expertise, through working on long-term problems ofimportance to the Navy, so that an adequate pipeline of new researchers, engineers, and facultyexists to meet anticipated future needs and opportunities. Seven key science and technology(S&T) emphasis areas for the program were identified: ship design tools, ship structuralmaterials, hydromechanics, advanced hull designs, ship propulsion, ship automation, andsystems integration.Following a workshop in 2002, several university consortia, consisting of teams ofcomplementary universities were formed under an ONR BAA to work with the newly formedCenter for Innovative Ship Design, NSWC-CD (CISD) (see for example, Keane et al.1). TheFAU Consortium consisted of Florida Atlantic University, University
/C planes, flies subsonic at very low Reynolds numbers. Anotherconsideration is thickness to chord ratio. While thicker wings have more drag, thicker wingsoffer advantages in other areas.5 The added volume gives space for fuel storage, structural load-bearing members, electronics, and control mechanisms. After scouring books for airfoils, the S8036 airfoil was selected because of its gradualdrag polar. According to Lyon, at Reynolds Number 400,000, the S8036's drag coefficient doesnot increase noticeably with the lift coefficient until a very extreme lift coefficient is achieved.7This relationship is ideal because the UAV operates over a range of velocities, and is, therefore,conducive to a slight, gradual change in drag with lift
, J. Hauser, and S. Coppock, “Establishing and Sustaining PFF Programs in Engineering and Computer Science,” Lilly-North Conference on College and University Teaching, Big Rapids, MI, 2002.4. University of Cincinnati Preparing Future Faculty in Electrical and Computer Engineering and Computer Science website, http://www.ece.uc.edu/~pffp/. Accessed 02/01/09.5. W.J. McKeachie and B.K. Hofer, McKeachie’s Teaching Tips: Strategies, Research, and Theory for College and University Teachers, 12th Edition, D.C. Heath & Co., 2006.6. D. Kolb, Learning Style Inventory, McBer and Company, Boston, 1981.7. T.W. Fowler and G.C. Markle, Advanced Teaching Techniques, University of Cincinnati.8. Accreditation Board for
Resources Statistics, Women, Minorities, and Persons with Disabilities in Science and Engineering: 2007, NSF 07-315 (Arlington, VA: February 2007). Available from http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/wmpd5. Clewell, B (1996).Access to Mathematics and Science Careers For Underrepresented Minority Students: Research Findings and Explorations . A Report from the National Science Foundation Minority Postdoctoral Research Fellows and Mentors Annual Meeting.6. Adya, M., & Kaiser, K. M. (2005). Early determinants of women in the IT workforce: a model of girls' career choices. Information Technology & People. 18, 230-259.7. Miller, P. H., Blessing, J. S., & Schwartz, S (2006). Gender Differences in High-school
fromtranscripts), teacher recommendation letters, and a required essay describing their desire to enterinto the field of engineering.Once a student receives acceptance into the STEPUP program, s/he must sign a contract andrelease form and is provided information on housing, the STEPUP orientation weekend, meals,industry tours, and the structure of both the residential summer and non-residential fall andspring program. STEPUP students are designated as “Summer B” admits (a six-week term) andattend Preview, a university orientation program required of all students, during which theyregister for fall classes. A fee of $750 is charged to each student to partially cover the expenses
. Page 14.223.7From the scores, TAs A and B score higher in areas relating to intellectual merit than TA E, whohas taught this class several times. TAs A and B were both enrolled in the special topics coursewhereas TA E did not take the special topics course. With the exception of ‘demonstratesknowledge’ TAs A and B outperform TA E by approximately 1 point. TA E was expected tohave an equal if not higher score on ‘demonstrates knowledge’ because TA E is a post-doctoral.The data, as shown in Figure 1, suggests that TA E does not effectively demonstrate properties ofintellectual merit, which may be a consequence of limited understanding of the importance ofintellectual merit on teaching effectiveness. TA E received mid 3’s on effectiveness
