, Honolulu, USA, June 2007.12. Clark, B. Creating entrepreneurial Universities: Organizational Pathways of Transformation, 1998 (Oxford: Pergamon-Elsevier Science).13. Bharadwaj, S. and Menon, A. Makin innovation happen in organizations: individual creativity mechanisms, organizational creativity mechanisms or both? Journal of Product Innovation Management, 2000, 17(6), 424- 434.14. High, A., Mann, C. and Lawrence, B. Problem solving and creativity experiences for freshman engineers. In: Proceedings of the 2005 American Society of Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, 2005.15. Weaver, J. and Muci-Küchler, K. In-class creativity exercises for engineering students. In: Proceedings of the
Page 14.1295.10observational data that educational researchers routinely encounter and can be used in a varietyof settings to gain deeper insight into the factors affecting educational outcomes.AcknowledgementThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under award0757020 (DUE). Any opinions, findings and conclusions or recommendations expressed in thismaterial are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NationalScience Foundation (NSF).References1. National Science Board Science and Engineering Indicators 2002; NSB-02-1; National ScienceFoundation: Arlington, VA, April, 2002.2. Bernold, L. E.; Spurlin, J. E.; Anson, C. M., Understanding our students: A longitudinal
.” Proceedings of the 2008 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference. 7. Jacoby, Barbara. 1996. Service-Learning in Higher Education: Concepts and Practices. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. 8. King, Patricia M., & Kitchener, Karen S. 1994. Developing Reflective Judgement, Jossey-Bass Inc, San Francisco, CA. 9. Lima, Marybeth, and Oakes, William Oakes. 2006. Service-Learning: Engineering in Your Community. Page 14.1223.10 Ann Arbor, MI: Great Lakes Press, Inc. 10. Lynch, C.L. and Wolcott, S. K. 2001. “Helping your students develop critical thinking skills.” IDEA Paper #37
”, Research in Higher Ed., Vol.38, 379-396.[2] Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology; 2007, “Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs - Effective for Evaluations During the 2008-2009 Accreditation Cycle”, ABET, Baltimore, MD, pg 2 of 19.[3] Passow, H.; M. Mayhew; C. Finley, T. Harding, and D. Carpenter, 2006, “Factors influencing engineering students’ decision to cheat by type of assessment,” Research in Higher Ed., Vol. 47, #6, 643-684.[4] Whitley, B., 1998, “Factors associated with cheating among college students: a review”, Research in Higher Ed., Vol.39, #3, 235-277.[5] Carpenter, D.; T. Harding; C. Finley; S Montgomery; and Passow, H.; 2006, “Engineering students’ perceptions of and attitudes
engineering student; must have completed four semesters at ASU or be withinthree semesters of graduation at the time of participation.Textbook(s): ≠ Recommended: Samovar, Larry, Richard Porter, Edwin McDaniel. Communication between cultures. ≠ Recommended: Rick Steve’s Guide to the destination city. ≠ Recommended: Lonely Planet Guide to the destination city.Course Objectives: ≠ Students will become aware of the differences in communication and interaction style of their host society. ≠ Students will develop an appreciation for and an understanding of the people in their host country. ≠ Students will be able to learn the necessary skills to function in a new environment. This will include: o Proper
application materials were anapplication form, resumé, statement of purpose essay, transcript, two letters of recommendation,and ranked list of at least two preferred projects. The application form requested student contactinformation, college/university, academic major(s)/minor(s), and GPA. The program wasadvertised through a promotional email message that contained basic program information andreferred potential applicants to the REU website for detailed information. The email wasdistributed to undergraduate engineering students at SMU, contacts at other universities whopreviously agreed to distribute the email at their institutions, and the Women in EngineeringProgram Advocates Network (WEPAN) nationwide list-serve.Participants were selected from
thinkindependently. Learning outcomes were strongly correlated with course evaluation, but aftercontrolling for learning outcomes, he found that expected grades were not positively related toevaluations. In fact, in natural sciences, the highest-rated courses were some of the ones withlower grades. Courses that were either “too hard” or “too easy” were rated lower than coursesbetween these extremes.Eiszler [13] comes at the question from a different perspective—the change in grades andevaluations over time. Using data from more than 37,000 course sections offered between 1980and 1999, he found that during the 1980s, the percentage of students expecting As or A–s heldsteady, as did the average scores on course evaluations. But in the 1990s, the percentage
