Conference Session

Biomedical Engineering Division (BED) Technical Session 3: Technology in Biomedical Engineering Education

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Christine E. King, University of California, Irvine; Yanfen Li, University of Massachusetts, Lowell; Roza Vaez Ghaemi, University of British Columbia, Vancouver; Alexis Ortiz-Rosario, The Ohio State University

Tagged Divisions

Biomedical Engineering Division (BED)

D. Patel, Tom O’Callaghan, and Scott Reeves. "The use ofvirtual communities of practice to improve interprofessional collaboration and education:findings from an integrated review." Journal of interprofessional care 32, no. 2 (2018): 136-142.[2] Barnett, Stephen, Sandra C. Jones, Sue Bennett, Don Iverson, and Andrew Bonney. "Generalpractice training and virtual communities of practice-a review of the literature." BMC familypractice 13, no. 1 (2012): 1-12.[3] Ting, Daniel K., Brent Thoma, S. Luckett‐Gatopoulos, Adam Thomas, Shahbaz Syed,Michael Bravo, Fareen Zaver, Eve Purdy, Edmund SH Kwok, and Teresa M. Chan. "Canadi EM:accessing a virtual community of practice to create a Canadian national medical educationinstitution." AEM education and

Conference Session

Computer Science Education and AI research

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Ayesha Johnson, University of South Florida, College of Nursing; Zachariah J Beasley P.E., University of South Florida

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods Division (ERM)

technology 51, 7 (2009), pp. 1110–1122.[16] Henry Kautz, Bart Selman, and Mehul Shah. “Referral Web: combining social networks andcollaborative filtering”. Communications. ACM 40, 3 (1997), pp. 63–65.[17] Ching-Yung Lin, Kate Ehrlich, Vicky Griffiths-Fisher, and Christopher Desforges.“Smallblue: People mining for expertise search”. IEEE MultiMedia 15, 1 (2008), pp. 78–84.[18] Julia M Mayer, Starr Roxanne Hiltz, and Quentin Jones. “Making social matching context-aware: Design concepts and open challenges”. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACMConference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 2015. pp. 545–554.[19] David W McDonald and Mark S Ackerman. “Expertise recommender: a flexiblerecommendation system and architecture”. In Proceedings of the

Conference Session

Ocean & Marine Engineering Division Technical Session 2

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Maija A. Benitz, Roger Williams University

Tagged Divisions

Ocean and Marine Division (OMED)

four yes votes, was cell C6. (Note that theRevolution Wind project is being planned for installation in cell C6 [15], while the location ofthe existing Block Island Wind Farm is the middle of Cell D3.)Table 3: Final site proposals and voting results. Three groups came together to propose the same final site. The stakeholders then agreed, by vote, to locate the proposed wind farm in cell C6. Final Stakeholder Group(s) Site Yes No Proposal Public: Anti Wind Farm (PA) None 1: PA 5: CF, D&E, PP, R&T, TR Public: Pro Wind Farm (PP) B5 2: D&E, PP 4: PA, R&T

Conference Session

Mechanical Engineering Division (MECH) Technical Session 7: Student Evaluation and Grading

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Scott F. Kiefer, York College of Pennsylvania; Ashley J Earle, York College of Pennsylvania

Tagged Divisions

Mechanical Engineering Division (MECH)

mastery isn’t a bad thing with the 80%s needed but the exams on the same day is a lot of pressure. Maybe a different way of retakes.Additional Survey Comments from students who did not have to retake any exams: 1) The structure felt perfect for this class. 2) Retakes are good minimum passing grade is too black and white in terms of students grasping the content 3) I think a pass/fail system is ok if the threshold is lower. 80% is a bit too high, at least on exams where one single mistake can mean a failing grade. 4) Use Canvas!! Pass/fail on quizzes makes no sense since one wrong is a fail. 5) Only down side (to me) is that Canvas doesn’t reflect actual grade. 6) Trying to understand the grading was brutal. It took a

Conference Session

Virtual Training, Online and Open Education; Instructional Technology

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Andrew Floyd Barnes, University of North Florida; Andrew McCoy, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods Division (ERM)

,” Procedia Engineering, 2017. 196, 1088–1097. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.08.066[9] I. Choudhury, "The Effect of Watching Video Clips on Student Performance in a Construction Science Course at an Undergraduate Level," In 2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2011. pp. 22-1450.[10] J. M. Burgett, “Can ‘Flipping the Classroom’ Improve the Educational Experience in Construction Management Courses: A Case Study in Teaching,” HVAC Psychrometrics, 2014. 8. http://ascpro0.ascweb.org/archives/cd/2014/paper/CEUE127002014.pdf[11] N. Lee, T. Salama, and S. J. Kim, “Using the Flipped Classroom Model to Improve Construction Engineering and Management Education,” 2016 ASEE Annual Conference &

