thesimilarities and differences of the APL to Python. Upon completion of the “Programminglessons”, there is a series of activities designed to help the students create circuit(s) andprogram(s) that interact with each other.The programming and circuitry scaffolded modules prepare students for an end-of-semesterCornerstone Project. ENGR 111 currently has two different Cornerstone Projects. TheCornerstone Project is determined by the semester and year that the course is taken. The firstCornerstone Project (Project 1) is comprised of a windmill power generation system. Project 1has students constructing a windmill and using Arduino programming to interpret sensor dataand calculate system performance. The second Cornerstone Project (Project 2) is comprised of
Inclusive Education, 20(4): 347- 363, DOI: 10.1080/13603116.2015.1079273[4] Equalities Act (2010), UK General Public Acts, Available to download: https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2010/15/contents[5] Kumar, K.L. and Wideman, M. (2014), “Accessible by design: applying UDL principles in a first year undergraduate course”, Canadian Journal of Higher Education, 44(1): 125-147[6] Bunbury, S. (2020) “Disability in higher education – do reasonable adjustments contribute to an inclusive curriculum?” International Journal of Inclusive Education, 24(9): 964-979, DOI: 10.1080/13603116.2018.1503347[7] May, H. and Thomas, L. (2010) Embedding Equality and Diversity in the Curriculum: Self Evaluation
interviews. It maynot be able to reflect the full extent and complexity of entrepreneurship education. The modelproposed here is intended to be a starting point for discussion rather than a fully validated model.In the future, we would like to continue to conduct a deeper investigation of program setups toinclude co-curricular and extracurricular activities in our program analysis. We would also like tointerview more universities to understand if the model captures the elements in other universitiesas well. The authors would like to receive feedback and welcome collaborations on this topic.References[1] E. Fisher, A. R. Reuber, S. Business, and T. Branch, The state of entrepreneurship in Canada. Industry Canada Ottawa, ON, 2010.[2] I. Government
reasons why certain topics are more popular than others. 2. Conduct a demographic analysis of the students to find out if there is any connection between the groups they identify with and the module they choose. 3. Examine the impact of these DEI-themed modules in an upper division algorithms course taken by all students in the computer engineering track in our department.References: 1. National Academy of Sciences. (2011). Expanding Underrepresented Minority Participation: America's Science and Technology Talent at the Crossroads: The National Academies Press. 2. Handelsman J., Elgin S., Estrada M., Hays, S., Johnson T., Miller S., Mingo V., Shaffer C., and Williams J., “Achieving STEM Diversity: Fix the
," 2010 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), 2010, pp. S3G-1-S3G-6, doi: 10.1109/FIE.2010.5673256. 2. Rahman, F., & Andrews, C., & Wendell, K. B., & Batrouny, N. A., & Dalvi, T. S. (2019, June), Elementary Students Navigating the Demands of Giving Engineering Design Peer Feedback (Fundamental) Paper presented at 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Tampa, Florida. 10.18260/1-2--32699 3. Pintrich, P. R., & De Groot, E. V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 33–40. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.82.1.33 4. Pintrich, P. R., Marx, R., & Boyle, R. (1993). Beyond
Paper ID #38789Stigma of mental health conditions within engineering culture and itsrelation to help-seeking attitudes: Insights from the first year of alongitudinal study ˜ University at Buffalo, The State University of New YorkMatilde Luz S´anchez-Pena, Dr. Matilde S´anchez-Pe˜na is an assistant professor of Engineering Education at University at Buffalo – SUNY where she leads the Diversity Assessment Research in Engineering to Catalyze the Advancement of Respect and Equity (DAREtoCARE) Lab. Her research focuses on the development of cultures of care and wellbeing in engineering education spaces
