, Signals and Measurements with the PCB project. Overall, it helps with better understanding the design process as other skills like soldering, solidworks, and machining. 3. I learned a lot about the design process, which I feel will help me a lot in my career. 4. This is a class that really helped me connect the elements of design we learned last year with concepts of circuits and systems. 5. I feel like I have a good understanding of the FDA design controls process and can apply it to real world situations. 6. I think it was nice that this class matched up with what we were learning in Circuits, Signals and Measurements. 7. A strength of this course was being able to apply the design process to the PCB Project
backgrounds in education. He received his BA from Central College (Iowa) in 1993 and his PhD in social and personality psychology from the University of Wisconsin–Madison in 2007. Prior to his career in psychology, he spent six years as a teacher, coach, and social worker. Chris is a second generation educator whose grand- parents were tenant farmers in Iowa and Nebraska. He tries to emulate their hard work and persistence in the pursuit of social justice. One of his favorite childhood memories is eating his paternal grandmother’s homemade fruit pies with plenty of ice cream.Delaram A Totonchi, University of VirginiaJoshua Davis, University of VirginiaMichelle Francis, University of VirginiaEmma HuelskoetterYoi Tibbetts
exercises, a hands-on project, career fair information, a labtour, presentations from faculty and upper-level students about upcoming classes, the curriculum,and internship opportunities, and some recreational games. The camp and its activities aredescribed in detail in previous publications [16,17]. The workshop allows students to learn moreabout chemical engineering generally and upcoming courses in the curriculum, and also serves asan opportunity for them to meet peers and interact with upper-level students and faculty.Data CollectionStudents attending the ChemE Camp are given written surveys to complete at the very start ofthe workshop (“Pre-Camp” surveys). The same surveys are administered to all chemicalengineering sophomores at the beginning
opportunities. References[1] American Society for Engineering Education, “Profiles of engineering and engineering technology, 2021,” 2022.[2] American Society for Engineering Education, “Engineering and engineering technology by the numbers 2019,” 2019.[3] E. Higginbotham and M. L. Dahlberg, The impact of COVID-19 on the careers of women in academic sciences, engineering, and medicine. 2021. doi: 10.17226/26061.[4] A. Patrick, M. Borrego, and C. Riegle-Crumb, “Post-graduation plans of undergraduate BME students: Gender, self-efficacy, value, and identity beliefs,” Ann Biomed Eng, vol. 49, no. 5, 2021, doi: 10.1007/s10439-020-02693-9.[5] A. E. Winkler, S. G. Levin
for anengineering career with evermore collaboration demands in the global arena. A considerable partof an engineer’s job is to figure out how to concisely communicate complex concepts and detailsto other people with technical writing. The types of writing include proposals, inspection reports,design documentation, progress reports, specifications, instruction manuals, online help files,emails, blogs, and more. A recent study [4] showed that students’ abilities in technical writingwere perceived to be below the standards by industry professionals, and engineering educators arerequested to address this major competency gap urgently. However, teaching technical writing faces several unique challenges in engineeringeducation. Many
theconcept.The Multidisciplinary Design approach has proven to be both challenging and rewarding in bothindustry and academia. Bringing together bright minds to attack a design problem functionallyand systematically can test the boundaries of all team members. “For some professionally,vocationally, or technically oriented careers, curricula delivered in higher educationestablishments may focus on teaching material related to a single discipline. By contrast,multidisciplinary, interdisciplinary, and transdisciplinary teaching (MITT) results in improvedaffective and cognitive learning and critical thinking, offering learners/students the opportunityto obtain a broad general knowledge base” Pooley, Alison and Wanigarathna, Nadeeshani(2016).KeywordsShipping
. Holly Matusovich is the Associate Dean for Graduate and Professional Studies in the College of Engineering at Virginia Tech and a Professor in the Department of Engineering Education where she has also served in key leadership positions. Dr. Matusovich is recognized for her research and leadership related to graduate student mentoring and faculty development. She won the Hokie Supervisor Spotlight Award in 2014, received the College of Engineering Graduate Student Mentor Award in 2018, and was inducted into the Virginia Tech Academy of Faculty Leadership in 2020. Dr. Matusovich has been a PI/Co-PI on 19 funded research projects including the NSF CAREER Award, with her share of funding being nearly $3 million. She has
librarians. During the project, fellowscompleted 24 hours of design thinking instruction, practiced teaching at digital fabricationsummer camps for elementary and middle school youth, and created a lesson plan that integrateddesign thinking into their subject area. This paper investigates the extent to which teacherconfidence & ability in integration of design thinking principles into classroom instruction wereimproved by participation in the PL fellowship.Project Rationale. The notion of “making” has shown promise as an active, project-basedlearning intervention[2]. Integrating digital fabrication into classroom instruction has beenshown to improve student attitudes toward the STEM disciplines and increase career interest [3]-[5]. However