1 11.29** .19 .91S within-grouperror 48 (3976)Note: Values enclosed in parentheses represent mean square errors. S = subjects. **p < .01The simple effect for the condition group at the low level of familiarity with the chemistry fieldproved not to be significant, F(1,24) = .01, p = .94. LOW Familiarity with Chemistry HIGH Familiarity with Chemistry 100 PERFORMANCE: Estimated Marginal Means
.1,2,11,12 The wind tunnel has a test section measuringapproximately 12 in x 12 in x 24 in (305mm x 305mm x 610mm), and has a maximum air speedof approximately 140 mph (63 m/s). It is instrumented with an electronic strain-gage basedbalance for measurements of normal force, axial force, pitching moment, and pressuredistribution as a function of air speed and angle of attack. Both manual as well as electronicpressure sensing is available on this facility. An electronic pressure scanning unit containing 32individual electronic pressure sensors is also used in conjunction with this facility. This latterunit can be used to provide real-time visualization of the pressure distribution in the wind tunnel,in much the same manner as it has been used to
the Faculty of the Future. 2006: Ithaca, NY.9. Villarejo M Barlow A, Making a difference for minorities: Evaluation of an educational enrichment program. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2004. 42(9): p. 861-881.10. B C Clewell, et al., Revitalizing the Nation's Talent Pool in STEM. 2006, Washington, DC: Urban Institute.11. G Price, The causal effects of participation in the American economic association summer minority program. Southern Economic Journal, 2005. 72(1): p. 78-97.12. S Russell, M Hancock, and J McCullough, The Pipeline: Benefits of Undergraduate Research Opportunities. Science 316 (5824):548–549, 2007. 316(5824): p. 548-549.13. M Summers and F Hrabowski, Preparing minority scientists and
. http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/wmpd/pdf/may2008updates.pdf.5 Wadley-Donovan GrowthTechLLC, Younger Associates. Strengthening the Pipeline: A Regional Cornerstone Report prepared for Memphis Regional Economic Development Council. June 2006.6 Tennessee Mathematics Users’Guide. May 2008. http://www.stemresources.com/index.html.7 Expanding Your Horizons Network. Retrieved January 15 009. http://www.expandingyourhorizons.org/about/history.php.8 Brophy S, Klein S, Portsmore M, Rogers C. Advancing Engineering Education in P-12 Classrooms. Journal of Engineering Education. 2008; 3:369-387.9 Virnoche M, Eschenbach E. AC 2007-2999: Expanding girls’ Horizons in Math and Science: A Longitudinal Evaluation of EYH
. Page 14.1043.9 2. They provide concise clear views of key metrics associated with project execution. 3. They help drive progress toward chosen milestones and encourage chosen behaviors. 4. The scorecards provide ‘early warning’ of projects in trouble allowing students and faculty time to take corrective action. 5. Care must be taken in selecting the metrics as the student teams will tend to focus on those activities and may neglect others. 6. The number of metrics monitored must be kept manageable to encourage use. 7. Successful implementation requires buy-in by all the members of each project team and considerable planning in advance.References 1. Chen, S. Yang, C., and Shiau, J., ‘The Application of Balanced
specific design functions and specifications. For thisassignment, teams must: 1) Identify up to 10 desired functions of their device, based upon the user needs and objective tree. 2) Categorize each function as either basic or secondary. 3) Explain how both convergent and divergent thinking were used to brainstorm and refine device functions. 4) Determine the appropriate design specification(s) for at least five of the identified functions. 5) Categorize each specification as procedural, prescriptive or performance.To support this assignment, accompanying lectures define a function as an operation a devicecan perform and a specification as a measurable attribute of a device. Emphasis is placed ontranslating imprecise user
Outcomes Course Improvement Objectives Program Assessment Actions Outcome(s) Method & List any improvement(As found on Metrics actions that will be course (ABET Standard Results Acceptable?incorporated as a result of syllabus) Specific a-k) (How do you feedback received. These measure Y/N actions will go on the
considered for implementation at other institutions, it is expected that, whilethe list of actual responsibilities and other documents may look somewhat different, the processitself would produce similar positive results in other programs.1. Somerton, C. W., Thompson, B. S., Gunn, C., The Role of the Faculty Advisor in the Capstone Design Experience: The Importance of Technical Expertise, Proceedings of the 2003 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition2. Taylor, D. G., Magleby, S. P., Todd, R. H., & Parkinson, A. R.). Training Faculty to Coach Capstone Design Teams., International Journal of Engineering Education, 17 (4-5) 20013. Gantt, L., Work, Wages and Profit, The Engineering Magazine
