course. This course is required forstudents from three majors: computer engineering, electrical engineering, and mechanicalengineering. The course content includes introduction to microcontrollers (μCs), actuators,analog and digital sensors, electronics, and programmable logic controllers. The justification tohave this course in the curricula is twofold. First is to provide a basic knowledge aboutelectromechanical systems to students since nowadays there are very few systems that can becategorized as either pure electrical system or mechanical system. Second is to help student buildmultidisciplinary team skills.Robotics is an appropriate technical field for the integration of different engineering curriculatopics and therefore it has been
semester credit hours.A recurring theme in the ongoing dialogue is the merit of having the Master’s degree orequivalent required for the design engineer and thus necessary for an engineer to becomelicensed. Substantial ongoing effort by ASCE has helped to clarify the learningappropriate to the body of knowledge (BOK) for civil engineering6 and much dialoguecontinues on the baccalaureate curriculum for civil engineering. Meanwhile, the Master’slevel learning defined in the ASCE BOK is only recently being examined in detail. The24 learning outcomes in the ASCE BOK are separated into three categories: foundational,technical and professional learning. Master’s level learning is not identified as a part ofthe foundational and professional learning
AC 2009-2507: CPAS: ON THE STRUCTURE AND USABILITY OF ACOURSE-PLANNING AND AUDIT SYSTEMTal Rusak, Cornell University Tal Rusak is an undergraduate student at the Department of Computer Science at Cornell University, graduating May 2009. Tal's interests lie in understanding the structure of networks and novel computing systems as well as in the theory and practice of engineering and computer science education. Tal was recognized as the 2009 Computing Research Association (CRA) Outstanding Undergraduate Award Winner. Tal's research in modeling the temporal variations of low-power wireless network links has been published internationally and was recognized by the Best Paper Award at ACM
broad availability of visuallyengaging and fast-paced games, contemporary students can find traditional classroom methods oflecture and guided laboratory experiments limiting. This paper presents a novel methodologythat incorporates driving simulation, motion simulation, and educational practices into anengaging, gaming-inspired simulation framework for a vehicle dynamics curriculum. Theresearch places students into a gaming scenario where learning occurs during game play, ratherthan using a formally structured learning approach to vehicle dynamics. The application of themethodology is demonstrated in the context of an advanced vehicle dynamics course. This paperreports on work done under National Science Foundation grant DUE-0633596 in the
of general education. In particular, we argue for the positive value of ageneral education program centered on common foundation courses taken by all studentsat an institution. Even more particularly, we argue for the positive value of a foundationcourse, taken by all first- or second-year students, which introduces them to, and providesopportunities for them to practice, their critical, analytical, quantitative, and scientificreasoning skills. Most particularly, we argue for the positive value of such a course forundergraduate Engineering majors. In part one of our paper, we will correlate the goals,objectives, and curriculum of UNST 130 Analytical Reasoning, a general educationfoundation course at North Carolina Agricultural and Technical
international team conducted research on one of four components of an integrated research program investigating wetlands adjoining Lake Victoria.2 Benin Groundwater Research and Development in Benin The program was initiated in 1998, with Benin student involvement since 2000 University of Notre Dame and annual trips involving US students since 2003. 2002-2005 involved a Universitéd’Abomey-Calavi summer Research Experience for Undergraduates (REU). 2006-2008 involved a Long-Term Research (LTR) Program. The REU involved 2-4 weeks of pre- travel
AC 2009-864: CONNECTOR FACULTY: A FRIENDLY FACE FOR EARLYENGINEERING STUDENTSDaina Briedis, Michigan State University Dr. DAINA BRIEDIS is an Associate Professor in the Department of Chemical Engineering and Materials Science at Michigan State University. Dr. Briedis has been involved in several areas of education research including student retention, curriculum redesign, and the use of technology in the classroom. She is a co-PI on two NSF grants in the areas of integration of computation in engineering curricula and in developing comprehensive strategies to retain early engineering students. She is active nationally and internationally in engineering accreditation and is a Fellow of
performance. Our intention is to initiate a dialogue on the dilemma ofdeclining achievement. BackgroundCoursesThe two courses focused on in this study have been in the aerospace engineering curriculum atPenn State University (PSU) for a number of years and offer fundamental content. One is arequired junior-level course, Introduction to Aeronautics, with a required prerequisite of the firstaerodynamics class and an aerospace analysis class. The other is a senior-level technicalelective, Theoretical Aerodynamics, and its prerequisite is the Introduction to Aeronauticscourse. The junior-level course introduces students to the basic concepts of aeronautics bycovering the estimation of the forces of flight and
