of Educational Research, 102, 101586. DOI:10.1016/j.ijer.2020.101586.[11] Chen, J., Kolmos, A., & Du, X. (2020). Forms of implementation and challenges of pbl in engineering education: a review of literature. European Journal of Engineering Education, 4, 1-26. DOI: 10.1080/03043797.2020.1718615.[12] Stoicoiu, C., & Cain, K. (2015). Industrial Projects in a Project-Based Learning Environment. Proceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association (CEEA). https://doi.org/10.24908/pceea.v0i0.5903.[13] Kline, A., & Aller, B. (2002, June). Involving Industry in Capstone Design Courses: Enhancing Projects, Addressing Abet Issues, and Supporting Undergraduate Engineering Practice. Paper presented at
).Activity Progress Summary (i) • Offered the new course at NJIT and CCM in Fall 2022 and Spring 2023. • Planned, developed materials, and offered K-12 summer workshop (in- (ii) person), July 19, 2022. (iii) • N/A • Advised undergraduate research including one student. (iv) • Advised two capstone senior design projects (one in progress) including nine students. • Attended and demonstrated at ATE-PI Conference (Virtual), Oct. 20-21 and 26-28, 2022. • Published and presented the paper [7] at ASEE Conference for Industry and Education Collaboration (CIEC), North Charleston, South Carolina, Feb
Paper ID #38836Process Control Laboratory Projects: Technical Training, TeamDevelopment, and Global CollaborationDr. Joaquin Rodriguez, University of Pittsburgh 2018+ University of Pittsburgh. Chemical and Petroleum Engineering Department. Assistant Professor. Teaching track. 1999-2018. Universidad Monteavila (Caracas, Venezuela). Founder, Academic Coordinator (1999-2004), Vice-Chancellor for Academic Affairs (2004-2005), Chancellor (2005-20015), President of High Studies Center (2015-2017) 1983-1998. Petroleos de Venezuela. Research Center (Caracas, Venezuela). Professional Engineer (1983- 87). Project Leader
the mechanical engineering capstone projects, introducing non-profit partnerships related to designs for persons with disabilities, and founding the Social/Environmental Design Impact Award. He manages several outreach and diversity efforts including the large-scale Get Out And Learn (GOAL) engineering kit program that reaches thousands of local K-12 students.Dr. Elisabeth Smela, University of Maryland College Park Received a BS in physics from MIT and a PhD in electrical engineering from the University of Penn- sylvania. Worked at Link¨oping University in Sweden and then Risø National Laboratory in Denmark as a research scientist before joining Santa Fe Science and Technology as the Vice President for Research
solutions to real-life/simulatedproblems using a project-based approach.1.1 IntroductionAs our courses geared towards incorporating new technological trends in supply chain management andsustainability, the capstone senior design project topics in this area also increased. The main aspectspresented are related to the integrative approach in green energy harvesting, manufacturing, andsustainability, serving as models of energy efficiency and sustainable supply chain management, with aclear assessment of student-led projects developed during past academic years and how they contributeddirectly to the development of leadership skills along with untamed creativity. These capstone projects,along with clear connections between projects and curriculum
electronics, mechanics, computer programming, and robotics.The progression of classes provides students with the skills to develop autonomous roboticsystems as part of the senior design capstone. Senior Design students in the program haveparticipated in the Autonomous Vehicle Challenge (AVC) as part of the National RoboticsChallenge [1] each of the last two years. The Program has sent two teams to participate in theAVC each of the last two years (2022 and 2023). In the first year that AVC was available aftercovid (2022) the team placed 1st and 3rd in the competition.The Program applied for accreditation as an Engineering Physics program during the 2022/2023review cycle. The Engineering Physics designation best matches the interdisciplinary nature
community college and technical college context. Communitycollege and technical college graduates typically start jobs with less training than bachelor’sdegree holders on average. The capstone experience can also be significantly different. BYOPrepresents the opportunity to add to the student’s portfolio of projects. Smaller class sizeshowever must be balanced against heavy teaching loads for faculty. Developing projectmentorship that enhances both the BYOP students and more advanced students experience maybe one approach. Another approach may be to partner with 4-year colleges and universities. Thevalue of the learning experience is considerable for the project mentors and the exposure toconnections with the 4-year program participants can be
Paper ID #37273Design and Implementation of Automation Systems as Electro-MechanicalEngineering Technology Senior Design ProjectsDr. Rasoul M. Milasi, Pennsylvania State UniversityDr. Andrzej J. Gapinski, Pennsylvania State University, Fayette Campus ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Design and Implementation of Automation Systems as Electro-Mechanical Engineering Technology Senior Design ProjectsAbstractThe senior design project is the capstone design course in Penn State - Fayette’s electro-mechanical engineering technology (EMET) curriculum. It is a two-semester project workcomposed of EMET403, design