internship has increased their communication skills. The 2-year students range between 17 to 20-year-olds and many never worked in a team researchsetting and lacked experience in communication with team members. However, the internshipenables them to learn how to effectively communicate with their mentors and teammates. Theyalso learned how to present their research formally at weekly meetings and at conferences. Theweekly practice improved their presentation style and confidence. Last, the internship stimulatesinterns’ personal growth and career goals. At the end of the internship, interns reaffirmed theirdesire to transfer to 4-year universities after graduating from their 2-year program and a fewaspires to go to graduate schools in the future
. All the peoplethat I work with are very supportive and come to me with questions.”2.2.2 Co-Op Experiences of IRE ScholarsA significant necessity to the financial viability of IRE and the financial success of our IRE scholars isdependant on obtaining a co-op after their first semester of preparation. All IRE Scholars have received aco-op starting the month after their first semester. These co-ops were all obtained by the studentsfacilitated through one of the program’s career fairs. The average co-op pay is $22.50 per hour (comparedto the average at IRE for the first co-op of $21.62 per hour), with an average of 40 hours of work perweek. Co-op contracts range from eight months to indefinitely. Average hours worked and months on firstco-op are
comfortable workenvironment with lowered barriers to engagement in a large lecture course. However, lowattendance rates amongst students at office hours suggests that the increased anxiety around thecourse likely increased cognitive barriers to help-seeking and threshold to office hoursattendance despite high academic need. Combined with the observation that reasons that studentsin the study reported attending office hours and barriers to office hours are consistent withliterature, we posit that ideas about office hours are solidified early in students’ college careersand that these beliefs may affect students’ likelihood of accepting new strategies implemented incourses taken later in their college careers. Future work will focus on better
includingmodified Rankine cycles, Brayton cycles, and Refrigeration cycles. This course represents thefinal thermodynamics course for most students. As with most engineering courses, the analysesof such systems are assessed in homework and exams. However, these types of assessments donot translate well into their engineering career as they would not be expected to use a paper andpencil approach. The intention in assigning the project to was to introduce students to a processsimulator which would replace or work in coordination with pen and paper results. The primaryobjective of this proposed work is to demonstrate the benefits of introducing systems to amodern process simulator that students could be expected to use in engineering industry jobs.The
industry demands and enhancing their careers. This approach is alsobeneficial for multidisciplinary project-based learning courses throughout the engineeringprogram. Although a formal assessment of the approach's effectiveness is yet to be conducted,anecdotal evidence suggests positive outcomes. Overall, this paper demonstrates the value ofusing free software and low-cost hardware in teaching PLC concepts, paving the way for moreaccessible and cost-effective education in this crucial area of engineering.IntroductionIndustrial control systems are heavily reliant on Programmable Logic Controllers (PLCs). Thesecontrollers are specialized computer systems with inputs and outputs designed for high voltagesand currents. Moreover, they utilize
affectivedomain. Lastly, we would like to continue to collect and analyze more data sets, e.g. apre-assessment, to inform and strengthen our findings.Overall, the use of EiE resources were successfully adapted into the newly defined CS&Ecurricular scope and sequence. As we continue to scale up our program, we will continue toutilize action research practices to study the impact of our curriculum on students’ contentknowledge, affect, and habits of mind.References[1] Engineering is Elementary, https://www.eie.org/. [Accessed February 2023][2] A. Bandura, C. Barbaranelli, G.V. Caprara, C. Pastorelli, A. Bandura, G.V. Caprara, & C.Pastorelli, “Self-efficacy beliefs as shapers of children’s aspirations and career trajectories,”Child Development, vol
Paper ID #39981A SwarmAI Testbed for Workforce Development and Collaborative,Interdisciplinary ResearchMartha Cervantes, Johns Hopkins University Martha Cervantes is a Mechanical Engineer at the Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Labora- tory where she works in mechanical design and integration of robotic systems. Additionally, Martha is the project manger of the CIRCUIT Program at JHU/APL, which connects and mentors students from trailblazing backgrounds to STEM careers through science and engineering projects. Martha received her B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from Johns Hopkins University, and she is currently