alsoincludes adding more EM related activities to existing laboratory and design courses and usingan updated assessment tool to compare the mindset of students in laboratory and design coursesacross the college. We plan to increase the survey response rate with multiple reminders andadditional incentives for Spring 2023.References[1] KEEN, “The Framework,” Engineering Unleashed, 2022. https://engineeringunleashed.com/framework (accessed Apr. 28, 2022).[2] C. Winberg and S. L. Winberg, “The role of undergraduate laboratories in the formation of engineering identities: A critical review of the literature,” The Journal for Transdisciplinary Research in Southern Africa, vol. 17, no. 1, Art. no. 1, Apr. 2021, doi: 10.4102/td.v17i1.962.[3] L. D
] Hadim, H.A., Esche, S. K., ‘Enhancing the Engineering Curriculum through Project-Based Learning,’ 32nd Annual Frontiers in Education, pp. F3F-F3F, (2002), doi:10.1109/FIE.2002.1158200.[5] Cassie Wallwey, Meris M. Longmeier, Donnelley Hayde, Julia Armstrong, RachelKajfez, Renee Pelan, Consider “HACKS” when designing hackathon challenges: Hook, action,collaborative knowledge sharing, Frontiers in Education, 10.3389/feduc.2022.954044, 7, (2022)[6] Fernanda Gobbi de Boer Garbin, Carla Schwengber ten Caten, Diego Augusto de JesusPacheco, ‘A capability maturity model for assessment of active learning in higher education,’Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 10.1108/JARHE-08-2020-0263, 14, 1, (295-316), (2021)[7] S. Hood, N
-implementation-of-a- power-and-energy-engineering-minor-with-limited-resources-first-results-and-lessons- learned[6] P. E. Hertzog and A. J. Swart, “Design and development of practical instruction for freshmen engineering students in a renewable energy course,” in 2017 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON), Apr. 2017, pp. 838–843. doi: 10.1109/EDUCON.2017.7942944.[7] L. (Heidi) Jiao, “Solar Energy Education at Grand Valley State University,” presented at the 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Jun. 2018. Accessed: Jan. 18, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://strategy.asee.org/solar-energy-education-at-grand-valley-state-university[8] S. Pullen and K. Brinkert, “SolEn for a Sustainable Future: Developing and
contribute to the advancementand better understanding of both Education for Sustainable Development and SustainableDevelopment Goals.Even though the spread of Sulitest in Europe (without France) and the Americas region hasreached 15% and 21% respectively [13], there is an invitation to higher education institutions toincrease the effort and knowledge of students towards sustainability. This research providesmeaningful insights to understanding students’ sustainability knowledge in higher educationinstitutions and strengthen the design of future sustainable global engineering courses.A sustainable future can be feasible if education for sustainable development is disseminatedworldwide.References 1. S. Ling, A. Landon, M. Tarrant, D. Rubin, “The
Undergraduate Engineering Education. Cambridge,MA:WorldwideCDIOInitiative.Crawley, E. F., & Hosoi, A. E. (2019). Moving Forward with the New Engineering Education Transformation (NEET)programatMIT-Buildingcommunity,developingprojects,andconnectingwithindustry.In2019 ASEEAnnualConference&Exposition,Tampa,Florida.Crawley,E.F.,&Hosoi,A.P.,&Mitra,A.B.(2018).RedesigningundergraduateengineeringeducationatMIT–the New Engineering Education Transformation (NEET) initiative. In 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition,SaltLakeCity,Utah.deGraaff,E.,Markkula,M.,Demlová ,M.,Kuru,S.,&Peltola,H.(2007).Innovativelearningandteachingmethods. In C. Borri & F. Maffioli (Eds.), TREE: Teaching and research in engineering in Europe
, innetworking courses to address the difficulty of teaching networking concepts to electricalengineering technology students.OMNet++ Network Simulation PlatformOMNeT++ is a framework and library that is essentially used to create and primarily simulatecommunication networks. The simulations are composed of individual modules written in C++and then connected to form larger components using Network Description Language (NED),OMNet++’s proprietary high-level language [11-13]. During the simulation, OMNeT++ willperform calculations given the user's parameters and then output the results. These resultsinclude throughput, queue times, round trip time, and more. These results represent theperformance of the communication network set up by the user. A library