. Page 14.268.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2009 Baja SAE Competitions: Meeting and Interacting with International Students – Experiences of Student and University ParticipantsAbstractIn today's global economy, engineers must collaborate with their international colleagues.11Study Abroad is an excellent preparation for this collaboration. Unfortunately, less than 3% ofUnited States (U.S.) engineering students take advantage of such programs.1 Baja SAEcompetitions may be a good alternative for students to achieve exposure to the culture of theirinternational peers.Baja SAE student competitions were started in the 1970’s in the U.S. and involve the design,analysis, and
excitement about the discipline of mechanicalengineering by itself, and as it intersects other, emerging disciplines.REFERENCES[1] Sweller, J. 1994. Cognitive load theory, learning difficulty and instructional design. Learning and Instruction 4: 295–312.[2] Kalyuga, S., P. Chandler, and J. Sweller.. 1998. Levels of expertise and instructional design. Human Factors 40: 1–17.[3] Pollock, E., P. Chandler, and J. Sweller. 2002. Assimilating complex information. Learning and Instruction. 12, no.1: 61–86.[4] Sweller, J., J. Van Merriënboer, and F. Paas. 1998. Cognitive architecture and instructional design. Educational Psychology Review 10 no.3: 251–296.[5] Renkl, A., and R. Atkinson. 2003. Structure the transition
. Online available: http://www.engsc.ac.uk/downloads/awards/load.pdf. Accessed: August 13, 2008.2 Bergen, A. R. and Vittal, V. Power systems analysis, 2nd edition, Prentice Hall, 1999.3 Glover, J. D. and Sarma, M. S. Power system analysis and design, 3rd edition. Thomson-Engineering, 2001.4 Grainger, J. and Stevenson, W. D. Power systems analysis, McGraw-Hill Publishing Co, 1994.5 Lau, M. A. and Kuruganty, S. P. Spreadsheet implementations for solving power-flow problems, eJournal of Spreadsheets in Education, 3(1): 27-45, August 2008. Online: http://epublications.bond.edu.au/ejsie/vol3/iss1/3/.6 Rao, N. D. and Haddad, N. Y Typical applications of new generation spreadsheets to power system problems, Proceedings of the 33rd
. United States Agency for International Development (2008): http://www.usaid.gov.bj/health/index.html 2. UNICEF (2004) The Official Summary of the State of the World’s Children Page 14.1362.13 3. United Nations (2005) Water World Development Report: Water for Life, Water for People. 4. World Health Organization (1993) Guidelines for drinking water quality, 2nd edition: Volume 1, recommendations. Geneva, Switzerland. 5. Striebig, et. al. (2008) Activated Carbon Amended Ceramic Drinking Water Filters for Benin. Journal of Engineering for Sustainable Development. Volume 2. 1-11. 6. Butler, S. (2006) Benin. Bradt
Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, and the National Council on Measurement in Education, Standards for educational and psychological testing. 1999, Washington, DC.5. Carminer, E.G. and R.A. Zeller, Reliability and validity assessment. 1979, Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.6. Messick, S., Validity, in Educational Measurement, R.L. Linn, Editor. 1989, The American Council on Education and the National Council on Measurement in Education: Washington, D.C. p. 13-103.7. Wilson, M., Constructing measures: An item response modeling approach. 2005, Mahwah, J: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.8. Baker, D., S. Krause, and S.Y. Purzer, Developing an instrument to measure
, mathematics and computing are shown inFigure 1.Figure 1 The definition of computational science and engineering.Each module has three main components: lecture(s), which are part of physics or engineering courses;CAS solved related-examples; work groups and home-works. In the lecture(s), the theory is presentedand examples of typical and/or real life problems are worked out using the facilities of the CAS. Duringthe work groups, typically during the tutoring session, small groups or individual students are assigned aset of problems to solve. Students are expected to solve additional problems and to study the course text.The project total workload for a term course is about 80 hours for the average student. The main aim ofthe courses and the CAS-based
International Planning/Advisory Committee for the 2009 Research in Engineering Education Symposium, and is guest co-editor for a special issue of the International Journal of Engineering Education on applications of engineering education research.© American Society for Engineering Education, 2009Trevor Harding, California Polytechnic State University Dr. Trevor S. Harding is Associate Professor of Materials Engineering at California Polytechnic State University–San Luis Obispo where he teaches courses in service learning, introductory materials engineering, biomedical materials design, and tribology. His research interests include both ethical development in engineering students and in vivo degradation of