focus. • Provide students with experiential learning opportunities to develop and work directly with sustainable technologies and community development efforts. • Support team-based, multidisciplinary, experiential learning opportunities that engage students at multiple points in their academic careers: from introductory and survey courses to capstone design and research initiatives. • Exposing students to the skills, materials and techniques associated with the global challenges in sustainable development. • Provide accessible meeting space for student teams to work on engineering for sustainable development initiatives, interact with internal and external partners, and support
University of Washington. Engineering education is her primary area of scholarship, and has been throughout her career. In her work, she currently focuses on the role of reflection in engineering student learning and the relationship of research and practice in engineering education. In recent years, she has been the co-director of the Consortium to Promote Reflection in Engineering Education (CPREE, funded by the Helmsley Charitable Trust), a member of the governing board for the International Research in Engineering Education Network, and an Associate Editor for the Journal of Engineering Education. Dr. Turns has published over 175 journal and conference papers on topics related to engineering education
candevelop critical professional skills such as networking, communication, and coaching skills whentaking on the “mentor” role [9, 10]. When carefully planned and thoughtfully implemented, near-peer mentoring can be mutually beneficial for both the mentor and the mentee.Near-peer mentoring is designed to be mutually beneficial for both the mentor and mentee. Forexample, in a study conducted at the Walter Reed Army Institute of Research (WRAIR),undergraduate college students instructed a STEM-based near-peer mentoring summer programfor middle and high school students. The mentoring benefitted the pre-college students throughSTEM-based activities, educational and career advice, and supportive relationships. Theframework implemented at WRAIR equally
with first year and at-risk students.Dr. Susan L. Thackeray, Utah Valley University Dr. Susan L. Thackeray is an Associate Professor and Department Chair at the Scott M Smith College of Engineering and Technology at Utah Valley University. She has over twenty-five years of demonstrated administrative leadership in industry and education that includes international and domestic higher edu- cation instructional design, distance learning development, usability testing, workforce development, and team organization/training. Dr. Thackeray is noted for her expertise in career pathways to align with the workforce and has received multiple awards for STEM education innovation. Susan holds a Bachelor of Science in
management self-efficacy (perceived confidence in the ability to engage, plan, andmeet deadlines regarding academic activities; Beta= 0. 38), self-efficacy in training regulation(perceived confidence in the ability to set goals, make choices, plan, and self-regulate theiractions in the training and career development process; Beta = -0.31), self-efficacy in proactiveactions (perceived confidence in the ability to take advantage of training opportunities, updateknowledge, and promote institutional improvements; Beta = -0.23), and finally, age (Beta = -0.09). The negative value of this last coefficient in the model indicates that the oldest enteringstudent had a lower average academic performance. There is no multicollinearity and no
theanalysis, and comparisons will be made to determine which yields stronger predictive power.Engineering identity is a type of role identity that students develop as they study and practicetheir engineering disciplines (Godwin 2016). Several studies have examined how EI isdeveloped. Kajfez et al. (2019) investigated how the structural components of a first-yearexperience influenced EI for students from various engineering pathways, such as transferstudents and regional campus students. Their initial survey, which included 300 completedresponses, showed that “students enrolled in direct matriculation first-year-engineering coursesmay initially exhibit higher levels of confidence in EI,” with EI proxied by their career choice.Choe et al. (2019
theyimpractically narrow. Finding this middle ground between generality and specificity is importantin consideration of preparing students for future contributions in industry. Though industrialfunctions require specialized skills, it is impossible to predict the exact skills needed by everystudent in a university program due to the number of possible career paths available to eachstudent, each requiring different technical knowledge. By providing students with generalknowledge applicable to a wide diversity of PLM processes, students are better equipped tospecialize according to their own interests. They are also better suited to excel in any arbitraryrole, having previously understood the basic, common functions of many different tasks. 7
society. She is particularly interested in developing and implementing interventions to improve mental health related help seeking in undergraduate engineering students. Sarah graduated with a B.S. in Chemical Engineering from Rowan University and a Ph.D. in Chemical Engineering from the University of Massachusetts. She began her academic career as teaching faculty in Chemical Engineering at the University of Kentucky. As an educator, Sarah works to integrate non-cognitive skills such as creativity, social and emotional intelligence, and communication into her courses. Her experience as a teaching faculty member led her to the development of her research in student mental health, resulting in her transition from