current state of forensic engineering education.AcknowledgmentOne of the authors was funded by FIU University Graduate School Dissertation Year Fellowship,and this support is gratefully acknowledged. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, orrecommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarilyreflect the views of the FIU University Graduate School.References[1] W. DeWitt, L. Geddes, F. Johnson, and L. Reader, “A master of science curriculum in forensic engineering,” in 31st Annual Frontiers in Education Conference. Impact on Engineering and Science Education. Conference Proceedings (Cat. No. 01CH37193), 2001, pp. F2B-8. doi: 10.1109/fie.2001.963696.[2] R. J. Heywood, “Responding to
, warehouses need the opportunities made available byIndustry 4.0. The above perspectives confirm the need for reskilling the current workforce toadapt to innovations of Industry 4.0, and the COVID pandemic produced a window of time thatmade the benefits of such adaptations apparent. References[1] S. Qiu, M. Natarajarathinam, M. D. Johnson, and E. A. Roumell, "The Future of Work: Identifying Future-ready Capabilities for the Industrial Distribution Workforce," in 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access, 2021.[2] E. Flores, X. Xu, and Y. Lu, "Human Capital 4.0: a workforce competence typology for Industry 4.0," Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, vol. 31, no. 4, pp
Agency. (2019). Community-port collaboration. Retrieved from: https://www.epa.gov/community-port-collaboration 3. Mendoza, D. L., Pirozzi, C. S., Crosman, E. T., Liou, T. G., Zhang, Y., Cleeves, J. J., Bannister, S. C., Anderegg, W. R. L., & Paine III, R. (2020). Impact of low-level fine particulate matter and ozone exposure on absences in K-12 students and economic consequences. Environmental Research Letters, 15(11), 114052. DOI 10.1088/1748- 9326/abbf7a 4. Cserbik, D., Chen, J.-C., McConnell, R., Berhane, K., Sowell, E. R., Schwartz, J., Hackman, D. A., Kan, E., Fan, C. C., Herting, M. M. (2020). Fine particulate matter
. Cady and G. Pearson, “Building educator capacity in K-12 engineering education,” in 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference, American Society for Engineering Education, Jun. 2020.[2] S. S. Guzey, T. J. Moore, and M. Harwell, “Building up STEM: An analysis of teacher- developed engineering design-based STEM integration curricular materials,” Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research (J-PEER), vol 6, no. 1, p. 2, 2016, https://doi.org/10.7771/2157-9288.1129.[3] M. A. Bakah, K. A. Nihuka, and A. G. Anto, “Fostering the sustainability and scalability of curriculum innovations through collaborative design,” In Collaborative curriculum design for sustainable innovation and teacher learning, pp
content. Students value that these authentic experienceshelp to answer “overarching scientific question[s] for most of the labs and we weredoing the lab for a purpose.” Course evaluations for Cellular Engineering report a4.83/5 overall evaluation score, with a 5/5 score for intellectually stimulatingcontent. Likewise, Molecular Engineering course evaluations report a 4.00/5overall evaluation score, with a 4.53/5 score for intellectually stimulating content.Additional questions on integrating these new gateway courses with advancedtopics and electives are pending, along with long-term success of the new courseson student engagement in primary research at Duke University, industryconnections and career success.Introduction Linsenmeier and
diversity.4 The program consists of five classes,unique to the minor, that span across two academic years (4 semesters) and relies on the use ofcohort-based program structure, near-peer mentoring, and project-driven learning. The cohortstructure allows for close relationships to form, combatting the social isolation that historicallymarginalized students may feel in CS classes. Peer mentoring benefits students by offeringfurther academic, social, and professional development support within the program. Project-based learning provides strong ties to students’ major area(s) of study (primarily biology andbiochemistry) and supports students’ future success in fields that are becoming increasingly data-driven.1 Finally, the minor program courses focus