environments. It should also be noted thatthis study followed upon extensive research that examined whether or not computer imagescould be used to accurately study the effects of luminance distribution on the subjectiveimpressions of luminous environments. This study will be briefly discussed to set the foundationof the work attempted within the classroom and the virtual reality theater. Page 14.1350.22.0 Literature ContextSubstantive research on the psychological aspects of lighting was initiated in the 1970’s, notablyby Flynn1,2,3. His investigations explored the effects of luminous environments on subjectiveimpressions of interiors and overt
rating to obtain the total.Therefore, the total would be: 1 from Member-A + 3 from member-B, + 2 from member-C, + 3from member-D + 3 from member E. The total rating from the five members would be1+3+2+3+3 = 12. Therefore, advisors rated the importance for this particular competency(Hazard Assessment Protocol) to be covered in OLS 331would be12. This approach will be Page 14.125.11utilized to rate each identified competency for the courses.Step 7: Modify a course based on the curriculum matrix.Each instructor teaching the course is now ready to use this matrix to develop or revise theircourse(s). After obtaining the average rating
University Central State Universityhttp://www.theharrisfoundation.org/programs/summersci http://www.theharrisfoundation.org/programencecamp/camp_bowie09.htm s/summersciencecamp/camp_csu09.htmDr. Elaine Davis Dr. Kaye Jeter(301) 860-3876 (936) 376-6374edavis@bowiestate.edu kjeter@centralstate.eduDelaware State University Georgia Institute of Technologyhttp://www.theharrisfoundation.org/programs/summersci http://www.theharrisfoundation.org/programencecamp/Camp_Del09.htm s/summersciencecamp/camp_GT09.htmDr. Mazen Shahin
course material. Section 6.4’s “Mathematical Modeling” assessment has onevolume calculation, but the one other problem given has to do with the statistics of a class’ testscores. The “Graphical Modeling” assessment of 6.2 is farther afield, involving the graphing ofcensus data.Principles of Engineering (POE)POE is the second foundation course in the PLTW sequence that we analyzed. Within POEstudents learn about various concepts inherent to the field of engineering. Among these conceptsare thumbnail and orthographic sketching, perspective drawing, free-body diagramming, thedesign process, X and Y components of vectors, thermodynamics, fluid and electrical systems
complete and turn in on weekly basis up to start of fall quarter.Closing Ceremony. The closing ceremony was held on the last day and was attended by the Deanof College of Engineering, Provost, Vice Provost for Academic Affairs, and Vice Provost forDiversity. A highlight of the closing was the presentation of the “Nia” and “Most ImprovedStudent” awards, which were voted by a consensus of the instructors. The Nia award is for thestudent who best represents the objectives of the program; one student is selected from eachsection of courses. The Most Improved Student Award is given to a student(s) who has made themost progress during the program; one student from each course is selected for the award.Other K-12 Outreach and College Retention ProgramsIn
isthe seminal work of the 1950’s educational committee chaired by Benjamin Bloom. Thecommittee established a set of taxonomies in three domains of learning: cognitive, affective andpsychomotor. The cognitive domain taxonomy is widely accepted in many fields and has beenidentified as, “arguably one of the most influential education monographs of the past halfcentury.”6 The taxonomies are a language that describes the progressive development of anindividual in each domain and are defined as follows7: • Cognitive: of, relating to, being, or involving conscious intellectual activity. • Affective: relating to, arising from, or influencing feelings or emotions. • Psychomotor: of or relating to motor action directly proceeding from mental
AC 2009-1155: CHANGING THE MARKS BASED CULTURE OF LEARNINGTHROUGH PEER ASSISTED TUTORIALSEsat Alpay, Imperial College LondonPeter Cutler, Imperial College LondonSusan Eisenbach, Imperial College LondonAnthony Field, Imperial College London Page 14.316.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2009 Changing the Marks Based Culture of Learning through Peer Assisted Tutorials E. Alpay1, P.S. Cutler2, S. Eisenbach2 and A.J. Field2 1 Faculty of Engineering (EnVision) 2 Department of Computing Imperial College London, South Kensington Campus