and participate in capstone projects to achieve substantive deliverables that do not result ina working product or system.Students building a working prototype product or system are operating in primarily in theproduct-oriented, phase of the complete system development life cycle. There are hiddenassumptions in the design of capstone courses that encourage students to work in that phase.A student team can accomplish the learning objectives of a technical capstone project byfollowing a clearly defined design and development process resulting in project deliverables thatare not a working prototype.Recently, an Information Technology (IT) capstone student team at Brigham Young Universityselected a project that requires them to follow a systems
Graduate Teaching Fellowship Program. in 2008 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition. 2008.2. Torvi, D.A., Engineering Graduate Teaching Assistant Instructional Programs: Training Tomorrow’s Faculty Members. Journal of Engineering Education, 1994. 83(4): p. 2-5.3. DiBiasio, D., J.E. Miller, and J.E. Groccia. Managers of the Learning Process: Preparing Future Faculty to Teach Productively. in 1996 ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings. 1996.4. Dziedzic, M., P.R. Janissek, and M.J. Tozzi, A Graduate Course in Faculty Development, in 37th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference. 2007, Milwaukee, WI.5. Kane, R., et al. An Integrated Approach to Teaching Assistant Training and Orientation. in 2007
learning.Marion Usselman, Georgia Institute of Technology Marion Usselman, Georgia Institute of Technology Dr. Marion C. Usselman is a Senior Research Scientist at the Center for Education Integrating Science, Mathematics and Computing (CEISMC) at the Georgia Institute of Technology. Marion received her B.A. in biophysics from the University of California, San Diego, and her Ph.D. in biophysics from Johns Hopkins University. She focuses on K-12 educational reform, university-K-12 partnerships, and equity issues in education.Thomas Morley, Georgia Institute of Technology Thomas Morley, Georgia Institute of Technology Dr. Morley, is a CEISMC Professor of Mathematics at Georgia Tech
, component-based software architectures, software and systems engineering process models, intelligent control, the semantic web, and real-time artificial intelligence. In 1999, Dr. Hawker joined the Computer Science Department at the University of Alabama as an Assistant Professor focusing on software engineering, and in 2004 he moved to the Software Engineering Department at RIT. Dr. Hawker is also co-director of the Laboratory for Environmental Computing and Decision Making, which focuses on modeling and understanding the impact of freight transportation and automotive industry activities and public policies. Dr. Hawker is a member of the ASEE, IEEE, IEEE Computer Society, and the
for small and large scale changes in its content, the curriculum,and the participation of different faculty and invited scholars from different disciplines and institutions.This particular feature of the program will lead to a change in the university academic culture, i.e., it willencourage the faculty to take calculated risks, be more innovative and to experiment with differentteaching methods, allowing for amplification of knowledge and techniques into other, more traditionalprograms, thereby having a long-term effect on students and society.Related work This proposed program assumes a general understanding of the term innovation, like the definitionby the 3M Company “new ideas plus action or implementation which results in an
Systems Design. He also has been responsible for the establishment of most of the Aerospace System Design laboratories in the School of Aerospace Engineering, such as the Aerospace Systems Design Laboratory (ASDL) in 1992, Space Systems Design Laboratory (SSDL) in 1996, and the Integrated Product Lifecycle Engineering (IPLE) Laboratory in 2007. Prior to coming to Georgia Tech in 1984, Dr. Schrage served as an engineer, manager and senior executive with the Army Aviation Systems Command (AVSCOM) from 1974 to 1984. In these capacities he was involved in the design, development and production of all of the current Army Aviation systems, including the UH-60 Black Hawk, the AH-64
heavily on computer resampling (computer-intensive). By teaching thebasic concepts of sampling, replication, and variation in a hands-on environment instead ofcalculus-based probability theory, students gain an immediate intuitive understanding ofstatistics, rather than memorize a series of poorly understood statistical “recipes”. The practicalresults are: 1) statistical concepts are more transparent, 2) students better retain understanding ofstatistical concepts, 3) students are capable of more sophisticated statistics than what they can doin a traditional engineering statistics course, and 4) the course can be taken earlier in anengineering curriculum than a traditional parametric, calculus-based course. The followingmodules have been used in a