. The first aim of this pipeline is to enhance senior design (SD) projectpreparedness by 1) introducing a new physical prototyping course to develop and practiceessential fabrications skills, and 2) revising CIP to better validate needs for the new pipeline’slongitudinal process. The second aim is to leverage interdisciplinary collaboration to enhancemedtech device design by 1) using CIP as a catalyst to identify and validate needs for use as SDprojects and 2) continuing longitudinal development beyond SD with medical student innovatorsfrom our four-year cocurricular Innovation Medicine (IMED) program for medical students.Transitioning projects from CIP to SD, by students with training in prototyping, and then tomedical capstone has substantial
, engineering and operations. His research interests include systems engineering, product design process and knowledge management in development teams.Dr. Elizabeth A. Debartolo, Rochester Institute of Technology Elizabeth A. DeBartolo, PhD is the Director of the Multidisciplinary Senior Design Program at the Rochester Institute of Technology, where students from Biomedical, Computer, Electrical, Industrial, and Mechanical Engineering work together on multidisciplinary projects. She is active in the national Capstone Design Community, and received her BSE in Mechanical Engineering and Materials Science from Duke University and her MS and PhD from Purdue University.Dr. Shun Takai, Northern Illinois UniversityMarcos Esterman Jr
to prepare students today for the future.On the other hand, Industry representatives shared their experiences and recommendations oneducating engineers for the 21st century during the National Academy of Engineering annualmeeting in [8]. While acknowledging that engineering schools already produce technicallycompetent graduates, they need engineers who are: creative, can work in teams, and cancommunicate and share their thoughts and ideas. They emphasized that engineering schoolsshould involve students in projects from day one and not rely on capstone design to practiceproblem-solving and learn about partnerships, relationships, and exchanging ideas. To help meetthis challenge, Jarrar and Anis suggested that integrating entrepreneurial
a Ph.D. in Civil Engineering from The University of Texas at Austin. Aaron has served in the military for 24 years as an Engineer Officer with assignments around the world to include Afghanistan, Egypt, and Bosnia- Herzegovina. He is a licensed Professional Engineer in Virginia and a Project Management Professional. Aaron’s primary areas of research are engineering education, the behavior of steel structures, and blast. Aaron mentors students by serving as an advisor for capstone projects and through service as an Officer Representative for Women’s Volleyball and Men’s Basketball. His passion for teaching and developing tomorrow’s leaders resulted in his selection for the 2009 American Society of Civil Engineers
Introduction to Engineering and the other one isSenior Capstone Design. Introduction to Engineering usually provides engineering students with a betterunderstanding of engineering disciplines through hands on experience and can engage students. SeniorCapstone Design courses offer rich opportunities for engineering students to work in teams or individuallyon industrial and real-world projects [2][3]. However, Introduction to Engineering is usually offered at thebeginning of freshman year, and Senior Capstone Design is usually offered during a student’s senior year.As a result, there are commonly limited design opportunities for engineering students in between.Second, many universities are emphasizing experiential learning and encourage engineering
selected core subjects is provided in Figure 1. Here the ‘clinic’nomenclature invokes the notion of a medical school clinical rotation, in which future doctorspractice applying concepts learned in class through hands-on interactions with patients. Theinclusion of CDC within the specialization has a similar aim, with the intention of givingstudents the opportunity to integrate and apply prerequisite knowledge, strengthen their designskills, and develop professional competencies required for project work. In this way, the subjectcan be viewed as a ‘mini-capstone’ for the specialization, although there is a separate year-longcapstone requirement all students in the degree must complete. The clinic subject is seen as acrucial opportunity to give
/Capstone design projects. In the former category, projects are usually highly structuredand uniform in scope across the class, and roles on the team and subgoals are typically specifiedto the students [1]. In contrast, Senior/Capstone projects range in scope and complexity fromteam to team depending on the sponsor, team size and composition can vary, and subgoals mustbe generated and managed by the students themselves [2,3]. Increasing complexity andambiguity are essential for simulating a more “real-world” design experience; however, they cancreate conditions for behaviors and situations that are detrimental to the growth of individualteam members [4,5].Certain types of conflict and bad team behavior can develop as the structure of the team