Science Foundation grant efforts includ- ing S-STEM, REU, and Includes Alliance grant efforts.Dr. Jennifer Ocif Love, Northeastern University Jennifer Love is a full-time faculty member of Northeastern University’s College of Engineering, most recently in the First Year Engineering program. She is currently the Associate Director for the Center for STEM Education. She has a Bachelor of Science in Mechanical Engineering from Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute (1993), a Master of Science in Biomedical Engineering from The University of Iowa (1997) and a Doctorate in Education from Northeastern University (2022) where she recently completed her dissertation in elementary STEAM education. She also worked as a professional
duration of the ten-week program. REFERENCES[1] L. Hong, and S. E. Page, "Groups of diverse problem solvers can outperform groups of high-ability problem solvers," Economic Sciences, vol. 101, no. 46, pp. 16385-16389.[2] A. Bandura, "Self-efficacy," in Encyclopedia of human behavior, vol. 4, V. S. Ramachaudran Ed. New York: Academic Press, 1994, pp. 71-81.[3] A. Bandura, "Self-efficacy: Toward a unifiying theory of behavioral change," Psychological Review vol. 84, no. 2, pp. 191-215, 1977.[4] A. Bandura, "Guide for constructing self-efficacy scales," Self-Efficacy Beliefs of Adolescents, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 307-337, 2006.[5] R. Scherer and F. Siddiq, "Revisiting teachers
-visual applications.References[1] M. C. Linn and A. C. Petersen, “Emergence and Characterization of Sex Differences in Spatial Ability: A Meta-Analysis,” Child Dev., vol. 56, no. 6, pp. 1479–1498, 1985, doi: 10.2307/1130467.[2] D. F. Lohman, “Spatial Ability and G.” 1993.[3] J. Buckley, N. Seery, and D. Canty, “Investigating the use of spatial reasoning strategies in geometric problem solving,” Int. J. Technol. Des. Educ., vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 341–362, Mar. 2019, doi: 10.1007/s10798-018-9446-3.[4] N. S. Newcombe, “Picture This: Increasing Math and Science Learning by Improving Spatial Thinking,” Am. Educ., vol. 34, no. 2, p. 29, 2010.[5] H. B. Yilmaz, “On the Development and Measurement of Spatial Ability,” Int. Electron. J
, no. 2, pp. 189–214, Apr. 2020, doi: 10.1007/s10956-019-09794-8.[5] D. Weintrop et al., “Defining computational thinking for mathematics and science classrooms,” J Sci Educ Technol, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 127–147, Feb. 2016, doi: 10.1007/s10956-015-9581-5.[6] M. L. Martínez, O. Lévêque, I. Benítez, C. Hardebolle, and J. D. Zufferey, “Assessing Computational Thinking: Development and Validation of the Algorithmic Thinking Test for Adults,” Journal of Educational Computing Research, vol. 60, no. 6, pp. 1436–1463, Oct. 2022, doi: 10.1177/07356331211057819.[7] M. C. Linn, H.-S. Lee, R. Tinker, F. Husic, and J. L. Chiu, “Teaching and Assessing Knowledge Integration in Science,” Science, vol. 313, no. 5790, pp. 1049–1050, 2006
of inferior educationalopportunities through organizing and activism in the U.S. Southwest primarily [1-3], educationaloppression and school failure for Latinos/as/xs has been marked by institutional processes thathave led to detrimental outcomes – particularly deficit thinking [4-6]. Even though deficitthinking has not been widely explored in engineering education research, there is a growing pushfor asset-based perspectives [7-9].Despite the resistance of the Mexican and Mexican American communitie in the U.S. Southwest(one of the areas with the largest proportion of Latino/a/s students) against unfavorable policiesthat have negatively impacted their educational attainment, the borderlands continue to have “thelongest and most pronounced
, International Journal of Science Education, 41:2, 248-279, DOI: 10.1080/09500693.2018.1548788[7] Streiling, S., Hörsch, C., & Rieß, W. (2021). Effects of Teacher Training in Systems Thinking on Biology Students—An Intervention Study. Sustainability, 13(14), 7631. MDPI AG. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su13147631[8] Smith, S. (2020). Obstacles to and progress toward the vision of the NGSS. Horizon Research, Inc.[9] Coppola, P. (2019) Preparing preservice elementary teachers to teach engineering: Impact on self‐efficacy and outcome expectancy. School Science and Mathematics;.119: 161– 170. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12327[10] Webb, D, LoFaro, K. (2020). Sources of engineering teaching self‐efficacy in a STEAM methods