Iowa, an M.Ed in Curriculum and Instruction from Texas A& M University and a B.S in Elementary Education from the University of Houston. She is a former elementary science teacher. Over the past twelve years in Utah, Dr. Monhardt has worked with Navajo teachers and students and her research interests deal broadly with the topic of relevance in elementary science education. She is particularly interested in place a context for making science meaningful for all students, especially those who have been traditionally underrepresented in science. Page 14.1314.1© American Society for Engineering
Technical High School, discussed the importance of math readiness and howparents could assist their students with understanding Mathematics. She discussed how math andscience are integrated in the real world, and the importance in learning both. Dr. Moyo engagedthe parents in a hands-on math activity to illustrate how parents could use math with their studentsto enhance their interest in it.The presentation for the fourth parent workshop session was given Dr. Joy Moore, AssistantProfessor of mathematics, who has been rated as one of the best teachers in math and is anAfrican American with an engineering undergraduate degree. Dr. Moore graduated with a BS inengineering degree and then pursued graduate degrees in mathematics education. Dr
at theperformance criteria for each of the program outcomes (Appendix). To be measurable, eachperformance criteria had to start with an action verb, such as “apply”, “choose”, “analyze”,“validate”, corresponding to the levels of learning. The performance criteria were then presentedto the Industry Advisory Board for their input and approval.We developed 38 performance criteria for the 11 program outcomes. In the next step the PCswere mapped to the curriculum (Figure 1). Page 14.258.3 A A A A A A A B B B B C C C C D D D E E E F Course
and teamwork through use of Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. 1st Austin Workshop on Engineering Management in Technology-Based Organizations; Proceedings. p. 31 - 36. ieeexplore.ieee.org/iel5/7206/19412/00897349.pdf17. Daigle, R.J., M.V. Doran, and J.H. Pardue. 1996. Integrating Collaborative Problem Solving Throughout The Curriculum. Proceedings of the 1996 27th SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, Feb. 15-18, Philadelphia, PA, pp. 237-24118. Felder, R.M. and R. Brent. 2001. Effective Strategies for Cooperative Learning. J. Cooperation & Collaboration in College Teaching. 10(2), 69-7519. Felder, R.M., G.N. Felder, and E.J. Dietz. 2002. The Effects of Personality Type on Engineering Student
AC 2009-785: PROMOTING FACULTY DEVELOPMENT USING INDUSTRYCONSULTING ACTIVITIESRalph Ocon, Purdue University, Calumet Page 14.992.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2009 Promoting Faculty Development Using Industry Consulting ActivitiesAbstractFaculty development is a major concern for faculty, academic administrators and students.Through experience, the author has discovered that an important source of faculty developmentis industry consulting and training activities. From the individual faculty member’s standpoint,consulting can provide real world, work related experience and enhance teaching skills. Also,consulting can improve the faculty member’s expertise in
students an opportunity toselect the course format they felt best matched their individual learning style. In this study, weconsider two “cross-hybrid” variants of these: traditional lecture with integrated problem solving(TL-IPS), and directed problem solving with lecture summary (DPS-LS). Initial trials comparingoutcome assessment and exit survey results for these formats are presented. The preliminaryresults demonstrate the viability of the various course delivery options, and provide a generalindication of student preferences.IntroductionThe goal of our previously reported work1 was to compare the relative effectiveness of the“traditional lecture” format with non-traditional “hybrid” course formats, specifically in whichthe roles of in-class
secretarial duties of collecting, collating and recording communications, or cap-turing discourse during face-to-face meetings. These are often captured as minutes, letters,reports, and recommendations. These activities can be supported in a more free-flowing manneron a Wiki where anybody is welcome to add/modify/delete content, changes can be tracked, andundone when necessary.This paper will describe the use of a Wiki to act as a central point for a professional group devel-oping new curriculum standards. The topics will include a prototype structure for the site, govern-ing principles, encouraging user involvement, and resolving differences of opinion.IntroductionThrough collaboration we able to produce more valuable works and share information
AC 2009-2375: A SURVEY OF EMBEDDED DATABASE TECHNOLOGY FORMOBILE APPLICATIONSKyle Lutes, Purdue University Kyle Lutes is an Associate Professor for the Department of Computer & Information Technology (CIT) at Purdue University. Kyle joined the department in 1998 and is the chair of the department’s software development curriculum. His teaching and scholarly interests cover a broad range of software development areas including software applications for mobile devices, data-centered application development, and software entrepreneurialism. He has authored/co-authored numerous papers and two college textbooks on various software development-related topics. Prior to his current