identificationof customer requirements [2]. Substantial interaction between mechanical engineering andentrepreneurship students in a senior level capstone course resulted in noteworthy improvementsin final project quality [3].When entrepreneurship is present, as it is in this study, a recent literature review identified a needfor more studies that measure its educational impacts [4]. This is not a new conclusion.Immersion in a process, such as the one conducted in this study, or even a simulation allowschildren to learn extensive amounts of information in short periods of time [5]. However, fewpedagogical impact investigations interrogate more than direct, overall academic achievement,even with one of the most studied constructs, achievement motivation [6
Paper ID #40105Work in Progress: Engaging First-year Engineering Students throughMakerspace Project-based PedagogyDr. Gisele Ragusa, University of Southern California Dr. Gisele Ragusa is a Professor of Engineering Education at the University of Southern California. She conducts research on college transitions and retention of underrepresented engineering students, engineer- ing ethics, PreK-12 STEM education, and also research about engineering global preparedness.Dr. Erik A. Johnson, University of Southern California Dr. Erik A. Johnson is a Professor of Civil & Environmental Engineering at the University of Southern
engineering departments to advertise tothe potential students who may be interested and has experience related to the topic of interest.Undergraduate students can register for a particular project in the form of research credits, but idlimited to a maximum of 3 credits per semester so that the effort is commensurate with the timeand effort expended. Based on individual departmental regulations, these credits may be used astechnical elective credits, capstone design credits, or research credits that count toward theirdegree plans. For high-performing honors students that are above a certain cutoff GPA, thesecredits are also eligible to be used as part of an honors section. Such flexibility allows for thisAggiE-Challenge program to conveniently
Villanueva and Nadelsonas the “stasis of engineering curriculum” [4, p. 639], has remained largely unchanged since itsintroduction in the nineteenth century. In this model, students are introduced to common math,science and engineering fundamentals during the first three years and receive more discipline 1specific instruction only in their fourth year of study through professional electives. Applicationof core knowledge and skills to real-world problems and projects is confined primarily to thefourth-year senior design capstone project [4].Figure 1. Current topic-focused undergraduate engineering curriculum model [6]There is extensive literature highlighting the deficiency of this approach. First, the
the instructors were pleased with how the course went and the students’ demonstratedlearning and responses. The seniors were all in their capstone design course at the same time asthis class so they had more experience with longer-term open-ended projects and presentationsthan the juniors. Initially some of the juniors were more tentative in their groups and theirpresentations but it was great to see improvement and by the end of the semester, all students tookownership of the projects. Note that all juniors were on teams with some seniors. One teamincluded only seniors. Having the whole class collaborate on the final presentation to outsidestakeholders was the most risky aspect of the project. This turned out to be one of the most
incorporated into capstone design projects, core engineering classes, orextra-curricular activities as part of the engineering curriculum to improve the achievement ofthe course’s learning outcomes [2]. Therefore, such projects are intentionally designed for allstudents (inclusive of background and cultural groups) to meet the course learning objectives,foster creative and critical thinking, promote engagement and teamwork, and connect to theneeds of the community by developing a socio-economic context, where students can implementengineering solutions to real-world problems. There are profound outcomes associated with PBSL. Studies have shown that PBSLeffectively helps students develop core concepts, technical skills, and critical thinking
infrastructure resilience, and engineering ed- ucation. She taught 11 courses at UConn, including Statics, Structural Analysis, Senior Capstone Project, and new Structural Health Monitoring and Sensors courses. Dr. Jang is the recipient of the 2018 Civil Engineering Educator of the Year award from the Connecticut Society of Civil Engineers, the 2021 Dis- tinguished Engineering Educator Award from the UConn School of Engineering, and the 2021 ASEE Emerging Leader Fellow Award from the Civil Engineering Division. She is the newsletter editor of the ASEE Civil Engineering Division and the treasurer of the ASEE Northeast Section. In addition, she is a faculty advisor of the American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) UConn Chapter