connecting students, faculty, and staff with NGOˆa C™s around the world for technical projects as part of immersions, teaching, and scholarly activity. She also is thDr. Amy Anderson Amy Anderson is the Associate Provost for Global and Intercultural Affairs and Executive Director of the Center for International Programs (CIP) at the University of Dayton. The CIP provides coordination, strategic planning and administrative support forElizabeth GenerasMrs. Marjorie Langston LangstonSharath Krishna ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Towards an Understanding of the Impact of Community Engaged Learning Projects on Enhancing Teachers’ Understanding of Engineering and Intercultural
, Virtual Online, 2020.[3] E. Davishahl, R. Pearce, T. R. Haskell and K. J. Clarks, "Statics Modeling Kit: Hands-On Learning in the Flipped Classroom," in 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Salt Lake City, UT, 2018.[4] E. Davishahl, T. Haskell and L. Singleton, "Feel the Force! An Inquiry-Based Approach to Teaching Free-body Diagrams for Rigid Body Analysis," in 127th ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Virtual Online, 2020.[5] E. Davishahl, L. Singleton, T. Haskell and L. G. O'Bannon, "Hands on STEM Learning at Home with 3D-Printed Manipulatives," in 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access, Virtual Conference, 2021.[6] R. Gorska and S. Sorby, "Testing Instruments for the Assessment of 3-D Spatial Skills
Stokes Alliance Impact Report 1992-2015 (2012 and 2015) [2] Vernon, Julieanne., and Brathwaite, Claude., “Authentic International Research Experience: Program Model in Cartagena, Colombia” in the Proceedings of the 2016 ASEE Annual Conference, Paper ID # 15025, New Orleans, June, 2016. [3] Vernon, Julieanne., and Brathwaite, Claude., “GlobalCUNY: The NYC Louis Stokes Alliance Model for International Re- search Experiences for Minority Students” in the Proceedings of the 2019 ASEE Annual Conference, Paper ID 26211, Tampa, June, 2019. [4] Boyd-Williams, A,. Bigsby, S., Gloster, C., Sowells-Boone, E., Melton, M., Preparing Future Minority Faculty for the Professoriate (Experience)” in the Proceedings of the 2019 ASEE Annual
(accessed Feb. 28, 2023).[2] “Citation report - 728 - Web of Science Core Collection.” https://www.webofscience.com/wos/woscc/citation-report/8c75c603-7be4-4c44-a972- 0c3425970bd1-72586299 (accessed Feb. 28, 2023).[3] M. E. Thompson, “Grade Expectations: The Role of First-Year Grades in Predicting the Pursuit of STEM Majors for First- and Continuing-Generation Students,” J. High. Educ., vol. 92, no. 6, pp. 961– 985, Sep. 2021, doi: 10.1080/00221546.2021.1907169.[4] J. Bastiaan and R. Bastiaan, “Increasing the Interest of Elementary School Girls in STEM Fields Through Outreach Activities,” in 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings, Tampa, Florida, Jun. 2019, p. 32961. doi: 10.18260/1-2--32961.[5] D. P. Holland, S
a better understanding of the subject and the ability to use and apply it [11].A Survey conducted by Poçan, S., Altay, B. & Yaşaroğlu, C [1] showed the effects of using appson the success and motivation of 73 students in a high school algebra class. The findingsrevealed that mobile technology applications positively impact the learning process. Fabian,Topping, and Barron [2] explored the effects of mobile technology on the attitudes andachievements of 52 elementary school students. They found that mobile technology results inpositive student responses, improving their performance. Yussop, Annamalai, and Salam [3]investigated to find out the effectiveness of a particular mobile application. They found that byusing the app, students
comparison to nationalenrollment data for civil engineering. It was not the intent of this study to further investigateadditional demographic influences.The authors are interested in pursuing additional research questions by using the same data setsupplemented with additional years. In particular an additional study looking at the availableelectronic copies of student essays using keyword search software would assist in understandingspecific reasoning behind student motivations.The views expressed in this work are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect theofficial policy or position of the United States Military Academy, Department of the Army, DoD,or U.S. Government.References[1] Zahorian, S., Elmore, M., and Temkin, K. J., Factors