Conference Session

Faculty Development Division (FDD) Technical Session 11

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Megan Morin, ASHLIN Management Group; Richard Goldberg, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill; Bryant Hutson, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill

Tagged Divisions

Faculty Development Division (FDD)

. Christopher, ‘Self-Study as a Method for Engaging STEM Faculty in Transformative Change to Improve Teaching’, International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 195–213, 2019.[2] E. Elliott, R. Reason, C. Coffman, E. Gangloff, J. Raker, J. Powell-Coffman, and C. Ogilvie, “Improved Student Learning through a Faculty Learning Community: How Faculty Collaboration Transformed a Large-Enrollment Course from Lecture to Student Centered,” CBE Life Sci Edu., vol. 15, pp. 1-14, March  2016.[3]  S. Pulford, N. Ruzycki, C. Finelli, L. Hahn, and D. Thorsen, “Making value for faculty: Learning communities in engineering faculty development,” in  2015 ASEE Annual Conf. &

Conference Session

Construction Engineering Division (CONST) Technical Session 3

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Veto Matthew Ray, Indiana University - Purdue University, Indianapolis; Brenda Morrow, Indiana University - Purdue University, Indianapolis

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Construction Engineering Division (CONST)

learning.References:[1] P.D. Rogers and C.C. Martin, C.D. (2019). “Using an inverted classroom approach to promote active learning in construction management and engineering courses,” 55th ASC Annual International Conference Proceedings. 2019, Associated Schools of Construction 2019.[2] M.J. Lage, G.J. Platt, and M. Treglia, M., “Inverting the classroom: A gateway to creating an inclusive learning environment,” The Journal of Economic Education, 31(1), 30–43. 2000.[3] S. McCallum, J. Schultz, K. Sellke, and J. Spartz, “An examination of the flipped classroom approach on college academic involvement

Conference Session

Multidisciplinary Engineering Division (MULTI) Technical Session 10

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Lauren Singelmann, Minnesota State University, Mankato; Yuezhou Wang, Minnesota State University, Mankato; Darcie Christensen, Minnesota State University, Mankato

Tagged Divisions

Multidisciplinary Engineering Division (MULTI)

’, Educational research review, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 130–144, 2007.[4] R. Butler and M. Nisan, ‘Effects of no feedback, task-related comments, and grades on intrinsic motivation and performance’, Journal of educational psychology, vol. 78, no. 3, p. 210, 1986.[5] J. Feldman, Grading for equity: What it is, why it matters, and how it can transform schools and classrooms. Corwin Press, 2018.[6] J. P. Moore and J. Ranalli, ‘A mastery learning approach to engineering homework assignments’, in 2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2015, pp. 26–64.[7] A. R. Carberry, M. Siniawski, S. A. Atwood, and H. A. Diefes-Dux, ‘Best practices for using standards-based grading in engineering courses’, in 2016 ASEE Annual

Conference Session

Disciplinary Engineering Education Research – Session 2

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Beth (Ann Elizabeth) Wittig, City University of New York, City College of New York, Department of Civil Engineering

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods Division (ERM)

to deepen understanding write effectively, create n. Self-assess regularly to monitor progress and redirect efforts productive groups, o. Think about how you feel about your performance and your work communicate professionally, p. Think about how you feel about being a part of the major and the college build network q. Actively work to build your sense of belonging in the major - 2 classes r. Connect with other students in class and in study groups5. Learning: Deep s. Connect with faculty in class and office understanding, growth t. Participate in activities on campus mindset, levels of learning u. Report

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division (ENT) Technical Session 5: Exploring and Re-Examining Ideas in Engineering Entrepreneurship and Innovation Education

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Felix Kempf, King's College London; Nada Elfiki, Stanford University; Aya Mouallem, Stanford University; Helen L. Chen, Stanford University; George Toye; Micah Lande, South Dakota School of Mines and Technology; Kei Hysi; Xiao Ge, Stanford University; Sheri D. Sheppard, Stanford University

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division (ENT)

SurveyTakers (Respondents could mark “all that apply”)When we look at the combination of R&D, Design and Production/Manufacturing (arguably thethree areas most directly aligned with “engineering”) in Figure 3.2 we see that 81 percent(581/719) are involved in one or more of these three engineering-centric functions (with some19.6% (141/719) involved in all three). This means that 1 out of 5 of the survey respondents have 9their primary function(s) outside of R&D, Design and Production/Manufacturing, suggestingthere is a diversity in the types of work that these graduates are involved in.Figure 3.2 Percentage of Design, R&D and/or Production

Conference Session

Experimentation and Laboratory-Oriented Studies Division (DELOS) Technical Session 5: Lab Design

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Sarah A. Wilson, University of Kentucky; Samira Azarin Azarin; Chris Barr, University of Michigan; Joanne Kay Beckwith, Carnegie Mellon University; Janie Brennan, Washington University in St. Louis; Tracy L. Carter, Northeastern University; Amy J. Karlsson, University of Maryland