Educational Technology, 30(4), 311-321. 6. Munz, U., Schumm, P., Wiesebrock, A., & Allgower, F. (2007). Motivation and Learning Progress Through Educational Games. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 54(6), 3141- Page 14.1052.14 3144. 7. Barab, S., Thomas, M., et al. (2005). Making learning fun: Quest Atlantis, a game without guns. Educational Technology Research and Development, 53(1): 86-107.8. Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., Cocking, R. R., & Donovan, M. S. (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school (Expanded ed.). Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences.9. Westera
the course and stopworking prior to the completing R4. These students are also assigned a value of 1. Thus the MoSfor each student starts with a value of 0 that linearly approaches 1 until they complete (or fail tocomplete) the course. This metric addresses the fundamental risk that leaving even small tasks tothe last minute can lead to failure. It does not account for the difference between a studentmethodically progressing through the units and one who completes the majority near the end ofthe semester.Pacing Metric(s) - Pacing metrics discern between early and later procrastination by looking atthe completion dates for intermediary milestones as well as the date a student completes the lastunit. This strategy allows insight into general
approach to sustainability education, International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 7(2), 142-157.15. Geli de Ciurana, A.M. and Leal Filho, W. (2006), Education for sustainability in university studies: experiences from a project involving European and Latin American universities, International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 7(1), 81-93.16. Shekar, A. (2007), Active learning and reflection in product development engineering education, European Journal of Engineering Education, 32(2), 125-133.17. USGS (1998), Materials Flow and Sustainability, Fact Sheet FS-068-98, U. S. Geological Survey, U.S. Department of Interior.18. ASCE (2004), Civil Engineering Body of Knowledge for the 21st
. & Peterson, P. (2001). A tool to measure adaptive expertise in biomedical engineering students. ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition. Albuquerque, NM: ASEE.11. Harris, T.R., Bransford, J.D. & Brophy, S. (2002). Roles of learning sciences and learning technologies in biomedical engineering education: A review of recent advances. Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering,4, 20-48.12. Pandy, M.G., Petrosino, A.J., Austin, B.A. & Barr, R.E. (2004). Assessing adaptive expertise in undergraduate biomechanics. Journal of Engineering Education, 93(3): 211-222.13. Martin, T., Rayne, K., Kemp, N.J., Hart, J. & Diller, K.R. (2005). Teaching for adaptive expertise in biomedical engineering ethics. Directions
proposed Environmental Engineering BOK.IntroductionInternational Science and Engineering (S&E) partnerships for research and educationare essential for maintaining U.S. competitiveness in the 21st century (NationalScience Board, 2008) and existing engineering program outcomes like globalization,contemporary issues, and sustainability lay the foundation upon which these neededinternational partnerships can be built. Unfortunately, a recent survey of engineeringundergraduates found that less than 2% viewed globalization and contemporary issuesas one of the five most important engineering outcomes and only 30-36% felt “well”or “very well” prepared to incorporate global context or contemporary issues intoengineering practice respectively (Atman
the Internet”: Critical thinking in the Internet era. Communications of the ACM 46 (5):70-75. Page 14.761.13MUDDIEST or FUZZIEST POINTCourse: _________________ Date: ____________________ IF YOU WOULD LIKE A PERSONAL REPLY TO YOUR QUESTIONS PLEASE INDICATE YOUR NAME AND EMAIL ADDRESS BELOW (OPTIONAL) NAME___________________________________ EMAIL ADDRESS___________________________________Muddiest Point(s) That You Encountered Please note the topic(s) covered in this instruction session that you particularly do not understand, are confused about, or you feel needs more
see the emergence of anational curriculum for high performance computing and cyberinfrastructure, and the applicationof these technologies to solve practical problems. We are grateful to be able to be a part of thiseffort. Page 14.443.11References1. Zweben, S. (2007), http://www.cra.org/statistics/survey/0506.pdf 3ed, pp. 7-22.2. Hecker, D. Occupational employment projections to 2014. Monthly Labor Review Online, 128.3. Bentley, L. (2007) The Future of IT Education is Here. Purdue University Department of Computer and Infomation Technology Report.4. Sloan, J. (2004) High Performance Linux Clusters with OSCAR, Rocks
. Future work will also be performed to construct an adequate propeller to test thegenerator under low-wind speed conditions. 7. Acknowledgements The authors would like to express appreciation to the Office of the Interim Vice Provost forGraduate Studies, Undergraduate Research Initiative program at UTPA for the financial supportto develop this undergraduate research project. 8. References[1] Cho, Chang K.; Yun, Myung Hwan; Yoon, Chang S.; Lee, Myun W. 1999. Ergonomic study on the optimal gear ratio for a multi-speed bicycle. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, v 23, n 1-2, January, p 95-100[2] Reed, Justin; Venkataramanan, Giri; Rose, Jonathan. 2008