Paper ID #40272Undergraduate Student Experience with Research Facilitated by ProjectManagement and Self-regulated Learning ProcessesMs. Sakhi Aggrawal, Purdue University Sakhi Aggrawal is a Graduate Research Fellow in Computer and Information Technology department at Purdue University. She completed her master’s degree in Business Analytics from Imperial College Lon- don and bachelor’s degree in Computer and Information Technology and Organizational Leadership from Purdue University. She worked in industry for several years with her latest jobs being as project manager at Google and Microsoft. Her current research focuses
of motivation on performance and persistence in mechanical engineering design courses. Elisabeth is an active member of ASEE, ASME, and Tau Beta Pi Engineering Honor Society. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Neurocognitive Examination of the Impact of Design Project Representation on Student Motivation and PerformanceAbstractThe ASME Vision 2030 Project (V2030) outlined a set of goals to aid in the development ofengineering education to better face the current and future demands of the profession. Part of thisvision proposed the implementation of designed-based curricula throughout the degree program.These design courses are meant to introduce students to implementing
settings. Dr. Farzan has an interest in innovative instructional technologies, and has co-developed the first lab-based online Mechatronics course, which brings hands-on engineering education to anyone around the world who wants to learn. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Project-Based Learning for Robot Control Theory: A Robot Operating System (ROS) Based Approach Siavash Farzan sfarzan@wpi.edu Robotics Engineering Department Worcester Polytechnic InstituteAbstractControl theory is an important cornerstone of the robotics field
electives) Courses teaching design 43% (7 core, 3 electives; 3 cornerstone/capstone) Faculty teaching design 70% (Possibly 4) Faculty incorporating design 100% (2 not teaching design process) project Weight of Design project (avg) 20% (range of 10-30%) Faculty Agreeing to standard 85% (no opposition in dept. discussion) process Willing to incorporate design 100% processIn a previous work a review of a variety of design processes was presented. [3] From this and areview of other processes [4]–[11] , a basic framework was determined based on what wasidentified by the authors to be the key and common elements of the various processes
emphasizesapplying dynamics modeling to predict hardware performance. Afterwards students work inteams of 4 or 5 on a capstone design project with sponsors from industry, the medical school,engineering faculty, and the community. This study was conducted during the mechatronicsproject in the first five weeks of the sequence, where emphasis was placed on curiosity in lectureand lab activities. The study took place during the winter quarter of 2023 with 131 studentsenrolled in the course. A survey was conducted at the beginning of the class and at week 5,which will be discussed in the Results section.The first 5 weeks of the class were based on a mechatronics project where students connected anArduino to a motor driver which was used to spin an acrylic
thinking blooms from multi-level (horizontal andvertical) integration and bridging of course design, projects, and content strengthened from firstyear to fourth year [31, 67]. Scaffolding, as explained by Carroll [68], should mean smoothtransitioning from “seat-of-the-pants” first-year design courses to skills and competencies gainedin second- and third-year courses to capstone projects—the peak of true engineering designexperience for fourth-year students. In addition, feedback on explicit scaffolding, restructuring,and mentoring in team collaborations and projects promoted teamwork and engineering design ininterdisciplinary or multidisciplinary settings [48, 69, 70].3.4) Importance of assessment.Multi-dimensional and multi-stage assessment of
enrolled in first-year engineering courses even has theresources to succeed were highlighted by Caroline Baillie. After reviewing different courseapproaches in twelve countries and over seventy institutions a common approach was to developthe first-year introductory subject to aid orientation for students to feel and think like an engineer[7]. Prior research has emphasized the importance of offering project-based tasks for students toapply critical thinking skills.The design canvas tool was used during this study to highlight behavior design and valuetowards the project. Research findings from the paper Development of a Design Canvas withApplication to First Year and Capstone Design Courses discuss the relationship between creatinga design canvas
, where he currently teaches first-year programming and user interface design courses, and serves on the college’s Capstone Design Committee. Much of his research involves design education pedagogy, including for- mative assessment of client-student interactions, modeling sources of engineering design constraints, and applying the entrepreneurial mindset to first-year programming projects through student engagement in educational software development. Estell earned his BS in Computer Science and Engineering degree from The University of Toledo and both his MS and PhD degrees in computer science from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.Dr. Stephany Coffman-Wolph, Ohio Northern University Dr. Stephany