Program (STEMTalent Expansion Program), the CEAS at WMU offers two student success courses for first-yearstudents entering at the Algebra II placement level. One course focuses on applications ofAlgebra II topics with the goals of helping students understand the importance of mathematics intheir desired career and improving their mathematical knowledge. The second course, ENGR2100, integrates concepts of study skills, career preparation, and student engagement to facilitatestudent success. Student feedback on ENGR 2100 has been generally very positive. However,the previous structure of ENGR 2100 had two significant limitations. The first was that ENGR2100 does not count towards graduation. The second was that enrollment in ENGR 2100 waslimited to
case studies,especially when combined with other often quantitative data, can uncover patterns that thequantitative data alone do not reveal (Achinstein et al., 2004). Case studies can also helpinterpret longitudinal data, making it a valuable method for studying educational trajectoriesof students (Lucas & Roth, 1996) or career trajectories of teachers (Johnson & Birkeland,2003). Case studies also allow researchers to make causal or explanatory inferences within aparticular case study or draw more generalized conclusions or comparisons between cases.This can be especially useful in educational contexts for evaluating programs or educationalreforms (Martin & Hand, 2009). Our research study aims to understand the relative
Bridge are to develop, implement, and assess on-ramp strategies for highschool students into engineering pathways at CCs; decrease remediation; increase engineeringenrollment; and increase retention and belonging to the engineering profession.The Contextualized Bridge strategies include:▪ addressing low self-efficacy in the profession due to gaps in math or science skills▪ developing professional identity by creating a cohort system and promoting socialization activities▪ alleviating financial barriers by providing a stipend▪ strengthening connections to Wright College and the profession▪ building awareness of engineering fields and career opportunities.EnrollmentThe Contextualized Bridge methodology, initially targeting only high
., Proctor, D., and Plough, A. (2017). What is health equity? and what difference does a definition make?Buse, K., Bilimoria, D., and Perelli, S. (2013). Why they stay: Women persisting in us engineering careers. Career Development International.Center for Instructional Excellence (2023). Global Learning. Accessed on February 11, 2023.Cho, J. Y. and Lee, E.-H. (2014). Reducing confusion about grounded theory and qualitative content analysis: Similarities and differences. Qualitative Report, 19(32).Farrell, S., Godwin, A., and Riley, D. M. (2021). A sociocultural learning framework for inclusive pedagogy in engineering. Chemical Engineering Education, 55(4):192–204.Fong, H. and Harris, E. (2015). Technology, innovation and health equity.Friedman
University, both in the areas of structural engineering and solid mechanics. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Work in Progress: Undergraduate Student Perceptions of Macroethical Issues in Aerospace EngineeringAbstractThis work-in-progress study explores student perceptions of ethics in undergraduate aerospaceengineering. Macroethics education is a topic that has been traditionally left out of aerospace engineeringundergraduate programs, often leaving students ill-equipped to assess and address the positive andnegative impacts of their future career field on humanity. Defined as the teaching of collective socialresponsibility within the engineering profession
professional identity development. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023The Impact of a 16-week Preparation Course on the Technological Pedagogical ContentKnowledge (TPACK) of Graduate Teaching Assistants in EngineeringAbstractTechnological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) is an important framework that definesteachers’ competencies for teaching effectively with technology. Graduate teaching assistants(GTAs) in engineering need to develop their TPACK so they can effectively fulfill their teachingresponsibilities and be better prepared for future teaching or industry careers, which usually entailscommunicating effectively with others and mentoring interns and other team members. Researchstudies have shown
last several decades, there are an increasing number of programs designed toengage preschool-age children and their families in engineering design [1], [2]. Creating learningopportunities for children at an early age is critical for supporting long-term engineering-relatedinterest development and career pathways [3], [4]. Out-of-school, family-based engineeringexperiences can be powerful catalysts supporting young children’s engagement with engineeringdesign practices and the development of engineering-related interests and identities [5]–[8].These experiences can also have an important influence on parents, including their motivation tocreate new engineering-related learning opportunities for their children and the ways theysupport children’s