students find fascinating andthought provoking. The purpose of this document to provide teachers and studentswith a baseline knowledge, and an opportunity to physically work with one of theseinnovative substance. MR fluids have served as topics in a variety of curriculums. Influid power courses such as hydraulics, MR fluids have the potential to revolutionize Page 14.156.2the “valve” component that currently relies on interfacing electro-mechanical devices.In applied process control engineering curriculums, such as programmable logiccontrollers, MR fluids are easily activated and deactivated by controllers to maintainprocess set points. Using these fluids in
area had an internal champion. However we had anentirely different situation in the water resources area, where we enjoyed the leadershipand collaboration of a champion from industry. In this case those involved in developingthe new educational offerings decided that a traditional three-credit format would betterserve their needs. Even in this case, however, we will examine the possibility of offering Page 14.697.7at least some part of the new program content in the one-credit bridge course format.The process of developing our post-BS program involved civil engineering practitionersin two important ways. First, they were an integral part of the team
Page 14.1136.4level courses, and presents a case study that demonstrates how facility management isimplemented in one healthcare facility building.BackgroundMany definitions exist for the term “facility management” (FM.) The International FacilityManagement Association defines FM as: “a profession that encompasses multiple disciplines toensure functionality of the built environment by integrating people, place, process andtechnology”3. The British Institute of Facilities Management adds that: “facilities management isthe integration of processes within an organisation to maintain and develop the agreed serviceswhich support and improve the effectiveness of its primary activities”4. Other definitionsinclude: “The primary function of facility
afundamentals-focused math and science freshman curriculum. A second goal was todevelop students’ self-efficacy in a range of abilities associated with engineeringincluding design, problem solving, innovation, communication, teamwork, application offundamental engineering and math concepts, teamwork, and being able to consider socialimpacts in technology in design. A third goal was to examine impact of different types ofsubjects by gender. The final goal was to discern if any gains in self-efficacy weresustained over time.An engineering self efficacy survey tool was developed for this study, with an expandedset of engineering self efficacy measures, that permit a more nuanced portrait of theimpact of different types of engineering curricular
providesand some data he has collected and provides suggestions for further improvement.IntroductionUtilizing real-world problems as a stimulus for student learning is not at all new and hasbeen in practice for a very long time. Problem-based learning has been defined asminds-on, hands-on, focused, experiential learning. (Wilkerson & Gijselaers, 1996). Aproblem-based curriculum is significantly different from the traditional disciplinecentered curriculum. (Woods, 1994). Instructors are considered to serve as problemsolving colleagues assigned with the responsibility of promoting interest and enthusiasmfor learning (Narayanan, 2005 & 2006). Instructors are also encouraged to act ascognitive coaches who can nurture an environment that can
Cross-Disciplinary Learning”. Computer Support forCollaborative Learning. Article No. 19, Proceedings of the 1999 conference on Computer support for collaborativelearning, Palo Alto, California, 1999.18 Bell, D., Scott, B., Kahrhoff, J., Seymour, S., Tamashiro, R., “Innovative Cross-Disciplinary Learning-CenteredStrategies in WebCT. http://webct.confex.com/webct/2005/preliminaryprogram/session_2385.htm19 Fazzolari, R., “Renewable Energy Systems”. AME445/545, Department of Aerospace and MechanicalEngineering, University of Arizona.20 Russel, I., Georgiopoulos, M., Castro, J., Neller, T., McCracken, D., Bouvier, D., "Condensing the CC-2001 corein an Integrated Curriculum," CCSCNE (Consortium for Computing in Small Colleges in the Northeast
University of South Florida. Their support is greatly appreciated.References1. Chang, Y.-H. I., and Miller, C. L., “PLM curriculum development: using an industry-sponsored project to teach manufacturing simulation in a multidisciplinary environment,” Journal of Manufacturing Systems, Vol. 24, No. 3, 2005, pp. 171-177.2. Felder, R. M., and Brent, R., “Learning by doing”, Chemical Engineering Education, Vol. 37(4), 2003, pp. 282- 283.3. Hall, S. R., Waitz, I., Brodeur, D. R., Soderholm, D. H., and Nasr, R., “Adoption of Active Learning in a Lecture-Based Engineering Class,” 32nd ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, Boston, MA, 2002.4. Impelluso, T. and Metoyer-Guidry, T., “Virtual reality and learning by design: Tools