outcomes. There are threesections to these course assessments that mirror the course assessments for the CivilEngineering Division within the Department of Civil and Mechanical Engineering at theUnited States Military Academy.5 The first section describes/defines the course as it wastaught through its catalog description (still appropriate?), course objectives, textbook(s)used, the course schedule, graded events, an assessment of facilities and technologyavailable, curriculum integration, and end-of-course feedback questions. The secondsection assesses the course through evaluating whether the course objectives wereachieved, evaluating the end-of-course feedback, evaluating course grade point average(GPA), time required to complete daily
writes a short paper about what s/he learned during the interview,followed by an informal presentation.Class Participation and Attendance (15%)Class participation requires each student to not only attend, but be engaged, committed, andattentive. Each class will require student participation in leadership projects and activities thatare designed to give him/her the opportunity to develop his/her leadership skills and makeconnections between his/her actions and reading assignments.Midterm Paper (20%)The purpose of the midterm essay is for the student to think about his/her “placement” as a Page 14.836.7leader by examining his/her leadership
press operators tends to be severe. Press operators areamong the most likely workers to suffer an amputation injury.Third, the requirements to safely guard and operate a mechanical power press are thoroughlydocumented. An entire section of the OSHA code (29CFR1910.217) is specifically devoted torequirements of safeguarding mechanical power presses. Mechanical press safety is alsoaddressed explicitly in ANSI B11.1. In the mid-1990’s the identification of presses as a serioussafety risk, particularly for amputations, led to the initiation of a focused OSHA emphasisprogram on press safety entitled, “CPL 2-1.24, National Emphasis Program on MechanicalPower Presses, 29CFR1910.217.”To provide better insight into the problem of press injuries
satisfy human need(s)”. If one subscribes to the abovedefinition, then every engineer has to be somewhat knowledgeable of manufacturing methods, ofdrafting (drawing) standards and programming techniques. We are proposing that these topics becovered in freshmen/sophomore level courses. Page 14.308.12Manufacturing Methods CourseManufacturing in the US has been continuously shrinking in the past decades, reaching historicallows (www.infowars.com/us-manufacturing-at-lowest-level-since-1948/). One reason for thedecline can be attributed to the lack of awareness of graduating engineers of the challengespresented in manufacturing a particular product
High School Study on 1/28/2009.2. American Time Use Survey 20033. Korean Time Use Survey 20044. Juster, T.F. and Stafford, F.P., “The Allocation of Time: Empirical Findings, Behavioral Models, and Problems of Measurement,” Journal of Economic Literature, 29 (1991), 471-522.5. Nist, S., “College Study Tips”, College Rules! How to Study, Survive, and Succeed in College, Ten Speed Press, 2002.6. Reilly, Ed, “Freshman Study Tips,” accessed at http://www.villanova.edu/studentlifr/counselingcenter/infosheets/studyskills/for_freshmen 1/28/20097. Sax, L., et. The American Freshman: National Norms, Fall 20038. National Survey of Student Engagement 20039. Sax, L., The American Freshman: National Norms, Fall 2004.10. Zeek
shared practice: Design engineers’ learning at work. Jyvaskyla Studies inEducation, Psychology and Social Research, Jyvaskyla.22. ibid., p. 12.23. ibid., p. 27.24. ibid., p. 28.25. Schrage, Michael. (2000). Serious Play: How the World’s Best Companies Simulate to Innovate. HarvardBusiness School Press, Boston MA.26. Trevelyan, J. (2007). Technical coordination in engineering practice. Journal of Engineering Education, 96 (3),p. 191.27. ibid., p. 191.28. Jonassen, D., Strobel, J., Lee, C., B. (2006). Everyday problem solving in engineering: lessons for engineeringeducators. Journal of Engineering Education, 95 (2), pp. 139-151.29. Korte, R., Sheppard, S., & Jordan, W. (2008). A qualitative study of the early work experiences of
links, when a previous mechanism had only two. Unconnected movementdesignated mention of the movement of an individual part of the mechanism without relation toother components. For example, one student explained an error in prediction as: “Becauseinstead of going this way (gestures to the right), [the link] went this way (gestures to the left).” Structure. This category referred to explanations that focused on the organization ofparts without mention of the functional relation(s) among these parts. For example, “I see two ofthem [links] joined together.” And, “I notice that [Mechanism A2] has a peg on this sideinstead of being on this side.” In some cases children noticed difference in the distance from thefixed pivot to the input link