Dr. Jerrilee Mosier Edmonds Community CollegeMr. Paul Clayson nCoat, Inc. Dr. Kesh S National Science Foundation NarayananDr. William Craft North Carolina A&T State Dr. Nat C Nataraj Villanova University UniversityMs. Chineta Davis Northrop Grumman Provost Priscilla P New Jersey Institute of Corporation Nelson TechnologyDean. Eugene M. DeLoatch Morgan State University Dr. Alfonso Ortega Villanova
interactions (communication). In fact,with the advance in technology, emails, video and phone conferencing have becomeincreasingly in practice over the conventional face-to-face meetings; they have oftenappeared as the new norm.Now a new wage of technology is sweeping into business; that is the development ofvirtual worlds. Virtual worlds have been rising in success just as the www revolution wasin the late 1990’s. One of the most prominent is Second Life®.Second Life® is 3-D virtual world that simulates an area about the size of Washington,D.C. [10]. Since its creation by Linden Lab in 2003, it has grown tremendously and as ofApril 2008 was inhabited by 13,448,143 residents from around the globe.Second Life® is often described as a game, in the broad
winners.Other Teaching AwardsThe Nicholas Salgo Distinguished Teaching Award and the Phi Beta Kappa Teaching Prize aretwo other teaching awards at Rice University. Each year, the Beta of Texas chapter of Phi BetaKappa at Rice University recognizes a non-tenured Assistant Professor for outstanding teachingperformance. An ad hoc committee of the general membership of Phi Beta Kappa reviewsstudent evaluations for non-tenured Assistant Professors and typically selects one (oroccasionally two) winner(s) each year. Each year, the Nicolas Salgo Award is awarded forexcellence in teaching to a faculty member at any rank. Voting for this award, which is normallygiven to one faculty member, is by the current junior and senior classes. Ballots are distributedand
with an engineeringapproach is also nothing new. The contribution of this paper is to note the two simultaneouslyand apply the latter in the context of the former.We expect to continue using intracourses as a change mechanism in our own curricula andrecommend them to others confronted with similar challenges. Future work includes developinga formal assessment and evaluation process for determining the effectiveness of an intracoursemove.Bibliography1. Belytschko, T., Bayliss, A., Brinson, C., Carr, S., Kath, W., Krishnaswamy, S., Moran, B., Nocedal, J., AndPeshkin, M. "Mechanics in the Engineering First Curriculum at Northwestern University," International Journal ofEngineering Education, Vol. 13, No. 6, 1997, pp. 457-472.2. Gomes, V. G
Engineering, Integrated Product and Process Development, and Supplier Sourcing7. IT Governance Institute -COBIT v.48. Baig M., Bisharat, S. A & Maqsood, A maturity model for quality improvement In higher education.9. Holland, C.P., Light, B. A stage maturity model for enterprise resource planning systems use, 200110. Fisher, D.M,, The business process maturity model: A practical approach for identifying. opportunities foroptimization, BP Trends, 200411. Marshall, S. & Mitchell, G. (2004), Applying SPICE to e-learning: an e-learning maturity model?12. Lutteroth C., Luxton-Reilly A., Dobbie G., Hamer J.A maturity model for computing education, 2007.13. Neuhauser, C., A maturity model: Does it provide a path for online course design? The Journal
downloaded off the internet at the project website andplaced in the same folder with the add-in. Once downloaded, the user needs to visit theProperties of the file to “Unblock” the Security prevention mechanism. The user will be able toview the help file via “Help on this function” as long as the Add-In(.xlam) and the helpfile(.chm) are in the same folder.ExampleProblemAn aluminum pin fin 15 mm in length and 5 mm in diameter is integrally attached to a wallwhich is maintained at 100 C. Air at 20C flows past the pin at 5 m/s. What is the heat transfercoefficient and the heat loss from the fin?SolutionThe problem requires use of a correlation to estimate the heat transfer coefficient. The “HeatTransfer” module function help presents a list of
– A Survey of Business Leaders. The National Commission on Writing. Retrieved January 11, 2009 from Web site http://www.writingcommission.org/prod_downloads/writingcom/writing-ticket-to-work.pdf4. Crainer, S., and Dearlove, D. (2004). Making Yourself Understood: In an age of technology, writing skills are Page 14.1042.11 more important than ever. Conference Board Review. Retrieved January 9, 2009 from Web site: http://www.conference-board.org/articles/atb_article.cfm?id=2525. D'Alessio, D., & Riley, M. (n.d.). Scaffolding Writing Skills for ESL. The WAC Journal. 13, 79- 89. Retrieved January 12, 2009 from Web site