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Experimentation and Laboratory-Oriented Studies Division (DELOS)

laboratory courses.References[1] L. D. Feisel and A. J. Rosa, "The role of the laboratory in undergraduate engineering education," Journal of engineering Education, vol. 94, no. 1, pp. 121-130, 2005.[2] S. A. Wilson, T. L. Carter, C. Barr, A. Karlsson, J. Brennan, and J. Beckwith, "Work-in- progress: Identifying unit operations laboratory curriculum needs," in 129th ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition: Excellence Through Diversity, ASEE 2022, 2022.[3] Y. Luo et al., “Chemical Engineering Academia-Industry Alignment: Expectations about New Graduates,” American Institute of Chemical Engineers, 2015.[4] National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, New Directions for Chemical Engineering. 2022.[5] ABET

Conference Session

Engineering and Engineering Technology Transfer and the Two-Year College Student Part 1

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Matthew Ford, University of Washington, Tacoma; Aleya Dhanji, Highline Community College; Kira Glynn King; Jie Sheng, University of Washington; Skyler Roth, Highline Community College; Emese Hadnagy, University of Washington

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Two-Year College Division (TYCD)

as the most important sources of informationthough at least two students commented there was not enough information and they did their ownindependent research.We also asked students to comment on what they found to be the biggest challenge(s) during thetransfer process and specifically what would have helped in overcoming those challenges. By farthe most commonly mentioned reason was being unsure which classes would transfer from 2-yearto 4-year colleges, and understanding what the transfer prerequisites were. Some studentsmentioned that they attended multiple 2-year colleges and had greater difficulty figuring out whatclasses would and would not count toward their 4-year degree.A majority of post-transfer students (68%) reported having an

Conference Session

Committee on Educational Policy Presents: Pillars of Our Curriculum

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Allen C. Estes, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo; Brent Nuttall, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo; Craig Baltimore, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo; Peter Laursen, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo; Michael James Deigert, P.E., California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo; Cole C. McDaniel, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Civil Engineering Division (CIVIL)

Conference Session

Ocean & Marine Engineering Division Technical Session 2

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Vincenzo Antonio Ventricelli, SUNY Maritime College; Paul M. Kump, SUNY Maritime College; Van-Hai Bui

Tagged Divisions

Ocean and Marine Division (OMED)

Conference Session

Committee on Effective Teaching Presents: Models, Models, & More Models

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Paulina Robles, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo; Gabrielle Rose Favro, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo; Anahid Behrouzi, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo; Abby Lentz

Tagged Divisions

Civil Engineering Division (CIVIL)

Conference Session

Design in Engineering Education Division (DEED) Technical Session 6

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Damon Kirkpatrick, U.S. Air Force Academy; Michael Anderson, U.S. Air Force Academy; Phillip Cornwell, U.S. Airforce Academy

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education Division (DEED)

Conference Session

Teaching Tools: Communication (NEE)

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jiaxi Li, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign; Colin P. Lualdi, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign; Yijun Lin, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign; Aarya Bhatia; Jihong Cai, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; Sujit Varadhan, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; Rob Kooper, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign; Lawrence Angrave, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators Division (NEE)

Conference Session

Multidisciplinary Engineering Division (MULTI) Technical Session 7

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Abdullah Ibrahim, Texas A&M University at Qatar; Roudha Saif Al-Khaldi, Texas A&M University, Qatar; Doaa Elamin Emam; Yasser M. Al Hamidi, Texas A&M University, Qatar; Marwan Khraisheh, Texas A&M University, Qatar

Tagged Divisions

Multidisciplinary Engineering Division (MULTI)

feedback with respect to an improvement ininnovation and creativity especially whilst problem solving. This spoke to the successof the two main aspects of this project/s; a multidisciplinary collaboration thatintegrated the strengths of an engineering-based education with that of an Arts basededucation, and the use of design thinking to produce outside the box thinkers. Despitea positive participant feedback, there were some areas where the collaborative projectscored low. The development of hands-on skills is one such example. It had an averagerating of 3.5 out of 5, with the lowest ratings coming from the Art and design teammembers who answered the survey questions. This can be easily explained, as thepurpose of this multidisciplinary project

Conference Session

Equity, Culture & Social Justice in Education Division (EQUITY) Technical Session 13

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Bridget M. Smyser, Northeastern University; Susan F. Freeman, Northeastern University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Culture & Social Justice in Education Division (EQUITY), Equity

Conference Session

Environmental Engineering Division (ENVIRON) Technical Session 2

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Victoria Matthew, Engineering for One Planet; Cynthia Anderson, Alula Consulting; Cindy Cooper, The Lemelson Foundation; Surbhi Godsay Lipkin-Moore, Amplify Evaluation

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Environmental Engineering Division (ENVIRON)