian companies in construction and machinery which may be more traditional and less high-tech than U.S
interest inthe ongoing activities of the agricultural industry. These exercises will incorporateoff-road vehicle balance and design elements, robotics and programming, andunmanned aircraft systems and instrumentation. These lessons will be piloted at acareer center run jointly by three local public school corporations, near theuniversity. Details of the lesson planning strategy, physical lab activities, andoverall learning objectives will be presented.KeywordsAgricultural Instruction, Hands-on Learning, High School, Lesson Plans, STEMIntroduction Throughout the world, the popular press is currently filled with articles describing theshortage of workers in all segments of industry following the pandemic of 2020-2021. This isparticularly
and how they need to frame their academic problem, ask for help, evaluateoptions, and decide for their academic path project.The authors identified two important courses to intervene: UNIV 1301 Learning Frameworksand MECE 1101 Intro to Mechanical Engineering. These two courses teach a variety ofimportant topics, and both traditionally had project elements of technical innovation (MECE1101) and career path planning (UNIV 1301) that required to be formalized into proper projects.For this purpose, the Challenge Based Instruction (CBI) approach (Fuentes et al., 2008;Bransford et al., 1999; Freeman et al., 2016) was chosen to guide the steps of the parallelprojects. CBI promotes engagement when properly implemented, and this is critical
paper describes a recently awarded project comprising the design andimplementation of a Sustainability Engineering (SE) Minor at UPRM. We propose a posterpresentation to discuss our SE Minor plan and collect data about people’s perceptions ofsustainability in engineering.1. IntroductionAddressing "Sustainability" is an overarching challenge for the 21st century, requiring engineersto play a critical role. In the US, undergraduate degree programs that directly attend tosustainability are of two types: (1) interdisciplinary programs that do not grant engineering degreesand (2) environmental engineering programs that are vital but do not entirely address the holisticnotion of sustainability. However, based on our reading of "Strengthening
Penn State’s 2016-2020 University-wide Strategic Plan clearly highlightsdiversity as one of its core foundations, the College of Engineering 2020-2025 Strategic Planreaffirmed and clarified this commitment by making one of its unit objectives the integration ofethics, inclusivity, and sustainability into undergraduate programs throughout the college. In theAerospace Engineering Department, senior undergraduate capstone courses offer idealconditions for exploring Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) issues since these classes areteam-based experiential learning environments intended to mirror the engineering workplace.While Penn State’s year-long Aerospace Engineering capstone courses have historically includeda unit on DEI presented at the
experiences (CURE) into the curriculum. After theworkshop, participants join a year-long coaching process with a faculty mentor to develop and executetheir projects with students.In this paper, we report on the key elements of the workshop design and insights from past participantsacross multiple years. We surveyed all past participants of the workshops, and respondents indicated thatthey had received several benefits from the workshop experience including better planning andorganization of research experiences for undergraduates. Faculty reported significant benefits to thestudents such as more attending graduate school but also to their own research practices includingbuilding a capacity for more readily identifying the value of their work.We hope
semesters has indicated that students enjoy having multi-ple homework assignments throughout the semester when they are asked to look up a paperrelated to a particular field covered in the robotics class, e.g. finding a paper in the field ofmanipulation and mobility after a manipulation lecture. The hypothesis of this work is thatthe topic that is assigned would affect the students relative interest in the subject and in pur-suing a job or internship in the field after the course has ended. During the semester, studentswere asked to look up papers of the same subject for the first half of the semester. In the sec-ond half of the semester, students were grouped into the topics of either motion planning orcontrol when being asked to look up papers in
the classroom. The current solution to tackle these challengeswas implementing a professional identity assessment [3], as well as utilizing the reflectionsto better understand their experiences and what needs arose from the program. IntroductionThe at-home remote patient monitoring sector of healthcare is a growing industry. Thishealthcare market is valued at $24 billion and is projected to reach $166 Billion by 2030 [1],[4]. This industry provides individuals with disabilities or chronic medical conditions withnew levels of independence by allowing them to remain at home. These companiesleverage technology and personally crafted care plans that address the needs of theirclients. The technologies
agile processes. The second activity discussed below highlights principles ofsoftware engineering without requiring students to do any programming. In addition, students areintroduced to humanitarian causes that encourage them to consider how their major cancontribute to social good.Lesson 1: Agile Process ActivityTraditional design processes in engineering and computing follow a sequence of steps. The endgoal of a design process could be a product or it could be a process. The steps to develop theproduct or process using a traditional approach usually start with comprehensive planning to becompleted before proceeding to creation. In contrast, agile design and development utilizesrepeated iterations of a shorter plan-create-test-revise process
the implementation of innovative ideas in sustainable energy and bioengineering. 2.Educate students to become independent researchers with entrepreneurial thinking skills and provide themopportunities to use their newly developed as well as innate skills in the summer-end final projectpresentation and competition. 3. Develop a network of mentoring relationship among high school teachers,faculty and underrepresented minority (URM) undergraduate students that will support them in theirprofessional and graduate careers. 4. Educate teachers on sustainable energy and bioengineering and helpthem create their lesson plans for high school curriculum development on nanotechnology and engineeringthat will increase students’ interest in STEM fields.The